Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍

Clowney, then what?

NFL is in nickel/dime 70% of the time, RAC will run nickel 70% of time, OB has been quoting this number since he was still a candidate for HC and as recently as at the 3/31 Town Hall Q&A: http://bit.ly/Oehy9n

Playoffs do you, or anyone, have a link to a video of the town hall meeting? I searched the mothership and came up lame. idonno:
 
See,this is me. I don't have to create excuses for jf,bb,or tb even with a bad game here or there. For some reason,we have Neo of college football,yet his teammates trumped him in every defensive category. Now before the defenders of supafreak starts lying about the doubles and line shift, von miler had moore and porter and neither trumped his production. Mario played with manny lawson and tank tyler and neither trumped his production. Peppers had guys on the line with him,again none trumped his production. Kelcy Quarles had more tackles,tfls and trippled his sack production,but it was because of clowney?

See,this is my big issue. I'm 43, and I've never seen a supposed top pick have to be defended like clowney.Imagine if luck would've thrown for 50% and 2k yds with a upside td/int ratio. We have never had a so called top prospect have such a dog of a year and people are acting like it didn't happen. We're not talking about ansah who was came from another country and didn't even play football until track wasn't a option. We're talking about a guy whom we've known about since he was 13. If people were being honest and watched his 2012 games like I did,you will see the same guy.The diference was teams realize what he can't do which is what nfl teams will. We've seen mark anderson get 12 sacks as a rookie upfield rusher then be basically avg after that. We've seen kearse go from the freak to just a guy because of no counter move. The trend on clowney is going the wrong direction.

On a side note, no team will double clowney until he proves he can beat single blocks. If you've watched enough games of clowney, you will know he has trouble doing it even at the college level. Go watch his 4.5 sack performance vs clemson in 2012.

I will trust Bruschi's eval over yours because he knows the type of guy RC wants. Your opinion is valid though. BTW, I still like Robinson.
 
Playoffs do you, or anyone, have a link to a video of the town hall meeting? I searched the mothership and came up lame. idonno:

Have not found full recording of it yet. I expect it will pop up on HT.com, but delayed a bit. If it doesn't show up after a few weeks I'll start asking around to see if I can get a copy.


From Clowney's post pro day presser: http://www.jaguars.com/media-galler..._Clowney/71a1bf6e-45c9-434e-9e84-6ef09307afd4

What are you going to miss most about your college experience?

JdC: Aww, man, my teammates. I came in with a good group of guys. We all bonded together like a real family of brothers. Everybody had each other's back, you know?

Cracking jokes, laughing with each other, everybody talking...

You always run into that guy that kinda had the same background as you growing up... and just having them in the lockeroom, you know, somebody going through the same things you're going through it's great.

We just sit there and talk about our problems, talk about something... it helps you out, you know, having somebody there you can count on... you're not worrying about them telling your business or nothing, so,

I miss my teammates, that's the thing I miss most about being at South Carolina, the same group I came in with... the same group that's still here.
 
Are you willing to go Clowney 1.1 and then:

trade #33 and 3rd round pick for Bortles/Manziel at roughly #20 overall?

That's an interesting call. If we were looking at a drop from one of them (or even Bridgewater) to around #20 then you would have to consider it if you thought they were better than the guy at #33.

I'd say "maybe". I'd make enquiries. I might try to put the other pick off a year but I bet in this draft they wouldn't want to do that.
 
Not following your line of thinking. There are plenty of good great players in this draft. Robinson/Watkins/Clowney/Matthews etc... help me figure out what you're saying?

You seem to be describing Teddy fans more than Clowney fans. IMHO

You'd probably need to read the guy I quoted I guess (read his full entry, I chopped it up just to quote it). I re-read it again and feel I wrote my point out correctly.
 
There are ways to go about making your point without calling others stupid. I believe it's very safe to say Texian knows more football than you will forget. I only defend this guy because in another message board people like you used to talk this way to him, then when the draft was over and he was right on a subject and they were wrong, no one ever apologized or admitted fault.

I have a different view of Bortles but Texian was raving about him as a #1 pick when most didn't know his name. The people paid to do this were calling him a 3rd round pick, now a simple google search will show Texian may not be that far off. Peyton Manning and Andrew Luck also got sacked, threw INTs, and lost games FWIW.

With that said, I do not want Bortles, nor do I find the need to call others stupid for wanting as much.

Your support is much appreciated! Thanks!
 
I get where you're coming from, but disagree with you.

If Clowney is 1-1 and say Bortles fell to 7, would you do an Atlanta type (Julio Jones trade to move up and pick Bortles?

If so this would solidify the 3 most important positions on the team. QB/Pass rusher/LT. After studying Bortles I would have to consider trading up.

After studying the Blake Bortles vs Jadevon Clowney game, I look at it this way. IIRC Clowney had Bortles in his cross hairs with a straight shot, Locked and Loaded about 4 different times if IIRC. Bortles was able side step or out maneuver Clowney each time. So I ask, is Bortles that good in the pocket and avoiding pressure or is Clowney a one trick pony? You be the judge:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYd29xlmc04

No I wouldn't make a Julio trade . The reason Atlanta is still is suffering today is because of giving up so much for Julio. Five picks is just to many and why give up any picks at all when you don't have to. I am also of the opinion that Jeremiah Attaochu could be a better NFL player than Clowney. Giving up 5 picks for a WR was absurd.

1800165_10100838073131649_2002853061_o.0_standard_730.0.jpg


I would not be opposed to giving up 2.1 and 4.1 to move up to 1.26 to select JEREMIAH ATTAOCHU or DONTE' MONCRIEF for that matter.
 
Last edited:
I will trust Bruschi's eval over yours because he knows the type of guy RC wants. Your opinion is valid though. BTW, I still like Robinson.


That's cool and I respect bruschi,but you can also look at RAC history of lbs from lt and banks to houston and Hali. In between he had wimberely who had a double digit sack season as a rookie and fel off after that. All in all, its gonna be O'Brien/Rick Smith pick not RAC pick. For all we know a qb could be the highest rated player and they feel great about ford,smith,murphy,or attachou at top of 2nd. I maintain my stance,as long as the guy is of probowl caliber,they got it right. For all the holes on indy's team, they've won 11 games 2 yrs in a row. If they stop spending dumb money, they can be even better. Think about ravens before flacco and falcons before ryan. No one is saying either are great qbs. I remember ravens having great defenses missing the playoffs before flacco. Even with brees in division and a miserable season,the falcons have won more games since 08 than any team in that division.
 
No I wouldn't make a Julio trade . The reason Atlanta is still is suffering today is because of giving up so much for Julio. Five picks is just to many and why give up any picks at all when you don't have to. I am also of the opinion that Jeremiah Attaochu could be a better NFL player than Clowney. Giving up 5 picks for a WR was absurd.

How many play off games did Atlanta win before they drafted Julio Jones?
 
Your logic is on point. If there are only "good" QBs who are likely to turn into shoot you take Clowney.

However, you speak as if this is a fact, that they are all just good. What if I told you that I don't agree with your opinion that you are pushing as fact?

This thread has gone on for over 100 pages and this same post you just wrote has been written on every single one of those 100 pages.

I just want to break it to you and the next guy that posts this same exact thing on page 104. Your opinion is not fact.

If everybody in this draft sucks and Clowney is the only good person in the draft, I will draft Clowney with my #1 pick. Boom! Game changing analysis for you.

I'd tell you that anyone who takes anything I say on this subject as fact is a fool. I'm a fan. I don't do mock drafts, nobody pays me for my opinion, and I am frequently wrong. If I sound as though I think this is a fact then that is merely because it is the way I see this and I feel strongly about it. That's really all. Everyone on here is voicing an opinion and they're all making their case for why their particular opinion is probably right. I'm no different.

Don't get so wound up about it. You don't know a ****ing thing and neither do I. I understand that. Do you?
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYd29xlmc04

No I wouldn't make a Julio trade . The reason Atlanta is still is suffering today is because of giving up so much for Julio. Five picks is just to many and why give up any picks at all when you don't have to. I am also of the opinion that Jeremiah Attaochu could be a better NFL player than Clowney. Giving up 5 picks for a WR was absurd.

How many play off games did Atlanta win before they drafted Julio Jones?

I think Atlanta should be our trade target. They could use Clowney in the worst way, he's from the region so it might help with bringing Gamecock fans from the Panthers over to the Falcons, and they have a history of doing this. If we could end up with 13 picks or so I'd be ecstatic.
 
I'd tell you that anyone who takes anything I say on this subject as fact is a fool. I'm a fan. I don't do mock drafts, nobody pays me for my opinion, and I am frequently wrong. If I sound as though I think this is a fact then that is merely because it is the way I see this and I feel strongly about it. That's really all. Everyone on here is voicing an opinion and they're all making their case for why their particular opinion is probably right. I'm no different.

Don't get so wound up about it. You don't know a ****ing thing and neither do I. I understand that. Do you?

Good post, Herv. +Rep.
 
See,this is me. I don't have to create excuses for jf,bb,or tb even with a bad game here or there. For some reason,we have Neo of college football,yet his teammates trumped him in every defensive category. Now before the defenders of supafreak starts lying about the doubles and line shift, von miler had moore and porter and neither trumped his production. Mario played with manny lawson and tank tyler and neither trumped his production. Peppers had guys on the line with him,again none trumped his production. Kelcy Quarles had more tackles,tfls and trippled his sack production,but it was because of clowney?

See,this is my big issue. I'm 43, and I've never seen a supposed top pick have to be defended like clowney.Imagine if luck would've thrown for 50% and 2k yds with a upside td/int ratio. We have never had a so called top prospect have such a dog of a year and people are acting like it didn't happen. We're not talking about ansah who was came from another country and didn't even play football until track wasn't a option. We're talking about a guy whom we've known about since he was 13. If people were being honest and watched his 2012 games like I did,you will see the same guy.The diference was teams realize what he can't do which is what nfl teams will. We've seen mark anderson get 12 sacks as a rookie upfield rusher then be basically avg after that. We've seen kearse go from the freak to just a guy because of no counter move. The trend on clowney is going the wrong direction.

On a side note, no team will double clowney until he proves he can beat single blocks. If you've watched enough games of clowney, you will know he has trouble doing it even at the college level. Go watch his 4.5 sack performance vs clemson in 2012.

Spectacular post! I really don't get how more posters don't see it like this.

Like you said, I have never seen a guy raved about like Clowney that people have had to make this many excuses for. As the article I posted yesterday said, Clowney has no pass rush moves except what they call his slap and arm-over move.

I am no draft expert. I am not claiming that I am. But I just can't imagine drafting a guy a 1.1 that had 3 sacks as a pass rushing defensive end. It just seems silly to me. Clowney is nearly every bit the project that Johnny Manziel is. The only thing with Johnny is there are ZERO questions regarding his heart. Talk about character concerns all you want (which I still find ridiculous) but there is not one objective person that has ever watched him, played against him, or played with him that would ever question his heart. Can the same be said about Clowney? No.
 
Clowney is nearly every bit the project that Johnny Manziel is. The only thing with Johnny is there are ZERO questions regarding his heart. Talk about character concerns all you want (which I still find ridiculous) but there is not one objective person that has ever watched him, played against him, or played with him that would ever question his heart. Can the same be said about Clowney? No.

Uh... Clowney is 6'6"
 
I think Atlanta should be our trade target. They could use Clowney in the worst way, he's from the region so it might help with bringing Gamecock fans from the Panthers over to the Falcons, and they have a history of doing this. If we could end up with 13 picks or so I'd be ecstatic.


Trading up from 6 to 1 would probably cost more than two extra picks I would think. I'm all for trading back though, it needs to happen.
 
Spectacular post! I really don't get how more posters don't see it like this.

Like you said, I have never seen a guy raved about like Clowney that people have had to make this many excuses for. As the article I posted yesterday said, Clowney has no pass rush moves except what they call his slap and arm-over move.

I am no draft expert. I am not claiming that I am. But I just can't imagine drafting a guy a 1.1 that had 3 sacks as a pass rushing defensive end. It just seems silly to me. Clowney is nearly every bit the project that Johnny Manziel is. The only thing with Johnny is there are ZERO questions regarding his heart. Talk about character concerns all you want (which I still find ridiculous) but there is not one objective person that has ever watched him, played against him, or played with him that would ever question his heart. Can the same be said about Clowney? No.

Maybe you don't get it bro....

I'm no expert.... but Clowney is the greatest athlete to ever enter the NFL draft and there will never be anyone else like him. No one is comparable to him. He doesn't need swim moves or bend cause he doesn't need them to still be the greatest ever. Have you seen that hit he put on the Michigan RB in 2012? 2013 didn't count dude, double teams, playing not to get hurt, schemed against, sad cause Lattimore broke his leg, not his fault, sick, ramble ramble. Since we don't need to spend #1 on a RT or another WR and all the QBs suck by default you take the guy who will be all pro for the next 12 years.

I hope you were taking notes son, you just got schooled.
 
Maybe you don't get it bro....

I'm no expert.... but Clowney is the greatest athlete to ever enter the NFL draft and there will never be anyone else like him. No one is comparable to him. He doesn't need swim moves or bend cause he doesn't need them to still be the greatest ever. Have you seen that hit he put on the Michigan RB in 2012? 2013 didn't count dude, double teams, playing not to get hurt, schemed against, sad cause Lattimore broke his leg, not his fault, sick, ramble ramble. Since we don't need to spend #1 on a RT or another WR and all the QBs suck by default you take the guy who will be all pro for the next 12 years.

I hope you were taking notes son, you just got schooled.

The thing is, every top prospect has warts. Some maybe more than Clowney, some less. Every one of them gets their fair share of defenders glossing over their weak points and pumping up their strong points.

Maybe Clowney has more excuses made for his weak points than others, maybe not. It's really hard to quantify since none of us have access to the same excuse-o-meter that y'all are using to validate your opinions.
 
Even jumping bags, Clowney wows 'em; LINK

Taneyhill, now the head coach of Union (S.C.) High School, stood there and shook his head.

"Just wow!" he said.

Every team in the NFL needs a "wow" player, but none more than the Houston Texans, who have the first pick of the draft. As Clowney reminded, he has never been a part of a losing team and South Carolina never won more than 10 games before he arrived.

The Gamecocks were 11-2 every year he was there.
 
Uh... Clowney is 6'6"

Huh? I said "heart" not "height." Did I miss something?

Maybe you don't get it bro....

I'm no expert.... but Clowney is the greatest athlete to ever enter the NFL draft and there will never be anyone else like him. No one is comparable to him. He doesn't need swim moves or bend cause he doesn't need them to still be the greatest ever. Have you seen that hit he put on the Michigan RB in 2012? 2013 didn't count dude, double teams, playing not to get hurt, schemed against, sad cause Lattimore broke his leg, not his fault, sick, ramble ramble. Since we don't need to spend #1 on a RT or another WR and all the QBs suck by default you take the guy who will be all pro for the next 12 years.

I hope you were taking notes son, you just got schooled.

Classic! Rep to you!
 
As far as "interviews" go, Clowney's was as strong as anyone else. I think the key is that his was not scripted. He had to follow instructions from pro coaches and did not know what he was going to be asked to do before his pro day. And just about everyone came away convinced that the "heart question" has been resolved and is now a non-issue.
 
As far as "interviews" go, Clowney's was as strong as anyone else. I think the key is that his was not scripted. He had to follow instructions from pro coaches and did not know what he was going to be asked to do before his pro day. And just about everyone came away convinced that the "heart question" has been resolved and is now a non-issue.

It's funny how pro days and interviews don't convince anyone of anything in regards to Manziel. But somehow with Clowney, it addresses all of the concerns. :thinking:
 
It's funny how pro days and interviews don't convince anyone of anything in regards to Manziel. But somehow with Clowney, it addresses all of the concerns. :thinking:

It's a lot harder to pick up tennis balls on the run after jumping over bags than it is to run around a broom. Just sayin.
 
If there's no trade, I would be very surprised if Clowney wasn't the pick. Antonio was let to walk. JJ can't do it by himself. I really think Houston would be the best organization for Clowney to be drafted to. The class and work ethic from O'Brien and Watt would have to rub off on him. Clowney probably wouldn't feel like the spotlight was solely on him. The defense would be immediately upgraded and gives OB more possessions with the ball (Does anyone else love the idea of OB calling the plays? Balls. He has them.)

It just makes too much sense for me.
 
I', sure Josenna Clowney, Jadeven's mother, is probably cheering those millions of fans out there fixing to knock those Doritos off Manziel's shoulder...........she'll enjoy her work that much more..............she's a processing technician at the Frito-Lay plant in nearby Charlotte............she helps make Doritos.:pirate:
 
It's funny how pro days and interviews don't convince anyone of anything in regards to Manziel. But somehow with Clowney, it addresses all of the concerns. :thinking:

Judging by the analysts on NFLN, they both convinced people on their pro days.
 
It's a lot harder to pick up tennis balls on the run after jumping over bags than it is to run around a broom. Just sayin.
It's a lot harder to hit a receiver in stride 40 yards downfield while rolling out than it is to jump over bags....even picking up balls as you run afterward. Just sayin. :kitten:
 
It's a lot harder to hit a receiver in stride 40 yards downfield while rolling out than it is to jump over bags....even picking up balls as you run afterward. Just sayin. :kitten:

I just wish Clowney would of came out with his helmet and shoulder pads on. Then there would be no question who should go number one. :swatter:
 
Judging by the analysts on NFLN, they both convinced people on their pro days.

I'm cool with that, as long as people are consistent. I won't name names, but there have been those on the board that ranted against using pro days and interviews to justify drafting a player, but then claim Clowney's pro day sealed the deal. Just remain consistent.

As for me, yes Clowney had a good pro day and good interviews. He said all the right things. But when I look at the stats and the tape, I see an athletic freak that commits to the bull rush or the speed rush but really has no counter moves when the offensive line adjusts.
 
I'm cool with that, as long as people are consistent. I won't name names, but there have been those on the board that ranted against using pro days and interviews to justify drafting a player, but then claim Clowney's pro day sealed the deal. Just remain consistent.

As for me, yes Clowney had a good pro day and good interviews. He said all the right things. But when I look at the stats and the tape, I see an athletic freak that commits to the bull rush or the speed rush but really has no counter moves when the offensive line adjusts.

I heard Bob Polian talking about Pro Days yesterday on Sirius XM.

He said, for scouts and GMs, Pro Days mean almost nothing. They've already seen most of these guys in person and already have solid opinions formed.

But for coaches, the Pro Day is a chance to see the person up close for the first time. And for coaches, this can help them make up their minds about guys.

Now, for the Media and for fans... yeah. The pro days can mean something for their opinion of the players. But. Their opinion means nothing.

I personally feel better about Clowney after his pro-day and although I thought Bridgewater was the #1 QB after the season, seeing him perform that poorly on his pro-day has raised doubts for me.

OTOH, Manziel's pro-day didn't really move me either way. I wasn't comfortable with him before his pro-day and I'm not comfy with him after it. I don't expect him to be a consistently good QB. I expect him to be a highlight reel guy who costs his team more games than he wins for them. I don't expect his game to translate to the NFL. I'm not saying I'm right, I'm just saying that's what I expect and why, if it was up to me, I wouldn't draft him in the first round.
 
It's a lot harder to hit a receiver in stride 40 yards downfield while rolling out than it is to jump over bags....even picking up balls as you run afterward. Just sayin. :kitten:

Should count the number of times the receivers had to slow down to wait on Manziel's throw.
 
Even jumping bags, Clowney wows 'em; LINK

Watching that jumping over bags sprinting out to pick up tennis balls drill I really question that no one has ever jumped 7 bags and grabbed both tennis balls? Maybe I'm just off base, but that didn't look like an Olympic feat to me? How long have they been testing that way? JJ Watt couldn't do it?
 
and as a result of their win NOW at all cost strategy, what # draft pick do they've today?

How will they look after drafting this yr should be the question. If they draft well then the Jones trade and bad yr this yr will serve them well as they move into the future.

The Falcons could be loaded with young talent for yrs to come.
 
Now, for the Media and for fans... yeah. The pro days can mean something for their opinion of the players. But. Their opinion means nothing.

I personally feel better about Clowney after his pro-day and although I thought Bridgewater was the #1 QB after the season, seeing him perform that poorly on his pro-day has raised doubts for me.

OTOH, Manziel's pro-day didn't really move me either way.

I don't care about pro-days, until someone stinks it up. Especially if they skipped the work-out portion of the combine. Because, this is it. This is what you've been working on since the season ended. You decided that this was going to be your opportunity to show the NFL what you can do. You wrote the script, you picked the venue, everything about it was set up to help you look your best.

I didn't watch all of Johnny's Pro Day & I probably won't watch all of Clowney's the reactions were where they needed to be for a #1 overall selection (even though I don't think anyone would pick Manziel with the #1 overall).

I did watch Teddy's, because I wanted to see if it matched the reaction.
 
I'm cool with that, as long as people are consistent. I won't name names, but there have been those on the board that ranted against using pro days and interviews to justify drafting a player, but then claim Clowney's pro day sealed the deal. Just remain consistent.

As for me, yes Clowney had a good pro day and good interviews. He said all the right things. But when I look at the stats and the tape, I see an athletic freak that commits to the bull rush or the speed rush but really has no counter moves when the offensive line adjusts.

I see someone that is consistently run past the qb, ala MW
 
I'm cool with that, as long as people are consistent. I won't name names, but there have been those on the board that ranted against using pro days and interviews to justify drafting a player, but then claim Clowney's pro day sealed the deal. Just remain consistent.

As for me, yes Clowney had a good pro day and good interviews. He said all the right things. But when I look at the stats and the tape, I see an athletic freak that commits to the bull rush or the speed rush but really has no counter moves when the offensive line adjusts.

IF you're referring to me, I was just having fun with it. The reason why "interview" was put in quotes in my previous post.

You were actually the one that put the interview idea in my head in the Manziel thread. You made a case for it. Perhaps the "Just remain consistent" mantra is something you should try to follow, since it's your advice and all.

I don't try to claim how much teams value pro days. I can only refer to the analysts that talk about it, and most of them say it is a small piece of the puzzle. Of course, after a good pro day, they rave about it. Go figure.

And I'm not a talent evaluator. I don't play one on the internet. I cannot claim what is in a dude's heart. So much of the things I hear from fans are the EXACT SAME THINGS I hear from the media. Isn't that interesting? Think the media analysts get their opinions from fans? Or maybe it's the other way around.

Tom Brady was drafted in the 6th round. If all these wannabe experts and analysts had a clue about evaluating and predicting the future, he would have been a 1.1 draft pick. We can go the other way with 1.1 picks that busted out.

Nobody really has this down to a science. The difference between me and others is that I don't claim to have any kind of insight or expertise into evaluations. I'm just a fan. And that's all I will ever be. I will root for Manziel or Clowney if either end up in a Texans uniform.

:texflag: <----this logo is what matters to me.
 
I'm cool with that, as long as people are consistent. I won't name names, but there have been those on the board that ranted against using pro days and interviews to justify drafting a player, but then claim Clowney's pro day sealed the deal. Just remain consistent.

I think you should name names, because, other than that it seems like you're generalizing, TBH.
 
I don't care about pro-days, until someone stinks it up. Especially if they skipped the work-out portion of the combine. Because, this is it. This is what you've been working on since the season ended. You decided that this was going to be your opportunity to show the NFL what you can do. You wrote the script, you picked the venue, everything about it was set up to help you look your best.

I didn't watch all of Johnny's Pro Day & I probably won't watch all of Clowney's the reactions were where they needed to be for a #1 overall selection (even though I don't think anyone would pick Manziel with the #1 overall).

I did watch Teddy's, because I wanted to see if it matched the reaction.

Pro days have some value if the players are asked to show their abilities doing things they didn't do in games, like drop back in coverage in Clowney's case, or in the case of QBs, take snaps from under center if he didn't do that in college.
 
Watching that jumping over bags sprinting out to pick up tennis balls drill I really question that no one has ever jumped 7 bags and grabbed both tennis balls? Maybe I'm just off base, but that didn't look like an Olympic feat to me? How long have they been testing that way? JJ Watt couldn't do it?

The test, IIRC, is supposed to test your balance and explosion. Not only did Clowney leap over 7 bags, but he grabbed the tennis balls with no issue compared to the other guy who jumped over 5-6 and couldn't grab both balls.
 
Ummmm RAC's portion w Clowney was NOT scripted. He even said it was the first time he was asked to drop back and turn. The dude took a chance on a drill he's never done on his biggest day so far. That gets some credit in my book.
 
Ummmm RAC's portion w Clowney was NOT scripted.

I didn't watch, but I heard it was three coaches from three different teams. None of it with the coaches was scripted. But I think it's that way with all defensive players.
 
I heard Bob Polian talking about Pro Days yesterday on Sirius XM.

He said, for scouts and GMs, Pro Days mean almost nothing. They've already seen most of these guys in person and already have solid opinions formed.

But for coaches, the Pro Day is a chance to see the person up close for the first time. And for coaches, this can help them make up their minds about guys.

Now, for the Media and for fans... yeah. The pro days can mean something for their opinion of the players. But. Their opinion means nothing.

I personally feel better about Clowney after his pro-day and although I thought Bridgewater was the #1 QB after the season, seeing him perform that poorly on his pro-day has raised doubts for me.

OTOH, Manziel's pro-day didn't really move me either way. I wasn't comfortable with him before his pro-day and I'm not comfy with him after it. I don't expect him to be a consistently good QB. I expect him to be a highlight reel guy who costs his team more games than he wins for them. I don't expect his game to translate to the NFL. I'm not saying I'm right, I'm just saying that's what I expect and why, if it was up to me, I wouldn't draft him in the first round.

That's a good post. You summed it all up very well. Thanks for the info on what Polian said as well.

IF you're referring to me, I was just having fun with it. The reason why "interview" was put in quotes in my previous post.

Wasn't referring to you. I really haven't seen you comment very much in either the Manziel or the Clowney thread.

You were actually the one that put the interview idea in my head in the Manziel thread. You made a case for it. Perhaps the "Just remain consistent" mantra is something you should try to follow, since it's your advice and all.

I'm not? Could you show me where I didn't follow that mantra? I said Clowney had a good pro day and did interview well. Does that matter? Yes. What I can't get over is his piss poor showing this last season. 3 sacks from a pass rushing DE is inexcusable. He shows hardly any pass rush moves and when offenses started figuring him out, he was basically neutralized. His sheer athletic ability allowed him to make a couple of highlight plays a game, but his athleticism won't do jack **** for him in the NFL.

Tom Brady was drafted in the 6th round. If all these wannabe experts and analysts had a clue about evaluating and predicting the future, he would have been a 1.1 draft pick. We can go the other way with 1.1 picks that busted out.

I agree.

Nobody really has this down to a science.

I agree again.

The difference between me and others is that I don't claim to have any kind of insight or expertise into evaluations. I'm just a fan. And that's all I will ever be. I will root for Manziel or Clowney if either end up in a Texans uniform..

I'll probably always root for this franchise. But to be quite honest, I'm tired of the boring, same old **** from this organization. We are vanilla. Frankly, I'm getting tired of the flavour vanilla. You are more than welcome to keep on lapping up whatever this franchise serves you, but I quit purchasing season tickets, didn't go to a single game last year because I saw the collapse coming after the first or second game, and am tired of watching this organization make changes at a snails pace.

For good or bad, drafting Johnny Manziel most definitely makes a statement for this franchise. It shows we are willing to swing for the fences, that we are ready for an exciting brand of football, and that we are ready to take advantage of the rule changes in this league and develop a high-powered offense that can put points on anyone. Drafting Clowney probably does much the same thing Mario Williams did for us: a few 8-8 seasons, a playoff appearance, and then he bolts for a stupid contract with a crap franchise.

There are no guarantees in the NFL. But this is a QB driven league. If you are counting on getting the next guarantee at QB, you are going to be waiting a LONG time, because those guys only come along about every 15 years. If you are counting on striking it lucky with a middle to late round pick at QB, you also might be waiting a long time. At some point, you have to take a chance. I firmly believe Manziel is worth gambling on.
 
Back
Top