beerlover
Hall of Fame
check this out fresh off the press- http://www.ourlads.com/2005MockDraft.html
they have the Texans selecting Demarcus Ware @ #13
they have the Texans selecting Demarcus Ware @ #13

Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
Add Barron to that list, and 19 picks come and go before anyone selects Spears, Pac-Man, or Barron. That would seem to be an unlikely scenario, buttexasguy346 said:That would be a little surprising to say the least. It has us passing on Marcus Spears, PacMan Jones, and Thomas Davis.
beerlover said:also documented in the notes is this little tidbit-
Houston was disappointed to lose out on trading for Orlando Pace. The left tackle position was a problem last season, but that doesnt automatically mean theyll select Alex Barron with the 13th pick. There are a lot of mixed opinions regarding Barron and the Texans are reluctant to start over with a rookie at left tackle. There is a good chance that Houston will add more speed on defense.
sounds resonable to me how about you?
AJ has more than 18 tackles. And he never plays defense. Wow - that guyhound said:So far in two years Kennedy has 18 tackles and no sacks...
and AJ... well he's done a little better than that.
beerlover said:the latest version of OURLADS Mock Draft-
http://www.ourlads.com/2005MockDraft.html
BringItOn said:Something highly conspicuous about this mock jumped out at me. I find it highly unlikely that only 1 QB will be taken in the first round even if it's a weak draft for QB's.
I don't have access to a radio right now. Anything of significance?beerlover said:Ourlads is on sports radio 610 3/29 9:10 am. check it out if possible![]()
nunusguy said:Anybody know if Kiper has
come out lately with an updated mock, lot of people think he's privy
to the insider info.
wags said:In his latest mock he has us picking Thomas Davis. So that probably means there is no chance we take him.
royce1054 said:If we go Davis he would have to bulk up to play OLB
D-ReK said:Davis would play ILB here, and his size/bulk is just fine...He's the same size as Greenwood if I remember correctly...
Yup, there was a guy that made a pretty successful conversion fromroyce1054 said:You think he will be a Brian Urlacher huh?
nunusguy said:Yup, there was a guy that made a pretty successful conversion from
Safety to LB. They ought to do the same thing with several other safeties currently in the NFL, like the Arlington Cowboys R. Williams. He can sure tackle and has LB size, but is poor in pass coverage with mediorce speed. Duh ! But that's another story.
GoBlue said:Why would we take a WR with the #13 pick overall to be a #2 receiver? He many balls do you think he might catch next year, 20? How many TD's, 4? An impact defensive player could stop more TDs than Williamson could score, if he lives up to all his hype, based on his track ability (not his football ability). I'm sorry I just don't see his upside like some of you do. He played in a conference that was so-so last year and never dominated anything. All the other guys we talk about taking at #13 at least showed flashes of impact plays that can change the momentum in a game- a big sack, forced fumble, interception, critical stop on 3rd down etc. Speaking of which, do you think the Texans need to get better at converting 3rd downs on offense or stopping 3rd down conversions for the other team on defense. IMO I think we need alot more help with the latter.
royce1054 said:I really done like Mel Kiper.
Many people have Edwards rated as the top WR prospect in this draft. He is not alone. Rick Gosselin is always right on top of the draft and he stated that the WR's were ranked Edwards, Clayton, Williamson and THEN Mike Williams on many teams draft boards. He said that Derrick Johnson and Mike Williams are fan favorites more than scout favorites.outofhnd said:Also Braylon will be picked before Mike Williams? Not Happening