KT,
...maybe not picking up Brandon Lloyd for a 5th when AJ went down,
We had just signed Derrick Mason the week before. We don't know that Lloyd was available at that time. We're right at the cap.... I don't know that Mason cost us anything.
Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
KT,
...maybe not picking up Brandon Lloyd for a 5th when AJ went down,
More like he knows he will be getting paid whether he stays here or not. Thats a sweet car though
The more I think about this situation the more likely I think it is that we retain Mario. I think they will give him a large signing bonus and then back-load his contract.
JJ will have to be released. KW will have to restructure or get cut. Leinart will get cut. Allen will be let go unless he signs a very reasonable contract. 'Meco and couple of others may have to do some restructuring as well. I would say restructure with Schaub as well, but I don't think we will do that until he has returned fully from his injury and played a few games at least.
Maybe they will fit Mario into the cap. However, every time you cut players with years left on their contract, the team takes a cap hit from the remaining years' signing bonus. For instance, Kevin Walter's deal runs through 2014, I think. If his signing bonus for the 5 year deal was $10 million then the prorated amount against the cap is $2 million per year. Cutting him with three years left, would escalate those three years into one. So, though his salary wouldn't count against the cap in 2012, $6 million in signing bonus money would.
In those cases, you have to take into account his cap hit for next year. His salary plus prorated bonus (or any bonus due this year). If that number is larger say $7 then we save $1M of cap space.
It may not be worth cutting him for $1M of cap space, but it depends on what you are trying to accomplish.
Besides, KW can restructure so his cap number is $2 or $3 million. We can keep him as our #3 & Bryant Johnson as our 4th.
just to get it on record (like I really need to) if they sign Mario to a big contract and we make wholesale changes to accommodate him it will set this Franchise back 3 hrs at least.
If Mario was a heart and soul player then I would maybe do it. Mario is a good guy but he is nowhere near the heart of the d.
I don't see even RS making that big a bone headed decision.
Blow this team up and risk being able to sign key players next, sorry don't see it UNLESS no one wants him and we get him for say $24 mill 4 hrs and I really don't see that happening.
just to get it on record (like I really need to) if they sign Mario to a big contract and we make wholesale changes to accommodate him it will set this Franchise back 3 yrs at least.
If Mario was a heart and soul player then I would maybe do it. Mario is a good guy but he is nowhere near the heart of the d.
I don't see even RS making that big a bone headed decision.
Blow this team up and risk being able to sign key players next year, sorry don't see it UNLESS no one wants him and we get him for say $24 mill 4 hrs and I really don't see that happening.
I think both Bob McNair & Wade Phillips will play a big part in re-signing Mario to a reasonable contract @ about $8m avg per year but with first two prob around 3-5m. I think less effort will be put towards Foster (and I really like the guy). Kubes will say Tate will step up in his 2nd year of actual play & the tag (1st & 3rd as I understand) will give us an out. I would love to have top 15 picks in those rounds.
The success of NYG tells me we need Mario the more guys you have to preasure the QB the better. Look at NYG secondary no one scares you its all about pass rushers.
Its only a 1st now. Not 1st and 3rd.
Mario looks sickly small in the pics...he will be a Texan next year
I think both Bob McNair & Wade Phillips will play a big part in re-signing Mario to a reasonable contract @ about $8m avg per year but with first two prob around 3-5m. I think less effort will be put towards Foster (and I really like the guy). Kubes will say Tate will step up in his 2nd year of actual play & the tag (1st & 3rd as I understand) will give us an out. I would love to have top 15 picks in those rounds.
Yeah, offer Mario a long term deal with $20-25m upfront that is prorated, then set his base salary at $3-5m first 2-3 years; $3m + $4-5 prorated bonus= 7-8m each for years 1&2 puts him way under the current cap hit & allows you to raise his cap hit later years when TV deal comes on. You then keep or trade him as you like and still initially clear millions to use on FA.Not sure what you are saying? Cap first 2 years for Mario 3-5 mill. Please explain in more detail if this is what you are saying. thanks
Basically bend over backwards for Mario and play hardball with Foster is that what you are saying? Mario wasn't even on the field at the end. Foster was the key player on offense.
Maybe McNair mucks things up but I hope Smith comes through.
Oh yeah we need 2wr not 1.
I think it will be easy to see failure in the Mario deal. Mario doesn't start for some reason. We are unable to sign some of our key players.
How do determine if Mario deal is a success?
I did not know he or Mario had been tagged with anything yet?
(1) Right of First Refusal Only: one year Player Contract with Paragraph 5
Salary of at least $ 1,200,000;
(2) Right of First Refusal and Draft Selection at Player's Original Draft
Round: one year Player Contract with a Paragraph 5 Salary of at least (a) the amount set
forth in Subsection (b) (i)(1) above, or (b) 1 1 0% of the player's prior year's Paragraph 5
Salary, whichever is greater; in addition, if option (b) applies, all other terms of the player's
prior year contract are carried forward unchanged (this Subsection is subject to the
rules of Subsection (c) below);
(3) Right of First Refusal, One Second Round Draft Selection: one year
Player Contract with a Paragraph 5 Salary of at least (a) $1,835,000, or (b) 110% of the
player's prior year's Paragraph 5 Salary, whichever is greater; in addition, if option (b)
applies, all other terms of the player's prior year contract are carried forward unchanged;
and
(4) Right of First Refusal and One First Round Draft Selection: one year
Player Contract with a Paragraph 5 Salary of at least (a) $2,611,000, or (b) 110% of the
player's prior year's Paragraph 5 Salary, whichever is greater; in addition, if option (b)
applies, all other terms of the player's prior year contract are carried forward unchanged.
S.O.D. is Chris Olsen. He's the cap guru that got us out of all those dead money contracts.We're paying Rick Smith & some other dude to manage the cap.
They'll get Mario & Arian & Myers & a 2WR, if that's what we want to do.
It worked with Mario when he first signed and more recently with Demeco and AJ. You should remember the agent looks at two things basically A. over all dollar amount as he uses that to advertise his services to potential new customers even if the player often does not get 100% of the years B. and most important to player is money quickly into his hands and that is thru upfront bonus and guaranteed money.I just don't see those numbers panning out. I think the best we could hope for is a contract close to John Abraham and Trent Cole's numbers.
With the league turning pass happy I expect the value of a guy who could can get after the QB consistently to jump even more. I think both him and his agent know how much he's going to score on the FA market and at worst he could be tagged for a one year huge payday.
I keep seeing these posts saying sign him to a long term deal and we'll be able to make it more cap friendly. I'm just not sure its the case, I have a feeling on face value it sounds nice but reality will be different.
Thanks, I thought it was two 1sts but saw another poster said CBA states 1 & 3. WHen I get time I'll research my copy. i want to have that staright in my mind. Regardless of what we tag Foster or Mario, we can negotiate less with another team.I don't know where exactly it was discussed, but ChampionTexan pointed it out to me the other day that in the new CBA, RFA tags (which applies to Foster) have a max tender of just a 1st round pick. No more 1st and 3rd for RFAs. That puts tendering Foster in jeopardy, as a 1st isn't much to give up for a team like the 49ers. However it does come with a right of first refusal.
Non-exclusive franchise tender is worth two 1sts if the player is tagged and signed by another team.
hmmm.... I suspect he could have bought this one by trading in his 2006 orange one plus last year's money.
Speaking of Mario and cars, did you see this...?
Mario donates five Camaros to HPD
![]()
hmmm.... I suspect he could have bought this one by trading in his 2006 orange one plus last year's money.
Speaking of Mario and cars, did you see this...?
Mario donates five Camaros to HPD
![]()
That's the stupidest donation I have ever heard of. Why would you help the cops like that? Those cars won't save anyone's life, nor help them do their job any better than the cars our tax dollars purchased. He could have set up a scholarship fund for poor kids who are good students, or donate to something like Doctors Without Borders that saves people's lives daily through medicine, vaccines, food and clean water. Instead he's helping the city give out more traffic tickets. Whoopty doo...
He probably got a couple speeding tickets and this was a way of preventing any future tickets.
He probably got a couple speeding tickets and this was a way of preventing any future tickets.
Then do what everyone else does and donate to the 100 club! Although, he might not want to put the stickers on his Ferrari...
We should be able to get something done here. With the cap likely going up in after next season it will make him a more trade-able asset even if it becomes impossible to re-sign the rest of our own FAs. Keeping him here for one more year and then trading him for some picks is a much better option then just letting him walk right now.
How do you plan on keeping him one more year, then trading him? We would have to franchise him (that'll cost between $16M & $22M for one year). If we don't want that $22M to hit our cap, we'll have to trade him this year, as next year we'll be in the same situation as we are now, except I believe the new CBA doesn't allow us to franchise him again.
Also consider "they" are saying we are already $20M over the "projected" 2012 cap, we still need to sign Myers, Brisiel, & Arian.
Right, that's the only way. I would have thought his agent wouldn't allow a contract with no signing bonus. It is the prorated portion that makes a player untradeable.By signing him to a long-term contract.
Considerable? His salary was $14 Million. I've heard rumor of his cap number being as high as $17Million.His cap hit this previous season was huge, so we could presumably retain him and actually lower his hit by a pretty considerable margin.
As long as Mario is willing to re-do his contract with his new team, it shouldn't be a problem. Any team desperate enough to trade for Mario, rather than letting him hit FA would probably offer him a large contract anyway.Even if it is more then we want to pay him, and more then we can afford in the future, signing him to a longer contract will give us more options then we have now. Rick Smith would just have to make sure he doesn't backload it so much that his contract is un-moveable.
I'm sure there would be a couple of teams willing to trade a pick or two for him after next season as long as his contract isn't completely outrageous. Plus, when the cap goes up after next season, Mario's contract will seem a little more reasonable for potential suitors.
Right, that's the only way. I would have thought his agent wouldn't allow a contract with no signing bonus. It is the prorated portion that makes a player untradeable.
But, his rookie deal was with no bonus, which was probably why they didn't renegotiate this past off-season; Most likely Mario's people felt it was money earned.
I also just looked over the details of AP's 7 year $100M contract. No bonus. About $36M guaranteed though.
Considerable? His salary was $14 Million. I've heard rumor of his cap number being as high as $17Million.
What are you thinking as a "good" number?
As long as Mario is willing to re-do his contract with his new team, it shouldn't be a problem. Any team desperate enough to trade for Mario, rather than letting him hit FA would probably offer him a large contract anyway.
I don't understand. If he's worth a quality pick or two in upcoming drafts, why is he not good enough for us?
That's the stupidest donation I have ever heard of. Why would you help the cops like that? Those cars won't save anyone's life, nor help them do their job any better than the cars our tax dollars purchased. He could have set up a scholarship fund for poor kids who are good students, or donate to something like Doctors Without Borders that saves people's lives daily through medicine, vaccines, food and clean water. Instead he's helping the city give out more traffic tickets. Whoopty doo...
maybe.
Then again, maybe not spending money on these cars allowed hpd to keep a couple more officers on the street and not lay them off. And those cops who are still around maybe prevent a mugging or robbery. Or maybe these new "hot rods" run down a drunk driver or three and keep that person from killing someone on the road. So this donation could save someone's life.
And if you're not a speeder or drunk driver, what do you have to worry about? They won't be used to stop you...
but i am a speeder!
I think both Bob McNair & Wade Phillips will play a big part in re-signing Mario to a reasonable contract @ about $8m avg per year but with first two prob around 3-5m. I think less effort will be put towards Foster (and I really like the guy). Kubes will say Tate will step up in his 2nd year of actual play & the tag (1st & 3rd as I understand) will give us an out. I would love to have top 15 picks in those rounds.
Its only a 1st now. Not 1st and 3rd.
I did not know he or Mario had been tagged with anything yet?
Is it now the consensus that trading Mario and getting something is not a realistic possibility?
Also is Mario 100% now and if not how will that effect everything?
Is it now the consensus that trading Mario and getting something is not a realistic possibility?
Also is Mario 100% now and if not how will that effect everything?
Here is where I am not sure I agree with you CBA Article 8 page 34 Section 2 says:They havent. I was just pointing out that the highest tender is a 1st, not a 1st and 3rd.