KoolAid Sipper
AFCEVET
It's ironic that the scouting reports on Schultz coming out of Stanford always mentioned his ability as a very good blocker...guess that didn't age to well.
Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
According to some well phrased articles CJ and Bobby were "not always" on the same page.If I were Stroud, I would have been on Dalton's ass for that! I do not know if Stroud had anything to do with slow week and the offensive line coach being fired but it was deserved and shows him that the boss was watching.
Edit
And gives me hope that the offensive line will be fixed.
Loveland would be my guy other than Banks.
Imagine if they got a big goon like Booker and Brown got healthy. Run Mixon and Pierce behind those two and the short yardage offense is solved!Im not completely opposed to Loveland at 25, but only if other options I like are gone. Booker is very Swarm to me. I think he may be the target. May…..just my hunch. Alabama…SWARM for miles, leadership, and top need on the team.
If Loveland is there in the 2nd, I waste no time in turning in the card. Lance compares him to Laporta, but the knock is average at best as a blocker.
Booker is such a bad athlete. Worse than Kenyon. Wouldn't be thrilled if he's the pick.Im not completely opposed to Loveland at 25, but only if other options I like are gone. Booker is very Swarm to me. I think he may be the target. May…..just my hunch. Alabama…SWARM for miles, leadership, and top need on the team.
If Loveland is there in the 2nd, I waste no time in turning in the card. Lance compares him to Laporta, but the knock is average at best as a blocker.
Look at the Alabama miss rate when it comes to Bama OL. I'll pass on that and at one time I had Booker as a top 1-15 pick, then right or wrong, I looked at Bookers combine pieced that together with the Bama OL that's come out over the last 5 yrs and I'll pass on Booker knowing I could be very wrong.Im not completely opposed to Loveland at 25, but only if other options I like are gone. Booker is very Swarm to me. I think he may be the target. May…..just my hunch. Alabama…SWARM for miles, leadership, and top need on the team.
If Loveland is there in the 2nd, I waste no time in turning in the card. Lance compares him to Laporta, but the knock is average at best as a blocker.
Yeah, I've got Jackson/Zabel rated over him and have him in the Milum/Membow grouping.Booker is such a bad athlete. Worse than Kenyon. Wouldn't be thrilled if he's the pick.
I want no part of Alabama OLmenImagine if they got a big goon like Booker and Brown got healthy. Run Mixon and Pierce behind those two and the short yardage offense is solved!
Remember when some people on here wanted no part of an Ohio State QB? Judge the prospect not the school.I want no part of Alabama OLmen
Im not completely opposed to Loveland at 25, but only if other options I like are gone. Booker is very Swarm to me. I think he may be the target. May…..just my hunch. Alabama…SWARM for miles, leadership, and top need on the team.
If Loveland is there in the 2nd, I waste no time in turning in the card. Lance compares him to Laporta, but the knock is average at best as a blocker.
Whoever gets drafted in the 1st has a possible 5 years of rookie contract to play with… I wouldn’t be concerned about “fit” their rookie season. I don’t see Schultz as a core member of this team after how he played last season. If they bring in a TE I expect them to compete for a roster spot and if it’s Loveland then he would likely be a direct replacement for Schultz this season or next.All the reports on Loveland have been generally positive, but from a Texans standpoint it kind of doesn't make sense.
Before I elaborate, you can re-read my big post on Schultz--I don't think he fits with the team identity. I know his days here are numbered. To say I'm not a fan of his style of play and what we've got out of him is an understatement. I've anointed him "Dalton Bagwell" for his love of acquiring stats during garbage time and choking in crucial playoff moments. I think he's ok in the regular season, especially if they would have given him a 1 year deal or his APY was significantly lower.
But he's on our roster so you have to consider him. We got Stover, Jordan, and Bagwell. If we draft Loveland, what is our role for the other guys? I guess you could put him and Bagwell on the field together, but that's going to exaggerate our blocking TE problem. We don't know what Jordan is after his injury, but he's kind of in the same mold as everyone not named Stover. Again, not hating on Loveland at 25, but it seems like it may not be our best course of action depending on what the board looks like at 25 (assuming we don't trade up/back). I guess we could cut Jordan because they aren't going to cut Schultz? But Jordan may be a better weapon that Bagwell.
I guess that's why I'm typing on a message board and not wearing a vest on Kirby.
Schultz is only on the team this year because of the structure of his contract... He is GONE next season, surely!!Whoever gets drafted in the 1st has a possible 5 years of rookie contract to play with… I wouldn’t be concerned about “fit” their rookie season. I don’t see Schultz as a core member of this team after how he played last season. If they bring in a TE I expect them to compete for a roster spot and if it’s Loveland then he would likely be a direct replacement for Schultz this season or next.
I wouldn't let below avg talent like Schultz/Jordan keep me from picking difference makers like Warren/Loveland/Taylor at 1-25. Draft one of these guys and if you have to cut Jordan you do it. Speaking of Jordan, he's coming off of an ACL and you dont know what you're going to get from him. Before he was injured he was a decent receiving TE that was a poor blocker. He's living off of the long TD catch in the playoffs. Other than that play what redeeming quality or play made him any different than any other avg TE? He's an H-Back that is faking it as a TE. Live with Schultz for a yr, admit your mistakes and move on. Fortunately this seems to be strenght of Caserio's.All the reports on Loveland have been generally positive, but from a Texans standpoint it kind of doesn't make sense.
Before I elaborate, you can re-read my big post on Schultz--I don't think he fits with the team identity. I know his days here are numbered. To say I'm not a fan of his style of play and what we've got out of him is an understatement. I've anointed him "Dalton Bagwell" for his love of acquiring stats during garbage time and choking in crucial playoff moments. I think he's ok in the regular season, especially if they would have given him a 1 year deal or his APY was significantly lower.
But he's on our roster so you have to consider him. We got Stover, Jordan, and Bagwell. If we draft Loveland, what is our role for the other guys? I guess you could put him and Bagwell on the field together, but that's going to exaggerate our blocking TE problem. We don't know what Jordan is after his injury, but he's kind of in the same mold as everyone not named Stover. Again, not hating on Loveland at 25, but it seems like it may not be our best course of action depending on what the board looks like at 25 (assuming we don't trade up/back). I guess we could cut Jordan because they aren't going to cut Schultz? But Jordan may be a better weapon that Bagwell.
I guess that's why I'm typing on a message board and not wearing a vest on Kirby.
I would love to see his playing time decrease next year.Schultz is only on the team this year because of the structure of his contract... He is GONE next season, surely!!
I'd rather see Q cut than Jordan... Jordan is willing to block anywayI wouldn't let below avg talent like Schultz/Jordan keep me from picking difference makers like Warren/Loveland/Taylor at 1-25. Draft one of these guys and if you have to cut Jordan you do it. Speaking of Jordan, he's coming off of an ACL and you dont know what you're going to get from him. Before he was injured he was a decent receiving TE that was a poor blocker. He's living off of the long TD catch in the playoffs. Other than that play what redeeming quality or play made him any different than any other avg TE? He's an H-Back that is faking it as a TE. Live with Schultz for a yr, admit your mistakes and move on. Fortunately this seems to be strenght of Caserio's.
Oh no you didn't!All the reports on Loveland have been generally positive, but from a Texans standpoint it kind of doesn't make sense.
Before I elaborate, you can re-read my big post on Schultz--I don't think he fits with the team identity. I know his days here are numbered. To say I'm not a fan of his style of play and what we've got out of him is an understatement. I've anointed him "Dalton Bagwell" for his love of acquiring stats during garbage time and choking in crucial playoff moments. I think he's ok in the regular season, especially if they would have given him a 1 year deal or his APY was significantly lower.
But he's on our roster so you have to consider him. We got Stover, Jordan, and Bagwell. If we draft Loveland, what is our role for the other guys? I guess you could put him and Bagwell on the field together, but that's going to exaggerate our blocking TE problem. We don't know what Jordan is after his injury, but he's kind of in the same mold as everyone not named Stover. Again, not hating on Loveland at 25, but it seems like it may not be our best course of action depending on what the board looks like at 25 (assuming we don't trade up/back). I guess we could cut Jordan because they aren't going to cut Schultz? But Jordan may be a better weapon that Bagwell.
I guess that's why I'm typing on a message board and not wearing a vest on Kirby.
Draft one of Taylor/Warren/Loveland in the 1st and this will happen.I would love to see his playing time decrease next year.
If there is one thing the offensive skill positions are lacking it's speed. We got guys that can get open but usually they need more a couple of seconds to win the route. Don't threaten me with a good time.Draft one of Taylor/Warren/Loveland in the 1st and this will happen.
Want to add speed to this offense? Not saying I would do this.
Taylor - fastest TE
Bond - 4.35
Blue - 4.28
Tuten - 4.32
There are players I like more than these guys but they're threats to score anytime they toch the ball. Something that's sorely lacking from the Texans offense and these guys would surely stretch a defense out creating more space to operate.
All the reports on Loveland have been generally positive, but from a Texans standpoint it kind of doesn't make sense.
Before I elaborate, you can re-read my big post on Schultz--I don't think he fits with the team identity. I know his days here are numbered. To say I'm not a fan of his style of play and what we've got out of him is an understatement. I've anointed him "Dalton Bagwell" for his love of acquiring stats during garbage time and choking in crucial playoff moments. I think he's ok in the regular season, especially if they would have given him a 1 year deal or his APY was significantly lower.
But he's on our roster so you have to consider him. We got Stover, Jordan, and Bagwell. If we draft Loveland, what is our role for the other guys? I guess you could put him and Bagwell on the field together, but that's going to exaggerate our blocking TE problem. We don't know what Jordan is after his injury, but he's kind of in the same mold as everyone not named Stover. Again, not hating on Loveland at 25, but it seems like it may not be our best course of action depending on what the board looks like at 25 (assuming we don't trade up/back). I guess we could cut Jordan because they aren't going to cut Schultz? But Jordan may be a better weapon that Bagwell.
I guess that's why I'm typing on a message board and not wearing a vest on Kirby.
I'd send Schultz and a Day 3 pick to Vegas for Michael Mayer before Andrews; but I don't think LV would go for that.
As they say, “squeaky wheel gets the grease”. You’ll never know until you ask.
I would give up a 7th to get rid of him.With his contact I don't think we get past a 6th and maybe only a 7th. And any team that watched last season may not want any part of reworking his deal. Too much risk for a guy going 1/2 speed.
I would give up a 7th to get rid of him.
Schultz is the opposite of swarm.
Mistakenly Rewarded and Weak SauceAre you suggesting he is MRAWS? Majorly rewarded and what ****?
I think you are correct and another area that perhaps no one has considered, his contract has not been reworked to increase cap space as others have been. I think that is extremely significant. Also, note that releases do not bring much relief. Pre June 1st trade (draft?)is what I am looking for: $9 million. I think another team is going to look at 2024 and say to themselves 'Schultz just gave up and a change of scenery is what he needs'. Those teams are also going to say he got a huge increase off of 2023 and that productivity is there to tap. I'm thinking Nick will be working the phones beginning day two. I would really like to have another round three or even a round 4.I have noticed something that I at first didn't think was anything. But, over the last few weeks I've been not hearing it more and more.
When asked about CJ, coaches and FO talk about protecting him better and that will help him tremendously to become even better. OL, like it or not they talk about how they feel they can become a good, nasty and aggressive unit. WR, they talk about Nico and Kirk, talk about how well Tank is recovering and what it could look like. About the D, thay talk about how good almost every player is. But, at TE I hear Stover was starting to play well until his shoulder injury (fixed) and how Jordan has to stay healthy but has great ability.
So, what's missing? The fact that you have not heard anything about Schultz. I know I might have missed it, but not 1 time have I heard anything about him. Is it a sign that he isn't going to be on the roster after the draft? They let Tegan walk, so a TE is needed. But no mention of Schultz.
My feeling is that they are either going to trade him during the draft or perhaps even release him. I could be wrong but NOW I am listening to the team every time I hear them and so far...no word on Schultz. I know Nick Caserio and Meco can't be happy with his play.
Thoughts?
Where are you getting these numbers from? Loveland's blocking suffered last yr do to a hurt shoulder. He blocked well in 2023 when Corum ran for all of those yds. No way Corum runs for all of those yds if Loveland was doing a poor job blocking.Another thing is any love for Loveland over Harold Fannin is confusing for me. Loveland's blocking is at 50% and Fannin at 56 which is significant. Fannin has better stats than Tyler Warren and completely blows away Loveland. Fannin can be had late round two and probably late round 3. Fannin is evaluated as an inline blocker while Loveland is a slot tight end.
Warren and Loveland are considered round one.
Tre Harris at 58 with Grant and Fannin round three is really good. Pop me 3.90 from Rams for Schultz and I add Skattebo. We can argue which round 3 for which player.
Next question if we got these guys..
What do we do with 25? If Jahdee Barron is there and he probably won't be, he's my guy. Otherwise, probably a trade down. Cleveland, I am looking at your 33 and 67 and you know you need to grab your quarterback at 25!
If you want a lead blocker for your running back, go get a full back.Where are you getting these numbers from? Loveland's blocking suffered last yr do to a hurt shoulder. He blocked well in 2023 when Corum ran for all of those yds. No way Corum runs for all of those yds if Loveland was doing a poor job blocking.
Any thoughts on why he was not targeted on three different teams? I see that he was tied for 21st tight end.. So an undrafted free agent? He has the size.Unknown TE, Maliq Carr (Houston) has become mine. At 6-6 265 lbs and runs a 4.61-40 makes him my kind of TE, especially when he’s viewed as a blocker first in both the run and pass game. He wasn’t targeted a lot at Purdue, Michigan State, and Houston…..he was an unused weapon.
I want a TE that can at least wall off the weakside edge and is effective on double teams with the OT's. He also needs to have good hands and enough speed to stretch the defense down the seams. I think in this class there's 5 TE's that meet this criteria. The top 3 dont carry much risk. The last 2 carry significant injury risk.If you want a lead blocker for your running back, go get a full back.
I am no tape watching analyst, but I do watch some of them on the internet. And I remember a lot of positive comments on Schultz in 2023. I also have friends who are Cowboys fans who think he was their best TE in recent years. I also remember that last season there were games where his effort was non-existent. Especially on plays he wasn't going to get the ball. Either he had an injury we didn't know about or he was just happy to get paid and mail it in...Schultz came over to Texans via Dallas as free agent signing. Caserio & coaching staff liked him enough, after first season to offer 3 year 36 million dollar contract. That’s not on Dalton, it’s on Caserio. Slowick play calling, scheme seemingly became more dysfunctional year two and didn’t age well. Not only Schultz but OL all the way to CJ.
Changes needed to be made and were. Brought in new OC Nick Caley (I love tight ends) and one voice for OL in Cole Popovich. Shuffled Tunsil out of town and brought in more experienced, veteran offensive lineman to reset culture. Say all that to say this, let’s see how this impacts Schultz before we totally give up on the guy. If he can return or even improve from his first season with Texans it should be welcomed change.
![]()
CJ gets what CJ wants and he wanted Schultz. What makes you think Schultz will be better? Fandom, Dallas let him go for a reason.Schultz came over to Texans via Dallas as free agent signing. Caserio & coaching staff liked him enough, after first season to offer 3 year 36 million dollar contract. That’s not on Dalton, it’s on Caserio. Slowick play calling, scheme seemingly became more dysfunctional year two and didn’t age well. Not only Schultz but OL all the way to CJ.
Changes needed to be made and were. Brought in new OC Nick Caley (I love tight ends) and one voice for OL in Cole Popovich. Shuffled Tunsil out of town and brought in more experienced, veteran offensive lineman to reset culture. Say all that to say this, let’s see how this impacts Schultz before we totally give up on the guy. If he can return or even improve from his first season with Texans it should be welcomed change.
![]()
Schultz was the best available by far. What QB doesn't want a TE to throw to?CJ gets what CJ wants and he wanted Schultz. What makes you think Schultz will be better? Fandom, Dallas let him go for a reason.
He got the TE he wanted and now the team is paying the price. Now is the time to draft a TE that's a long term solution over what they've got there now.Schultz was the best available by far. What QB doesn't want a TE to throw to?
Everyone was pretty happy with Schultz after 2023. Just because he shat the bed in 2024 doesn't negate that. I have no problem with taking yet another TE in 2025, but not in the first roundHe got the TE he wanted and now the team is paying the price. Now is the time to draft a TE that's a long term solution over what they've got there now.
If you want an immediate upgrade you will have to take a TE in the 1st or possibly trade into the top of the 2nd..Everyone was pretty happy with Schultz after 2023. Just because he shat the bed in 2024 doesn't negate that. I have no problem with taking yet another TE in 2025, but not in the first round
I don't believe that to be true. Travis Kelce was a 3rd round pick, Owen Daniels a 4th. That's just off the top of my head.If you want an immediate upgrade you will have to take a TE in the 1st or possibly trade into the top of the 2nd..
He's not that hard to replace or improve on:If you want an immediate upgrade you will have to take a TE in the 1st or possibly trade into the top of the 2nd..
Agreed, replace him with an impact player like Taylor and draft Kyle Williams. This would make a huge impact. I'm a Donovan Jackson guy at 1-25. But the thought ofHe's not that hard to replace or improve on:
2025 fantasy football rankings: Profiles for the top 30 tight ends
24. Dalton Schultz, Houston Texans
Schultz is eyeing a rebound in 2025 after he followed up four consecutive top-12 fantasy campaigns with a 20th-place finish (28th in PPG) in 2024. Schultz posted a productive 59-635-5 receiving line in 15 games in 2023 (his first season in Houston), but saw his usage dip last season despite ranking fourth among tight ends in pass routes. Schultz became a nonfactor near the goal line, totaling two end zone targets and two TDs, both of which are his fewest since taking on a regular offensive role in 2020. His history suggests a return to the fringe-TE1 mix is possible and he could see a slight boost in targets with Christian Kirk replacing Stefon Diggs and Tank Dell (knee) in doubt for the season, but he also could lose work to second-year TE Cade Stover. Schultz doesn't have much late-round appeal.
That sounds great, but how many 1st rd qbs came from OState vs oline from Bama in the last 15 yrs?Remember when some people on here wanted no part of an Ohio State QB? Judge the prospect not the school.