Obviously, the preseason games will play into this but, if CJ looks good, do you think they'll start him right away or do you believe it will be gradual?
I'm getting excited for this season to start. I'm hoping that Stroud really gels with Tank, Collins, Metchie, and Hutchinson. That could be the start of a great, young receiving corps. That and I think Dalton Schultz is going to be great in this offense.Before the draft I spent some time on a Carolina board because I thought they were going to take CJ. What I told them and what I'll tell you is that, when it's 3rd and long and you need a big throw, I would take CJ over Bryce Young. Bryce is a great player, no doubt, but when you need ELITE ball placement on a long throw, CJ is on another level than most other QB's, including Bryce. At Ohio State CJ was dropping dimes in places where nobody else but the receiver could touch it and he did it all the time. As well, CJ puts the ball in places with phenomenal touch making it easy for the receiver. He will be missed in Columbus.
And Beyond!Start Mills? Sure, why not? LOL
Start Case? I'd love it, just for the drama.
Start Stroud? I'm pretty sure that's what we'll see. The debate of when/if to start rookie QBs will live on into infinity.
This all day, every day.If he's not the starter day 1then they probably should have just passed on QB this year.
And sure, they'll say he has to "earn" but then look at the competition. If he's not beating out Mills and Case then they probably should have passed on QB.
Don't set yourself up for the possibilityYou take a guy #2 overall, start him and play him until he gets it or it's clear he doesn't have it.
I'm not sure what you mean.Don't set yourself up for the possibility
of disappointment.
Jared Goff didn't start until the 9th game.I'm not sure what you mean.
Peyton started right away and he's one of the best QB's of all time.Jared Goff didn't start until the 9th game.
Now he's a 3-time Pro-Bowler.
He lost in the SB only to Brady and because he didn't have enough support in the run game.
He's still ranked 8th by NFL.com last year. Not to shabby.
Kyler Murray started right away, and he's still not going anywhere.
All that said, I think Stroud has a good chance to start early.
The Oline seems to shape up well.
The running game should get there quickly.
There are some talent at TE and in the slot.
Some experience on the outside.
Whenever Stroud is ready in term of learning the offense, he can start.
That might be game 1, game 6, game 10, whenever.
Mahomes played only the last game of his rookie season, a meaningless game.
Doesn't mean he didn't have it in him.
Dude you crack me up!Is he better than Mills? If so start him right away. This isn't a situation like Derricks where he's going to be playing behind a terrible ol and at risk of injury.
Sink or swim
No excuses
So, here's the deal with trying to use pre-season as a gauge for the QB position...IMO, Stroud has to play a fair amount in pre season just to get him to start settling in and the coaches to start getting a read on him as to what he can do well and what he can't. Based on how that read works out should determine if he plays right away or needs to sit for a few games to get a good grasp of the pro game. I'm fairly sure that by game four he will have settled in. That doesn't mean he won't screw up every now and then.
The Seahawks did not depend on Wilson.Peyton started right away and he's one of the best QB's of all time.
Russell Wilson started right away and he won a SB and went to another.
Matthew Stafford
Andrew Luck
Joe Burrow
There's all kinds of examples of success and failure with starting right away vs sitting.
This is just a personal preference.
There is no right or wrong way, but I'm a big "go with the best player" kind of guy and I expect Stroud to be a much better player than Mills or Keenum, so no need to sit him...IMO.
Not sure what any of that has to do with anything, especially with what I posted.The Seahawks did not depend on Wilson.
They were dead last in pass attempts and first in rushing attempt.
The Seahawks were running the WCO that Wilson was well versed in his 3 years at NC St.
They also had the no. 1 defense in points allowed.
If the Texans have that situation, I don't see any reason why a QB like CJ can't start right off the bat.
Luck was inconsistent his first year, 54.1% completion rate (better only than Chad Henne), 23 TDs, 18 Ints (third most).
Who knows whether he picked up the bad habit of hanging on to the ball with defender at his feet, trying to make a play by starting too early.
He got beat up a lot and had his career cut shirt.
Stafford also struggled his rookie season.
He got injured after 4 games.
He missed 2 games, then played another 6 before sitting out the rest of the year.
53.3 completion rate, 13TDs, 20 Ints (2nd most even though he played in only 10 games).
Joe Burrow went 2-7-1 before tearing his ACL and was done for the year.
The Colts went 3-13.Not sure what any of that has to do with anything, especially with what I posted.
Peyton Manning played like crap his first year when he started and then went on to be an all time great...
What's your point here? That they didn't come out of the gates blazing? So what?
Peyton Won a Super Bowl for them and was one of the best QB's to ever play the game. Not sure what point you're trying to make here.The Colts went 3-13.
What does it matter whether Peyton started game 1 or game 4 or game 6?
My stand is that Stroud will start whenever DR thinks he's ready.Peyton Won a Super Bowl for them and was one of the best QB's to ever play the game. Not sure what point you're trying to make here.
Not sure what point you are trying to make but seems like you just want to debate for the sake of debating. I already said it's personal preference and the way I would do it is start the best player and I expect that Stroud will be the best QB on the roster.
You wouldn't do it that way. Ok, great.
lol, ok.My stand is that Stroud will start whenever DR thinks he's ready.
I was merely trying to point out that there are pros and cons.
It's the HC's job to weigh the pros and cons to make his decision.
What a novel idea! Not Caserio or Cal or Hanna's? HmmMy stand is that Stroud will start whenever DR thinks he's ready.
I was merely trying to point out that there are pros and cons.
It's the HC's job to weigh the pros and cons to make his decision.
I'd feel better about JC's long, accurate throws if we had more speed with our WRs. Tank's 4.49 is okay but i hope his separation skills translate to NFL.Before the draft I spent some time on a Carolina board because I thought they were going to take CJ. What I told them and what I'll tell you is that, when it's 3rd and long and you need a big throw, I would take CJ over Bryce Young. Bryce is a great player, no doubt, but when you need ELITE ball placement on a long throw, CJ is on another level than most other QB's, including Bryce. At Ohio State CJ was dropping dimes in places where nobody else but the receiver could touch it and he did it all the time. As well, CJ puts the ball in places with phenomenal touch making it easy for the receiver. He will be missed in Columbus.
Stroud should start day 1. I mean the colts are potentially starting richardson day 1 and Stroud is a more polished passer. I see no reason he doesnt beat out keenumObviously, the preseason games will play into this but, if CJ looks good, do you think they'll start him right away or do you believe it will be gradual?
He had growing pains because sitting doesnt make you better playing does.Peyton Won a Super Bowl for them and was one of the best QB's to ever play the game. Not sure what point you're trying to make here.
Rodgers sat for years behind Favre and when he got his chance to start he still had growing pains.
Seems like you just want to debate for the sake of debating. I already said it's personal preference and the way I would do it is start the best player and I expect that Stroud will be the best QB on the roster.
You wouldn't do it that way. Ok, great. But bringing up all these stats of young QB's is meaningless...As I also said earlier, there's plenty examples of it working and not working both ways. You trying to make some definitive case for sitting is not going to work.
It's always interesting to me when you look at the three best QB's of all time.Start Mills? Sure, why not? LOL
Start Case? I'd love it, just for the drama.
Start Stroud? I'm pretty sure that's what we'll see. The debate of when/if to start rookie QBs will live on into infinity.
The Colts picked up Gardner Minshew. I predict he'll start and that AR15 will be brought in gradually. AR is a strong-armed, physical, freak but a polished passer he is not. I think the Colts will regret picking him.Stroud should start day 1. I mean the colts are potentially starting richardson day 1 and Stroud is a more polished passer. I see no reason he doesnt beat out keenum
I agree with the bolded part. But Richardson is starting game 1.The Colts picked up Gardner Minshew. I predict he'll start and that AR15 will be brought in gradually. AR is a strong-armed, physical, freak but a polished passer he is not. I think the Colts will regret picking him.
I could argue with your all time list, to start with. But taking those QBs into account, Brady was not drafted to be a starter, and only became one because of injury. Mahomes had a very solid QB in front of him. Rodgers had a HOFer in front of him. All pretty unique situations. I think sitting behind good QBs helped these guys. But Peyton Manning didn't need to sit. Dan Marino did sit for a few games, but didn't need to. Joe Burrow played from the start. It's all situational. There's no secret recipe that has to be followed.It's always interesting to me when you look at the three best QB's of all time.
Brady
Mahomes
Rodgers
Literally all of them sat for at least a year.
I mean.......its kind of hard to argue with.
Tank creates his separation with Quick starts and stops and changes of direction, once he has that separation 4.49 will keep him away for the defender long enough.I'd feel better about JC's long, accurate throws if we had more speed with our WRs. Tank's 4.49 is okay but i hope his separation skills translate to NFL.
Personally, I am more interested in his mid level throws which should be productive.
You're counting on 2 or 3 rookies (Metchie didn't play in 2022), one aging vet, and a young vet that has been injury prone. Dalton Schultz is the closest thing Stroud will have to a #1 target. It would be a huge plus for the Texans if this group becomes average in 2023.Assuming that Metchie is healthy I think the receiving corp could be really good.
I agree, the Texans don't really have a WR that can take the top off the defense. But, I don't think the deep ball will be heavily featured in the 2023 offense. More about getting the ball out on time and letting the receivers pick up YAC.I'd feel better about JC's long, accurate throws if we had more speed with our WRs. Tank's 4.49 is okay but i hope his separation skills translate to NFL.
Personally, I am more interested in his mid level throws which should be productive.
I agree with the bolded part. But Richardson is starting game 1.
I like the two receivers drafted and perhaps a free agent signee such as Noah Brown can contribute.You're counting on 2 or 3 rookies (Metchie didn't play in 2022), one aging vet, and a young vet that has been injury prone. Dalton Schultz is the closest thing Stroud will have to a #1 target. It would be a huge plus for the Texans if this group becomes average in 2023.