TEXANFAN23435 said:
I'm sorry Big B Texan Fan but this David Carr bashing has got to be founded on all the stats, not just the stats that say his numbers went down this past season. Please help me out here, take the Top 6 QB's (Based on the QB Rating System) from the 2004 season and put them in Carr's place for the 2005 season and which of them would have improved on their QB Rating???
I mean it should be fairly easy to improve on your QB Rating..... when AJ misses enough games to contribute a total of 650+ receiving yards and a whopping 2TD's for the season. Then you have a MASH Unit as RB's with no one capable of staying healthy enough to reach a 1,000 yards rushing and by the way, exactly which one of our "running wounded", (STUD RB"s) would force any NFL Defense to respect our running game??? And, oh yes!!! Our awesome OL, who was so busy passing out "Sack Our QB Tickets" to opposing defenses that they plum forgot their blocking assignments. Oh, by the way, they managed to hand out a lot more tickets than just the 68 winners.
So Big B Texan Fan, find me a legitimate QB who would improve his QB rating over his 2004 season, playing in place of Carr for the 2005 season. Your answer and reasoning are much anticipated.
Do you watch the games or does your daddy read you a box score before he tucks you in t night.
I don't care too much for stats when my team is losing, I'm looking for a strong finish, a finish that would make the team, the city, and the owners proud to call themselves a part of the organization. Not some lame duck squandering in th last week of the season 2 seasons in a row. One season had the promise of not having a losing record yet we lost to one of the worst teams in the league and the next was the season that all we needed to do finish with a win and beat the team that had the #1 in last years draft and avoid the #1 pick ourselves.
Look, I've supported carr ever since he came and think he's a classy guy, with good christian values and would want either of my boys to grow to be like him, but when it comes to football and what I perceive as good football instincts, he's lacking. Not because he cannot play, just that I believe he cannot pull it off in this town, he's never gonna live up to the hype he was much less any other QB in the upcoming draft with the name Lienert, Cutler and Young. Forget the o-line and the injuries for a minute. The Pats keep plugging in guys (including Brady when Bledsoe went down) and they keep winning/stay in contention for a playoff spot every year the past 4 years although they fell a game or two short after their 1st SB win. His O-line guys were practically nobodies and they were the same guys that got Bledsoe murdered yet they were able to get Brady to a SB (or at least to a playoff game where the infamous "tuck rule" happened and kept that SB win a possibility). Is that coaching or is it the will to win with a leader who will guide his team to victory, even with his predeccessor on the bench watching. The following season Bledsoe was gone.
So I guess to answer you question, Brady is one.
Besides, most coaches that get a new team usually gets a new/different QB right away. The list is more than twice as long as the other as far coaches switching QB's ince the inception of free-agency and the salary cap.
Am I carr bashing, yes....
Do I want a change, yes....
Do I think carr can be successful elsewhere, yes.....
Do I like Bush or the thought of trading down, yes....
Would I rather have VY more than Bush or trade down, yes...
Does stats mean anything to me, yes.... (don't know why I added that)
I just don't want to see us keep a guy for the sake of not wanting to look bad and like we don't know what we're doing draft wise. IMHO that's what keeping carr will make me think and feel. Why stop at the coaches when it comes time to pass blame, the players on the field are the ones whoe either get it done or not.