Runner, in response to your message:
1) Not a wise move to put all your RB faith into an aging vet, a second-year player who hasn't performed well, a rookie, and an undrafted rookie. (I'm removing DD from the equation because it seems his health will prevent him from being effective.) And they've said they need another veteran RB. Bennett was the target, until the Chiefs got him. Right now I'd argue that the Texans have the most questionable/concerning running back situation in the entire league.
2) Good players don't equal rare talent. There have been a lot of RBs come and go over the last several years, and none have the electric potential that Bush has. I agree, the DL looks very improved. And again, I like Mario and think he's a beast. But I'd argue that the DL looked better before the draft too, with the addition of Weaver (who was signed to play the same spot Williams played in college). And given (1) and (2), it sure seems like Bush would have filled a greater need than Williams.
3) Admittedly, this comes from these boards. Of course, the coaches/FO haven't noted next year's draft yet. BUT - if they have a bumpy season because of a total lack of a running game, and they do take a RB in the first round in '07, then it sure will seem like they blew it in '06.
We can agree to disagree, but...I was on board with the Texans taking Williams, so long as DD was the horse at RB, as was part of the justification the team used to sell the pick to the fans. Now, take DD out of the equation, and what do you have? A really thin RB group, and an overstocked DL featuring Williams. And if they knew this all along - I just don't get their logic at all.