kiwitexansfan
Hall of Fame
C'mon guys its not that bad. If Hoyer doesn't work out, we can trade Mallet to Cleveland for Johnny Football!
Do you feel safe now there is no negative rep option?

Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
C'mon guys its not that bad. If Hoyer doesn't work out, we can trade Mallet to Cleveland for Johnny Football!
C'mon guys its not that bad. If Hoyer doesn't work out, we can trade Mallet to Cleveland for Johnny Football!
C'mon guys its not that bad. If Hoyer doesn't work out, we can trade Mallet to Cleveland for Johnny Football!
Again, I don't see any direction. If you're in win now, why wasn't sorry as schaub given a chance to compete vs fitz last year. If OB thinks he can fix Hoyer, why didn't he try to fix schaub?
Is this a bad time to bring up Keenum?
Now I am convinced it was a test and he failed. Hopefully this Sunday and Mallett just says 'We did it your way. now Im unleashing the dragon!"
No, he must release the Kraken!
![]()
I can't believe how people can watch that game and say that Mallett is the solution.
No, he must release the Kraken!
![]()
Mallett to Blame for Hoyer Starting, No One Else
HOUSTON (CBS HOUSTON) – There is one person to blame if you don’t like the Texans decision to start Brian Hoyer at quarterback against the Chiefs in a few weeks.
Ryan Mallett.
The fan favorite in the quarterback competition has been relegated to the backup spot on the depth chart much to the chagrin of fans of the Texans. Brian Hoyer will start under center and, should he play well, stay there.
It’s certainly not Bill O’Brien’s fault. He simply let the two battle it out from OTAs to the first few weeks of training camp and then picked a quarterback at the conclusion. Make no mistake, one guy didn’t blow the other one away. O’Brien himself commented at how tough it was to choose, likely because he was just trying to pick the lesser of two mediocre situations.
Brian Hoyer is QB1. That’s not because Brian Hoyer won the competition.
It’s because Ryan Mallett lost it.
Look, I’m a Ryan Mallett guy.
I like him. I thoroughly enjoyed his work in college for the Razorbacks. I was disappointed when on draft night 2014 the Texans didn’t somehow end up with the 6’6″ gunslinger. I knew there was a glimmer of hope when he arrived via trade towards the end of training camp last year. I felt the despair when an injury cut short his season.
He went out there and flat out blew it.
Momentum was on Mallett’s side. The team kept him. His teammates know him. They didn’t bring in a star to compete with him, they brought in a journeyman quarterback who was playing for his fifth team since he was undrafted in 2009.
He wasn’t good enough.
I wasn’t at every Texans training camp, but I was at most. I didn’t see every quarterback throw from Hoyer and Mallett, but I saw a lot. Hoyer was better. He wasn’t blow you away good, but he wasn’t bad either. Mallett had great days, sure. He also had horrible days where he looked like it wasn’t even close between he and his competition.
Mallett’s ceiling very well might be higher, but that doesn’t mean much right now. Potential doesn’t mean anything if you can’t tap into it.
When it mattered, Mallett did cut it. Don’t believe me? Ask the decision-maker.
“I don’t put a whole lot of stock in the games,” O’Brien said Monday after the starter announcement. “I put more stock in what’s been going on in practice and things like that.”
Practice was where the competition was decided, and if you watched enough you would know who to pick too.
Tuesday Ryan Mallett faced the media and said a lot of the right things. He was disappointed, hurt, and mad. He didn’t agree with the decision. And he shouldn’t by the way.
He did say one thing that irked me, though.
“I thought I had a pretty good camp. I thought I was consistent. My completion percentage every day, didn’t turn the ball over a lot, had three incompletions so far in the preseason so I thought I was playing alright.”
Alright doesn’t win you the job and the preseason games matter little to none. If you have to think you were consistent, you weren’t.
The Texans are trying to win football games now. Right now, as in week one against the Chiefs at NRG stadium, they have a better chance to win with Hoyer. That’s why he is the quarterback and that’s why Mallett isn’t.
Blame Ryan Mallett for Brian Hoyer starting, not anyone else.
Cody is certainly entitled to his opinion, but the writing was on wall for everyone to see. Higher salary and more games started under his belt.Mallett to Blame for Hoyer Starting, No One Else
HOUSTON (CBS HOUSTON) – There is one person to blame if you don’t like the Texans decision to start Brian Hoyer at quarterback against the Chiefs in a few weeks.
Ryan Mallett.
The fan favorite in the quarterback competition has been relegated to the backup spot on the depth chart much to the chagrin of fans of the Texans. Brian Hoyer will start under center and, should he play well, stay there.
It’s certainly not Bill O’Brien’s fault. He simply let the two battle it out from OTAs to the first few weeks of training camp and then picked a quarterback at the conclusion. Make no mistake, one guy didn’t blow the other one away. O’Brien himself commented at how tough it was to choose, likely because he was just trying to pick the lesser of two mediocre situations..
"I don’t put a whole lot of stock in the games." “I put more stock in what’s been going on in practice and things like that.”
Cody's opinion on who "looked better" during TC isn't shared by many...
I love O'Brien's comment:
Funny, I thought games were the important part.
It was the consensus opinion of media members who actually witnessed a majority of the practices. They were saying it would be Hoyer.
I hate that everyone is beating around the bush on this. They may as well tell specially if HK caught itPDS @PatDStat 6m6 minutes ago
It's going to be interesting to see how the team deals with a disgruntled quarterback moving towards week one.
![]()
It was the consensus opinion of media members who actually witnessed a majority of the practices. They were saying it would be Hoyer.
It was the consensus opinion of media members who actually witnessed a majority of the practices. They were saying it would be Hoyer.
Funny, I thought games were the important part.
It's preseason. It's not even a real game. It's a scrimmage. What's more important...10 snaps a game running vanilla offense against vanilla defense or 10,000 snaps over the course of an entire offseason?
Everyone knows the battles are won at practice.
Games really don't mean much...![]()
The consensus was that it would be Hoyer. I heard dead-even more than once (including OB) on performance.It was the consensus opinion of media members who actually witnessed a majority of the practices. They were saying it would be Hoyer.
It's preseason. It's not even a real game. It's a scrimmage. What's more important...10 snaps a game running vanilla offense against vanilla defense or 10,000 snaps over the course of an entire offseason?
It's preseason. It's not even a real game. It's a scrimmage. What's more important...10 snaps a game running vanilla offense against vanilla defense or 10,000 snaps over the course of an entire offseason?
OK - turn it around.
What's more important...2000 snaps in 7-on-7 or 11-on-11 vs. your own teammates in a scripted practice or 50-100 snaps against guys not on your team trying to make names for themselves and/or trying to make a roster in a real game environment?
And if folks go back and watch HK OB actually announced to the staff that Hoyer would be the starter after game one. He then said "we'll let this thing play out for another week and then tell them".
O'Brien did not say Hoyer would be the starter to the staff. I will watch and listen again. But my recollection is he never said Hoyer's name because he said after the game it was still even. He did say "we'll let this thing play out for another week and then tell them" but he never said Hoyer was going to be the starter.
Its very hard to take someone's spot during practice. Very hard. You have to be spectacular and the other guy has to struggle and still even then often times coaches default to the vet.
Basically I tell that story just to reiterate, it is hard to move up the depth chart based on practice. Even if the coach "moves you up". Coaches like vets with notches under their belt and I'd imagine in the NFL that is magnified times 1000.
Just based on the way football practices are generally run it is tough to take a guys spot based on practice. It normally takes a guy actually getting in the game to be moved up. Either the starter sucks terribly or is injured almost every time.
Competitions get sorted out in practice.
I've actually not seen a true competition get sorted out in practice. Live action against other teams is usually the difference in a true competition from what I've seen. Jmo.
For practice to be the deciding factor there usually has to be a clear gap between the players.
Preseason is not a real game. It's a scrimmage.
I've said from the beginning that Hoyer was no better than Mallett and that he got the job because he has more experience. It was Mallett's job to look better in practice and win the job because he is the younger, less experienced guy.
It's just funny to me that the same guys that are pissed about Hoyer getting handed the job are the same guys that had no issue whatsoever just handing the job to Mallett.
I should have said pecking order. And yes, like you and I both stated, live games is where that stuff evaluated. Preseason is not a real game. It's a scrimmage.
OK then, if he's basing his decision on practice, what is a scrimmage but another form of practice?
Which is why I said from the beginning that 2000 reps in practice has way more merit than 20 reps in a scrimmage.
Yeah but they were basing that off of the higher salary. Do you believe that Hoyer suddenly got better in the practices that were not public? I don't. I believe if you look at the signing from day 1 it said he was going to be the man. I said the same thing last year and most of you guys said Fitz would never start, that he was just the vet backup. There was no competition then either. This whole "competition" nonsense has been for HBO, nothing more IMO.
Which is why I said from the beginning that 2000 reps in practice has way more merit than 20 reps in a scrimmage.
It was more of a competition than you guys want to admit. I could understand you guys' point of view if OB declared an open competition and then turned around and didn't let Mallet get 1st team reps in practice ever..didn't let him start 1 of our preseason games with the 1's & didn't give him opportunities to throw the ball in the games. But he did.
I personally am content with Hoyer though I'd have preferred mallett myself. But whatever...I'm looking at OB now. He's either made the right choice, the wrong choice, both guys suck or both are ok. Either way it's his doing.
O'Brien did not say Hoyer would be the starter to the staff. I will watch and listen again. But my recollection is he never said Hoyer's name because he said after the game it was still even. He did say "we'll let this thing play out for another week and then tell them" but he never said Hoyer was going to be the starter.