Texansballer74
The Marine
Good defensive stance
Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
We're down 3 points late in the third quarter. It's a high-scoring dog fight. We have a good chance to win this game bro. Our defense has held the Seahawks offense to field goals following some critical turnovers. We're right there trying to win this game!The turnover by our young talented rookie Qb has cost us this game. I hate that and I am glad we have him. He gives us a chance to win against good teams but he also can cost us. I think this game a loss due to his inexperience. Hopefully he does not do that any more.
The turnover by our young talented rookie Qb could cost us this game. I hate that and I am glad we have him. He gives us a chance to win against good teams but he also can cost us. Hopefully he does not do that too much more. Especially in a close game like this.
Ehhh, I don't know about all that.Kevin Johnson is blossoming into a shut-down corner right before our eyes.
Kevin Johnson is blossoming into a shut-down corner right before our eyes.
Believe he was referring to the Johnson pass break up in the EZ by Graham. Other than that hes made some boneheaded plays, and gotten burned some. Ah well still a nice play by him and the gang.?????
Two nice plays. Granted it was Jimmy Graham the tight end he knocked the ball from in the end zone. He played the ball beautifully though. 15 years watching the Texans play, I can't count how many times our defensive backs played the player and not the ball (getting called for pass interference) or still giving up the Touchdown.?????
game isn't overThe turnover by our young talented rookie Qb could cost us this game. I hate that and I am glad we have him. He gives us a chance to win against good teams but he also can cost us. Hopefully he does not do that too much more. Especially in a close game like this.
Kevin Johnson is blossoming into a shut-down corner right before our eyes.
Yep, it's a start. He's got to be consistent now. He's battled injuries the past few years. I still have faith for him yet. You know Kareem Jackson sucked a lot early in his career and started to play better by Year three.Believe he was referring to the Johnson pass break up in the EZ by Graham. Other than that hes made some boneheaded plays, and gotten burned some. Ah well still a nice play by him and the gang.
I was only talking about the last two plays when our defense held the Seahawks to a field goal. They could have seized a lot of momentum with a Touchdown following our last turnover.You might need some prescription glasses. My eyes aren't seeing what yours are.
Kevin Johnson is blossoming into a shut-down corner right before our eyes.
DeleteI was only talking about the last two plays when our defense held the Seahawks to a field goal. They could have seized a lot of momentum with a Touchdown following our last turnover.
Watson limping a bit after that sack?
Yep, it's a start. He's got to be consistent now. He's battled injuries the past few years. I still have faith for him yet. You know Kareem Jackson sucked a lot early in his career and started to play better by Year three.
Hope not. As much as he's run today it would be ironic to get hurt in the pocket...behind this pathetic olineWatson limping a bit after that sack?
His right knee was bent back onto itself........that's how patellar tendon and quadriceps tendon injuries occur.Watson limping a bit after that sack?
His right knee was bent back onto itself........that's how patellar tendon and quadriceps tendon injuries occur.
The O-line has played quite well. Yes they gave up 4 sacks but that stat is a bit misleading. I have seen plenty of times where they gave DW plenty of time to throw the football. The Seahawks don't have a great O-line as well but they have a Qb much like ours who can make things happen when most other Qb's would throw an int or get sacked. I still say despite DW's talent at making things happen when flushed out of the pocket our O-line was not bad. They have been solid and that is better than I expected.This OL is inexcusable. Just no way to make a case for having a line this bad at this point in OB's run.
Watson limping a bit after that sack?
He missed the 1st three weeks of the season with a high ankle sprain.Blue's been available all season.
Graham did NOT get that 1st down...whatever though
creating time through scheme (play-action) or through Watson extending plays is not the same as the OL playing wellThe O-line has played quite well. Yes they gave up 4 sacks but that stat is a bit misleading. I have seen plenty of times where they gave DW plenty of time to throw the football. The Seahawks don't have a great O-line as well but they have a Qb much like ours who can make things happen when most other Qb's would throw an int or get sacked. I still say despite DW's talent at making things happen when flushed out of the pocket our O-line was not bad. They have been solid and that is better than I expected.
A lot of games go that way. I expected as much.Man game changed at halftime
Man, I don’t want to hear that!His right knee was bent back onto itself........that's how patellar tendon and quadriceps tendon injuries occur.
creating time through scheme (play-action) or through Watson extending plays is not the same as the OL playing well
the time Watson gets is manufactured not because of the OL ability
Whatever. However you want to see it I myself don't buy the "it is all about scheme," argument. To an extent that may be the case but to not give the O-line any credit is wrong imo.creating time through scheme (play-action) or through Watson extending plays is not the same as the OL playing well
the time Watson gets is manufactured not because of the OL ability
You have got to be the Board's respectable Reality Check.... we all need them in life, and almost always appreciate them in hindsight, but hot damn are they a tough pill to swallow haha.His right knee was bent back onto itself........that's how patellar tendon and quadriceps tendon injuries occur.
If you have a canned argument then why bother to respond?Whatever. However you want to see it I myself don't buy the "it is all about scheme," argument. To an extent that may be the case but to not give the O-line any credit is wrong imo.