maverick512000
Hall of Fame
Hardin's latest defense salvo is speaking about the psychology of potential victims, which is often irrational, emotional, and illogical. It's easy for a bunch of dudes on a football message board to say what and how these women should act, but what do most of us really know about being a victim of sexual assault?
Women will often stay in abusive relationships for years while fronting as happy couples to friends/family/social media. They can internalize their own fears and insecurities and quite often want to avoid being perceived as a victim because it leaves them more vulnerable. Fronting is a method for them to feel like they have some control, even if it's just faking that they are okay.
I have no doubt that Buzbee will easily put doubt in the mind regarding Hardin's claims by simply bringing in psychologists and abuse counselors that are deeply familiar with behavioral patterns of sexually abused women. Go read any literature about the subject. It's clear that whatever thoughts us men on a football forum have on the subject is delusional and most likely said without any informed background or education on the matter.
Folks want to keep bleating "alleged" about these claims against Watson. Perhaps that same "alleged" perspective should be given to any/all accusations about these women, as well.
DB you could drop the mic after that one.
It's easy for people to fall into the trap of thinking they know what kind of person a celebrity is because they feel a connection with them. Maybe they star in your favorite movie or show or is the star of your favorite team but we as fans feel a connection with them and in many ways view them as not actually people. The old joke about celebrities don't use the bathroom, no one can picture the hot supermodel sitting on the john doing a number two and no one can picture the famous movie/sports star doing something truly reprehensive. Its so much easier to believe that the random nobody is just out for money, its why guys like Weinstein, Epston and Cosby got away with things for so long because we want to believe that the carefully crafted public persona is the real person.
Maybe Watson is innocent, maybe he is guilty. Doesn't change the fact that if he wasn't who he was then this wouldn't even be a question and nobody would be defending him.