I don’t know that they necessarily had Ersery graded higher, but it’s possible Ersery was on their list of players they’d like to add to the team & Conerly wasn’t.Did they come out and say they had Ersery rated higher than Conerly Jr or is that just your deductive reasoning?
I could absolutely see them valuing Ersery+extra picks more than Conerly at 25, but curious how they compare the 2 in a vacuum.
We tend to look at past production & measurables as if nothing else matters. Like there’s no reason for the interview process or talking to coaches & things like that.
We don’t have enough information to understand it but it is entirely possible they wanted Higgins/Ersery + future pick more than they wanted Conerly.