PapaL
Loose Screw
Peter, Paul and Mary...right?
Naw it’s Ronnie, Bobby, Ricky, and Mike
Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
Peter, Paul and Mary...right?
This season with Watson at the helm.
Hopefully you're right. A lot of people have wrote/said O'Brien isn't good with QB's. If you also believe that do you think he'll change his ways with Watson? Or will they win in spite of O'Brien?
My hope is O'Brien will imrpove the play calling drastically. Not only does it appear to confuse the QB's but the WR's as well. And there's a lot of young receivers on this team.
I can't really make any BOLD predictions (most people who have known me as long as you and TK know I don't stick my neck out with predictions and hypotheticals). I believe the defense will be top 3 but that's hardly a bold prediction. The offense with O'Brien calling all the shots is a big wildcard for me as well as the impact Crennel will have as a "roving Head Coach". I think Crennel can help O'Brien with game management (another complaint I've had with O'Brien) but how much remains to be seen. I'm looking forward to seeing how it all works out.
Ah heck, I'll make a bold prediction. Clowney will be defensive MVP of the NFL and Watt will finish runner-up.
One more - both Foreman and Miller will have over 1,000 yards each from the line of scrimmage.
Hopefully you're right. A lot of people have wrote/said O'Brien isn't good with QB's. If you also believe that do you think he'll change his ways with Watson? Or will they win in spite of O'Brien?
How about that Garrapolo? So, whose decision was it to pass on him and draft Filo? Rumor has it that OB wanted him, and Rick said we could get him im the 3rd.
I'm sure it was a collaborative process... and who is to say Garropollo is a franchise QB again?
It's only collaborative when it's a good decision. When its a bad decision It's usually someone else's.
And Garrapollo has been looking good enough for the job after Brady. Most if not all agree. And Belicheck makes few mistakes.
Maybe...or maybe he's injury prone?
How about that Garrapolo? So, whose decision was it to pass on him and draft Filo? Rumor has it that OB wanted him, and Rick said we could get him im the 3rd.
Like D. Watson? Look at how many injuries he had in college.
Does that make Garoppolo less injury prone, or does it make it acceptable if he is?
Did they really pass on Garoppolo? Did anyone, other than our posters, have Garoppolo going at 33? I thought he was predicted to go mid third.
It would have been like drafting Tom Savage at 33. Can you imagine this board's reaction?
Does it make the whole injury prone thing go away because all three had history injuries?Does that make Garoppolo less injury prone, or does it make it acceptable if he is?
This. Fact is Jimmy G got hurt in his 2nd NFL start. Fair or not he's proved about as much as Tom Savage that he can stay healthy and be a franchise QB.
Same with Watson and his injuries in college.
Good job asking questions with questions.
Does it make the whole injury prone thing go away because all three had history injuries?
Did they really pass on Garoppolo? Did anyone, other than our posters, have Garoppolo going at 33? I thought he was predicted to go mid third.
It would have been like drafting Tom Savage at 33. Can you imagine this board's reaction?
Here he is going 40th to the Vikings
Bill Polian thought he was a first rounder
And he was invited to attend the first day of the draft by the league..
Tom Savage was none of those things, by anyone, except our font office..
Whether it’s Watson or Tom Savage, O’Brien implements a bevy of quick-strike, timing-based concepts built on three- and five-step drops. We also saw an increase in boots and move-the-pocket throws during Watson’s performance to capitalize on his athleticism and accuracy on the move. Houston has also done a tremendous job of sending high-volume targets their tight end’s way to compensate for the amount of extra coverage forced upon DeAndre Hokpins via tactics such as rotations and bracket coverage.
Defenses doing so naturally opened the middle of the field while corners were left to handle one-on-one matchups. That vacant area over the middle is where the tight ends were able to do their damage from a simple in-line alignment, while O’Brien wasn’t averse to sending multiple targets down the field. Dual tight end formations often forces the defense to show their hand and treat them with base coverage which caps the regularity in which they can feature disguised blitzes and coverage rotations.
Another vital staple of O’Brien’s offense is the use of 3×1. Trip sets put pressure to respond with nickel packages over base defense that can incorporate coverage rotations. When you factor in the speed of Will Fuller and Braxton Miller, split-safeties are tasked with basic coverage duties that limit what defenses can do with them. Running out of 3×1 is also an offensive advantage that stems from the defense being forced to widen with the offense. And running to keep the offense on schedule shifts the burden from your quarterback being forced to convert an outrageous amount of third downs.
...
Teams tried to leave Watt unattended to with action working away from him, but he still managed to work his way to longer-developing plays. Crennel also implemented numerous twists and stunts that featured Clowney capitalizing on his bend and athleticism by working around the line and attacking compromised pass-rush lanes. Continuing the theme of pressure includes their threatening man pressure package out of both nickel and dime (but with more of an emphasis on the latter) where they disrupt outside releases, slant their interior guys to the middle of the protection and loop either Watt or Clowney around to exploit the free rushing lane.
Working from a base quarters coverage, the Texans have become adept at identifying the ideal personnel and matchup principles. These matchup-zone concepts are built on the defensive backs dropping to take away their own fourth of the field with a conversion to man coverage if a receiver, once he passed the linebackers, enters their respective area of responsibility. With countless repetitions, Houston has this communication-based coverage down a T and makes it increasingly difficult for offenses to beat them vertically.
Did they really pass on Garoppolo? Did anyone, other than our posters, have Garoppolo going at 33? I thought he was predicted to go mid third.
It would have been like drafting Tom Savage at 33. Can you imagine this board's reaction?
I don't know what the Texans' board look like, but I had JG in the second.Did they really pass on Garoppolo? Did anyone, other than our posters, have Garoppolo going at 33? I thought he was predicted to go mid third.
It would have been like drafting Tom Savage at 33. Can you imagine this board's reaction?
He did get hurt, I agree.This. Fact is Jimmy G got hurt in his 2nd NFL start. Fair or not he's proved about as much as Tom Savage that he can stay healthy and be a franchise QB.
He did get hurt, I agree.
But he showed much more than Savage when he was on the field.
On the injury front, it's also Savage that looks more iffy.
I don't. JG hasn't shown enough.Yes, but point is neither should be considered a franchise QB (like Derek Carr) and someone that we should complain about having passed on.
We've passed on lots of excellent players. No need to bring up Jimmy G as an example...
Shock yourself.Understood, but after the Vikings took Bridgewater & Garoppolo was there at 60, who'd have guessed he'd be drafted before our pick? Who'd have guessed the Patriots would be the ones to draft him.
I'd be shocked if you were to tell me you weren't shocked.
I'm not saying he isn't worthy, just saying it wasn't expected.
Thank you.Preseason reading...nothing much honestly.
The Breakdown: A Look at the Houston Texans Schematic Philosophy
http://lastwordonprofootball.com/2017/08/13/houston-texans-schematic-philosophy/
Understood, but after the Vikings took Bridgewater & Garoppolo was there at 60, who'd have guessed he'd be drafted before our pick? Who'd have guessed the Patriots would be the ones to draft him.
I'd be shocked if you were to tell me you weren't shocked.
I'm not saying he isn't worthy, just saying it wasn't expected.
Understood, but after the Vikings took Bridgewater & Garoppolo was there at 60, who'd have guessed he'd be drafted before our pick? Who'd have guessed the Patriots would be the ones to draft him.
I'd be shocked if you were to tell me you weren't shocked.
I'm not saying he isn't worthy, just saying it wasn't expected.
This comes off a bit goal post moving tbh, tk.
And no, I wasn't shocked to see a team take him take him before our third pick. My thoughts were clear on him back then, wouldn't have risked whatsoever waiting past #33 to snag him, and was repeating this to my draft buddy as we were getting ready for the start of day two then. Didn't necessarily think it'd be NE who took him, but the moment I saw it was them it immediately made perfect sense.
I don't think I'm moving the goal post.
Again, it's not that I said he wasn't worthy, but after four QB were off the board to the team's most likely to take a QB, I would have been shocked if another QB was selected before the third.
& in my post I said once he got to 60..
60. Carolina
61. Jacksonville
62. Patriots
63. Dolphins
64. Seahawks
I could actually go all the way back to the Bears at 51 as the only team likely to take a QB in the 2nd.
Maybe a team would have traded back into the 2nd to take him, still it would have to be early for me to think the story is that we passed on him. Three picks before our third, I'd think the story should be that we didn't trade up.
But I guess since most people aren't happy with XSF, they say we should have used that pick on a QB.
I bet they'd say the same thing if the Texans went OL instead of QB like they did this time.
You asked specific questions and were given specific indisputable answers. Then you asked different questions to try and buoy your argument. Call it what you will.
You just continuously discount that there were/are people who've believed highly enough in Garroppolo thinking that the Texans should've also. It's not shocking to think so. The mocks and many experts agreed then. I showed you this. The Pats proved it. His play ever since, albeit limited, has only reinforced it over and over.
He's a wicked talented player with a solid head on his neck. These guys tend to go earlier than not come one way or another, and especially at his most valuable of positions. Many of us were rooting for his choosing to happen thinking it unwise to risk missing out and will continue to think he's exactly the kind of 'one that got away'. Whatever reason you have for not wanting to see this I've no idea really, but it's been told and evidenced and witnessed ad nauseam. We simply could have had him.
"Who'd have thunk it?" Is rhetorical. I wasn't asking a question in that post.
The draft usually gets it right on mid to late round QBs. Not many Tom Bradies & Russell Wilsons out there.
We're arguing semantics. We did pass on him as we didn't select him in the second.
It would have been more efficient to trade back into the 2nd & get him before New England did. Some people even suggested New England only selected JimmyG because we wouldn't give them our third for Mallett.
But you don't hear many people argue the Texans should have traded up to get him at 60, or 61... most likely because no one expected him to be taken at 62, 63, or 64.
Imagine how happy we'd all be if we got him at 65
Understood, but after the Vikings took Bridgewater & Garoppolo was there at 60, who'd have guessed he'd be drafted before our pick? Who'd have guessed the Patriots would be the ones to draft him.
I'd be shocked if you were to tell me you weren't shocked.
I'm not saying he isn't worthy, just saying it wasn't expected.
As been pointed out - some had him targeted in the second. Rumor is (don't know how true) OB wanted him in second and Rick was confident to get him in third.
It seems he is being groomed to be the heir apparent for Brady. I would trust Belicheks decision on players.
And it was being brought up as a could have been. OB wanted him. What could have been - we may have not even reached for Brock had we just started him. And by all accounts he looks great in games but not practice.
But whatever.
Actually not sure what it is, in light of everything that's been unpacked on the topic, that you're actually arguing against at this point.
Again, you're completely ignoring, and I don't know if it's the contrarian hangup or that you simply refuse to see this position for what it is, the fact that the risk was deemed too much by several people for completely good reason and it is well within rights to look back and say, 'well damn, that certainly should/could've been a positive for my team' versus the convoluted turdstain of a road said team has taken to get to a hopeful difference maker at QB.
Trade back up would've been fine if one were playing the result, but he was in our hands to be had and the pooch was screwed given the risk/reward of the situation.
Actually not sure what it is, in light of everything that's been unpacked on the topic, that you're actually arguing against at this point.
I think just that it wasn't unreasonable to think that because he was available at 61 that he would be available at 65. I was shocked to see the Pats take him, because they had Mallet for another year. But like you said, in hindsight it makes sense. Hindsight says the Texans trade down from 2-1 and take him no later than 40... cuz hindsight works so well.
At the time it was surprising, as was Nix falling to 83.
But yeah the Texans blew it
Why? He's got Brady, fairly good of getting veterans because he's got Brady. His draft record is on the low side of mediocre, particularly when it comes to QB's
He was drafted three spots from our third round pick. It doesn't make sense to take him 29 spots sooner.
I'm not being contrarian. It made sense to believe he would be there at 65. & that's if they were looking at him in the first place.
Why not?
It made sense that the risk/reward was worth banking on him being there at 65, sure. It didn't to me and several others. For the multiple reasons I've pointed to here. As a fan I feel comfortable holding these as a reasonable criticism of our front office regarding their continued lack of success at this position. The latter there being the whole point to this whole thread of discussion, of course.
Why not?
It made sense to some that the risk/reward was worth banking on him being there at 65, sure. It didn't to me and several others. For the multiple reasons I've pointed to here. As a fan I feel comfortable holding these as a reasonable criticism of our front office regarding their continued lack of success at this position. The latter there being the whole point to this whole thread of discussion, of course.
It makes more sense to trade up & get him at 60. That's all I'm saying.
What you're saying is the Texans should have drafted Savage at 65, just to be safe.
Of course Garoppolo could go on to make everyone forget about Brady, then yeah... it wasn't worth the risk, should have taken him at 33.
But right now, where the majority of his "tape" is preseason, & he's not killing it like Prescott did... I think it makes more sense to say we should have traded up to get him... or, since he's accomplished about as much as Savage & realistically speaking he's got about as much chance of being the next Tom Brady as Tom Savage... see if he falls to 65.