Instead of doing a driveby tell me why you think the QB position is more important than who's running/coaching an org?
I don't know why you come out of left field with this stuff, but it ain't black and white and it ain't easy
Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
Instead of doing a driveby tell me why you think the QB position is more important than who's running/coaching an org?
Watching them play. We'll that and the common sense that possibly the GOAT QB isn't fungible.
Given the record of hall of fame QBs getting their teams to the playoffs and shots at the SB absent stupid extremism yes. Put Brady on the 2013 Texans and we go to the playoffs. Put him on the Texans 2011-12 there might very well be a Lombardi on Kirby.
Doesn't contradict anything I said.
No. They didn't make the playoffs.
I don't know why you come out of left field with this stuff, but it ain't black and white and it ain't easy
You watching them play is an opinion.
Doubt an injured 2-14 team makes the playoffs even with Brady.
Jan 8th 2011
Seattle 41
Saints 36
Mathew Hasselbeck Seahawks starting QB threw for 4 TD's and 1 Int with a QB rating of 113
Simple question which do you think is most important? This isn't brain surgery, I'm just asking for your opinion so we can have further dialogue.
Very astute of you.
Oh look, there's another one.
That injured team almost beat the SB champs.
Not the season before Wilson got there. And so what? - they made the playoffs at 7-9. The next season (the one before Wilson) they were 7-9 again and no playoffs.
What makes you think that I believe the qb position is more important than the staff or that one can do without the other?
Not the season before Wilson got there. And so what? - they made the playoffs at 7-9. The next season (the one before Wilson) they were 7-9 again and no playoffs.
Didn't the Seahawks beat the Saints in a playoff game the yr before Wilson was drafted?
I'll give you an example to think about. The Colts finished 14-2 in 2009. Do you think that was due to Jim Caldwell coaching (his first year as HC after Dungy retired) or Peyton Manning's passing (4500 yds, 33 TDs, 16 ints).Instead of doing a driveby tell me why you think the QB position is more important than who's running/coaching an org?
I'll give you an example to think about. The Colts finished 14-2 in 2009. Do you think that was due to Jim Caldwell coaching (his first year as HC after Dungy retired) or Peyton Manning's passing (4500 yds, 33 TDs, 16 ints).
Correction. It was the corpse of Jim Caldwell propped up on that sideline all season. I swear I never saw the man move once.
it's like the never ending story when steelB decides to take part in a conversation
COACH Manning had something to do with it. QB Manning relied upon the Prior GMs and HCs to have a team around him that was capable of that 14-2 record with HRH.I'll give you an example to think about. The Colts finished 14-2 in 2009. Do you think that was due to Jim Caldwell coaching (his first year as HC after Dungy retired) or Peyton Manning's passing (4500 yds, 33 TDs, 16 ints).
In fairness, OB has "one" NFL HC season under his belt. We still know very little about what he can/will accomplish in this league. (It's not as if McNair could say his choice was certainly the right one, based off of prior Belichick disciples.) If you're completely "sold" on OB, that's fine, but let's not get carried away and act like he has some great pedigree and track record to go on.OB replaces Kubiak because they needed to instill a culture that being a good team was not enough and to shoot for greatness. I see that in two years OB has reshaped not only the types of players on this team, but the attitude of players as well. I see a defense that finished the year strong and got better in the off-season with key additions and subtractions. I see young O-linemen coming into OTA's in the best shape of their lives with something to prove. I see Foster literally being the best teammate he can be in OTA's by showing up in shape and healthy. I see what could be a credible QB competition. I see leadership both among the players and coaches that was absent in the previous regime. I like where this organization is going overall and think that they are setting themselves up for future success.
The Texans went to the playoffs twice as well in an extremely weak post-Manning era division.Interesting note on Seattle since they seem to be the team that the Texans are being measured against right now. Carroll was 7-9 in his first two seasons as HC in Seattle after taking over a 4/5-win team. Only made the playoffs in 2011 at 7-9 because they played in a horrible division. Missed the playoffs in 2012. They turned over 90% of their roster in two years. Then they draft Wilson who wound up being the starter in Carroll's third season as coach. The rest as they say is history.
But OB without a viable QB last season doesn't turn the 2-win Texans into a SB contender after one season, and our FO sucks and the owner only cares about making money.
I'll give you another. The Cowboys finished 12-4 in 1995 and won the Super Bowl with Barry Switzer at the helm.I'll give you an example to think about. The Colts finished 14-2 in 2009. Do you think that was due to Jim Caldwell coaching (his first year as HC after Dungy retired) or Peyton Manning's passing (4500 yds, 33 TDs, 16 ints).
In fairness, OB has "one" NFL HC season under his belt. We still know very little about what he can/will accomplish in this league. (It's not as if McNair could say his choice was certainly the right one, based off of prior Belichick disciples.) If you're completely "sold" on OB, that's fine, but let's not get carried away and act like he has some great pedigree and track record to go on.
I saw a ball-hawking defense do great things...which like the Defense that preceded it, has little to do with the HC. I can't see them keeping up that turnover rate. I saw a team win games it shouldn't. I also saw a team that imploded completely more than once for enough minutes to lose games. I'm cautiously optimistic, but I'm also realistic about our inexperienced line, our yet-to-be-determined QB situation and whether the Texans wasted a #1 overall last year on Clowney.
The Texans went to the playoffs twice as well in an extremely weak post-Manning era division.
I'll give you another. The Cowboys finished 12-4 in 1995 and won the Super Bowl with Barry Switzer at the helm.
No.
The Seahawks finished 7-9 two years in a row, the first two years of the Carroll regime. The first year, they became the first team to finish with a losing record to make the playoffs. Then the second year, they missed the playoffs. And then they drafted Wilson.
I'll give you an example to think about. The Colts finished 14-2 in 2009. Do you think that was due to Jim Caldwell coaching (his first year as HC after Dungy retired) or Peyton Manning's passing (4500 yds, 33 TDs, 16 ints).
COACH Manning had something to do with it. QB Manning relied upon the Prior GMs and HCs to have a team around him that was capable of that 14-2 record with HRH.
I'll give you another. The Cowboys finished 12-4 in 1995 and won the Super Bowl with Barry Switzer at the helm.
I'll give you an example to think about. The Colts finished 14-2 in 2009. Do you think that was due to Jim Caldwell coaching (his first year as HC after Dungy retired) or Peyton Manning's passing (4500 yds, 33 TDs, 16 ints).
2011 Seahawks- 41
Saints - 36
And another day goes by where the SteelB troll continues to get fed.
How many times do you have to be told that was not the year before Wilson was drafted? The year before Wilson was drafted they did not make the playoffs.
The playoff game was played in 2011 but it was the playoffs for the 2010 season.
Disagreeing = Troll
Deep and insightful, get back to me when the Texans are committed to put a consistent winning product on the field. Hasn't happened in over a decade.
Same theory, the GM/HC does make a huge difference. Unless you have a Manning/Brady to carry the water for the franchise.
Same theory, the GM/HC does make a huge difference. Unless you have a Manning/Brady to carry the water for the franchise.
Disagreeing = Troll
Deep and insightful, get back to me when the Texans are committed to put a consistent winning product on the field. Hasn't happened in over a decade.
Wait, what?
Pete Carroll and John Schneider were the HC/GM in 2010 when they went to the playoffs with a 7-9 record.
Pete Carroll and John Schneider were the HC/GM in 2011 when they didn't go to the playoffs with a 7-9 record.
Pete Carroll and John Schneider had losing records as HC/GM for the Seahawks until 2012 when Wilson was gifted to them in the 3rd round.
Otherwise, it would have been Pete Carroll and John Schneider were HC/GM in 2012 when they didn't go to the playoffs with a <insert losing record>, because Matt Flynn was going to be their starter.
Do you think the Texans would have Irvin/Haley/Eric Williams etc... on their team? You know integral parts of championship teams.
Texans have had winning records 3 out of 4 years. This coming year would make 5 of the last 7. I think you need to move your goalposts...
Look at all of the great QB's that never even played in a SB.
Under similar circumstances absolutely yes. And you ain't got **** other than wanting to trash the Texans to say otherwise.
I have examples of the Texans (a) drafting troubled players and (b) sticking by players who get in trouble. Marcus Coleman DUI, Cushing pre-draft rumors and then post-draft getting caught.
OK, rattle off a few?
Dan Fouts/Brian Sipe/Archie Manning/Roman Gabriel/John Brodie etc....
So you're saying that the McNair's would give BOB Johnson type control and let him bring in these types of players? You really believe this? We will never agree, you can talk all you want but scorebard seems to set the facts straight.
Dan Fouts/Brian Sipe/Archie Manning/Roman Gabriel/John Brodie etc....
Can you name a few in the modern passing league era?
Disagreeing = Troll
All true, but we never wasted a draft pick or maneuvered a trade for him either. Either way - To paraphrase 'Cak above, he wasn't necessarily a "bad actor".You can chuck Foster into the discussion of guys we've grabbed with red flags coming out of school. The whole league passed on him, in part because of his malcontent attitude, and he's said he wouldn't have drafted his younger self if he were in charge because of it. But we now have had one of the best backs in the league because of course we're clearly not trying to win.
All true, but we never wasted a draft pick or maneuvered a trade for him either. Either way - To paraphrase 'Cak above, he wasn't necessarily a "bad actor".
...To me the GM/HC positions are just as if not more important than the QB positions...
You know this how?
Lets just say 9-7 isn't good enough and I think BOB would agree with me. During the 2 playoff yrs do you think that the Texans were true SB contenders? If so we disagree again.
I can see this is going nowhere and probably should move on. To me the GM/HC positions are just as if not more important than the QB positions. Look at all of the great QB's that never even played in a SB.
O'Brien... hardly knocked on HBO's door asking them to invade the Texans' training camp with cameras; as with most coaches, he was told by his bosses that such an arrangement would be good for the organization, and he decided to make the best of the situation. That said, he has already informed the show's producer that he would prefer the storylines focus primarily on the Texans' players...
Holy crap you just named two guys that retired 40 years ago and another that is 77th in career passing yards. Seventy-Seventh...Dan Fouts/Brian Sipe/Archie Manning/Roman Gabriel/John Brodie etc....
Don't overshoot to make your point. - Roger Staubach is 84th.Holy crap you just named two guys that retired 40 years ago and another that is 77th in career passing yards. Seventy-Seventh...
You are totally trolling at this point. Well played.
Don't overshoot to make your point. - Roger Staubach is 84th.
Don't overshoot to make your point. - Roger Staubach is 84th.
Instead of doing a driveby tell me why you think the QB position is more important than who's running/coaching an org?