Death to Google Ads! Texans Talk Tip Jar! 🍺😎👍
Thanks for your support!
The more important number regarding INT can be found in the last column from the orginal site here:
Deshaun Watson & Adjusted Interceptions
Football Outsiders provides an extra layer of insight into DW4’s interception stats in 2019.www.battleredblog.com
Interesting read
Whatever "facts" you read from those scouting reporst, they are now reflecting from those websites, and others (like NFL, ESPN, PFF, etc.) and they all have upgraded Watson from year to year.
Nothing I say will make a difference to you and going back and forth with you will be as effective as you trying to argue with the person who wrote that evaluation. So, back to the subject at hand:
Even the Packers game was not that bad.
Many posters like Tannehill's game. Many of us can agree he is having a good year. Some posters would even take him over Watson. In Thursday night's game against the Colts, Tannehill had 53 yards passing on the first drive of the game. He had 58 yards passing in the 2nd half and finished with 147 yards passing in a 34-17 loss. His team didn't score in the second half and in a 17 point loss, when they had to pass, he did not pass for more than 58 yards in garbage time. Obviously, it's not as easy to rack up stats in garbage time as some would imply.
Franchise QBs don't get behind.
That can't be right. When did David, I mean Derrick Carr score below 50?
I thought he mostly had bad games this year, according to the complaining gurus.
LMAO. So, you ignore the other 327 attempts to nitpick 15 attempts? If this was so succesful, don't you think more defenses would be playing cover-2 man? This is worst than your 4 year old scouting report. Instead of SnakeEyes, you should have change your user name to SonofSteelBIssue with cover 2? So if you can read a D you will know when it is zone or cover 2. You also will study more film and figure out ways it is disguised, ways to attack it. Meaning that you improve. That is the point and only point most are trying to make. Is he isn't getting any better at it. Numbers say a lot more than a person explaining. So... numbers are below. I took this from an article that came up when you put in "Watson reading defense issue" it says he is good against zone. Which is good.
_________________________________
This season, teams are playing more zone coverage against Watson and the Texans offense, which makes sense since they can keep an eye on the QB and keep the receivers in front of them.
However, Watson is shredding zone coverage averaging over nine yards per pass attempt while completing 70 percent of his passes. Against man, Watson’s numbers are pedestrian.
In particular, the Houston quarterback, in a limited sample size, has struggled to figure out cover-2 man coverage or two-man as it’s often called in football.
No. You’re the only one making this point unless you can somehow tie this in to his scouting report
You didn’t read the part about the Patriots playing more cover 2.
His point is Watson is terrible against Cover 2. My point is if it's so successful and Watson is so terrible at reading it, wouldn't more teams play it where he would have more than 15 attempts?
My point was New England playing more cover two has nothing to do with nothing. We haven’t played the Patriots
LOL. Got it. Who is going to tell him Cover 2 is zone based? Do we need to find a WalterFootball article on defensive coverage?
@Corrosion knows how to lookup stats. If those stats were readily available, he would have provide them. If you put the effort to find the garbage time stats or provide a link to those stats, I will put the effort to find the stats. Deal?
Direct link?
Posters like us have already told you OB needed to be fired back in 2014.
I edited my post before you made this post and I already said....To be fair you were talking about Cover 2 man and not the basic Cover 2
Do you have a link to the orginal article?Issue with cover 2? So if you can read a D you will know when it is zone or cover 2. You also will study more film and figure out ways it is disguised, ways to attack it. Meaning that you improve. That is the point and only point most are trying to make. Is he isn't getting any better at it. Numbers say a lot more than a person explaining. So... numbers are below. I took this from an article that came up when you put in "Watson reading defense issue" it says he is good against zone. Which is good.
_________________________________
This season, teams are playing more zone coverage against Watson and the Texans offense, which makes sense since they can keep an eye on the QB and keep the receivers in front of them.
However, Watson is shredding zone coverage averaging over nine yards per pass attempt while completing 70 percent of his passes. Against man, Watson’s numbers are pedestrian.
In particular, the Houston quarterback, in a limited sample size, has struggled to figure out cover-2 man coverage or two-man as it’s often called in football.
I found the article by this beat writer .Issue with cover 2? So if you can read a D you will know when it is zone or cover 2. You also will study more film and figure out ways it is disguised, ways to attack it. Meaning that you improve. That is the point and only point most are trying to make. Is he isn't getting any better at it. Numbers say a lot more than a person explaining. So... numbers are below. I took this from an article that came up when you put in "Watson reading defense issue" it says he is good against zone. Which is good.
_________________________________
This season, teams are playing more zone coverage against Watson and the Texans offense, which makes sense since they can keep an eye on the QB and keep the receivers in front of them.
However, Watson is shredding zone coverage averaging over nine yards per pass attempt while completing 70 percent of his passes. Against man, Watson’s numbers are pedestrian.
In particular, the Houston quarterback, in a limited sample size, has struggled to figure out cover-2 man coverage or two-man as it’s often called in football.
www.pro-football-reference.com
To be fair, except one poster who rarely post these days, no one thinks Watson is perfect. The majority of posters who believe the Texans can win with Watson have posted he needs to improve and CAN improve. I would challenge you to find anyone who thinks Watson is perfect.