Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
Carr Bomb said:There is no way I'd be willing to give up a 2nd (#33 pick in the draft), especially since it didn't even take that much to get Culpepper. Third round pick or no deal.
Nope if we can't find a #2 in FA, we take one in the third, I'd rather use the #2 on defense or OL. We should be able to get a excellent offensive lineman with that pick and I'm tired of hoping mid rounders will work out, we should be able to get a blue chipper with that second round pick in this draft.Koolbrz said:So you would rather they use the second pick on an unproven WR out of college than give GB the pick for a great WR how has not even hit his prime. Doesn't make any sense to me. They will go after a WR with that second pick...you know that right. We need that #2 guy, after the 2nd rd there will be slim pickens. I'd rather have Walker. Awesome pair of recievers. You will be able to compare them to Duper/Clayton, Rice/Taylor, Harrison/Wayne...Man what a pick up this would be!
Carr Bomb said:Seattle just signed Peterson to a blockbuster 54 million dollar contract
http://www.kffl.com/hotw/nfl
I think they just might of took themselves out of the Burleson sweepstakes.
outofhnd said:Duh...
Look at the denver offense... Here is the breakdown.
Rod Smith - Andre Johnson
Ed McCaffrey - Kevin Walter
Ashlie Lelie - Jerome Mathis
Stephen Alexander - Mark Bruener
Jeb Putzier - Jeb Putzier
Mike Anderson - Jonathan Wells
Tatum Bell - Reggie Bush
Kyle Johnson - Jameel Cook
The Snake - The Carr
tulexan said:The only problem is that you left out Domanick Davis and Jonathan Wells hasn't been re-signed yet.
Ibar_Harry said:Seahawks spent the money from Hutch plus on a 49er. Will they have enough for Burleson.... Stay Tuned!!!!
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2377300
Ibar_Harry said:Seahawks spent the money from Hutch plus on a 49er. Will they have enough for Burleson.... Stay Tuned!!!!
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2377300
pskinny said:Do you even know if we are still interested? I mean, we canceled his visit. What makes you think we will even try to sign Burelson?
pskinny said:Do you even know if we are still interested? I mean, we canceled his visit. What makes you think we will even try to sign Burelson?
O.G. said:The visit was cancelled only because of the supposed bidding war that was going to happen between Seattle and Minnesota. Now both have commited over 50 million in two players, Julius Peterson (55 million) now at Seattle and Steve Huchinson (50 million) now at Minnesota. With the visit with Ike Hilliard ending with a non-signing and the two teams that battled for Burleson now financially commited to other players, this opens the door to re-establish talks with Houston if they (being Houston) wants too. IMO
Money talks.pskinny said:So John McClain says.....Seems like to me there's more to this one. I hope we go after Burelson, but we may have already burnt that bridge by canceling the visit.
LBC_Justin said:Money talks.
Bridges are rarely burned as long as Benjamin Franklin is in the room.
Texas said:So whats the deal. Are we most likely going to get him or not?
TexanFan881 said:For Burleson? We're out of the running for him as of now. It's between the Vikings and Seahawks.
jmerog said:I said all that to saythis...If we get Burleson and get as good of a deal as we got on putzier...I may soil myself. At the very least laugh histerically and pee down my own leg in crazy joy and disbelief at the prospect of a winning season.
TexansFanatic said:You may want to seek professional help for your incontinence. Either that, or find a less exhilarating hobby....
jerek said:I am amazed to see 230+ posts and 6,000 hits on the prospect of Nate Burleson.
I still wish we had resigned Gaffney.
Texas said:It looks like we are going to get him and he may come cheap because of all the drama between seattle and minnesota
BrianC said:i may have missed it but has a visit been rescheduled yet? or is this just speculation?
LBC_Justin said:Money talks.
Bridges are rarely burned as long as Benjamin Franklin is in the room.
Carr Bomb said:In the year that Burleson had a break out year Moss missed 3 starts and was injured all year, Nate was their #1 option and had such a good year the Vikings were more than comfortable in letting Moss go. This past year Nate struggled with injuries just like AJ and by the time he got healthy he had a new QB that was throwing to his new favorite targets.
Nate is the best option #2 reciever out there, given his age and speed/hands, he is more than worth a 3rd round pick.
outofhnd said:He wont come at the bargain Putz did, and they may be happy with the walter pickup to where they wont make a play for him at all. I doubt he comes here, however Minnesota would be less inclined to match the offer as long as it isnt seattle... Hey since they have Hutch who job was lost? Maybe we can sign them?
Bearfan Blue and Orange said:First of all, if he is that good, do you think they are going to let him go for less than a 3rd round, and REMEMBER our 3rd wound it the 1st pick in the third round, therefore you are saying he is really worth a 2nd round pick (NOT). We can better use that pick for a OL or DT MUCH MORE NEEDED than taking a "chance" dropping a pick and high money for him. I think we forget, yes we compensate a 3rd rounder, but you also have to use CAP money to get the guy paid... So you are really LOSING the opportunity of possibly 2 players.
Hulk75 said:We do not need to get any DLineman right now. Good call last year right DJohnson and I am not even a UT guy.
Bearfan Blue and Orange said:Why What??