Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
Although most people return to normal daily activities, except for sports, within 3 to 4 months, studies have shown that athletes can still be recovering up to 2 years after their ankle fractures. It may take several months for patients to stop limping while they walk. Again, we need more information to determine return to competitive level........and then prognosis will not be entirely predictable...........to be determined only by Tate's unique course.
Foster & JJ both undrafted FAs the Texans signed. Let's just not invest anymore high draft picks in backs because it's too easy for them to get banged up, especially in the NFL.
As for Slaton, I thought he looked good until the fumble. Ok maybe that's like saying Chicago was doin fine untile the fire, or San Fran was OK until the earthquake, but let's give some more time before we write him off ? Still 3 more weeks of preseaon, 3 more preseason games.
Thanks Doc. If it is a fracture, what is the best case scenario? Broken fibula with no ligament damage? How unlikely is that.
Worst case? Could his career be over before it got started?
Your examples span the possibilities. However, the broken fibula with no ligament damage, even though possible, is probably unlikely.
Yeah, I know. How likely is ligament damage with no fracture? Would that be a better scenario in terms of recovery time?
Although most people return to normal daily activities, except for sports, within 3 to 4 months, studies have shown that athletes can still be recovering up to 2 years after their ankle fractures. It may take several months for patients to stop limping while they walk. Again, we need more information to determine return to competitive level........and then prognosis will not be entirely predictable...........to be determined only by Tate's unique course.
Your examples span the possibilities. However, the broken fibula with no ligament damage, even though possible, is probably unlikely.
What about the often-claimed phrase "It's better, in the long run in terms of recovery and future stability, to have broken it instead of fractured it"?
Is that a an urban legend? My wife played volleyball and has always said that it's better to have a break than a fracture. Have just always wondered if this is true or not.
Probably, but "a fractured ankle" has been reported by McClain.
The Steelers lost Rashard Mendenhall, their first round pick, during his rookie
year, and still won Superbowl. When Ben went down, I felt bad for Ben,
but for the Texans' production at halfback. We still seem to have
two more realistic options, and one scatback.
As good as Jacoby Jones and Dickerson looked last night, this offense
shouldn't miss a beat. It took Moulden two seasons to recover from
a shattered ankle, so here's hoping Ben makes a speedy recovery.
Is is just me or does anyone else feel like their IQ went up 10 pts after reading CnD's posts
Well, we've got 3 more weeks of camp and 3 other p/s games to find out how bad this impacts the running game. And there have got to be tons of other RBs to bring in to compete for that 4th RB spot. Right now it's still Foster/Slaton/Johnson/Henry. If our line improves, that might be enough.
What I don't get is how it happened. The tackler grabbed Tate by his ankle; was that enough to do the damage or did he land on that joint during the tackle and that's what broke it??
Do you still have faith in what McClain says? I know he said he thinks Ben is done for the year with a broken ankle, but I will wait for the official report.
Odd because that is why I would say don't use high picks on backs, use them on OLine so any half talent back can be productive.
GP,
In medical terminology, a fracture of a bone and a broken bone are synonymous. Lay people assign all sorts of specific meanings (although incorrectly) to these terms. Sometimes, I've seen partial break assigned to one to distiguish it from complete separation break . Other times, I've seen a "clean" break assigned to one to distinguish it from a comminuted (multiple pieces) break assigned to the other. If your wife is trying to say that a "clean" break [her term-"a break"] is better to have sustained than a comminuted (multiple fragmentation) break [her term-"a fracture"], then she is correct.
it's all about strategy. A great line can make a crappy back look good but the reverse is also true. A great back can make a crappy line look good.
You never know which rb is going to get injured. So you need your overall talent level to be high and it's a helluva risk thinking you're going to get talented udfa's like foster and johnson. If you look at the top rbs in the league, most of them are high round draft choices. Otoh, if you look at starting offensive linemen, more of them are udfa and low round draft choices.
Therefore, despite stories of players like terrell davis and arian foster, you have a higher chance of having a good line with udfas and low round draft choices than you have of finding a good running back down there.
I was thinking the same thing. I recall all the uproar when we had a chance to snag him but traded down and ended up with Slaton.
Any of you draftniks or waiver wire bloodhounds out there know of anyone that we could bring in?
I'm not always sure that my lack of faith in the accuracy of reporting Texans injuries stops with McClain.
I wonder if Larry Johnson would have been a good pickup, had we shown interest in him?
Or maybe even Thomas Jones? But he slipped away.
Cedric Benson? I know, know: legal problems.
Willie Parker? Signed with someone else.
(Sigh)
You're always going to have a RB problem, IMO. It's never-ending.
I did a quick Google search and it looks like all the veteran F/A RB names I recognized have signed on with someone already. WalterFootball has a decent list that was updated on 8/13.
i just re-watched the play multiple times where Tate got injured... didn't look like there was much there that should've caused an injury? Did I miss something?
Willie Parker or Ryan Torrain will probably be cut by the Redskins.
I bet Henry and Johnson slept better last night than they have in weeks.
The regime has egg on their face. Their failure to secure a veteran Rb made them reach for a RB early in draft and now the guy is done after one carry.
So the spendthrift ways cost them a 2nd and leaves them with Foster and a bumbling and fumbling loser like Slaton
thank god we have foster running well but we need more....now!!
The regime has egg on their face. Their failure to secure a veteran Rb made them reach for a RB early in draft and now the guy is done after one carry.
So the spendthrift ways cost them a 2nd and leaves them with Foster and a bumbling and fumbling loser like Slaton
thank god we have foster running well but we need more....now!!
So much for worrying about the durability of the vets...
...they wouldn't even commit 6million to get one of the plethora of vets available
shame on you mcnair and smithiak
but at least you have another excuse to go along with Cush's suspension
excuse after excuse for Gary the flatlining moron of a head coach
great OC but it's a fact that he is a loser of a head coach
can't argue that either
guy is a big fat loser, period. It sucks but it's true
It's all about strategy. A great line can make a crappy back look good but the reverse is also true. A great back can make a crappy line look good.
Hey look, another completely predictable post! You could possibly write a book, maybe title it something like "Gary Kubiak Is A Loser" I mean in your head nobody could argue that point right? After the success of your first book, you could follow it up with "Bob McNair Is Cheap" because again, nobody could argue that point with you could they?
Oh well, maybe you'll post something in the realm of reality in a month or two.
Truth hurts
they screwed up in not getting a vet RB
is it even up for debate after the Tate disaster?
That makes 0 sense. Don't even understand your point here.
Truth hurts
they screwed up in not getting a vet RB
is it even up for debate after the Tate disaster?
Truth hurts
they screwed up in not getting a vet RB
is it even up for debate after the Tate disaster?
Yeah, but what if we had acquired a RB (from your list) and he gets hurt, too?
Injuries happen. What if Schaub gets hurt and misses 8 games or more?
Freak stuff happens. Ask Charles Spencer.
I think what's angering most people about your post in this particular instance, is that you're leveraging freak injuries in order to support your theories.
I think it's border line "Bad fan" to use unforeseen and accidental situations to your advantage. It's like you're an ambulance chaser: "Gee whiz, sir, sorry you lost your wife in that accident back down the road...do you have legal counsel for what just happened a few minutes ago? I'd like to help you..."
I know we're all worried about the newly-created problem that Tate's injury presents us...but we're going to find a way to make things work. Trent Green of the St. Louis Rams got hurt and A guy named Kurt Warner popped up from pure obscurity to lead that team to a title.
Injuries do not discriminate. It's life. I hope a guy like Steve Slaton sees this and somehow gets his damn head screwed on straight: You might not get another chance, so make the best of it and do your job better than you have.
Right now, my main concern is will Ben Tate ever get to play and be able to show what he can do? One great run, and BAM! it's done. That, ladies and gents, sucks.
The regime has egg on their face. Their failure to secure a veteran Rb made them reach for a RB early in draft and now the guy is done after one carry.
So the spendthrift ways cost them a 2nd and leaves them with Foster and a bumbling and fumbling loser like Slaton
thank god we have foster running well but we need more....now!!
So much for worrying about the durability of the vets...
...they wouldn't even commit 6million to get one of the plethora of vets available
shame on you mcnair and smithiak
but at least you have another excuse to go along with Cush's suspension
excuse after excuse for Gary the flatlining moron of a head coach
great OC but it's a fact that he is a loser of a head coach
can't argue that either
guy is a big fat loser, period. It sucks but it's true
Truth hurts
they screwed up in not getting a vet RB
is it even up for debate after the Tate disaster?
While it is true I would've prefered a vet. FA signing. Nobody has foresight to know who's going to get injured.
As far as the Kubes thing we're in agreement that Kubes isn't the guy to lead a team to a championship. But the tone you have seems to get koolaid drinkers blood pressure up.
This makes me LOL so keep it up.
Name the player they should've signed.
great OC but it's a fact that he is a loser of a head coach
can't argue that either
guy is a big fat loser, period. It sucks but it's true