It's basic stuff as a fan. I don't think anyone is as angry as you seem to perceive - or as angry as you seem to be about it - but it's simple common sense stuff.
When people are using expletives and writing their posts in all caps about how awful and ignorant our fans is, I don't think its overreacting to think they are angry.
Double Barrel said:
A few years ago the Texans used to keep a running tally on false starts and fumbled Center/QB exchanges that were a direct result of excessive crowd noise.
You are being naive if you think homefield advantage is not something tangible for good teams. NFL history proves it to be true, as does anecdotal evidence by old Oiler fans who were at the House of Pain in it's heyday.
I just hope our fans understand this simple stuff if we host a playoff game. Homefield advantage can make a difference. Just ask 7-9 Seattle last year when they beat the Saints. There is a reason that the Seahawks stole the "12th Man" idea from Texas A&M.
You can call me naive if you want, but like I've said, I've looked at the numbers and home field advantage in the NFL is real, but a lot more subtle than the majority of fans seem to believe. Its also extremely multi-factorial, meaning that loud home fans is only a small part of what makes home field advantage what it is.
You quote the Saints Seahawks playoff game for last year, so lets look at it in detail. Your post implies that you believe that loud fans is what caused Seattle to win that game.
Lets look at the two things that fan noise can directly affect. Penalties and wasted timeouts.
NO was called for 7 penalties. The 6 listed in the play by play are
1. Defensive holding/pass interference x2
2. Intentional grounding x1
3. Illegal block/holding x3
No false starts. No illegal motions. No delay of game.
As for timeouts, NO called 1 in the 2nd quarter that set up a touchdown on the next play. This may be due to crowd noise, but more likely due to changing a play based on defense. Net effect was a TD for NO anyway.
The 2nd timeout was during a seattle series while on D and the 3rd was an injury timeout.
In the 2nd half they called their first timeout on defense, their 2nd on their 2nd to last series in the 4th, and their final timeout during seattles final series to try and buy as much time as possible.
Now, I don't have gametape so I'm just going by play by play, but it sure seems as if crowd noise did not have any
tangible affects on the NO Saints.
If you look at recent NFL statistics, the home field advantage is just not all that impressive. And home field advantage encompasses so many things like where the players sleep, how far they travel, how much practice time they get, how familiar they are with the field,
the weather, and finally the crowd. Even the crowd component is fairly mixed with stadium noise only being part of the issue.
Check out some articles if you want to read up on it more. This is just the first I've found that is linkable. There are whole segments of psychology that research this stuff. If you're more interested in the academic papers I can find those for you as well.
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=simmons/partone/081121
In basketball if I'm sitting behind the basket, I'm waving my batons and shouting at the opposing team to try and distract him, but I don't really believe that its having an effect. Because I've seen the stats. I know that there is only a miniscule difference. It sure feels like my cheering impacts the player when he misses, but its a false impression. There are many, many more factors not being considered.
I'm not trying to discount home field advantage and good crowds. Even 1 or 2 false starts can be drive killers and that can shave points off an offense. Football is a complex game where one misstep and change the entire momentum of a game.
However, years of games have shown that in the NFL, home teams only gain about 1-3 points of an advantage over their visiting rivals. And so much goes in to that advantage, that the tangible effect of loud fans is difficult to quantify.
The point is, when up by 14 points against a hapless offense in the 4th quarter, I just don't see the wave as a big deal. I actually find the wave fun whenever I've been able to do it.
And its just so sad to me to see "fans" of the same team going after each other for not being good enough. They make it sound like if you don't wear a certain jersey or cheer a certain way or stand a certain amount of time, that its
your fault that the team loses. And thats just depressing.
Because football is first and foremost a source of entertainment. Its supposed to be fun. If the Texans win or lose its on them, the coaches, and the other teams.