New Quick top 10 mock

[Errant Hothy]

anyone watching cal vs. washington? marshawn lynch has two bad ankles and he's destroying everyone. silky smooth runner. best back in the nation.

He was flat out the most impressive player on the feild yesterday. The first play over OT should prove to everybody why he i sbetter then Peterson...He has a knack ofr stepping out of tackles, which is much easier on the body then trying to run everybody over.

 

[kastofsna]

He was flat out the most impressive player on the feild yesterday. The first play over OT should prove to everybody why he i sbetter then Peterson...He has a knack ofr stepping out of tackles, which is much easier on the body then trying to run everybody over.

peterson can't make the moves lynch can. not at all.

 

[kastofsna]

quick update:

1: Miami - Brady Quinn, QB, Notre Dame.
2: Oakland - Calvin Johnson, WR, Georgia Tech.
3: Arizona - Joe Thomas, T, Wisconsin.
4: Detroit - Brian Brohm, QB, Louisville.
5: Cleveland - Adrian Peterson, RB, Oklahoma.
6: Tennessee - Daymeion Hughes, CB, Cal.
7: San Francisco - LaRon Landry, S, LSU.
8: Houston - Marshawn Lynch, RB, Cal.
9: Green Bay - Gaines Adams, DE, Clemson.
10: Buffalo - Jared Gaither, T, Maryland.

 

[real]

I doubt we take Lynch...

 

[AustinJB]

I doubt we take Lynch...

Yeah, the only way we take Lynch is if he drops to the 2nd or 3rd round. IMO, the ONLY RB that Kubiak would consider taking in the 1st round would be AP.

Mark my words...If we don't take AP, we will NOT draft a RB in the 1st round...period. It's that simple.

 

[kastofsna]

lynch is a MUCH better fit for the offense than peterson. and...he's a better player overall anyway.

 

[real]

I don't want either one...I hope we go Defense in the first...

 

[Porky]

lynch is a MUCH better fit for the offense than peterson. and...he's a better player overall anyway.

I agree on both counts. Lynch is a poor mans LT, and that might not be giving him enough credit. I have seen more of AP, but enough of Lynch to form a very positive impression. He is a better receiver than AP, and has more moves and open field speed than AP. AP is more of a bruiser. He isn't slow by any means, but he would rather run over you than around you for the most part. He's a darn good RB in his own right, but between the two I would take Lynch. I think he will have a more productive, longer career, and fits Houston's scheme better. I am on the bandwagon.

 

[infantrycak]

Mark my words...If we don't take AP, we will NOT draft a RB in the 1st round...period. It's that simple.

Yeah since the only RB we would have considered taking in this past draft was Reggie Bush--oops well either him or DeAngelo Williams who they tried to trade to get.

 

[Errant Hothy]

Yeah, the only way we take Lynch is if he drops to the 2nd or 3rd round. IMO, the ONLY RB that Kubiak would consider taking in the 1st round would be AP.

Mark my words...If we don't take AP, we will NOT draft a RB in the 1st round...period. It's that simple.

I would have agreed with this before last years draft, when we tried despreatly to trade back into the first to pick up DeAngelo Williams.

Kubes might not be as opposed to RBs in the 1st now that he isn't in Denver, and I still don't think anybody on our roster is capable of being an everydown, 16 game back.

And Lynch is better then D. Williams, too.

 

[bah007]

Mel Kiper didnt even have Lynch or Peterson on the last board that I saw. He had Kenny Irons and Michael Bush though. Does he only rank seniors?

 

[kastofsna]

yes. he won't rank juniors until they declare.

 

[bah007]

My early opinion:

1. Oakland- Calvin Johnson-WR, Georgia Tech
2. Detroit- Brian Brohm-QB, Lousiville (maybe a reach at #2, but I like him better than Quinn)
3. Miami- Brady Quinn-QB, Notre Dame (they could use one of the safeties, but I couldnt see Quinn falling all the way to Green Bay)
4. Arizona- Joe Thomas-OT, Wisconsin
5. Cleveland- Adrian Peterson-HB, Oklahoma
6. Tennessee- Daymeion Hughes-CB, California
7. San Francisco- LaRon Landry-S, LSU
8. Buffalo- Jared Gaither-OT, Maryland
9. Houston- Michael Griffin-S, Texas (maybe a little early for him, but he could be the next Roy Williams,but a liability in pass coverage)
10. Green Bay- Marshawn Lynch-HB, California

I also like Gaines Adams-DE, Clemson:
but I couldnt find out where he would go in that draft order

 

[Porky]

My early opinion:

1. Oakland- Calvin Johnson-WR, Georgia Tech
2. Detroit- Brian Brohm-QB, Lousiville (maybe a reach at #2, but I like him better than Quinn)
3. Miami- Brady Quinn-QB, Notre Dame (they could use one of the safeties, but I couldnt see Quinn falling all the way to Green Bay)
4. Arizona- Joe Thomas-OT, Wisconsin
5. Cleveland- Adrian Peterson-HB, Oklahoma
6. Tennessee- Daymeion Hughes-CB, California
7. San Francisco- LaRon Landry-S, LSU
8. Buffalo- Jared Gaither-OT, Maryland
9. Houston- Michael Griffin-S, Texas (maybe a little early for him, but he could be the next Roy Williams,but a liability in pass coverage)
10. Green Bay- Marshawn Lynch-HB, California

I also like Gaines Adams-DE, Clemson:
but I couldnt find out where he would go in that draft order

We are going to take a safety with coverage issues over an impact RB? God, I hope you aren't in charge of the Texans draft.

 

[TFL]

My early opinion:

1. Oakland- Calvin Johnson-WR, Georgia Tech
2. Detroit- Brian Brohm-QB, Lousiville (maybe a reach at #2, but I like him better than Quinn)
3. Miami- Brady Quinn-QB, Notre Dame (they could use one of the safeties, but I couldnt see Quinn falling all the way to Green Bay)
4. Arizona- Joe Thomas-OT, Wisconsin
5. Cleveland- Adrian Peterson-HB, Oklahoma
6. Tennessee- Daymeion Hughes-CB, California
7. San Francisco- LaRon Landry-S, LSU
8. Buffalo- Jared Gaither-OT, Maryland
9. Houston- Michael Griffin-S, Texas (maybe a little early for him, but he could be the next Roy Williams,but a liability in pass coverage)
10. Green Bay- Marshawn Lynch-HB, California

I also like Gaines Adams-DE, Clemson:
but I couldnt find out where he would go in that draft order

Quinn would not go to Green Bay if he fall to them becuase they got A. Rodgers

 

[bah007]

We are going to take a safety with coverage issues over an impact RB? God, I hope you aren't in charge of the Texans draft.

Potential coverage issues. If we find another good corner to complement Robinson then it shouldnt be a problem. Is Roy Williams a bad safety because he is a beast against the run but gets sucked in on play action?

 

[bah007]

Quinn would not go to Green Bay if he fall to them becuase they got A. Rodgers

they only took Rodgers cuz they felt sorry for him. He is #3 on that depth chart already

 

[bah007]

We are going to take a safety with coverage issues over an impact RB? God, I hope you aren't in charge of the Texans draft.

keep in mind that a mock draft is not a list of who you think should get drafted but a list of who you think will get drafted.

I think the Texans should get Peterson or Lynch.

I dont think they will.

 

[real]

I think the Texans should get Peterson or Lynch.

No...they shouldn't....

If they end up in that spot I'd like to see them trade down to maybe 11 or 12 and pick up Griffin...I like Griffin and would like to see him in a Texans uni...

 

[real]

they only took Rodgers cuz they felt sorry for him. He is #3 on that depth chart already

That whole statement is Bolgna...

 

[bah007]

No...they shouldn't....

If they end up in that spot I'd like to see them trade down to maybe 11 or 12 and pick up Griffin...I like Griffin and would like to see him in a Texans uni...

I also like Griffin a lot but like I put in the draft, that spot would be too high for him

 

[Porky]

No...they shouldn't....

If they end up in that spot I'd like to see them trade down to maybe 11 or 12 and pick up Griffin...I like Griffin and would like to see him in a Texans uni...

So a safety will have a greater impact on the w/l column than an impact dual threat RB? In general, I am not a fan of taking a safety in Rd 1. Only when you have a rare game changing safety would I even consider it. Good safety's can be had as low as rd 4 and 5. We have far too many needs to use a #1 in that way. Griffin is not that kind of game changer. Lynch is.

 

[real]

So a safety will have a greater impact on the w/l column than an impact dual threat RB?

I didn't say that...but im not denying it either...

I think a ball hawking SS will help us more at this point than a RB....

I think we can pick up a suitable RB in rds. 2-4...

 

[bah007]

That whole statement is Bolgna...

either you really like bologna or you should tell me your opinion on Rodgers

 

[real]

either you really like bologna or you should tell me your opinion on Rodgers

lol....

I don't have an opinion on him...But i seriously doubt they took him because "they felt sorry for him"...

 

[bah007]

lol....

I don't have an opinion on him...But i seriously doubt they took him because "they felt sorry for him"...

I just dont have a high opinion of Rodgers. He didnt impress me in college and he still hasnt even become Favre's back-up

 

[real]

I just dont have a high opinion of Rodgers. He didnt impress me in college and he still hasnt even become Favre's back-up

First TeamSecond TeamThird Team

QB4Brett Favre12Aaron Rodgers7Ingle Martin*



http://www.packers.com/team/depth_chart/
http://www.packers.com/team/depth_chart/

 

[bah007]

First TeamSecond TeamThird Team

QB4Brett Favre12Aaron Rodgers7Ingle Martin*



http://www.packers.com/team/depth_chart/
http://www.packers.com/team/depth_chart/

Well I dont have a link but everything I had heard was that Martin looked better than Rodgers already.

 

[nunusguy]

I think a ball hawking SS will help us more at this point than a RB....

And I think a top LT would help us more than either a SS or RB.
We may already have that guy, but by the April-2007 college Draft the
coachs may have determined that Spencers propects for a full recovery
aren't looking to encouraging ?

 

[real]

Well I dont have a link but everything I had heard was that Martin looked better than Rodgers already.

Maybe....he was pretty good at florida before he got that raw deal when Leak came in...

 

[real]

And I think a top LT would help us more than either a SS or RB.
We may already have that guy, but by the April-2007 college Draft the
coachs may have determined that Spencers propects for a full recovery
aren't looking to encouraging ?

I agree with that too...I just don't want any of those RB's in the first unless we trade up into the latter half to get Irons or whoever is there...I just don't want to draft one with our first pick...

 

[TexansSeminole]

I agree with that too...I just don't want any of those RB's in the first unless we trade up into the latter half to get Irons or whoever is there...I just don't want to draft one with our first pick...

I don't think we NEED to have one of those running backs in the first round. We need a lineman more and need a safety more.

 

[bah007]

I don't think we NEED to have one of those running backs in the first round. We need a lineman more and need a safety more.

My mock has us choosing a safety

 

[run-david-run]

I didn't say that...but im not denying it either...

I think a ball hawking SS will help us more at this point than a RB....

I think we can pick up a suitable RB in rds. 2-4...

Griffin is a hitter, not a ball hawk. We already have 3 SS's, we need a feature back or a DB who excels in coverage, saftey or corner.

 

[real]

Griffin is a hitter, not a ball hawk. We already have 3 SS's, we need a feature back or a DB who excels in coverage, saftey or corner.

I think we can find a good back in rds. 2-4

I'd rather get a stud defensive player or OL...

 

[TexansSeminole]

Griffin is a hitter, not a ball hawk. We already have 3 SS's, we need a feature back or a DB who excels in coverage, saftey or corner.

He may not be a "bawl hawk" but he knows how to make an interception, and seems to know how to get himself in position to break up passes (or intercept them).

Michael Griffin (and Michael Huff) statistics:

In 2004 Griffin played in all 12 games and had 1 INT 3 break ups and 2 quarterback hits. (Griffin also had 49 total tackles) With 1 forced fumble along with 1 fumble recovery. Griffin also had 2 blocked kicks and 1 sack for 11 yards lost. (Huff had 2 INTs with 14 break ups and 1 quarterback hit in 12 games played. Huff also had 73 total tackles with 1 forced fumble and no recoveries and no sacks.)

In 2005 Griffin played in all 12 games plus 1 more game(NCG) and had 3 INTs (1 in the NCG) 8 break ups and 5 quarterback hits. (Griffin had 124 total tackles) With 1 forced fumble and 3 fumble recoveries. Griffin also had 4 blocked kicks and 0 sacks. (Huff had 1 INT with 14 break ups and 3 quarterback hits. Huff also had 4 forced fumbles and 2 recoveries with 109 total tackles. Huff also had 2 sacks for 18 yards lost.)

In 2006(so far) Griffin has played in 8 games. He has 70 tackles and no sacks. He has forced 2 fumbles and also recovered 2 fumbles. This year he has also had 2 interceptions and 4 break ups with no quarterback hits. He also also managed to block 1 kick this year.

These are some statistics from Michael Griffin's career, and I have put them next to Michael Huff's statistics as well. Michael Huff went to the Raiders at #7 overall. They both played for University of Texas.

Just to fill in these extra games that haven't been played yet, Griffin would end the year on these stats (by average). In 12 games:

Total tackles: 105
Interceptions: 3
Forced Fumbles: 3
Fumble Recoveries: 3
Passes broken up: 6

This is just by calculating what he is on track for.

I wouldn't say he isn't a ball hawk but a hitter. I'd say he was more of a balanced FS. He tackles well...he covers well...he can put the lick on receivers or go over the top of them and intercept passes. He may or may not be a gamebreaker at the safety position like Ed Reed, Sean Taylor, Roy Williams, Adrian Wilson, and Mike Brown. He is obviously not a lock as that type of gamebreaker (as Michael Huff seemed to be) but he has the ability to be a good safety in the NFL.

 

[run-david-run]

He may not be a "bawl hawk" but he knows how to make an interception, and seems to know how to get himself in position to break up passes (or intercept them).

Michael Griffin (and Michael Huff) statistics:

In 2004 Griffin played in all 12 games and had 1 INT 3 break ups and 2 quarterback hits. (Griffin also had 49 total tackles) With 1 forced fumble along with 1 fumble recovery. Griffin also had 2 blocked kicks and 1 sack for 11 yards lost. (Huff had 2 INTs with 14 break ups and 1 quarterback hit in 12 games played. Huff also had 73 total tackles with 1 forced fumble and no recoveries and no sacks.)

In 2005 Griffin played in all 12 games plus 1 more game(NCG) and had 3 INTs (1 in the NCG) 8 break ups and 5 quarterback hits. (Griffin had 124 total tackles) With 1 forced fumble and 3 fumble recoveries. Griffin also had 4 blocked kicks and 0 sacks. (Huff had 1 INT with 14 break ups and 3 quarterback hits. Huff also had 4 forced fumbles and 2 recoveries with 109 total tackles. Huff also had 2 sacks for 18 yards lost.)

In 2006(so far) Griffin has played in 8 games. He has 70 tackles and no sacks. He has forced 2 fumbles and also recovered 2 fumbles. This year he has also had 2 interceptions and 4 break ups with no quarterback hits. He also also managed to block 1 kick this year.

These are some statistics from Michael Griffin's career, and I have put them next to Michael Huff's statistics as well. Michael Huff went to the Raiders at #7 overall. They both played for University of Texas.

Just to fill in these extra games that haven't been played yet, Griffin would end the year on these stats (by average). In 12 games:

Total tackles: 105
Interceptions: 3
Forced Fumbles: 3
Fumble Recoveries: 3
Passes broken up: 6

This is just by calculating what he is on track for.

I wouldn't say he isn't a ball hawk but a hitter. I'd say he was more of a balanced FS. He tackles well...he covers well...he can put the lick on receivers or go over the top of them and intercept passes. He may or may not be a gamebreaker at the safety position like Ed Reed, Sean Taylor, Roy Williams, Adrian Wilson, and Mike Brown. He is obviously not a lock as that type of gamebreaker (as Michael Huff seemed to be) but he has the ability to be a good safety in the NFL.

I go to UT and have seen every game the last two years. I know what Michael Griffin can do and I would love to have him on the Texans, but he is a SS which means we either play someone out of position or get another player to play FS, which we still dont have on the Texans. We need someone who can cover so Marvin Harrison and Reggie Wayne stop running around wide open everytime they play us.

 

[TexansSeminole]

LaRon Landry:

In 2003: LaRon played in 14 games. He had 80 total tackles with 3 sacks for 30 yards lost. He had 2 INTs with 4 breakups and 7 quarterback hits. He also had 1 blocked kick. Also 0 forced fumbles and 0 fumble recoveries

In 2004: LaRon played in 12 games. He had 92 total tackles with 3 sacks for 19 yards lost. He had 4 INTs with 5 breakups and 0 quarterback hits. He also had 1 forced fumble and 0 fumble recoveries. 0 blocked kicks.

In 2005: LaRon played in 12 games. He had 69 tackles with 1 sack for 10 yards lost. He had 3 INTs with 8 breakups and 1 quarterback hit. Also had 0 forced fumbles, 0 fumble recoveries, and 0 blocked kicks.

In 2006(so far): LaRon has played in 8 games. He has 40 tackles with 0 sacks. He has 1 INT with 1 break up and 3 quarterback hits. He also has 1 forced fumble and 1 blocked kick.

On this track(on average) he will end the season with these stats:
Total tackles: 60
Interceptions: 1 or 2 (1.5)
Forced Fumbles: 1 or 2 (1.5)
Fumble Recoveries: 0
Passes broken up: 1 or 2 (1.5)

Of course these on track statistics will be wrong but they are an assumption off what he has shown thus far.

 

[TexansSeminole]

I go to UT and have seen every game the last two years. I know what Michael Griffin can do and I would love to have him on the Texans, but he is a SS which means we either play someone out of position or get another player to play FS, which we still dont have on the Texans. We need someone who can cover so Marvin Harrison and Reggie Wayne stop running around wide open everytime they play us.

I am not trying to prove you wrong or anything...I just thought it'd be interesting to show some statistics and give my opinion as well.

But as far as I am concerned we need to replace both of our safeties...almost equally (Brown more than Earl, but still). Whichever position Griffin plays in the NFL, we need help in.

 

[Bubbajwp]

IMO you cant go wrong with either of them.

Landry or Griffin that is.

 

[Blake]

1. Oakland - Brady Quinn, QB, Notre Dame
2. Tennessee - Calvin Johnson, WR, Georgia Tech
3. Cleveland - Quentin Moses, DE/OLB, Georgia
4. Detroit - Joe Thomas, OT, Wisconsin
5. Houston - Adrian Peterson, RB, Oklahoma
6. Miami - Levi Brown, OT, Penn St.
7. San Francisco - LaMarr Woodley, DE/OLB, Michigan
8. Arizona - LaRon Landry, FS, LSU
9. Green Bay - Leon Hall, CB, Michigan
10. Tampa Bay - Gaines Adams, DE, Clemson

With Kubiak's philosophy, I doubt we take AP with a first round selection. More likely a linebacker, or lineman.

I think Oakland wont pass again, on a franchise signal caller.

I think Tenn would love to get a special wide out for Vince.

I think Cleveland will always be looking for tweeners for their 3-4 defense.

I think Detroit needs tackle help, and Thomas is the best this year.

I think Miami needs line help more than anything, and will reach to fill the void. Brown should be a good tackle though.

I think Frisco is another 3-4 team that will always be looking at the hybrid linebacker, and Woodly should shoot updraft boards this year.

I think Arizona takes the best defensive player on the board, and now have someone to pair with Adrian Wilson, or to replace him.

I think Greenbay needs to look to the future here, and with Batman gone, and Charles Woodson a temp solution, they opt for the #1 corner in the draft.

I think Tampa is a team that loves defense, and will be looking to reload with a sack artist from Clemson.

 

[painekiller]

I didn't say that...but im not denying it either...

I think a ball hawking SS will help us more at this point than a RB....

I think we can pick up a suitable RB in rds. 2-4...

And I am will go out on a limb and say Irons ends up the high prospect than Lynch. In this draft I would go Griffin, before Lynch, why because like xtruroyaltyx I think we can get a RB later that will more than work.

 

[SF49erFaithful]

1. Oakland - Brady Quinn, QB, Notre Dame
2. Tennessee - Calvin Johnson, WR, Georgia Tech
3. Cleveland - Quentin Moses, DE/OLB, Georgia
4. Detroit - Joe Thomas, OT, Wisconsin
5. Houston - Adrian Peterson, RB, Oklahoma
6. Miami - Levi Brown, OT, Penn St.
7. San Francisco - LaMarr Woodley, DE/OLB, Michigan
8. Arizona - LaRon Landry, FS, LSU
9. Green Bay - Leon Hall, CB, Michigan
10. Tampa Bay - Gaines Adams, DE, Clemson

With Kubiak's philosophy, I doubt we take AP with a first round selection. More likely a linebacker, or lineman.

I think Oakland wont pass again, on a franchise signal caller.

I think Tenn would love to get a special wide out for Vince.

I think Cleveland will always be looking for tweeners for their 3-4 defense.

I think Detroit needs tackle help, and Thomas is the best this year.

I think Miami needs line help more than anything, and will reach to fill the void. Brown should be a good tackle though.

I think Frisco is another 3-4 team that will always be looking at the hybrid linebacker, and Woodly should shoot updraft boards this year.

I think Arizona takes the best defensive player on the board, and now have someone to pair with Adrian Wilson, or to replace him.

I think Greenbay needs to look to the future here, and with Batman gone, and Charles Woodson a temp solution, they opt for the #1 corner in the draft.

I think Tampa is a team that loves defense, and will be looking to reload with a sack artist from Clemson.

Let me start off by saying I love the SF pick. I'm glad you didn't give us a DB, or even worse an offensive player. :brickwall I am very high on Woodley and that would fill a need. Our front seven can't produce a pass rush and what good would picking a DB do? Rookie DB's tend to struggle their rookie season, and how much would they help out with no pass rush? I don't expect DB's to cover WR's for 5 seconds.

Don't think Oakland will draft a QB with Al Davis in charge. Plus, Walter has shown some potential, but doesn't have an O-line or a great WR core.

I'm not fond on the Moses pick. He really hasn't been playing great this season and IMO isn't a top 10 pick.

 

[bah007]

1. Oakland - Brady Quinn, QB, Notre Dame
2. Tennessee - Calvin Johnson, WR, Georgia Tech
3. Cleveland - Quentin Moses, DE/OLB, Georgia
4. Detroit - Joe Thomas, OT, Wisconsin
5. Houston - Adrian Peterson, RB, Oklahoma
6. Miami - Levi Brown, OT, Penn St.
7. San Francisco - LaMarr Woodley, DE/OLB, Michigan
8. Arizona - LaRon Landry, FS, LSU
9. Green Bay - Leon Hall, CB, Michigan
10. Tampa Bay - Gaines Adams, DE, Clemson

With Kubiak's philosophy, I doubt we take AP with a first round selection. More likely a linebacker, or lineman.

I think Oakland wont pass again, on a franchise signal caller.

I think Tenn would love to get a special wide out for Vince.

I think Cleveland will always be looking for tweeners for their 3-4 defense.

I think Detroit needs tackle help, and Thomas is the best this year.

I think Miami needs line help more than anything, and will reach to fill the void. Brown should be a good tackle though.

I think Frisco is another 3-4 team that will always be looking at the hybrid linebacker, and Woodly should shoot updraft boards this year.

I think Arizona takes the best defensive player on the board, and now have someone to pair with Adrian Wilson, or to replace him.

I think Greenbay needs to look to the future here, and with Batman gone, and Charles Woodson a temp solution, they opt for the #1 corner in the draft.

I think Tampa is a team that loves defense, and will be looking to reload with a sack artist from Clemson.

I think Oakland gets Calvin Johnson before a QB (Jerry Porter is leavin and Moss wants to).
I think if Johnson is there, Titans grab him.
I think Quentin Moses has no business being selected before Gaines Adams.
I think Joe Thomas is a beast.
I think the Texans dont draft a RB in the first round.
I think Levi Brown is a little overrated.
I think LaMarr Woodley doesnt go that high.
I think LaRon Landry is the best safety in the draft.
I think Daymeion Hughes (California) is the best corner in the nation, not Leon Hall.
I think Gaines Adams is almost as good as Mario.

 

[SF49erFaithful]

My early opinion:

1. Oakland- Calvin Johnson-WR, Georgia Tech
2. Detroit- Brian Brohm-QB, Lousiville (maybe a reach at #2, but I like him better than Quinn)
3. Miami- Brady Quinn-QB, Notre Dame (they could use one of the safeties, but I couldnt see Quinn falling all the way to Green Bay)
4. Arizona- Joe Thomas-OT, Wisconsin
5. Cleveland- Adrian Peterson-HB, Oklahoma
6. Tennessee- Daymeion Hughes-CB, California
7. San Francisco- LaRon Landry-S, LSU
8. Buffalo- Jared Gaither-OT, Maryland
9. Houston- Michael Griffin-S, Texas (maybe a little early for him, but he could be the next Roy Williams,but a liability in pass coverage)
10. Green Bay- Marshawn Lynch-HB, California


I also like Gaines Adams-DE, Clemson:
but I couldnt find out where he would go in that draft order

Doubt Griffin goes that high. Honestly, Griffin is one of my favorite prospects but IMO he is more of a mid-first rouder. Also don't like the Roy Williams comparison at all. MG is very talented and brings different things to the table; he is a ballhawk and can lay the wood. Where as Roy Williams is an "In-the-box" safety who is a big hitter, but can be a big liability in coverage.

quick update:

1: Miami - Brady Quinn, QB, Notre Dame.
2: Oakland - Calvin Johnson, WR, Georgia Tech.
3: Arizona - Joe Thomas, T, Wisconsin.
4: Detroit - Brian Brohm, QB, Louisville.
5: Cleveland - Adrian Peterson, RB, Oklahoma.
6: Tennessee - Daymeion Hughes, CB, Cal.
7: San Francisco - LaRon Landry, S, LSU.
8: Houston - Marshawn Lynch, RB, Cal.
9: Green Bay - Gaines Adams, DE, Clemson.
10: Buffalo - Jared Gaither, T, Maryland.

You think Miami would pick a QB with the first pick? I don't think they give up on Culpepper that easy. I think your team could use an O-line more.

 

[bah007]

Doubt Griffin goes that high. Honestly, Griffin is one of my favorite prospects but IMO he is more of a mid-first rouder. Also don't like the Roy Williams comparison at all. MG is very talented and brings different things to the table; he is a ballhawk and can lay the wood. Where as Roy Williams is an "In-the-box" safety who is a big hitter, but can be a big liability in coverage.



You think Miami would pick a QB with the first pick? I don't think they give up on Culpepper that easy. I think your team could use an O-line more.

I said in my post that Griffin might be a reach that high. Roy Williams is a ballhawk when he is in a deep zone. So is Griffin. They both lay heavy wood. Williams is a liability in coverage and Griffin gets sucked up on play action too easy.

 

[SF49erFaithful]

I think we can pick up a suitable RB in rds. 2-4...

Selected 65th overall (3rd Round) in the 2005 NFL Draft.

 

[SF49erFaithful]

I said in my post that Griffin might be a reach that high. Roy Williams is a ballhawk when he is in a deep zone. So is Griffin. They both lay heavy wood. Williams is a liability in coverage and Griffin gets sucked up on play action too easy.

Fair enough. I still wouldn't define Roy Williams as a ballhawk though.

 

[thunderkyss]

1. Oakland - Brady Quinn, QB, Notre Dame

Why is everybody crying about Oaklands QB?? They've got their man in Walter, and they are happy with him. So far, I believe the general understanding is that they are loosing, because of poor Offensive line play, and archaic coaching....

..... sounds familiar.

If we didn't need a QB change, they shure as heck don't.

Smart thing for them, would be to go with a big ugly..... trade down, and get a bunch of big uglies.

But their defense is playing pretty well, they may add some high caliber talent to the defensive side of the ball, and get back to playing Raider Football, with a defense like Baltimore, or Chicago.

 

[real]

I don't even think we are going to be picking in the top ten...

and if we do I hope we trade down somewhere between 11-13 and pick up a defensive player...