Who is Adam Schilitz?
Wasn't he the first person to use malted barley in alcohol?
Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
Who is Adam Schilitz?
Wasn't he the first person to use malted barley in alcohol?
Wasn't he the first person to use malted barley in alcohol?
I haven't the faintest idea, but Spotrak has him listed on the roster at a salary of $.585 and listed as a TE. Must be someone we signed since the end of last season; or maybe just an error. NFL.com has him listed with the KC Chiefs with 1 year of experience.Who is Adam Schilitz?
I haven't the faintest idea, but Spotrak has him listed on the roster at a salary of $.585 and listed as a TE. Must be someone we signed since the end of last season; or maybe just an error. NFL.com has him listed with the KC Chiefs with 1 year of experience.
He was signed by the Texans in the 2013 preseason as a FA rookie. Then he was cut by the Texans in their last 2013 cut. He was then picked up by the Tacks where he spent the 2013 season on their PS. He was then picked up by the Chiefs in 2014 and shifted back and forth from their PS to regular roster before finally being released December of last year. But on the last day of December, he was signed to a futures contract by the Chiefs for the money amount that has been assigned supposedly to the Texans..............gotta be a mistake.......don't believe he is a Texan.
Spoke to Cordarelle Patterson's agent who has been in close contact w/MIN. Rumors of Patterson being shopped are patently false Branion said
Jason La Canfora ‏@JasonLaCanfora
Translation = team didn't get offer they wanted.
Who is Adam Schilitz?
I'm really glad you speak front office B/S because I sure don't.
NOT sarcasm
A couple of more.
"There is no truth to the rumor..." = It's true.
Silence = It's not true.
"They have our unwavering confidence" = They are on the chopping block and don't want to diminish their value for a possible trade.
I agree but it is noted Patterson cannot run routes, learn offense and hates cursive as he only speaks English. What exactly screams offer the team a lot?Jason La Canfora ‏@JasonLaCanfora
Translation = team didn't get offer they wanted.
I agree but it is noted Patterson cannot run routes, learn offense and hates cursive as he only speaks English. What exactly screams offer the team a lot?
I just read on another source that a 4th or 5th pick but I'd say a 6th only because we should have some comps and can give up our own.Impressive physical tools/speed/plus STs/some RB ability a la Cobb/Harvin. I'm hearing they were shooting for the moon.
So we're all good, we upgraded 1 position so far?
progress!
Well done!
I haven't the faintest idea, but Spotrak has him listed on the roster at a salary of $.585 and listed as a TE. Must be someone we signed since the end of last season; or maybe just an error. NFL.com has him listed with the KC Chiefs with 1 year of experience.
I agree but it is noted Patterson cannot run routes, learn offense and hates cursive as he only speaks English. What exactly screams offer the team a lot?
So we're all good, we upgraded 1 position so far?
I don't know about all that. I doubt he made it to the NFL without being able to run routes or learn an offense. I can believe that he can't run all the routes, specifically the ones the Vikings want him to run. I can believe he couldn't learn the Vikings offense.
Norv Turner may not be as flexible as he should be with a player like Patterson. There may be a coach out there dreaming of the routes & offense they can install around Patterson.
Can't play this one off on Turner. Ask Alvin Harper.
That said, I'd take a gamble on Patterson but would do so knowing he's not and never will be a complete WR.
If I could get a deal on him , I'd take it and make sure he gets 6-10 touches a game .
That said, I'd take a gamble on Patterson but would do so knowing he's not and never will be a complete WR.
Patterson is a no for me. But I also value versatility and skill set over pure athletic ability. I wouldn't have drafted Patterson for that reason. He just doesn't fit what I look for in a WR. That doesn't mean he can't play. It just means that I would rather have someone else.
Guys like Patterson and Harvin have their uses. But the problem with them is that they cannot get themselves open within the confines of an offense. To put the ball in their hands you have to create plays designed specifically for them that use the other options on the field as decoys. That's all well and good if it works, but if it doesn't it's a completely wasted play.
Within the scheme of a regular play you always have a primary target so that's no different. But you also have at least two other options to check off to if your primary guy isn't open.
Harvin and Patterson cannot be a primary target because they cannot beat coverage on anything other than a Go route. So you have to waste your other targets by making them run decoy routes designed not to get open but to draw coverage off of the primary target. If the primary target still doesn't get open the play is dead, because you have nobody to check off to.
I understand why fans desire athletes like Harvin and Patterson, but people don't realize that every player in the NFL is a great athlete. Athleticism alone isn't enough. That's why I'd rather take a slightly lesser athlete with a greater skill set. People always want to jump up and say that you can just coach them to run better routes or have better hands. But Harvin has been a pro for how long now and still hasn't learned.
Patterson is a no for me. But I also value versatility and skill set over pure athletic ability. I wouldn't have drafted Patterson for that reason. He just doesn't fit what I look for in a WR. That doesn't mean he can't play. It just means that I would rather have someone else.
Guys like Patterson and Harvin have their uses. But the problem with them is that they cannot get themselves open within the confines of an offense. To put the ball in their hands you have to create plays designed specifically for them that use the other options on the field as decoys. That's all well and good if it works, but if it doesn't it's a completely wasted play.
Within the scheme of a regular play you always have a primary target so that's no different. But you also have at least two other options to check off to if your primary guy isn't open.
Harvin and Patterson cannot be a primary target because they cannot beat coverage on anything other than a Go route. So you have to waste your other targets by making them run decoy routes designed not to get open but to draw coverage off of the primary target. If the primary target still doesn't get open the play is dead, because you have nobody to check off to.
hahahahahahaha
I thought the dreaded vote of confidence only applied to head coaches who were on the hot seat
![]()
![]()
World domination was within his grasp.
OK, but aren't making guys miss, breaking tackles, and out running defenses also skills? A David Anderson type, for instance, can be great at running routes, and catching the ball. But, if all of that adds up 9 yards a catch and zero TDs, so what? I don't think you can have a receiving corps made up of Pattersons. However, one can come in handy when you can beat a blitz with a WR screen for a 60 yard TD.Patterson is a no for me. But I also value versatility and skill set over pure athletic ability. I wouldn't have drafted Patterson for that reason. He just doesn't fit what I look for in a WR.
Agreed. Like Harvin, Hester, & a few others I can't think of at the moment. Even though they're labeled WR, they're not. Probably should come up with another name for them.
McCluster, Casey... football players for sure, but they don't really fit any one position.
If someone can find the perfect role & offense for them, like Belichick did for Welker, they could be just as valuable as any WR. That's not to say these guys are slot WRs... just that Welker isn't a "WR" the way he was used in the slot was perfect for him. Casey could have really been something as a FB/HB/TE if someone took advantage of his play making ability.
OK, but aren't making guys miss, breaking tackles, and out running defenses also skills? A David Anderson type, for instance, can be great at running routes, and catching the ball. But, if all of that adds up 9 yards a catch and zero TDs, so what? I don't think you can have a receiving corps made up of Pattersons. However, one can come in handy when you can beat a blitz with a WR screen for a 60 yard TD.
I'm for bringing in Patterson, I mean what other player currently on the roster has scored 9 TD's in a season (Not named Foster) and isn't scoring TD's kinda important?
Patterson is a no for me. But I also value versatility and skill set over pure athletic ability. I wouldn't have drafted Patterson for that reason. He just doesn't fit what I look for in a WR. That doesn't mean he can't play. It just means that I would rather have someone else.
Guys like Patterson and Harvin have their uses. But the problem with them is that they cannot get themselves open within the confines of an offense. To put the ball in their hands you have to create plays designed specifically for them that use the other options on the field as decoys. That's all well and good if it works, but if it doesn't it's a completely wasted play.
Within the scheme of a regular play you always have a primary target so that's no different. But you also have at least two other options to check off to if your primary guy isn't open.
Harvin and Patterson cannot be a primary target because they cannot beat coverage on anything other than a Go route. So you have to waste your other targets by making them run decoy routes designed not to get open but to draw coverage off of the primary target. If the primary target still doesn't get open the play is dead, because you have nobody to check off to.
I understand why fans desire athletes like Harvin and Patterson, but people don't realize that every player in the NFL is a great athlete. Athleticism alone isn't enough. That's why I'd rather take a slightly lesser athlete with a greater skill set. People always want to jump up and say that you can just coach them to run better routes or have better hands. But Harvin has been a pro for how long now and still hasn't learned.
Jayson Braddock ‏@JaysonBraddock · 55s56 seconds ago
Vikings announce the release of WR Greg Jennings
I hope the Texans bring him in for a look. He'd be a valuable asset at the right price.Jayson Braddock ‏@JaysonBraddock · 55s56 seconds ago
Vikings announce the release of WR Greg Jennings
The jags tried to coin the term a couple years ago when they drafted Shoelaces as an offensive weapon ...
![]()
... may not have been the best player to try and break it in with, but I thought it sounded kind of slick.
I can't imagine them not going WR first round in this draft.
Texans @Official Texans
We've hired Thorn as our official illegal drug tester.
fifytexans @official texans
we've hired thorn as our official illegal drug taster.
Belichick traded a 2nd and 7th for Welker. That's not chicken feed. But certainly a bargain.When Welker became available, I don't think Bill made a huge push to get him, he most likely played it cool, but when the deal was done... contract signed.
kendrick Lewis to Ravens
http://www.chatsports.com/houston-t...greement-with-the-Baltimore-Ravens-2-11238744
Per Adam Schefter of ESPN, Texans free-agent safety Kendrick Lewis has agreed to join the Baltimore Ravens this afternoon.
Thats been in the NFL forum since like noonbut yeah it sucks, i wish he would stayed so DJ could be the third safety.