I guess your post about taking a college QB with 3 starts to his name over a multi year starter who has been drafted and in the NFL for a year makes you sound super smart and makes a lot of sense.
Well, let's look at that.
Multi-year starter at multiple schools - sometimes winning the starting job, sometimes losing it. Someone who makes snap decisions might consider his inability to follow through at one school a negative. Some who give it more consideration might also come to the same conclusion. Others might consider that a strength.
A year of NFL experience - good point; since this is a plus we don't have to consider the "he's just a rookie" excuse. When he was put into a game he couldn't even hand off properly among other questionable actions. I was not impressed during the small amount of time he played; others seem to think he showed great potential. Do I hate Savage? No. I just don't think he has shown as much as others think he has.
Drafted in the NFL - I think Jones will probably be drafted in the NFL at some point, so that is a wash.
=================
College quarterback with three starts to his name - blowout win in conference championship, solid win over #1 ranked Alabama, comfortable win over #2 Oregon for NCAA Championship. He
is inexperienced, but I take those wins as a positive since he was able to perform under pressure without those multi-year starter qualifications. I hardly think "only three starts" makes him a bad player. He might actually get better with more experience and coaching. In other words, he has potential, just as others claim for Savage.
He was surrounded by an extremely talented team, so he didn't "win" those games by himself. However, he did his fair share - he didn't just ride the coattails of the rest of the team, nor did he play so badly his team was at risk of losing.
=======================
Therefore, I think it does make sense to consider Jones over Savage if a team is looking to develop a third string quarterback with potential.