Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍

[Sources] OB & Smith relationship has worsened

I can't believe we are sitting her debating who is "more responsible" for our lack of legit QB presence. How about they both suck and need to go.

OB runs a flawed offense, lacks any in game decision making skills, continue to run injured players into the dirt with no regard to the long term in mind.

Smith has constantly produced terrible contracts that hurt this team, allows talented players to leave via free agency each season, continues to ignore key areas of the team via the draft, not to mention his poor track record of quality players through the draft.

Both suck and need to go.
 
Obviously because he doesn't think that Weeden would give us a better chance
Maybe. There's been comment by posters in support of Weeden. But I can't recall any discussion of Weeden from how OB might perceive his 3rd string QB. Of course any discussion would be pure guess work unless someone could find in the files comment by OB.
 
Maybe. There's been comment by posters in support of Weeden. But I can't recall any discussion of Weeden from how OB might perceive his 3rd string QB. Of course any discussion would be pure guess work unless someone could find in the files comment by OB.

Any posters not named Thorsson? Cuz we all know who he is
 
There is something to this argument. The one thing not being brought into this discussion of McNair, Smith, OB and Oz, is the right now, going into the playoffs. Right now should be all about winning and nothing else. Who gives us the best chance of winning.

The problems with Oz's game has been well discussed by many. There's been no need for me to repeat what so many others have said - I simply sum it all up by saying I don't like his mechanics. I've expressed my opinion that I'd like to see Weeden starting.

But to return to the point of this thread, if O'Brien is not OK with Oz, why isn't he playing Weeden? There is something to be said with the suggestion by some on this forum that Weeden has the better mechanics and is the more accomplished QB and gives us the better chance at winning. So why isn't OB seeing this?

Why is Oz starting over Weeden?

Because Bob/Cal/Ricky McNair told BOB to start Os.
 
When Kubiak benched Keenum McNair was upset. He didn't try to hide it. When O'b benched Osweiler McNair seemed proud of his H.C.

My point about Rick not having the juice, all he can do is let McNair know his opinion. McNair will be the one to fire O'b.

Proud, I think not,

Agreed
 
Hopkins was open a lot more in the last three games than he'd been all year. Instead of relying on his route running or push offs, he's been stacked, bunched, running underneath routes.

Look at the catches he had in the Jacksonville game & then again in the Titans game. They helped to get him open.

Both QBS were able to go to him quickly.
I had only rewatching the Jags game.

I don't see anything particularly that would qualify as scheming.

The closest to that is a play where Hopkins was in the slot and ran a crossing route.
Savage got the ball to him quickly , but that was just because the CB played way off (which is rare unless the Defense is playing zone).
The coaches upstairs must have noticed an earlier play or two and decided to exploit it.
This is rather normal in the course of a game.

Other than that, it was just a matter of Savage's compact delivery and quick decision, getting the ball out on time that makes Hopkins "look" open.

Same plays, same throws by Osweiler and Hopkins is covered, resulting in a broken up pass.
 
I had only rewatching the Jags game.

I don't see anything particularly that would qualify as scheming.

The closest to that is a play where Hopkins was in the slot and ran a crossing route.
Savage got the ball to him quickly , but that was just because the CB played way off (which is rare unless the Defense is playing zone).
The coaches upstairs must have noticed an earlier play or two and decided to exploit it.
This is rather normal in the course of a game.

Other than that, it was just a matter of Savage's compact delivery and quick decision, getting the ball out on time that makes Hopkins "look" open.

Same plays, same throws by Osweiler and Hopkins is covered, resulting in a broken up pass.
On another note, I rewatched the Pats vs. Bills game, and I saw a mix of screen pass and play action that helped the QB.

We do that, too.
But the execution sometimes can be off or the timing of the call (down and distance) sometimes is off and didn't catch the Defense off-balance.

And this is the worse game by a Pat QB this year.
But it wasn't helping when a receiver dropped a pass early to stop a drive by the Pats.
In the meantime, the Bulls jumped out to a quick 13 point lead.
Then another receiver dropped a TD pass stalling a drive and Brissett fumbled and lost the ball on a run up field where he should have slided to avoid being double hit.

There were two bang bang plays, but that was late in the 4th quarter trailing by 16, Brissett was trying to make some play.

Again, with Osweiler, those could have been picks instead of just a couple of broken pass.

Osweiler really needs to work on his mechanics in the off-season.
 
I had only rewatching the Jags game.

I don't see anything particularly that would qualify as scheming.

The closest to that is a play where Hopkins was in the slot and ran a crossing route.
Savage got the ball to him quickly , but that was just because the CB played way off (which is rare unless the Defense is playing zone).
The coaches upstairs must have noticed an earlier play or two and decided to exploit it.
This is rather normal in the course of a game.


Other than that, it was just a matter of Savage's compact delivery and quick decision, getting the ball out on time that makes Hopkins "look" open.

Same plays, same throws by Osweiler and Hopkins is covered, resulting in a broken up pass.

You hit the nail on the head with the bolded statement. I think even a halfway decent QB makes this scheme and its receivers look much better. Savage made some throws in tight spaces that I haven't seen Brock do all year. He also led some receivers so they could actually gain some yards after the pass instead of getting slammed because they had to stop and catch it behind them like Brock does all the time.
 
If OB is planning to walk away from the Texans as soon as the season ends, why does he care what he is told?

He only has six potential employers, and they have visibility to his daily conduct.

Osweiler really needs to work on his mechanics in the off-season.

How many examples exist of QB's fixing their poor mechanics after they get to the pros? I don't mean tweak or refine, but fix fundamental problems. From my observations, if mechanics and accuracy are bad by the time you're a pro, no amount of work will fix it.
 
Can OB walk away from the mess of an organization that many on this forum believe the Texans to be? He has a year left on his contract.
 
Os definitely has warts. We knew that coming in. I didn't expect him to be a world beater.

But I thought we could at least get solid play from him. Instead he's been the worst starter in the league. One of the worst qb performances over the course of a season that we've ever seen.

I just don't think he is THAT bad.

I think there are some things that can be done play calling and scheming wise to have a middling offense at least. TBH it seems like they didn't/don't try and just approach it as do it the way we are doing and if you can't then you'll just be upset about it.

And I can see why it's been so dysfunctional. A qb that doesn't believe in the offense and a coach that is unhappy with his qb.

No way that doesn't result in the **** product we've seen.

Failure at all levels. The players, offensive coaches, HC, GM and ownership. They've had a season to reflect and a week to accept reality.

We'll be able to tell quite a bit about the state of things from this game coming up.
 
He only has six potential employers, and they have visibility to his daily conduct.

How many examples exist of QB's fixing their poor mechanics after they get to the pros? I don't mean tweak or refine, but fix fundamental problems. From my observations, if mechanics and accuracy are bad by the time you're a pro, no amount of work will fix it.

No doubt, man. I still remember those ladders they used to use on David Carr to try to correct his sidearm throwing motion. It rarely works when you are trying to change those kinds of fundamentals in the pros.
 
Has anything of substance been released other then the glazer report?


Don't know if you would consider this as anything of substance but this is written on profootballrumors.com

Rick Smith has been the Texans’ general manager since 2006, but his role might change sometime during the offseason – perhaps after the draft – tweets Neil Stratton of Inside the League. According to Stratton, Smith could get a promotion (possibly to team president), thus elevating director of player personnel Brian Gaine to GM.

Interesting responses on the tweets.

:coffee:
 
Don't know if you would consider this as anything of substance but this is written on profootballrumors.com

Rick Smith has been the Texans’ general manager since 2006, but his role might change sometime during the offseason – perhaps after the draft – tweets Neil Stratton of Inside the League. According to Stratton, Smith could get a promotion (possibly to team president), thus elevating director of player personnel Brian Gaine to GM.

Interesting responses on the tweets.

:coffee:


We've heard this before, most recently after the 2013 season I believe
 
Can OB walk away from the mess of an organization that many on this forum believe the Texans to be? He has a year left on his contract.
He can walk away anytime - he can't be forced to work against his will. In order to take another NFL coaching position, he either needs to be involuntarily terminated, or have the Texans agree to let him do it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JB
This reminds me
Thorsson is Bill O'Brien! That explains so much!

Actually Bill O'Brien has won games with people I don't even totally understand how it was possible to win with under the circumstances. Case Keenum couldn't get a win until Bill O'Brien came to town. Brandon Weeden that year in Dallas couldn't get a win until he got on a Bill O'Brien led team. He couldn't get Hoyer past the pressure of a playoff game but then it's not like anyone else has ever been able to do that and until Mallet got delusions of grandeur and didn't come clean about his pectoral injury he had him playing well too. Fitz played well (for Fitz), Yates kept right on trucking like always.

Not Os though. Os just hasn't worked out. Makes me wonder how much is Os and how much is O'Brien.
Last season BO'b turned over the lions share of the offensive duties to George Godsey. This season BO'b had more say in now the offense was run. I don't know about all of you but I saw improvement with just George Godsey. I like BO'b as a head coach but our offense may have been served better with a primary offensive coordinator. That is just how I see things.
 
Last edited:
You mean the same way they looked stupid when the last coaching staff was jettisoned and went on to win the Super Bowl? What's the common denominator?

rick-smith.jpg
Gary Kubiak was about as awful with the offense as BO'b has been this season. Denver won in spite of an inept offense. That does not happen very often but it did last season. Brock thought he was escaping that situation and instead this season the offense in Houston was worse. Os has issues but the way the offense was run this season did not help him in the least.
 
We all say we want these guys to be held accountable, but every time they're held accountable by the only guy who can hold them accountable, we complain that he's a meddling owner.

It's ridiculous the amount of power Kubiak had in this organization as a first time head coach, but McNair let him do his thing. David Carr was one stipulation... but that's the way it goes. He was our 1st ever pick, the guy had the talent, I don't think anyone denies that. We either had to pay him $8M or let him walk. If he were let go & became a franchise QB we'd be talking about another wasted opportunity. That decision had to be made before Kubiak could work with him. So all he's got is a bunch of game tape & a few conversations with Carr & there's no doubt Carr could come across as someone who gets it. But on game day...

Still, it got so bad that most of the country thinks the fans in Houston cheered when Matt Schaub got hurt. That's a decision Kubiak refused to make. He farts around with Keenum all season. We lead in most of those 8 games at half time & blew the lead, not being able to score... not scoring, because I think they were fully capable if Kubiak didn't turtle up every game. He pulls Keenum, throws Schaub back in there, damn right he needed his hand slapped. McNair did the right thing then, we all said as much at the time (we may not have liked the way he did it) but now we can pile it all up to a "meddling" owner.

Kubiak was only in that situation because our meddling owner fixed Kubiak's defensive problems.

Then O'brien says he can win with Fitz, then benches him. He says he can win with Hoyer, then benches him... neither had a winning record as the starting QB of the Houston Texans. Then he sticks Hoyer in that playoff game after Rick done got him Yates & Weeden. Our QB turns the ball over four times in the first half & he's trotted out there for the second half... there's no way in the world that O'brien should have had any say on who our QB should be. He's proven he couldn't pick a franchise QB out of a HOF candidates list. He can coach the heck out of them, but he can't pick them to save his life.

So our GM does his job & gets him a decent prospect with big game experience.

After these rumors come out that there's friction between Smith(McNair) & O'b, I don't think we can base our opinion of Brock on anything that happened this season. All season long O'bs play calling has been called predictable & stale. Sure, it's possible that's due to the limitations of the QB. But we've seen some pretty good drives from Osweiler. So we know it's possible. IMO it's the coach's job to find a way to get more of those drives out of his offense. Do the things that you're successful at more often than you don't.

But that's not what O'brien has done. He doesn't try to get his QB into a rhythm until late in games. He doesn't call "complimentary routes" until he "has" to. & I've yet to see us exploit any matchup. Most teams will attack the weaker matchups, the one where we have the advantage, but we go after teams best players. Whoever Jalen Ramsey was covering was the guy we're going to throw the ball to & that's with Tom Savage.

The guy is a joke. If he can't do his job, which is coach the players he's given to the best of his abilities... we don't need him. I think McNair spoiled him by giving him the benefit of the doubt, giving him more influence in player selection than he earned. But he screwed up twice. He shouldn't get a third chance, especially without proving that he can develop the players he's given... especially when it seems like there's a lack of "want to"

That said, I think the dumbass figured out the best thing for him to do is win. The more he wins from here out, the better his ability to negotiate new terms with the Texans will be, if he wants to be here, & the better the chances he'll be selected to coach another team, if he decides to leave.

Had he gone to San Francisco, he'd have had to win with Kaepernick/Gabbert, or he'd have had to been fired after one year.

Had he gone to Buffalo, he'd have had to win with Ej Manuel, Tyrod Taylor, or Cordale Jones, or he'd have been fired after two years.

If he went to Miami, he was going to have to make Tannehill work...

I can't think of any team that will give him more say in personnel than he's had here. He botched it. He needs to deal with it, make it work, or leave.
tk this is a HOF post!!! Thank you!!!
 
It was Rick. Savage was O'Brien's guy, and I doubt that O'Brien would've put his stamp on Osweiler and his Tebowesque wind-up.
I agree with you, but I'm also trying to keep an open mind.

I've read so many posts on the subject, and tons of the posters around here on both sides of the argument make really good points. The evidence sure seems to lead more towards Rick Smith, but I don't think any of us can say with 100% certainty what's happening on Kirby.

I do know one thing though with 100% certainty: whatever John McClain says, it's probably the exact opposite.
 
How many examples exist of QB's fixing their poor mechanics after they get to the pros? I don't mean tweak or refine, but fix fundamental problems. From my observations, if mechanics and accuracy are bad by the time you're a pro, no amount of work will fix it.

Agree. I remember a former NFL coach saying you can't fix an inaccurate QB. They are similar to a wild pitcher in baseball who is always struggling to find the strike zone.

As far as mechanics, the only QB I can recall who "tweaked" their mechanics was Rodgers. But he had the luxury of working on his mechanics while sitting and learning from Favre. Besides wasting time at the line of scrimmage and how to handle press conferences, I really don't know what Osweiler learned from sitting behind Manning.
 
I can't believe we are sitting her debating who is "more responsible" for our lack of legit QB presence. How about they both suck and need to go.

OB runs a flawed offense, lacks any in game decision making skills, continue to run injured players into the dirt with no regard to the long term in mind.

Smith has constantly produced terrible contracts that hurt this team, allows talented players to leave via free agency each season, continues to ignore key areas of the team via the draft, not to mention his poor track record of quality players through the draft.

Both suck and need to go.

It's about people refusing to believe their anointed one is responsible even in the slightest. We all know Rick Smith ranges from underwhelming to terrible.
 
How many examples exist of QB's fixing their poor mechanics after they get to the pros? I don't mean tweak or refine, but fix fundamental problems. From my observations, if mechanics and accuracy are bad by the time you're a pro, no amount of work will fix it.

Haha, ironically, Matt Schaub comes to mind.

I don't know if you were here at that time, but I and some others used to rag about his delivery in the early years.

He worked on it and improved his TD/INT every year until 2012 when he got hurt.

And I just came back to look at his string of INTs in 2013; none was due to the poor old delivery.
They were results of various other things.
 
Haha, ironically, Matt Schaub comes to mind.

I don't know if you were here at that time, but I and some others used to rag about his delivery in the early years.

He worked on it and improved his TD/INT every year until 2012 when he got hurt.

And I just came back to look at his string of INTs in 2013; none was due to the poor old delivery.
They were results of various other things.
It seemed after his pro bowl showing.,which IIRC was the worst performance ever for a QB in a probowl, mentally screwed him up. Well the injury to the foot didnt help.

He went full blown Chuck Knoblauch. It seemed
 
In fairness they spent the equivalent of a mid 1st (2 2nds) to get Schaub who then held the starting job for 7 years.
Do you think that's enough? And held the starting job for 7 years? On paper I guess, but that year 7 was a complete disaster. There is ZERO excuse to have not drafted a QB in the first 3 rounds in 2013, 2014, and 2015. And with Schaub's injury history (11 games in 2007 & 2008 and 10 games in 2013), we should have been looking for a legitimate backup to Schaub prior to 2013.

There's no fairness needing to be involved here. Rick has botched the QB situation the entire time he has been here. He lucked out with Schaub becoming available, but I also firmly believe much of Schaub's success was a result of Kubiak's offense. Just watch what Brock looked like in Gary's offense to get your answer.

There is ZERO excuse for Rick Smith not drafting a QB in the first 3 rounds. Plenty of other teams do it while they have a franchise QB on the team. We have never had a true franchise QB, yet don't see a need to draft one where it matters.
 
Do you think that's enough? And held the starting job for 7 years? On paper I guess, but that year 7 was a complete disaster. There is ZERO excuse to have not drafted a QB in the first 3 rounds in 2013, 2014, and 2015. And with Schaub's injury history (11 games in 2007 & 2008 and 10 games in 2013), we should have been looking for a legitimate backup to Schaub prior to 2013.

There's no fairness needing to be involved here. Rick has botched the QB situation the entire time he has been here. He lucked out with Schaub becoming available, but I also firmly believe much of Schaub's success was a result of Kubiak's offense. Just watch what Brock looked like in Gary's offense to get your answer.

There is ZERO excuse for Rick Smith not drafting a QB in the first 3 rounds. Plenty of other teams do it while they have a franchise QB on the team. We have never had a true franchise QB, yet don't see a need to draft one where it matters.

Not to mention Schaub being hurt off and on for half of that period.
 
That was what, his 1st year here? What's he done since? Schaub wasn't going to last forever and he never did anything to prepare for that. Hell, the Patriots draft QBs higher than 4, at least 4 since 2008, and they have the GOAT.
Heck, I even wanted them to consider drafting a QB in 2011.

Dalton low risk, medium reward.
Kaepernick high risk, higher reward.

I mean, when the team doesn't have a bona fide QB, the GM and HC need to look for one.

I understand that Kubiak's system doesn't need a great QB, but a prospect like Kaepernick shouldn't be ignored.
If needed, he can always be traded later.
 
This team hasn't drafted a QB in the first 3 rounds since Drew Henson in 2003. I don't understand the logic of not picking a QB when BoB came in with Fitzpatrick. We have always had that as a need and I think they have built this entire offense without thinking they needed a top flight QB. That logic doesn't hold water and I think McNair needs to really evaluate why the people are telling him he can get by with backups all the time.
 
This team hasn't drafted a QB in the first 3 rounds since Drew Henson in 2003. I don't understand the logic of not picking a QB when BoB came in with Fitzpatrick. We have always had that as a need and I think they have built this entire offense without thinking they needed a top flight QB. That logic doesn't hold water and I think McNair needs to really evaluate why the people are telling him he can get by with backups all the time.
Remember when McNair said that the Texans don't need a "franchise-type" QB?

http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/story/bob-mcnair-texans-don-t-need-super-quarterback-072715

That's the mindset of the guy at the top of the organization.
 
Agree. I remember a former NFL coach saying you can't fix an inaccurate QB. They are similar to a wild pitcher in baseball who is always struggling to find the strike zone.

As far as mechanics, the only QB I can recall who "tweaked" their mechanics was Rodgers. But he had the luxury of working on his mechanics while sitting and learning from Favre. Besides wasting time at the line of scrimmage and how to handle press conferences, I really don't know what Osweiler learned from sitting behind Manning.
I agree that it seems Os learned little to nothing from Manning. However there are times when Brock looks good and a head coach not set on his ways finds out how to best adjust his system to what fits that quarterback. BO'b should be able to pattern an offense to his quarterbacks strengths and I saw very little of that for either Os or TS.

This next game in the playoffs should tell us all we need to know in regards to BO'b and Os. If BO'b goes back to the system that Os struggled most with it will be hard on me to place the lions share of the blame on Os. If BO'b does more of what was working last week throughout most of the game and Os struggles than we can squarely place blame on Os and consider him a poor excuse for a starting quarterback. Heck, even a sorry excuse for a second stringer.

I know where I stand now but I will reserve full judgement till after the game.
 
Remember when McNair said that the Texans don't need a "franchise-type" QB?

http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/story/bob-mcnair-texans-don-t-need-super-quarterback-072715

That's the mindset of the guy at the top of the organization.

This is why I don't blame Rick Smith or O'Brien. McNair is the CEO of the boardroom. All strategy and philosophy direction comes from Bob McNair according to his son, Cal.

If folks are wondering why the Texans haven't drafted a QB in the higher rounds, you have to look at the top of the pyramid. Occam's razor says the boss apparently doesn't want them to (or he's receiving bad advice, but the buck still stops with him, either way).
 
It's curious to see how the media thinks O'Brien is a great coach. Looks like they are wasting much time covering the ''big name'' teams such as Cowboys and Patriots, and forgetting to study and analyze the ''under the radar'' teams like us.
 
O'Brien harps on being a good teammate and stresses that all the time. How good a teammate is he for leaking **** to the press right before a playoff game causing a huge distraction. He is a gigantic fraud. Don't let the door hit you on the way out, take Rick with you.
 
Don't know if you would consider this as anything of substance but this is written on profootballrumors.com

Rick Smith has been the Texans’ general manager since 2006, but his role might change sometime during the offseason – perhaps after the draft – tweets Neil Stratton of Inside the League. According to Stratton, Smith could get a promotion (possibly to team president), thus elevating director of player personnel Brian Gaine to GM.

Interesting responses on the tweets.

:coffee:
Please God let this happen. This would be a late Christmas gift that all of us would appreciate.
 
O'Brien harps on being a good teammate and stresses that all the time. How good a teammate is he for leaking **** to the press right before a playoff game causing a huge distraction. He is a gigantic fraud. Don't let the door hit you on the way out, take Rick with you.

Regardless who leaked it. If he's not acting in good faith to be the best teammate he can be.. what's that say to the team?
 
If OB is planning to walk away from the Texans as soon as the season ends, why does he care what he is told?

Because he's looking for another job and just wants to get along until he moves on. I hope I'm wrong about this.
 
Regardless who leaked it. If he's not acting in good faith to be the best teammate he can be.. what's that say to the team?
It tells them do as I say not as I do. If Jim Harbaugh who went to a SB and 3 NFC championship games wore his players down with his act how do you think O'Brien's tough guy schtick without the success is going to fare with this team going forward. Even if he sticks around, the players will see him as a fraud and start tuning him out.
 
It seemed after his pro bowl showing.,which IIRC was the worst performance ever for a QB in a probowl, mentally screwed him up. Well the injury to the foot didnt help.

He went full blown Chuck Knoblauch. It seemed

Shaub?

7138173_G.jpg
 
Os definitely has warts. We knew that coming in. I didn't expect him to be a world beater.

But I thought we could at least get solid play from him. Instead he's been the worst starter in the league. One of the worst qb performances over the course of a season that we've ever seen.

I just don't think he is THAT bad.

I think there are some things that can be done play calling and scheming wise to have a middling offense at least. TBH it seems like they didn't/don't try and just approach it as do it the way we are doing and if you can't then you'll just be upset about it.

And I can see why it's been so dysfunctional. A qb that doesn't believe in the offense and a coach that is unhappy with his qb.

No way that doesn't result in the **** product we've seen.

Failure at all levels. The players, offensive coaches, HC, GM and ownership. They've had a season to reflect and a week to accept reality.

We'll be able to tell quite a bit about the state of things from this game coming up.

If Os was more accurate none of these problems would exist. But he's not, they do and will continue to exist as long as Os is here. There's no way to fix/scheme around an in accurate QB in the NFL. You just try to limit his mistakes which BOB has done well enough to win 9 games and would've won 10 if he tried.

Making the most out of a bad situation is what BOB did this yr. Kudos

And he will probably be gone to an org that winning comes 1st and foremost.
 
Regardless who leaked it. If he's not acting in good faith to be the best teammate he can be.. what's that say to the team?

According to LZ an exec from another team said Ricky McNair leaked it. Take that for what it's worth. I could certainly see that happening. Especially given Ricky's track record with the man who got Ricky his job. (Kubes)
 
Losing O’Brien Would Be Catastrophic For Texans
January 5, 2017 4:30 PM By Marc Ryan

Houston (CBS HOUSTON) – This past Sunday, Fox Sports’ Jay Glazer dropped a bomb when he suggested Texans coach Bill O’Brien could be this year’s surprise firing. When describing Houston’s front office, Glazer called the relationship between owner, general manager, and coach “just not a good fit.”

When the opening question at Monday’s press conference addressed Glazer’s report, rather than the Texans upcoming playoff game, O’Brien said little to refute it: “I mean, I don’t think about that. I just think about this team and concentrating on the Oakland game and how far we’ve come. I don’t know – again, I don’t address those things. I just talk about where we’re at right now. I mean, I don’t even know if that’s even worthy of an answer.”

With the Texans set to host the Oakland Raiders in Saturday’s wild card round, this naturally creates an intriguing storyline around the contest. Most pundits have already deemed this game, featuring benched-and-starting-again Brock Osweiler vs. Oakland third-stringer and rookie Connor Cook as the least compelling matchup of the weekend. But now, the subplots are saucy.

Is Bill O’Brien coaching for his job? Do rumors of a possible divorce point to O’Brien wanting out or to his being forced out? Who’s really calling the shots here? And would moving on from O’Brien be the best thing for this franchise moving forward? I have thoughts on all of the above, but I’d like to address the last of these questions.

Losing Bill O’Brien would be CATASTROPHIC to the Texans. As Glazer opined, should O’Brien become available, he’d easily be the top NFL head coaching candidate on the market. The “why” there isn’t hard to decipher. The Texans are back-to-back division champions with arguably the worst quarterback situation in the league. Of the eight division winners, they are the only team dealing with shaky quarterback play. New England, Pittsburgh, Kansas City, Dallas, Green Bay, Atlanta, and Seattle are all rock solid at the sport’s most important position. Many point to the reputation of the AFC South, incorrectly labeled as the worst division in football. It ranks sixth of eight in combined winning percentage, and AFC South teams had to run the gamut of the AFC West this season, arguably the strongest division.

O’Brien’s lengthy list of accomplishments doesn’t end there. His offense has turned the previously pedestrian CJ Fiedorowicz and Ryan Griffin into playmakers. He’s successfully utilized the added team speed from one offseason to the next, turning a previous team weakness into a strength. He’s worked successfully with defensive coordinator Romeo Crennel, and player development under both has led the Texans to the #1 overall defensive ranking in yards per game this season. Perhaps most impressive, O’Brien won ten straight division games before last week’s otherwise meaningless season ending loss at Tennessee.

The friction between Bill O’Brien and general manager Rick Smith has apparently reached a boiling point. O’Brien’s contract states he and Smith are supposed to reach personnel decisions “in concurrence,” yet, one has to wonder who really pulled the trigger to sign Brock Osweiler. The massive four year, $72 million dollar deal now looks to be a massive albatross for the team. Osweiler’s benching against the Jaguars in Week 15 sheds some light on his true feeling about the Texans signal caller. It may be no small coincidence that reports of O’Brien’s days being numbered have surfaced shortly thereafter. There were also reports last season that O’Brien wanted to release then Texans’ quarterback Ryan Mallet after Mallet missed a team flight to Miami. In that situation, Smith reportedly rejected and ultimately overruled his head coach’s wishes. If true, this is just another example of a strained relationship between the coach and GM.

As someone who’s covered the Texans and has been at O’Brien press conferences, I can add that at times, he comes off a bit curt, abrupt, and irritated. He seems to make decisions emotionally, as displayed by his oft-occurring sideline tirades. It’s not hard to imagine that there are difficult days at the office working with someone whose operating temperature reading can be rather sweat-inducing.

Despite these faults, the notion that O’Brien is coaching for his job against the Raiders in the Texans’ playoff game on Saturday is patently absurd. O’Brien has provided stability and success in the face of dire injury and consistently dismal quarterback situations. With JJ Watt projected to be healthy, the Texans’ over/under win total was set at 8.5 by betting experts. Without Watt, your guess is as good as mine. You’d struggle to name five head coaches who’d be able to deliver back-to-back division titles, and matching playoff appearances in these circumstances.

Yet, when one considers what O’Brien has accomplished in a situation where many teams would have imploded, his value is obvious. Here’s to hoping Texans’ brass wisens up and sees it the same way.
 
Back
Top