Did they have credibility when they were winning AFC South titles? I would say within the league they didOne thing that the Lovie hire gives the Texans that they haven't had in the last year, CREDIBILITY.
Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
Did they have credibility when they were winning AFC South titles? I would say within the league they didOne thing that the Lovie hire gives the Texans that they haven't had in the last year, CREDIBILITY.
Clearly, you skipped right over the part that said, haven't had in the last year. Do you not understand the meaning of that statement?Did they have credibility when they were winning AFC South titles? I would say within the league they did
Sipp’n the koolaid…. So nice to have you on board my friendOne thing that the Lovie hire gives the Texans that they haven't had in the last year, CREDIBILITY.
I call them like I see them.Sipp’n the koolaid…. So nice to have you on board my friend
One thing that the Lovie hire gives the Texans that they haven't had in the last year, CREDIBILITY.
Sipp’n the koolaid…. So nice to have you on board my friend
One thing that the Lovie hire gives the Texans that they haven't had in the last year, CREDIBILITY.
The Texans may only win 4 games in 2022 but they will be credible wins. I'm not convinced that Pep Hamilton is the answer to Tim Kelly. In fact, Pep could be a step backwards.Yep. This is one of the big positives with hiring Lovie. The perception of both coaches and players matters, and that would not have been the case with a puppet McCown that has Jack holding his strings.
A lot of fans are focusing on potential win/loss record, and I certainly understand that. But, I think this franchise is in such a sorry state that they basically have to focus on building a football-oriented foundation before they can really look at long term and sustainable success. O'Brien left this franchise in a hole that Watson just dug deeper. Fill that hold first and then build on that instead of covering it up with worthless, empty platitudes and double-speak that just hides it.
The Texans may only win 4 games in 2022 but they will be credible wins. I'm not convinced that Pep Hamilton is the answer to Tim Kelly. In fact, Pep could be a step backwards.
The Texans may only win 4 games in 2022 but they will be credible wins. I'm not convinced that Pep Hamilton is the answer to Tim Kelly. In fact, Pep could be a step backwards.
Really? Have you looked at the schedule? We have 7 games against opponents below .500 this past year. And we have 5 games against opponents with only 9 wins. You really have to be drinking the hemlock to think we can't, or won't, improve on this past year's 4 wins.The Texans may only win 4 games in 2022 but they will be credible wins. I'm not convinced that Pep Hamilton is the answer to Tim Kelly. In fact, Pep could be a step backwards.
You're drinking just as much if you think records this year mean anything next year.Really? Have you looked at the schedule? We have 7 games against opponents below .500 this past year. And we have 5 games against opponents with only 9 wins. You really have to be drinking the hemlock to think we can't, or won't, improve on this past year's 4 wins.
The Texans may only win 4 games in 2022 but they will be credible wins. I'm not convinced that Pep Hamilton is the answer to Tim Kelly. In fact, Pep could be a step backwards.
You're drinking just as much if you think records this year mean anything next year.
Well.... I for one still expect the Texans to suck even IF there is improvement... so one record from this season I believe will remain at least semi relevant next season.You're drinking just as much if you think records this year mean anything next year.
Whose?I bet we'll be talking about playoff scenarios come December.
I'll take the UNDER .500.Well.... I for one still expect the Texans to suck even IF there is improvement... so one record from this season I believe will remain at least semi relevant next season.![]()
The Texans may only win 4 games in 2022 but they will be credible wins. I'm not convinced that Pep Hamilton is the answer to Tim Kelly. In fact, Pep could be a step backwards.
Hahahahahahahaha!I bet we'll be talking about playoff scenarios come December.
AFC South = 1st and 3rd pick in draft.And I still think the AFC South is a weak division.
Lovie is known for really pushing turnovers and special teams, so if this team can put together a solid defense and an offense that doesn't pee down it's own leg, who knows?
Be competitive, make good coaching decisions during games, and take it week to week. That's all I'm asking for as a Texans fan in 2022.
I think losing Eberflous is going to hurt.And the Colts and Jags are who they are, so this is a division that can still be wide open next season.
I think losing Eberflous is going to hurt.
Bad.
Whose?
I am concerned that Pep hasn't had an OC gig since the Colts. I wonder why.It's Pep's offense to win or lose. My thoughts on Pep are, he sure was fired from a lot of jobs, after some rather short stints.
I am concerned that Pep hasn't had an OC gig since the Colts. I wonder why.
I wasn't a big fan of his offense in Indy. I don't think Luck ever got better at reading defenses. He got better at using his skills & talent. But was still a poor pocket passer.
I hope promoting Pep doesn't stop Mills' development.
Really hard to tell, may be a chicken/egg thing. The Colts addressed the OL again & again. Like the early Texans. They were able to run, but couldn’t protect the QB.Luck was a poor pocket passer because his line never gave him a pocket to pass in.
AFC South = 1st and 3rd pick in draft.
Lovie's defense ranked close to the bottom in most categories in 2021. Why would 2022 be any different? Lovie is going to be the DC and call plays. That takes an enormous amount of time away from him being HC. Lovie will spend most of his time putting in the defensive game plan for next week's opponent. It's Pep's offense to win or lose. My thoughts on Pep are, he sure was fired from a lot of jobs, after some rather short stints. Why? Pep sounds like he's here because he's part of the good old buddy plan. We know how that usually works out... not so well. (Remember Kubiak's first foray)
Luck was always a slightly above avg passer from the pocket.I am concerned that Pep hasn't had an OC gig since the Colts. I wonder why.
I wasn't a big fan of his offense in Indy. I don't think Luck ever got better at reading defenses. He got better at using his skills & talent. But was still a poor pocket passer.
I hope promoting Pep doesn't stop Mills' development.
Luck and Derrick's games were similar, Luck was not a selfish person or player. Of course they had different upbringings and we can't talk about that.Luck was a poor pocket passer because his line never gave him a pocket to pass in. People think Watson had to run for his life it was nothing compared to what Luck had to deal with not just first couple of years but his whole career.
True. Point differential is probably a better indicator.I don't think wins are a good indicator of where a franchise like ours is at.
Luck was a poor pocket passer because his line never gave him a pocket to pass in. People think Watson had to run for his life it was nothing compared to what Luck had to deal with not just first couple of years but his whole career.
I don't think wins are a good indicator of where a franchise like ours is at.
Of course, I always disagree with the whole "a win is a win" and "you are what your record says you are" when it comes to sports.
In our case we have to look at individual games and context. In 2021 we won a pittance of games but many other games were winnable and we got blown out in what, 5 of 17 games? We were far from the worst team in the league and for a team like ours with absolutely nothing on it and in the situation we were in, the team was better than the record indicated. Conversely, while under Vladimir Obrien, we won how many divisions and were complete uninteresting, unwatchable, non-competitive garbage against anybody who was actually good.
It's just hard to judge solely on paper right now. I know we all want wins and championships and of course I thoroughly agree with that as the ultimate objective and everything should be with that in mind. I just think nuance is important.
True. Point differential is probably a better indicator.
In our case we have to look at individual games and context. In 2021 we won a pittance of games but many other games were winnable and we got blown out in what, 5 of 17 games? We were far from the worst team in the league and for a team like ours with absolutely nothing on it and in the situation we were in, the team was better than the record indicated.
It's actually not that difficult to judge on paper. Baseball statisticians use the Pythagorean Theorem to determine expected wins and losses via runs scored. The same can be done for football.It's just hard to judge solely on paper right now.
It's actually not that difficult to judge on paper. Baseball statisticians use the Pythagorean Theorem to determine expected wins and losses via runs scored. The same can be done for football.
View attachment 9743
The Texans scored 280 points and allowed 452 points.
Expected record = 280²/(280² + 452²) x 17 = (78400/(78400+ 204304)) x 17
Texans Expected Record in 2021 = 4.7 wins - 12.3 losses.
Pretty close to their actual record of 4-13
The other teams that finished in the bottom 5 of record expected records:
Jags - 4.0 Wins - 13.0 Losses (3-14 actual)
Lions - 5.5 Wins - 11.5 Losses (3-13-1 actual)
Jets - 4.7 Wins - 12.3 Losses (4-13 actual)
Giants - 4.7 Wins - 12.3 Losses (4-13 actual)
So the Texans were about 4 TDs away from being the worst team in the NFL. So thank you Mark Ingram, Phillip Lindsay, and Anthony Miller. Your TDs kept the Texans from being the bottom of the barrel.
It's actually not that difficult to judge on paper. Baseball statisticians use the Pythagorean Theorem to determine expected wins and losses via runs scored. The same can be done for football.
I was also interested and didn’t get around to create my spreadsheet. Thanks for doing the work!This fascinates me. I plugged the formula into my database and got these results. Sorry for the terrible formatting.
2014 | 16 games | 372 Texans | 307 opps | 65 point diff | 4.1 ave diff per game | 9-7 actual | 9.5 - 6.5 predicted
2015 | 16 games | 339 Texans | 313 opps | 26 point diff | 1.6 ave diff per game | 9-7 actual | 8.6 - 7.4 predicted
2016 | 16 games | 279 Texans | 328 opps | -49 point diff | -3.0 ave diff per game | 9-7 actual | 6.7 - 9.3 predicted
2017 | 16 games | 338 Texans | 436 opps | -98 point diff | -6.1 ave diff per game | 4-12 actual | 6.0 - 10.0 predicted
2018 | 16 games | 402 Texans | 316 opps | 86 point diff | 5.4 ave diff per game | 11-5 actual | 9.9 - 6.1 predicted
2019 | 16 games | 378 Texans | 385 opps | -7 point diff | -0.4 ave diff per game | 10-6 actual | 7.9 - 8.1 predicted
2020 | 16 games | 384 Texans | 464 opps | -80 point diff | -5.0 ave diff per game | 4-12 actual | 6.5 - 9.5 predicted
2021 | 17 games | 280 Texans | 452 opps | -172 point diff | -10.1 ave diff per game | 4-13 actual | 4.7 - 12.3 predicted
You can see that the years where we had a winning record with a negative point differential through it off.
I never thought we would lose to the Jets & be totally dominated by the DolphinsHowever, I never felt the 2021 squad could win more than four games.
By that logic the Lions were a ton better football team than the Texans were. They lost/tied 6 games by 4 points or less. Texans with just 2.
Your record absolutely says who you are. The game is about winning or losing. Don’t win the game, you’re not good enough. Sure, sometimes there’s fluke losses when a ball bounces a certain way or a refs call goes a certain way, but you can say that about wins too. The accumulation of games during a season tells you who you are, whether you lose by 1 or 40, or win by 1 or 40. How many games can you endure all that takes place in those games and come out on top? The Texans were only able to do that 4 times. That’s who they are.
Texans had the 3rd worst point differential, right where their record was.
I was also interested and didn’t get around to create my spreadsheet. Thanks for doing the work!
Your data supports what I’ve believed about the 2020 versus 2021 seasons. Although the win totals are the same, the 2020 squad felt like they could have won 3 to 4 more games. However, I never felt the 2021 squad could win more than four games.
I’m not bashing you because your viewpoint is very common among fans. This extreme viewpoint on QBs appears based on your feelings for a QB, you either give them too much credit or too much blame for wins and losses. There is no nuance or context and no amount of data or facts will change your mind.Speaking of feelings, I felt they would win as many games without Derrick as they did the yr before and said so before the yr started. I was called crazy/a hater etc... What I haven't been called since the season is over is CORRECT.
I also felt that Derrick will never win a SB. I still feel this to be the case more than ever right now.
I’m not bashing you because your viewpoint is very common among fans. This extreme viewpoint on QBs appears based on your feelings for a QB, you either give them too much credit or too much blame for wins and losses. There is no nuance or context and no amount of data or facts will change your mind.
IMHO. No one has said you are CORRECT because, your four win prediction was based strictly on your dislike of Derrick. Any objective observer or metric shows the 2020 squad should have won more than four games and the reasons they didn’t was more about complementary football than it was about one single player.
Unfortunately, nothing will change your mind and it’s pointless to try. With Mills at QB, you’re now aware that the OL, running game and defense can impact a QB development and impact wins and losses. Glad you decided to join Team Objective.
That’s incorrect. You didn’t think the Hopkins trade would be good for Derrick because you believed he can’t read defenses and expected him to fail without his “blankie“.See I'm not a believer in numbers like you are. Numbers have their place but are far from a be all end all. Fact they won as many games. Fact, Derrick had more weapons to work with, like a healthy Tunsil protecting his blindside/WFV/Cooks etc... Funny how I thought trading Hopkins would be a good thing for Derrick and he ended up having his best statistical season. Even if those numbers were mainly hollow numbers.
That’s incorrect. You didn’t think the Hopkins trade would be good for Derrick because you believed he can’t read defenses and expected him to fail without his “blankie“.
Anyway, it doesn’t matter now and I’m not interested in another pointless Derrick debate. You responded to my post and out of courtesy, I responded to yours. We will always agree to disagree with your evaluation of Derrick‘s on-field play.
You didn’t think the Hopkins trade would be good for Derrick because you believed he can’t read defenses and expected him to fail without his “blankie“.