I think I am not coming across very clear. I don't want to make an exception for this guy. I don't really care what happens to him, beyond the fact that I hope he doesn't die in a desert somewhere across the ocean. He knew full well what he was getting into, and from what I've read, was determined to fulfill his service one way or another anyway. Good for him.
My issue is entirely with how the Army handled it. They should never have told him that he could go play football if he got drafted. That is exactly what they told him, and by doing so, they set themselves up to create a bad situation. All this guy did was ask, they said yes, and he pursued it. Now that they've reneged, he is doing what he has to do, which is fulfill his obligation.
That doesn't make what the Army did right.
Everyone is looking at this from the standpoint that he knew what he was getting into, he has to fulfill his obligation, he got an education .... yadda yadda ya. All of that is well and good, and I disagree with none of that. The Army, however, should have known what they were getting into when they gave him permission, and should have handled themselves with honor and integrity.
They didn't. That is my problem.