KoolAid Sipper
AFCEVET
We made the playoffs in both mocks you've seen, it's just that Trader Nick pulls the trigger and moves upThis is the second mock draft I've seen where no AFC South team makes the playoffs

Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
We made the playoffs in both mocks you've seen, it's just that Trader Nick pulls the trigger and moves upThis is the second mock draft I've seen where no AFC South team makes the playoffs
It has been posted but thanks anyway.Don’t know if this has been posted elsewhere but the Texans revealed their rookies numbers. Can’t remember them all but I know Higgins is 81, Noel is 82, and Ersery is 79.
Hoping we will need neither OT or the RB.Never too early to start I guess. Pick 17
![]()
3-Round 2026 NFL Mock Draft: A QB Goes No. 1 Overall, But It Isn't Arch Manning | PFSN
The 2026 NFL Draft is filled with intriguing quarterbacks, explosive pass rushers, and sturdy offensive tackles. Will your team land an impact starter?www.profootballnetwork.com
Hoping we will need neither OT or the RB.
I like his skills breaking tackles and track speed. I want him to pick up another 5 lb of solid muscle this season at Notre Dame and then another five his first year in the NFL. Probably out of our range.Oh, I would like to have the kid from Penn State. 5' 11" 220lbs runs a 4.3 40....the kid is like Barkley and Robinson only maybe more explosive and runs through tackles with ease or just cuts and leaves them hugging air.
I like his skills breaking tackles and track speed. I want him to pick up another 5 lb of solid muscle this season at Notre Dame and then another five his first year in the NFL. Probably out of our range.
This organization has proven to have serious difficulties in solidifying a talented offensive line .... so, to me, there is no such time as "Too Soon"! It's no longer speculation .... it's a proven fact. I'm still in the process of grieving over likes of Jared Wilson and Charles Grant. I'll soon be 75 .... which means, over 6 decades ago, I started noticing, and then identifying dynasties, by their offensive linemen's names. They were always out-front and the good-uns would last 15 seasons. When I began playing organized ball in 7th grade, I didn't appreciate them as I should've - always a back or receiver, and I became too ball oriented. If we had a great line right now, we'd be in contention for the SuperBowl. We got to broaden our focus when building our team .... underneath all is the foundation .... Mike Holovak proved that to me !I am extremely optimistic for this roster but based only upon what we know and have seen, I have our needs for 2026 as follows:
LG, RG , OT that can play both sides; back up RB and back up corner.
Too soon for a thread.
Agree 100 % but am willing to allow whomever this line turns out to be 2-3 games to 'bond'. I imagine I will be throwing things at the TV and yelling but I have to give them at least that.This organization has proven to have serious difficulties in solidifying a talented offensive line .... so, to me, there is no such time as "Too Soon"! It's no longer speculation .... it's a proven fact. I'm still in the process of grieving over likes of Jared Wilson and Charles Grant. I'll soon be 75 .... which means, over 6 decades ago, I started noticing, and then identifying dynasties, by their offensive linemen's names. They were always out-front and the good-uns would last 15 seasons. When I began playing organized ball in 7th grade, I didn't appreciate them as I should've - always a back or receiver, and I became too ball oriented. If we had a great line right now, we'd be in contention for the SuperBowl. We got to broaden our focus when building our team .... underneath all is the foundation .... Mike Holovak proved that to me !
Based on the reports coming out of the media availability at rookie minicamp, Marks is larger than how he appeared on game tape. To piggyback on your point, I think they envision Marks as a back that can make spot starts (if needed), split carries with Mixon, and be the 3rd down back. If my theory is correct, it would justify why they traded a 2026 pick to get him this year. Especially when there were several other RBs available, including Dylan Sampson and Jarquez Hunter. I heard way more about Hunter and Sampson than I ever did about Marks. Let's hope the Texans scouting department knows what they're doing.Perhaps they do not expect Marks to be a bell cow but perhaps a quarter horse. Great vision and understanding of what opponents are going to do; good stop and starts. There is room to operate between every down player and '3rd down specialist' only.
My thinking is they probably identified Marks as an ideal RB for Caley's system. Between Mixon and Marks (M&M nickname?), the backfield should be dynamic.Based on the reports coming out of the media availability at rookie minicamp, Marks is larger than how he appeared on game tape. To piggyback on your point, I think they envision Marks as a back that can make spot starts (if needed), split carries with Mixon, and be the 3rd down back. If my theory is correct, it would justify why they traded a 2026 pick to get him this year. Especially when there were several other RBs available, including Dylan Sampson and Jarquez Hunter. I heard way more about Hunter and Sampson than I ever did about Marks. Let's hope the Texans scouting department knows what they're doing.
You may be correct. Does that mean that Caley's system will look more like the NE system they were running when they had James White/Shane Vereen type RB? I think we may have our answer.My thinking is they probably identified Marks as an ideal RB for Caley's system. Between Mixon and Marks (M&M nickname?), the backfield should be dynamic.
Marks was compared to James White by @steelbtexan IIIRC.You may be correct. Does that mean that Caley's system will look more like the NE system they were running when they had James White/Shane Vereen type RB? I think we may have our answer.
Yeah I got lazy and didn’t scroll up high enough. Sorry all.It has been posted but thanks anyway.
No apology necessary. We have information strung all over this message board in different threads. I often don't read six different threads to see if something has been posted.Yeah I got lazy and didn’t scroll up high enough. Sorry all.
This organization has proven to have serious difficulties in solidifying a talented offensive line .... so, to me, there is no such time as "Too Soon"! It's no longer speculation .... it's a proven fact. I'm still in the process of grieving over likes of Jared Wilson and Charles Grant. I'll soon be 75 .... which means, over 6 decades ago, I started noticing, and then identifying dynasties, by their offensive linemen's names. They were always out-front and the good-uns would last 15 seasons. When I began playing organized ball in 7th grade, I didn't appreciate them as I should've - always a back or receiver, and I became too ball oriented. If we had a great line right now, we'd be in contention for the SuperBowl. We got to broaden our focus when building our team .... underneath all is the foundation .... Mike Holovak proved that to me !
Isn't that click bait that Porky and Lucky don't like?
Isn't that click bait that Porky and Lucky don't like?![]()
Porky, I don't care how somebody gets paid. I care about the information. Of course the source can often be eliminated from people I review.No. Not exactly at least. It’s on Twitter. It’s unsourced with no link. If he linked to an unsubstantiated article whose sole purpose is generating clicks…then yes. Don’t see that unless i am missing something.