Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍

2018 TT Mock Draft Selection Thread

Hope we make it through the first round before draft actually starts, can’t wait to see who is available with 32nd pick :beer:
 
CD4N8BDWAAEBLoB.jpg-large.jpg


01. Cleveland Browns select: Saquon Barkley, RB, Penn State

02. NY Giants select: Sam Darnold, QB, USC

03. NY Jets (IND) select: Josh Rosen, QB, UCLA

04. Cleveland Browns(HOU) select: Mike McGlinchey, OT, Notre Dame

05. Denver Broncos select: Quenton Nelson, OG, Notre Dame

06. Indianapolis Colts select: Tremaine Edmunds, LB, Virginia Tech

07. Tampa Bay Buccaneers select: Bradley Chubb, Edge, NC State



09. Steelbtexan- San Francisco- YOU ARE NOW:
nfl-draft-on-the-clock.png
 
Last edited:
The Chicago Bears select: Denzel Ward - CB - The Ohio State University

Da Bears were hoping to land Quenton Nelson to plug and play at RG, but have to settle for adding a corner. I would have looked at trading back if possible. Top players on my board were Fitzpatrick and James, but the Bears have a duo of young promising safeties and a top ten pick should be a player that improves your team day 1.
 
CD4N8BDWAAEBLoB.jpg-large.jpg

01. Cleveland Browns select: Saquon Barkley, RB, Penn State
02. NY Giants select: Sam Darnold, QB, USC
03. NY Jets (IND) select: Josh Rosen, QB, UCLA
04. Cleveland Browns(HOU) select: Mike McGlinchey, OT, Notre Dame
05. Denver Broncos select: Quenton Nelson, OG, Notre Dame
06. Indianapolis Colts select: Tremaine Edmunds, LB, Virginia Tech
07. Tampa Bay Buccaneers select: Bradley Chubb, Edge, NC State
08. The Chicago Bears select: Denzel Ward - CB - Ohio State University



09. Steelbtexan- San Francisco- YOU ARE NOW:
nfl-draft-on-the-clock.png
 
Chubb should have gone #1 or 4

Ya, I was just saying that the way this TT Mock draft went, the Colts should have taken him.

If I'm the Browns, I'm taking QB and then Fitzpatrick for the secondary. Or doubling down on defense with Chubb and Fitzpatrick.
 
Ya, I was just saying that the way this TT Mock draft went, the Colts should have taken him.

If I'm the Browns, I'm taking QB and then Fitzpatrick for the secondary. Or doubling down on defense with Chubb and Fitzpatrick.

A top pass rusher is their biggest need imo since they now have Taylor
 
636290017247492846-USP-NFL-2017-NFL-Draft.jpg


with the 7th pick the Tampa Bay Buccaneers select:




Bradley Chubb, Edge, NC State

TB has to find an answer for their DL....I think they would have to go and clean themselves up before taking the pick to the podium if Bradley Chubb is there for the taking. Great pick!
 
Chubb should have gone #1 or 4

Cleveland didn't want him at 1 or 4. Barkley will provide them a ground game that they haven't had in ages. The #4 pick would've been a trade back....and there would be plenty of takers for the 4th pick. The Browns have Barkley, Tyrod Taylor, Gordon, Landry, and no LT since they missed out on Solder. LT has to be a priority and McGlinchey is the surest plug-n-play LT in the draft.

Even if they take a QB, the team has stated he would sit for a season behind Taylor. If Taylor is going to carry this team in 2018, then protect the investment....unless they're playing for draft position in 2019. This offense has weapons, and adding Barkley could have a similar effect as to the one Elliott brought to Dallas in his first season.
 
A top pass rusher is their biggest need imo since they now have Taylor

I think they are pretty set on the edge with Myles Garrett and Ogbah starting, then Nassib coming off the bench. I am normally against taking a running back in the top 5 picks, or 1st round period, but there are some special exceptions: Sanders, Peterson, Elliot and Barkley. He is far and away the best prospect in the draft and best RB prospect since Sanders. The Browns need an identity and Saquon gives them one. With the pick up of Taylor the Browns are looking at a run heavy offense behind one of the most talented run blocking lines in the NFL. Barkley also improves their defense more than Chubb would.

IMO the Browns will go Elliot, Fitzpatrick and then try to trade back into the late 1st round to get Jackson or Mayfield to watch Tyrod for a couple years. Wouldn't be against the tackle but just think he is a reach at 4. IMO, the Browns think they have a LT starter in Coleman or they would have went after Solder; if he doesn't pan out they have can look at LT in the 1st next year.
 
I think they are pretty set on the edge with Myles Garrett and Ogbah starting, then Nassib coming off the bench. I am normally against taking a running back in the top 5 picks, or 1st round period, but there are some special exceptions: Sanders, Peterson, Elliot and Barkley. He is far and away the best prospect in the draft and best RB prospect since Sanders. The Browns need an identity and Saquon gives them one. With the pick up of Taylor the Browns are looking at a run heavy offense behind one of the most talented run blocking lines in the NFL. Barkley also improves their defense more than Chubb would.

IMO the Browns will go Elliot, Fitzpatrick and then try to trade back into the late 1st round to get Jackson or Mayfield to watch Tyrod for a couple years. Wouldn't be against the tackle but just think he is a reach at 4. IMO, the Browns think they have a LT starter in Coleman or they would have went after Solder; if he doesn't pan out they have can look at LT in the 1st next year.

I would've never needed to use the 4th pick on McGlinchey if trades were permitted. In this exercise, I had no option but to work with the given pick. Knowing the demand of LT's in this draft, McGlinchey would be gone inside the 11th pick. The Browns have to get LT answered and he's the best available. I took him with the 4th pick...I would've much rather had selected him between 5-10 while grabbing a few extra picks. Remember, at minimum 2 of the top 4 QB's are still on the board....I would get my picks and I would get my LT in the process. This is a win-win for all the offensive skill positions.
 
I gotta agree! Trades make it a lot funner but the rules were set and these guys have no chill... They want the whole entire draft done in 10 mins like we're all in one room and hav somewhere to be?? There's an advantage to doing a mock draft online, say it with me! "PATIENCE"
 
You want updates? Their ONE click away.

http://www.texanstalk.com/threads/2018-tt-mock-draft-results.113081/#post-2811028

Feel free to do updates on your own. The updates you were doing were enthusiastic enough but beware of the other GMs. They're Grim to enthusiasm about this mock draft!

We get a little problem here and there and they want to shut the whole thing down, well I am a Texan and I will keep it going whether they want to pick or not. I got the knowledge and I got the backbone.
 
If you're the commish then take charge and get this thing rolling!
Unless you've heard from steelbtexan shouldn't we just move on to keep the little bit of momentum we had?
I believe steelbtexan dropped out, so someone will need to step up for him.

Nevermind, Pharoh made the pick.

With Pick # 10, the Vegas Raiders select, Vita Vea, DT - Washington.

901037966.jpg.0.jpg


The Raiders missed out on Suh in FA, but Vea is more of a long term solution. Vea will provide the inside push that Mack and Irvin need to collapse the pocket.
 
Last edited:
Everything is much cleaner if the results thread is ONLY for posting the results. Look at past years for an example. All discussion should take place in this one.


I actually wanted the picks to be posted in the results thread so it can be seen who made the picks and what their description of that prospect is.
 
Also someone locked up my post in the results thread so I can't edit it anymore.... Would that be the admin or a mod who did that and who was it?
 
I actually wanted the picks to be posted in the results thread so it can be seen who made the picks and what their description of that prospect is.
That's what the selection thread is for. Hence the title, selection thread.

Try the results thread again. You had 2 posts with the same round.
 
I actually wanted the picks to be posted in the results thread so it can be seen who made the picks and what their description of that prospect is.

Sure, you do it your way. It's working soooo much better.

Also someone locked up my post in the results thread so I can't edit it anymore.... Would that be the admin or a mod who did that and who was it?

Nobody locked you. There is a 30 min period to edit. Of course going back and editing only makes sense if the thread is otherwise clean.
 
Mock draft selection thread for SELECTING YOUR TEAM, NOT YOUR DRAFT PROSPECT.


Believe me it's a lot more better if you can see the results at the top and the posts of each GM and their description and reason as to why they chose "said" prospects.... but then I mean, it's not like im the commissioner, right?
 
Mock draft selection thread for SELECTING YOUR TEAM, NOT YOUR DRAFT PROSPECT.


Believe me it's a lot more better if you can see the results at the top and the posts of each GM and their description and reason as to why they chose "said" prospects.... but then I mean, it's not like im the commissioner, right?
You do you commish.

Lead and we'll follow...but don't get us lost....we don't like lost.

So this thread will be for discussion and the other thread for posting picks?
Do I have that right?
 
Sure, you do it your way. It's working soooo much better.



Nobody locked you. There is a 30 min period to edit. Of course going back and editing only makes sense if the thread is otherwise clean.

My thread has been locked for HOURS, not no "30 minute period"...

And my way IS working isn't it?? Or were you one of the ones who were trying to vote to end the draft once the 1st pick was late??? Patience is a virtue because it's morale to have it so when I decided to wait it out and keep the ball rolling then it caught on and now you have GMs describing the "Mock Draft" as gaining momentum.
 
Mock draft selection thread for SELECTING YOUR TEAM, NOT YOUR DRAFT PROSPECT.


Believe me it's a lot more better if you can see the results at the top and the posts of each GM and their description and reason as to why they chose "said" prospects.... but then I mean, it's not like im the commissioner, right?
You do you commish.

Lead and we'll follow...but don't get us lost....we don't like lost.

So this thread will be for discussion and the other thread for posting picks?
Do I have that right?
 
Sure, you do it your way. It's working soooo much better.



Nobody locked you. There is a 30 min period to edit. Of course going back and editing only makes sense if the thread is otherwise clean.

My thread has been locked for HOURS, not no "30 minute period"...

And my way IS working isn't it?? Or were you one of the ones who were trying to vote to end the draft once the 1st pick was late??? Patience is a virtue because it's morale to have it so when I decided to wait it out and keep the ball rolling then it caught on and now you have GMs describing the "Mock Draft" as gaining momentum.
 
Mock draft selection thread for SELECTING YOUR TEAM, NOT YOUR DRAFT PROSPECT.


Believe me it's a lot more better if you can see the results at the top and the posts of each GM and their description and reason as to why they chose "said" prospects.... but then I mean, it's not like im the commissioner, right?
You do realize this is supposed to be a 7 round draft, right? If you have posts after the round 1 post, the the round 2 post will not be together with round 1. That will make it very difficult to keep track with who has been selected. Believe me, I'm trying to help you. If you don't want help, then no problem.
 
1st pick result
2nd pick result
3rd pick result
and so on



^^^^^^^^
This top is the 1st post in the thread and is the results


EVERYTHING UNDERNEATH IS THE GMs POST ABOUT WHO THIER PICKING AND WHY



1st pick"GM PICK AND PROSPECT DESCRIPTION"
2nd pick"GM PICK AND PROSPECT DESCRIPTION"
3rd pick"GM PICK AND PROSPECT DESCRIPTION"
4th pick"GM PICK AND PROSPECT DESCRIPTION"
5th pick"GM PICK AND PROSPECT DESCRIPTION"
6th pick"GM PICK AND PROSPECT DESCRIPTION"
7th pick"GM PICK AND PROSPECT DESCRIPTION"
8th pick"GM PICK AND PROSPECT DESCRIPTION"
9th pick"GM PICK AND PROSPECT DESCRIPTION"
10th pick"GM PICK AND PROSPECT DESCRIPTION"
11th pick"GM PICK AND PROSPECT DESCRIPTION"
12th pick"GM PICK AND PROSPECT DESCRIPTION"
 
You do realize this is supposed to be a 7 round draft, right? If you have posts after the round 1 post, the the round 2 post will not be together with round 1. That will make it very difficult to keep track with who has been selected. Believe me, I'm trying to help you. If you don't want help, then no problem.


ONCE WERE DONE WITH THE 1ST ROUND THEN WE'LL POST A 2ND TEMPLET UNDER THE SAME THREAD FOR THE 2ND, 3RD 4TH AND SO ON.... ROUNDS
 
1st pick result
2nd pick result
3rd pick result
and so on



^^^^^^^^
This top is the 1st post in the thread and is the results


EVERYTHING UNDERNEATH IS THE GMs POST ABOUT WHO THIER PICKING AND WHY



1st pick"GM PICK AND PROSPECT DESCRIPTION"
2nd pick"GM PICK AND PROSPECT DESCRIPTION"
3rd pick"GM PICK AND PROSPECT DESCRIPTION"
4th pick"GM PICK AND PROSPECT DESCRIPTION"
5th pick"GM PICK AND PROSPECT DESCRIPTION"
6th pick"GM PICK AND PROSPECT DESCRIPTION"
7th pick"GM PICK AND PROSPECT DESCRIPTION"
8th pick"GM PICK AND PROSPECT DESCRIPTION"
9th pick"GM PICK AND PROSPECT DESCRIPTION"
10th pick"GM PICK AND PROSPECT DESCRIPTION"
11th pick"GM PICK AND PROSPECT DESCRIPTION"
12th pick"GM PICK AND PROSPECT DESCRIPTION"

OK, let me explain something I assumed you knew. There is a character limit on a single post. I can't remember what it is offhand, but there is no way you can put 7 rounds of results in one post. As said, to keep the rounds together, you can't have commentary between them.
 
ONCE WERE DONE WITH THE 1ST ROUND THEN WE'LL POST A 2ND TEMPLET UNDER THE SAME THREAD FOR THE 2ND, 3RD 4TH AND SO ON.... ROUNDS
And that would be confusing, right? Seeing that you would have to weed thru commentary to find the next round.
 
Back
Top