Yes, the Browns aren't very good, but the Saints were playing on the road in a traditionally pretty loud, hostile stadium. Look at Reggie Bush's stats for the Saints game. He led the Saints in rushing of course, but he led the Saints in receiving yards and receptions. He didn't break anything for long yardage, but there is no doubt that Reggie Bush was a factor in every single drive they had that ended in a score. I think the Saints lose without Reggie Bush.
Jimmy Johnson said on Foxsports.com
"Now, Howie, you'll like this story. When I first got into the league, I mistakenly was trying to trade anybody to get some picks. I talked to Al Davis about trading him Michael Irvin. Al told me I didn't want to do that. He said some players score touchdowns, and some others will help you win games no matter how good they are at a particular position. But certain individuals are the difference between winning and losing games because they can put the ball in the end zone. That always stuck with me. Now, I look at Reggie Bush and maybe he is only going to touch the ball 15 times a game, but that one touchdown or two touchdowns that he either sets up or scores is going to be the difference between the Saints winning or losing a game. Now, Mario Williams may end up being a great player, maybe, I don't know. But he's not going to score any touchdowns and he's not going to be the difference between winning and losing a game."
I agree with Jimmy.