Texansphan
Football connoisseur
Bradbury is definitely rising, but I have seen mocks that have McCoy ranked higher - another to watch if you're going for a C.This mock I think Bradbury is the first Center taken at 16
Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
Bradbury is definitely rising, but I have seen mocks that have McCoy ranked higher - another to watch if you're going for a C.This mock I think Bradbury is the first Center taken at 16
Bradbury is definitely rising, but I have seen mocks that have McCoy ranked higher - another to watch if you're going for a C.
Don't tell Texans he is versatile - they'll draft him fer sure.But McCoy is generally considered a guard, not a pure center
Don't tell Texans he is versatile - they'll draft him fer sure.
All jokes aside, a significant portion of the olinemen in this one are experienced along the line. Risner being a prime example.
The Browns haven't replaced Joe Thomas and currently have last year's UDFA Desmond Harrison atop the depth chart at LT. They may get a LT in FA. So may the Texans. Just right now, it's the glaring hole. And they have a young franchise QB to protect, as well. What I'm saying is, it will be tough trading up that high, because there are teams with similar needs.Ok, so do you trade up to 14 with the Falcons and don't get the 4th back. But in this particular Feb. pre-combine mock, the Browns are looking CB
The Browns haven't replaced Joe Thomas and currently have last year's UDFA atop the depth chart at LT. They may get a LT in FA. So may the Texans. Just right now, it's the glaring hole. And they have a young franchise QB to protect, as well. What I'm saying is, it will be tough trading up that high, because there are teams with similar needs.
Just read that mock. Some really weird things going on there. I would just make the pick at #23. Pretty sure I would go with Little or Jawaan Taylor, though.Yes, I don't expect any team to allow the Texans to trade up since all know their GLARING needs, but I was talking this particular mock
Just read that mock. Some really weird things going on there. I would just make the pick at #23. Pretty sure I would go with Little or Jawaan Taylor, though.
.But is Dillard that much better with Risner, Taylor, Little and Cajuste still on the board?
.
I like Dillard more, but they're close. Dillard just moves so we'll we' his size. Risner has the toughness that the Texans OL is currently missing. Since Dillard plays LT, he's my guy. He can play RT too and if Brown was to get hurt you could slip Dillard into LT and not miss a beat.
I agree, but would love Risner at RT or RG because of hi mean streak and run blocking ability. Both would be ideal.
And not require a trade up. That's a likely starter to move up.
The question really should be do you trade up to get the best LT who can also play RT, or do you sit there and draft Risner (Who CnD has questions about his shoulders.) at 23.
My question is if the sign Trent Brown in FA and draft a CB at 23, (Say Greedy falls) and Risner falls to the top of the 2nd rd due to those shoulder issues, do y'all trade up and get him? Same scenario goes for Cajuste.
If they dont sign Brown in FA, I'm definitely doing what it takes to move up and get Dillard.
The question really should be do you trade up to get the best LT who can also play RT, or do you sit there and draft Risner (Who CnD has questions about his shoulders.) at 23.
My question is if the sign Trent Brown in FA and draft a CB at 23, (Say Greedy falls) and Risner falls to the top of the 2nd rd due to those shoulder issues, do y'all trade up and get him? Same scenario goes for Cajuste.
If they dont sign Brown in FA, I'm definitely doing what it takes to move up and get Dillard.
You're trade up fascinated this offseason.
There are other options like Little & Taylor. It's not just Dillard or Risner. I might take Risner entirely off the board due injury risk.
Duane Brown was the 7th T taken in 2008 and ended up with the best career. Coincidentally we had the same pick that year and actually traded down for him.
I wouldn't give up a starter who might very well help out Watson more than a marginal gain at T to claim we got him "the best."
Brown will be a big disappointment if signed IMO.
Neither Greedy or Risner will fall that far, but if both do who do you take? I say Greedy
Agree. It will put us in a nervous spot to get a top tier T, but if you really want Taylor, you may have to trade up to get him. I think he falls into the second. If not, its a nerve racking wait for Little or Cajuste. I am pretty sure Williams, Ford, Dillard and Risner will go in the 1st, in that order.Neither Greedy or Risner will fall that far, but if both do who do you take? I say Greedy
What do you make of David Edwards - for mine he is in the next tier down.I like McGary at RT as much as I do Risner.
Give me an ace LT and a king RT and I'm fine.
What do you make of David Edwards - for mine he is in the next tier down.I like McGary at RT as much as I do Risner.
Give me an ace LT and a king RT and I'm fine.
What do you make of David Edwards - for mine he is in the next tier down.
You're right about Edwards .... the farther he got into the season the worse he looked .... I was really pulling for him. Ya'll are making too much sense with your prospects. If O'Brien thought he could pull it off, he'd have Jawaan Taylor and Cody Ford on the right side .... grinding and grinding .... field-goaling them to death !! How avant-garde - cutting edge of him ! I shouldn't be so negative .... we did finish 11 and 5 .... what a fluke. I would never be considered a purist .... their perfect game would end 3 - 2. I like to see my team 45 or 50 points per game. That's irrelevant. What do we do if Dillard is not there ?
What do we do if Dillard is not there ?
JMO, if the Texans are as impressed as I've been watching video on this guy then you don't take the chance of losing him, trade up and go get him. I'm not sure how far our 3rd round pick would move us up, but I'd do what it takes to solidify this position.
JMO, if the Texans are as impressed as I've been watching video on this guy then you don't take the chance of losing him, trade up and go get him. I'm not sure how far our 3rd round pick would move us up, but I'd do what it takes to solidify this position.
Right and the Texans second round pick gets you up to 'bout maybe the 15th or 14th pick in the first round. It's expensive to move up and I dunno if a young, second year18th tops.
Right and the Texans second round pick gets you up to 'bout maybe the 15th or 14th pick in the first round. It's expensive to move up and I dunno if a young, second year
GM like Gain would have the juice or the nutz to make that kinda move in just his second Draft 'cause that's a lot of house money he'd be playing with ?
It be on CBSsports/Will Brinson...
link
If his draft holds true and Dillard falls 10 18, would you trade up to 17 with the Browns again? What would it cost? One of our seconds and get back a 4th?
I hope he has the wisdom to not. That is giving up a starter, potentially a very high quality starter, for incremental improvement at one spot.
I understand this line of thinking.
But it wouldn't be an incremental improvement. If Gaine did what I wanted he would sign the best FA LT and draft the best OT, this would solve the OT problems that have plagued this team since Winston/DB left Kirby. Then you have your 2nd/3rd rd picks and FA to fix the CB/WR etc... issues.
It is incremental at the one OT spot you are moving up for.
You can do everything else you said plus have another likely starter.
You wont be able to add the best OT in the draft. IMHO
Give me 1 great player
Instead of 2 lesser players.
Problem is that you can never be sure that you're getting a great NFL player in the first year. Especially OL. They all take time to develop and the OL as a unit has to play together for awhile to achieve their best.
You wont be able to add the best OT in the draft. IMHO
Give me 1 great player
Instead of 2 lesser players.
You're assuming here that the difference between the best and second or third best is necessarily significant. Hell, most publications/analysts can't come to a remote consensus past Jonah Williams, and we're nowhere near close enough to move for him.
If the difference can't be measured more than splitting hairs I'd just as soon get one and still have resources to get someone else. And I don't think the differences between Dillard, Little, Ford, Cajuste, Taylor, and Risner will really be accurately measured for a few years.
I'm confident in my evals of Dillard.
I want who I consider the best OL in this class. Although I do like Williams. I also want a RT that can play LT in case of injury and you have to pay for these guys.
The one of the other things I like about Dillard is that he has no injury history that I'm aware of. Who do you like as much as Dillard/Williams?
Taylor is who I'm reading
Okay... everyone has an opinion. I haven't seen enough film to know, but I am an avid readerI dont like Taylor at all. He's a guy that got by in college because he was bigger and stronger than most guys he went up against. He plays much too high and frankly seems dumb.
2nd rd pick for me.
Okay... everyone has an opinion. I haven't seen enough film to know, but I am an avid reader
I dunno I'm still not sure how to feel about it ? Securing a franchise LT is so important but you are right because it's a high enough risk gamble without investing multiple picks.I hope he has the wisdom to not. That is giving up a starter, potentially a very high quality starter, for incremental improvement at one spot.
Yes Dillard clearly seems to be the best pass-protector in the Draft this year but most folks do have reservation about his run- blocking abilities ?I'm confident in my evals of Dillard.
I want who I consider the best OL in this class. Although I do like Williams. I also want a RT that can play LT in case of injury and you have to pay for these guys.
The one of the other things I like about Dillard is that he has no injury history that I'm aware of. Who do you like as much as Dillard/Williams?
I dunno I'm still not sure how to feel about it ? Securing a franchise LT is so important but you are right because it's a high enough risk gamble without investing multiple picks.
What tape of ford didn’t you like?Have seen a little tape on Scharping, Cajuste and Ford...I'm not impressed with Scharping nor Ford. Both look quite slow foot wise to be playing in the NFL.
Cajuste is the only guy who looks like he can handle those speed edge rushers much better. nice quick feet & he works from a strong base. The thing with him that might be an issue is his arms look kinda short....to me anyway.
Having said that, i don't look at these guys all that often...so take that for what its worth.
Yes Dillard clearly seems to be the best pass-protector in the Draft this year but most folks do have reservation about his run- blocking abilities ?
But who's the best all around OT ?
They've been pussyfooting around with the OT positions for yrs. It's time to protect Watson. If Gaine signs Brown and trades for Dillard (Who can start out at RT) the OL will look like we all want it to look. The cost of securing the OT positions is a 2nd rd pick and they've got and extra 2nd.
The philosophy Cak has and I'm not saying he's wrong, is the one that's gotten the OL talent where it's sitting today. If they do what Cak wants, they better be right or it's going to set this franchise back a bit.
Spending a 1st & a 2nd on 2 OTs is neither pussyfooting nor what they have been doing to get here.
Spending a 1st & a 2nd on 2 OTs is neither pussyfooting nor what they have been doing to get here.
Spending a 1st & a 2nd on 2 OTs is neither pussyfooting nor what they have been doing to get here.
The Browns are looking at LT, too. Better get ahead of them. I can also think of 10 teams selecting ahead of the Texans that would consider taking an OT. Not going to be easy finding a trading partner.