Time for Cleveland Browns owners to speak up, be accountable on Deshaun Watson | Opinion
Marla Ridenour
Akron Beacon Journal
BEREA, Ohio – It is time Browns ownership shared the burden.
It is time for
Jimmy and Dee Haslam to address
the civil lawsuits facing quarterback Deshaun Watson and take some of that responsibility off coach Kevin Stefanski.
As the count of cases filed against Watson continues to mount, the black eye the franchise is sporting grows darker by the day. Yet the Haslams remain out of the spotlight.
They spoke on Zoom March 25 following Watson’s introductory news conference, then met with the Beacon Journal and a few Cleveland outlets
the following week during the NFL owners meetings at The Breakers Palm Beach.
Since then, the Watson situation has become more tenuous. The possibility that
the NFL will suspend him remains as
24 women have filed civil suits accusing Watson of sexual misconduct during massage appointments.
When the
Browns traded for the Houston Texans’ Watson on March 18 after a
second Texas grand jury failed to indict him on criminal charges, Watson faced 22 civil suits. Investigations continue to unearth more disturbing details.
The latest came Tuesday, when
a New York Times report by Jenny Vrentas said Watson saw 66 different women for massages over a span of 17 months.
Vrentas’ piece included that the Texans obtained hotel rooms Watson sometimes used for the appointments and that a staff member provided him with a
non-disclosure agreement form Watson used. On Wednesday evening, Tony Buzbee, attorney for the 24 women,
issued a statement that he will be adding the Texans as defendants in many of the civil suits.
Yet Stefanski continues to be the only one stepping in front of the microphones.
Every time he’s spoken in the past two weeks, it has come on the heels of more Watson news.
At the first open session of organized team activities on May 25, a segment on Watson’s legal woes on
HBO’s “Real Sports with Bryant Gumbel,” which included
on-camera interviews with two of his accusers, had aired the night before.
The Browns’ June 1 OTA availability
came after lawsuit No. 23 had been filed on May 31.
The impending filing of the 24th civil suit was circulating during Monday’s 22nd annual Cleveland Browns Foundation Golf Tournament at Westwood Country Club, and official word came during Stefanski’s interview.
On Wednesday at the Browns’ CrossCountry Mortgage Campus,
Stefanski fended off questions about the New York Times piece and whether the Browns knew about the circumstances detailed in the 24th lawsuit when they traded for Watson.
Stefanski talked for over 10 minutes and 12 of the 24 questions involved Watson, including queries about his character, standing with the Browns and the status of the league’s investigation. Another involved the Browns’ experience dealing with adversity during two years of the COVID-19 pandemic and whether
backup Jacoby Brissett is getting enough practice reps with Watson’s status for the regular season uncertain.
Stefanski calmly answered all of them, many with a similar reply.
“I understand the question. I think for me, I am going to be respectful of the investigation, of the legal proceedings and I am going to let that play out,” he said.
With no end in sight to the Watson saga and an agreement in place that there will be no legal proceedings between Aug. 1 and March 1, Stefanski was asked if he was frustrated by the repeated questions.
“I would not characterize it that way,” Stefanski said. “I do understand that you have a job to do, so I am just going to provide as much information as I can, when I can.”
THE REST OF THE STORY