WolverineFan
Hall of Fame
Would love to hear Cook's explanation for completely disrespecting Archie Griffin after the game.

Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
I saw that live and thought it looked really odd.
Then the rest of the team left the stage as he started talking and I couldn't tell if I was making a bigger deal of that than it really was.
It's like he became Bo Callahan for a minute.
You think he'll still be around at 1-32... 1-31?A 22-play 9:04 82 yard game winning drive. He was the MVP of the game when he didn't play at his best 16/32 191 yds and 1 INT. if the Texans do not draft this kid then, Bill O'Brien and Rick Smith need to be fired immediately after the draft
Connor Cook apologized, said he was caught in the moment when accepting MVP trophy from Archie GriffinWould love to hear Cook's explanation for completely disrespecting Archie Griffin after the game.
![]()
It is possible he had no idea who Griffin was. He is under twenty-five. I wouldn't have known it if I hadn't been told who he was.Connor Cook apologized, said he was caught in the moment when accepting MVP trophy from Archie Griffin
http://www.freep.com/story/sports/c...onnor-cook-handshake-archie-griffin/76875066/
I think that's going to be enough for me to take Cook off of my draft board. In the FWIW Dept, Coker had a better game against Florida D than Cook had against the Iowa D.Might be a glimpse into why he's not a senior captain.
It's been bugging me all year how he's a third year starting QB and not a team captain. Just seems so weird.
It is possible he had no idea who Griffin was. He is under twenty-five. I wouldn't have known it if I hadn't been told who he was.
Yes. But the guy is still young and excited. He MAY learn protocol as he matures.It terms of protocol, it should not matter if he knew who Archie Griffin was. Take the whole 2 seconds, shake the guy's hand correctly, and go on about your life.
Yes. But the guy is still young and excited. He MAY learn protocol as he matures.
Would love to hear Cook's explanation for completely disrespecting Archie Griffin after the game.
![]()
Couldn't have been more Unimpressed with him after the game yesterday....dude's a low end game manager..if we draft this kid and we do it any earlier than the 3rd round I'm gonna be pissed.
My impression of Cook so far is he's quick-minded, but has a bit of a 'dumb blonde' in him. A little like Tom Brady, dumb blonde/self-centered/not the most liked by teammates. Certainly doesn't disqualify him as you can add both Mannings, Ben, Russell Wilson, Kaepernick among recent SB QBs whose teammates didn't love them.
I think he was just nervous and looked right past Archie to Joel Klatt. He owned it right afterwards after seeing the video:
http://btn.com/2015/12/06/watch-connor-cook-celebrate-big-ten-title-with-parents/
Still more digging to do through the Combine.
He's still playing injured from the shoulder subluxation. One of the most anticipated Combine medical reports in 2016, no doubt.
I'm curious what about him makes you think he could be even mentioned in the same sentence as multiple Super Bowl winners like Big Ben and Brady. Admittedly I don't know a lot about him other than what I've read in here, but that's a big time comparison.I think he could end up being a Tom Brady or even a Big Ben. He is a leader, fighter and most importantly he's a winner he can lead a team from a come from behind to win and possibly win a Super Bowl or two and I agree the only thing that worries me is the shoulder if he throw deep at the combine or at his pro day without any problems from his shoulder, he is a 1st rounder and I hope the Texans draft him because this team needs a QB.
I'm curious what about him makes you think he could be even mentioned in the same sentence as multiple Super Bowl winners like Big Ben and Brady. Admittedly I don't know a lot about him other than what I've read in here, but that's a big time comparison.
I get that. Cook obviously isn't a multiple super Bowl winning veteran. It just seems kind of silly to me to ever compare players to guys like Cool Joe, Brady, Big Ben, etc. These are some of the greatest to ever play the game.You have to understand no one will make a direct comparison to a college prospect & a veteran QB.
When you see "college player" compared to "multiple Super Bowl winning veteran" they're mostly talking about that "multiple Super Bowl winning veteran" when he was a prospect, straight out of college.
There's a trait, or attribute the poster is identifying as a trait, or attribute that helped that prospect achieve what he has in the NFL & since the new prospect has those same traits hopefully the new prospect will have a successful NFL career.
I get that. Cook obviously isn't a multiple super Bowl winning veteran. It just seems kind of silly to me to ever compare players to guys like Cool Joe, Brady, Big Ben, etc. These are some of the greatest to ever play the game.
So what specific traits do you, or others, see in Cook to make such an unbelievable comparison? If it's the leadership and intangibles, then you better freakin draft the guy, especially if we are mentioning Brady. The guy is probably the fiercest competitor the sport has just about ever seen. No one wants to win more than Brady, and that's what sets him apart.
If that's Cook, then you better f-ing draft him. So why the comparison? I wish you had answered the question.
I think he could end up being a Tom Brady or even a Big Ben...
MSU's Connor Cook wins Unitas award as top QB
http://www.freep.com/story/sports/c.../08/connor-cook-johnny-unitas-award/76993958/
Which Round?He has played poorly since his shoulder injury. (Granted he had plenty of rest before playing Penn State.)
I'd feel very confident that MSU could beat Bama if I knew his shoulder was 100%. I'm pretty sure it's not and will most likely require surgery after the season ends.
Regardless,
I hope we draft Cook.
ESPN AT&T Stadium
Thu, Dec 31
8:00 PM ET
Michigan State
(12-1, 7-1 Conf.)
@
Alabama
(12-1, 7-1 Conf.)
Conversation »Tickets »
Yep, I agree, thought they were trying to go to fast. Haste makes waste.Cook did stare down that end zone throw.
Cook did stare down that end zone throw.
So Cook made two mistakes on the same play?It was poorly placed more than anything. Defender wouldn't have had a chance had Cook threw it over the top.
Remember when everyone tried to hype up the fact that Gurley could fall to the end of the 1st round and the Seahawks could get him? The media hyped it up to no end and he ended up getting drafted 10th overall.
People who don't like Cook are going to hype him falling into the 2nd or 3rd round. That isn't happening. He's a mid-late 1st round pick. If you're just now watching Cook then of course you don't like him. He's injured and is going to try to play through it because he gives MSU the best chance to win.
Wolverine, I thoroughly enjoy your draft analysis but please look at Cook as a QB that ISN'T playing for your in-state rival. It is affecting your judgement. The team captain stuff is blown completely out of proportion. I will admit that he has a slight arrogance to him but with that arrogance comes confidence.
When the year started, the media asked him who the best QB in the Big Ten was and he said himself. Pretty sure he was right.
And last but not least, the Archie Griffin episode. Yes, he quickly shook his hand and moved past him.
1. He was caught up in the moment of just winning the Big Ten and he forgot to acknowledge Archie accordingly. It happened, he apologized, MOVE ON. I've talked to several OSU fans that are over it.
2. When OSU won the Big Ten last year, Cardale Jones didn't even SHAKE Archie's hand, he took the trophy and walked right past him without even looking at him. Go look it up. All about making something out of nothing.
End rant.
How many folks here jumped off the Cook wagon??
Honestly, I would expect anybody that liked Mallett would like Cook.
Trying to figure how that makes sense.
People like several different types of qb's and for different reasons.
Very similar college players with similar tools, strengths, and weaknesses.
I'm not saying you have to like both. But they are very similar, and I would expect that whatever it is you value in the one you like you would also value if you saw the same things in someone else.
I guess that's an interesting way to look at it. I still don't fully get he take though.
For instance, I like guys who are good and help teams win and I just assumed everyone thought that way.
To throw some concrete names out there...I like Manning, Brady, Newton, Wilson, Luck, Romo, Palmer, Rivers, Brees....and a bunch of other guys throughout history and also current.
A bunch of guys with different skill sets....
Mallet was a guy with with physical tools, had high round talent, had been in the system with a great franchise and learned from a great coach and qb.
Situations, circumstances....that matters.
But no biggie...was just wondering
I'm not far from that point of view. Identifying skills is just part of the evaluation. Finding out how well they can be coached up to utilize those skills to bring about success is just the hardest part of the evaluation. Is it their fault or the fault of those surrounding them that YOU can change for the better?We might just look at things a little bit differently. No biggie at all, just different perspectives.
There's a lot that goes into an evaluation, but one big thing for me is that I look at players in terms of what tools they have, what are their strengths, and what are their weaknesses. That way I can evaluate guys who play across a whole spectrum of different systems with different responsibilities even though they may play what is considered to be the same position. It's more than just looking at a guy and saying whether he's good or not. Because what he's good at in college may be different from what he would be asked to do in the pros.
To give you an example, two guys who were compared at length as extremely similar players were Russell Wilson and Manziel. They are similar size and similar athletes with somewhat similar abilities. But I had a 1st round grade on Wilson when nobody else did because of how I felt that his particular set of skills translated to the next level. Then Manziel comes out, who people think is very similar, but I had a 3rd round grade on him because I didn't see his tools translating to the next level in the same way. Both were very good in college and helped their team win. But to me they project to the next level of football in drastically different ways.
I'm also a coach, so that may change the way I look at it. That's what we do (at least at my school). We don't get to pick our players, and so each kid we get has to be evaluated for what he brings to the table, what he's good at and what he's not good at. A kid being good and helping his team win are two different things and they are so dependent on things that are totally out of the kid's control that it's impossible to make a true projection of the kid's abilities just looking at it that way. At least in my opinion.