I believe I've said many times he should be fired after 51-7 but you dont want to hear any of that kind of talk because it doesn't allow you to pidgeon hole me. Yes, I liked the Tunsil trade. I said I would've held onto Nuk and made him play out his contract. But I dont have to work with him so I really dont have a valid opinion on this subject.
As far as what I would've done besides draft DW4, I said it at the time, I would've used the DW4 draft to build up the OL and then drafted a QB in the Mayfield/Darnold/Allen `draft. Instead RS decided to repeat history and draft a young QB and put him behind a crappy OL just like the Texans did with Carr. History is repeating itself and nothing more. You can try to explain away the Texans failures all you want, blame game etc... but this is the unfortunate truth. It's the middle of the lost decade.
Hmm, no.
I did hear you about the 51-7, but that was already too late.
Tunsil isn't the solution when you have to pay all that equity to fix one hole, while creating more holes elsewhere.
That was simply a desperate move; we had warned you that it would come at a greater cost.
But see, you still like that trade even though it did not, do not, and will not remotely solve the problem on the Offensive line.
(Note how corrosion also said Tunsil is quite poor on run blocking.)
There wasn't any Mayfield/Darnold/Allen in the 2017 draft, so basically, you had NO solution.