cland
Rookie
So according to the rule of double-negatives, you'll be the most positive fan on this message board!Im going to be negatively negative because I'm dedicated and its what I do best.

Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
So according to the rule of double-negatives, you'll be the most positive fan on this message board!Im going to be negatively negative because I'm dedicated and its what I do best.
How dare you!!!So according to the rule of double-negatives, you'll be the most positive fan on this message board!![]()
How dare you!!!
Double negatives because I'm gunna be doubly negative.... cause I dont math or Inglesh well good.
In my world, for decades, props were propellers usually referring to high-speed boats. Then I found out that prop could mean compliment. Now I'm being told that there is a rule about negatives. I did not do well in that class either. But then again, I did not do very well in any class. I am very positive about that fact which led to a negative result.Well props for being so positive about your negativity!
Yes, was clearly traumatic for several of the players including CJ. Having said that...if CJ allowed the horrific injury of his friend to impact his performance for the rest of the year, he's SAWWWWFFFFT and probably not traditional franchise QB material. Just saying.Yea ikr also think CJ took it hard when his buddy WR friend was doing so good and then went horribly down with severe injuries. You could see it in his face when he was there next to him laying in the end zone. Game stopped stretchers came out a very solemn quiet moment in the stadium. It was almost like losing a loved one.
Tank Dell
Ive got nothing against guys that cry, even guys who cry in public. But guys who cry in public & continue to take a buttwhoopin... c'mon. He's soft.
I need to see a whole lot more from CJ and what's blocking for him and what's catching his passes before I think he's softHad he won the game... I wouldn't complain. Use that emotion & raise your level of play. Get mad, then get even.
Cry & continue to get your but whipped.... continue to play at that level none of us want to see. In 2025... sorry. He's not a winner. We're going to have to hope Lamar Jackson is hurt if we're ever going to beat Baltimore. We'll have to depend on injuries to have even odds against a gimpy Mahomes in the playoffs.
Ive got nothing against guys that cry, even guys who cry in public. But guys who cry in public & continue to take a buttwhoopin... c'mon. He's soft.
Good question. All I know is what they have provided to me . They each have said no mental health issues prior to military. As TK said, I would prefer Stroud to shake it off and get back into it, if not that game then the next for certain. I just tried not to judge people and the way they handle their emotions.Did your neighbors have mental health issues before they joined the military?
I would prefer the leader of the team not bawl like a baby when a teammate gets injured. I never saw Montana/Brady/Manning/Favre/Staubach/Bradshaw/Elway etc.... react like that to a teammate being injured.
I second this recommendation/ motion.I would rather see stronger online.
I would rather see stronger online.
Your first time here?What a stupid argument.
A good OL would catapult CJ into top a 5 QB.I would rather see stronger online.
A 2023 Stroud behind a slightly above average line and this defense, I'm going to be disappointed if we don't get at least to the final two teams in the AFC.A good OL would catapult CJ into top a 5 QB.
Not my first or my last beer SirYour first time here?
It’s a golden era of QB play. Texans have an elite defense but Stroud will still have to keep pace with the likes of Mahomes (and his refs), Allen, and Jackson. Then there’s Burrow who may be the most talented QB in the league but his supporting defense doesn’t measure up to the other QBs in the conference.A 2023 Stroud behind a slightly above average line and this defense, I'm going to be disappointed if we don't get at least to the final two teams in the AFC.
What? You want a miracle! LOL
Let it be so!I predict that CJ will kick the holy crap out of the league in 2025.
Then, cry and pray for forgiveness on the podium at the Super Bowl trophy presentation.
DupI predict that CJ will kick the holy crap out of the league in 2025.
Then, cry and pray for forgiveness on the podium at the Super Bowl trophy presentation.
If he does this he will be the 1st QB from a single parent family household to win a SB.I predict that CJ will kick the holy crap out of the league in 2025.
Then, cry and pray for forgiveness on the podium at the Super Bowl trophy presentation.
I believe his dad was in the home for the first 10-12 years. Also, Patrick Mahomes father and mother divorced when he was 10. Not sure where you're getting your information from since we know you don't research things yourself.If he does this he will be the 1st QB from a single parent family household to win a SB.
Did these mothers get remarried while the child was young, or were they raised by a truly single mother? You know DeeAnn Watson style single mother?I believe his dad was in the home for the first 10-12 years. Also, Patrick Mahomes father and mother divorced when he was 10. Not sure where you're getting your information from since we know you don't research things yourself.
Edit: Johnny Unitas' father died when Johnny was 5. For some reason, I remembered that. I'm not going any further since your statement has been proven false.
Why does it matter? What is your fixation with this? I just pointed out that you were dead wrong. I don't know if you made it up or heard it from someone. Just drop it.Did these mothers get remarried while the child was young, or were they raised by a truly single mother? You know DeeAnn Watson style single mother?
You dont like the fact that people who are from 2 parent stable households have a better track record than those who dont. Like I said, I hope CJ can be another one of the anomalies. But it is an anomaly whether you want to admit this or not. I'll let you have the last word.Why does it matter? What is your fixation with this? I just pointed out that you were dead wrong. I don't know if you made it up or heard it from someone. Just drop it.
You like anomalies, I've got anomalies.You dont like the fact that people who are from 2 parent stable households have a better track record than those who dont. Like I said, I hope CJ can be another one of the anomalies. But it is an anomaly whether you want to admit this or not. I'll let you have the last word.
Interesting.Do you know that no QB that went by his initials has ever won a Super Bowl? None
Nothing has ever happened until it happened. Nothing.You like anomalies, I've got anomalies.
Do you know that no QB that went by his initials has ever won a Super Bowl? None.
My point stands, no QB from a single parent household has won a SB. That's the reason Lucky is wrong. I guess he's saying Google is wrong. Anyways it's very rare even if I'm wrong.Johnny Unitas did come from a single family home. His father died and his mother did not, according to my research, get re-married. She took over the family coal business and worked multiple jobs to support Johnny and his three siblings.
Johnny U did not start Super Bowl III, coming in in the 4th quarter. He did start Super Bowl V, but left in the 2nd quarter.
However, when I did a search for SB winning QBs from single family homes, it came back with none.
So, I don't know what the hell is going on.
Quoted for truth and hopefully CJ breaks the trend which is what I said earlier.Nothing has ever happened until it happened. Nothing.
No QB has won a Super Bowl until they did, regardless of name, or anything else.![]()
It's not a trend, it's just a random, outlying statement. CJ has been on the QB fast track since he was very young, and his character has never been called into question.My point stands, no QB from a single parent household has won a SB. That's the reason Lucky is wrong. I guess he's saying Google is wrong. Anyways it's very rare even if I'm wrong.
I'm not saying any of this.It's not a trend, it's just a random, outlying statement. CJ has been on the QB fast track since he was very young, and his character has never been called into question.
If your going to bring this up as an actual reason, the onus to prove how it affects a QB's career is on you.
If that's the case then what your saying is no different than the letter that his first name starts with, as Lucky pointed out. According to the logic above, that is also a trend.I'm not saying any of this.
I'm just pointing out the trends.
Obviously you don't believe in trends, I believe in trends but think trends can be broken.
What would you call a trend vs random 50 years would be a trend for me and not some random happening.
First,My point stands, no QB from a single parent household has won a SB. That's the reason Lucky is wrong.
Here you go again being argumentative when clearly you don’t know. lolDid these mothers get remarried while the child was young, or were they raised by a truly single mother? You know DeeAnn Watson style single mother?
Steel,I'm not saying any of this.
I'm just pointing out the trends.
Obviously you don't believe in trends, I believe in trends but think trends can be broken.
What would you call a trend vs random 50 years would be a trend for me and not some random happening.
They may or may not be correlated.Steel,
I think the pushback you are getting is that you aren't presenting this as just a random correlation to observe. You seem to be hinting at a thesis (without actually offering it): what is your thesis regarding championship level QBs in the NFL and the significance of having both biological parents together throughout the QBs childhood? I think most people would generally agree that it matters but just don't agree that it is always a determining/eliminating factor. In other words, explain the "why" they are correlated.
You know my point, it is what it is and even if Lucky's right, which according to Google he isn't. A QB coming from a single parent home and winning a SB is an anomaly.Here you go again being argumentative when clearly you don’t know. lol
What’s your point again
You just made my point.First,
![]()
Second, Johnny U was the starting QB for the winning team in Super Bowl V. With all due respect to @The Pencil Neck, he meets the criteria. Did he play the entire game? No. Would he had his father lived throughout Johnny's formative years? See how ridiculous this weak argument is?