Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍

Official Brock Osweiler MVP Watch Thread!

Brock is looking good (MVP? Someone got hold of Thorn's stash) but if the Texans don't put some semblance of a running game together, it's all going to go downhill in a hurry. I realize much of it is injury related upfront, but the backs are not getting any room to run and if that continues, teams will blitz the hell out of this weak line and it's Katy bar the door. If they can't do it conventionally due to lack of talent upfront, they will have to get creative.

I don't even think we can write it off to injury. This is the starting lineup that has been practicing as the starting lineup, since the preseason started.
 
Unless you & O'b are sharing game notes over coffee, don't tell me they didn't game plan the run game, yet handed the ball off 23 times.

I read this morning OB was quoted as saying he didn't install any run schemes or blocking packages this game. It was as basic as it gets. Still, I would like to see our guys be able to outmuscle theirs for some yards. I think they proved last year they could manufacture rush yards if needed. The fact OS is looking good and our wrs look great, I feel ok with our run game.
 
Unless you & O'b are sharing game notes over coffee, don't tell me they didn't game plan the run game, yet handed the ball off 23 times.

I read somewhere that they didn't plan anything for the run game for this game. Let me see if I can find it...
 
I'm extremely interested to see how defenses line up against DHop and Fuller (whom, by the way is a certainty to start opposite of Hopkins, IMO. Sorry those of you thinking Strong will win that position).
I think one of the two WR will see a double team on a large majority of plays, but honestly, I think defenses will have to mix up doubling them because they both merit being doubled for different reasons.

I am really stoked to see how Fuller's presence impacts opposing game plans. And like I said, I fully believe his presence out there is already causing changes to opposing game plans. At least the Bears for game one have made adjustments already I think, assuming they are already doing some game planning for us.

I don't see Strong as a big time potential wide out any way personally. He seems like a much better fit in the slot to go on a lot of underneath routes. You want your speedy guy at wideout, and Strong has nice hands where he should be able to take advantage of coverage going to Fuller down the field. It just makes more sense that way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ROO
It's still pre-season, put the crow forks away. It is perfectly acceptable to be cautious right now

Sure, but when you watch pre season, the main thing you look for is to watch the first team offenses and how they work together and what the chemistry is like. Oz is in a brand new offense to him with younger WR's that he has needed to develop communication and signals and timing with. So far it looks like they are doing well with that. It is a good sign for a 3rd pre season game which is usually the pre season game that tells you the most. What we saw yesterday was something to feel good about going into the season.
 
We all know that things happen in football and circumstances change. But as things now stand, Os is our QB going forward and if he is the starter going into 2017 season, I can't see Savage staying, for any amount of money, to be a career backup. He's going to leave for a team where he has a legitimate shot at becoming a starter. Weeden, yes, at his age, I could see being willing to accept such a role. The knock on Savage was lack of experience and consistent playing time, coming out of college. The Texans have provided this seasoning. If Os is our starter, Savage will be gone. If he has trade value, I'd take a 2 or a 3, not this year, but next year.

Keep dreaming if you think teams are going to offer a 2nd round pick for Savage because he made a few nice throws. I liked what I saw, but you don't seem to to have that much awareness on the history of the NFL and how they value QB's. Show me a backup QB that teams traded a 2nd round pick for all because he made a few throws in the pre season. We gave two 2nd round picks for Schaub, because he played pretty well every time that Vick would get hurt. Teams don't offer high picks like that for a 4th round guy who plays well in pre season. It just doesn't happen.
 
Last edited:
I read somewhere that they didn't plan anything for the run game for this game. Let me see if I can find it...
There was a brief mention in the Chron to this effect. They simply ran a few basic plays they have been practicing since the start of camp. Also seem to imply that Sunday's run game was not game planned.
 
WTF he looked decent in his 3rd Pre season game. My 7 year old can catch a ball (barely) but I'm not ready to call him the next Jerry Rice just yet....
THIS, fron the dude that was just as confident about The Texans going to the Super Bowl - NO, winning the Super Bowl.

I suck at poker but I like my chances against both of you.

Y'all get points for optimism though.
 
I don't even think we can write it off to injury. This is the starting lineup that has been practicing as the starting lineup, since the preseason started.

I get that but what I am saying is that 3/5ths of the projected starters are missing. We all know what happened to Martin. Brown is an unknown. He might start game one, or might be out the year. Who knows.

Newton may be average at best in pass blocking, but he is a fine run blocker. Lamm is a journeyman at best all the way around. His game is finesse and he's a borderline roster guy imo. This team absolutely needs to make another Chris Clark style trade. We need a second competent veteran swing tackle because Brown is uncertain and if Newton goes down again and Lamm starts because Clark is manning LT - that's major trouble imo. We might be able to find a swing interior player off of cuts but that's less likely at tackle. Clark only cost us a 7th and he is competent. We don't need a world beater but someone that can play left or right and not be a complete turnstile.

At this extremely early juncture OT is the leader in the clubhouse for our 2017 1st rd pick.
 
Keep dreaming if you think teams are going to offer a 2nd round pick for Savage because he made a few nice throws. I liked what I saw, but you're out of your mind right now.
First, I'm referring to next year. Second, Savage may have an opportunity to showcase his talent during the current season. Third, I didn't say a team would offer a 2; I simply implied that if a team did, I'd make the trade. You wouldn't? Savage was selected in the 4th round. A third is not unreasonable if he shows this year. Savage would have to have multiple starts this year and perform well for a 2 to be a possibility.
 
There was a brief mention in the Chron to this effect. They simply ran a few basic plays they have been practicing since the start of camp. Also seem to imply that Sunday's run game was not game planned.
Also heard something similar in a Vandy interview with OB on 610. Said that they weren't game planning the run, and they were more focused on preventing penetration and TFLs.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-T337A using Tapatalk
 
Keep dreaming if you think teams are going to offer a 2nd round pick for Savage because he made a few nice throws. I liked what I saw, but you're out of your mind right now.

You didn't say "if Oz gets hurt, and Savage plays really well". I went by what you said in your post, and again no one around the league cares about Savage as he is a 4th round pick from two going on three years ago now. He looked nice yesterday, but teams don't make investments in pre season performances. They just don't. A QB generally has to have at least 4 or 5 strong showings in the regular season. And yes of course I'd take a 2nd rounder for him. If he continues to look good and impress the coaches, I'd hold off maybe on a 3rd honestly. 3rd rounders have a pretty high potential bust rate, and I'd rather have a backup that can come in and perform personally.
 
Agreed. He navigates the pocket very well under pressure.

It's refreshing to see a QB climb the pocket while looking downfield for an open receiver like he did on the 4th down conversion to Miller when he was pressured.

Much different than what we're used to... which was QBs squeeling like a pig running around aimlessly in the pocket before throwing an INT.

WEEEEEE INT!!!
Amen. I was talking to a guy next to me at the game about this very same point. We both hated Hoyer with the intensity of the sun.
 


Was you over there trying to make friends with your comment. hahahaha just kidding Thunder.

Brock was very impressive Thunder.

Late on what throws? He was on point and did what a few people complained about last week. He didn't stare down his receivers and he was very accurate.

Each game we have added a few more plays. And you can best believe he is ready for week one. The Bears defense will not put that type of pressure on him anyways. Even with our make shift line. LOL


That free rush was mainly on the center and Lamar couldn't pick the MLB up in time. That is not on Brock. The 2nd sack was on the tackle, Clark got beat bad on that particular play.

This was meant for Thunderkyss
 
Last edited:
The single thing which annoyed me most was Os throwing short on third down. The passes were completed but we failed to make the first down. This is something which is correctable, but annoys me. I'd rather take a shot downfield. If intercepted, it's as good as a punt.
 
The single thing which annoyed me most was Os throwing short on third down. The passes were completed but we failed to make the first down. This is something which is correctable, but annoys me. I'd rather take a shot downfield. If intercepted, it's as good as a punt.

Throwing short on 3rd down doesn't bother me, if that's the correct throw to make. I always hated the Madden "why do you throw short of the first down on third down" mantra because you only say that if the guy didn't make it.

You get the ball to your playmakers and let them make the first down.
 
The single thing which annoyed me most was Os throwing short on third down. The passes were completed but we failed to make the first down. This is something which is correctable, but annoys me. I'd rather take a shot downfield. If intercepted, it's as good as a punt.

Without seeing whether anyone was open beyond the sticks, it's hard to criticize him. If you think you're risking an INT if you go deep, probably better to let a receiver make a play with YAC if possible. If not, you punt.
 
THIS, fron the dude that was just as confident about The Texans going to the Super Bowl - NO, winning the Super Bowl.

I suck at poker but I like my chances against both of you.

Y'all get points for optimism though.

I mean we won 9 games, with Hoyer, Mallett, Weeden, and Yates last season. Me predicting the SB does not require Brock to be an MVP candidate.
 
Throwing short on 3rd down doesn't bother me, if that's the correct throw to make. I always hated the Madden "why do you throw short of the first down on third down" mantra because you only say that if the guy didn't make it.

You get the ball to your playmakers and let them make the first down.


If you look across the league you will see every quarterback doing that exact thing.
The single thing which annoyed me most was Os throwing short on third down. The passes were completed but we failed to make the first down. This is something which is correctable, but annoys me. I'd rather take a shot downfield. If intercepted, it's as good as a punt.


Every Quarterback does that exact thing. You get the ball to your playmakers and let them do there thing. Sometimes it works and sometimes it don't.
 
One (preseason) game does not a season make...
That said, I think that the boys looked pretty dang good yesterday.
The only real gripe that I had was early on it still looked like we suck at defending the run.
Other than that, I think the O looked pretty good and so did Os.
Truthfully, it's the first time I've seen him play that gave me some sense of optimism.
Like he said after the game, it's all about learning the system and getting better every week.
 
I read somewhere that they didn't plan anything for the run game for this game. Let me see if I can find it...

Sounds like a coach who's covering his butt.

4369918522_c442539502.jpg


Heaven forbid if Kubiak said such nonsense. :tinfoil:
 
Was you over there trying to make friends with your comment. hahahaha just kidding Thunder.

Brock was very impressive Thunder.

Late on what throws? He was on point and did what a few people complained about last week. He didn't stare down his receivers and he was very accurate.

Each game we have added a few more plays. And you can best believe he is ready for week one. The Bears defense will not put that type of pressure on him anyways. Even with our make shift line. LOL


That free rush was mainly on the center and Lamar couldn't pick the MLB up in time. That is not on Brock. The 2nd sack was on the tackle, Clark got beat bad on that particular play.

This was meant for Thunderkyss

Act like you're not a fan. Then watch the game. There are still things he can work on. A lot of his drops were clean & the decision of where the ball should go was made by the time he made his last step backwards. On those, he came forward & delivered the ball. On others, whether it was due to coverage he wasn't expecting or guessed wrong, he kept his feet moving, while he continued to scan after he finished his drop.

Doesn't mean he's a bust. Just means he's got room to improve.

& On the free runner... Brock may or may not have identified him as a rusher. He came on a delayed blitz, after the center was already engaged. I would like to think if Brock identified him as a rusher, the RB would have been moved to Brocks right side before the snap.

Edit: I'm just listing an observation. I may very well be wrong. "I would like to think..." means just that. I'm no expert, I'm a freak'n electrician.
 
Last edited:
Act like you're not a fan. Then watch the game. There are still things he can work on. A lot of his drops were clean & the decision of where the ball should go was made by the time he made his last step backwards. On those, he came forward & delivered the ball. On others, whether it was due to coverage he wasn't expecting or guessed wrong, he kept his feet moving, while he continued to scan after he finished his drop.

Doesn't mean he's a bust. Just means he's got room to improve.

& On the free runner... Brock may or may not have identified him as a rusher. He came on a delayed blitz, after the center was already engaged. I would like to think if Brock identified him as a rusher, the RB would have been moved to Brocks right side before the snap.

Brock had no chance on that play if you're referring to the play action play where he was sacked. If so, you credit the defense on plays like that.
 
Brock had no chance on that play if you're referring to the play action play where he was sacked. If so, you credit the defense on plays like that.

I'm assuming the blitzing guy was Miller's responsibility, but not sure he could have gotten there in time the way the play was designed and how quickly the blitz was in the backfield.
 
Throwing short on 3rd down doesn't bother me, if that's the correct throw to make. I always hated the Madden "why do you throw short of the first down on third down" mantra because you only say that if the guy didn't make it.

You get the ball to your playmakers and let them make the first down.
Sounds like I have something in common with Madden. It's old school football and it's less on the QB than on the design of the play and the coach who called it. Granted it's only preseason, but it seems to me a case that the play, or "playmaker" as the case may be, more times than not does not make the first down. Defenses are giving you the completion but not the YAC. That type of route should be called on 1st or 2nd down. Also granted, this play will be more successful against bad teams, but playoff caliber teams will shut it down. Again, it's only preseason and I'll wait until the starters are playing for real.

I was about to post and had one more "old school" thought. This situation is when your possession receiver and a properly designed timing route excelles. I keep saying "old school". Well, I grew up watching Johnny Unitas throwing to Ray Berry.
 
I'm assuming the blitzing guy was Miller's responsibility, but not sure he could have gotten there in time the way the play was designed and how quickly the blitz was in the backfield.

Miller couldn't get to him from where he was pre snap. If he were on Brock's right, he could have been a speed bump. But that guy was going to get to Osweiler.
 
Sounds like I have something in common with Madden. It's old school football and it's less on the QB than on the design of the play and the coach who called it. Granted it's only preseason, but it seems to me a case that the play, or "playmaker" as the case may be, more times than not does not make the first down. Defenses are giving you the completion but not the YAC. That type of route should be called on 1st or 2nd down. Also granted, this play will be more successful against bad teams, but playoff caliber teams will shut it down. Again, it's only preseason and I'll wait until the starters are playing for real.

I was about to post and had one more "old school" thought. This situation is when your possession receiver and a properly designed timing route excelles. I keep saying "old school". Well, I grew up watching Johnny Unitas throwing to Ray Berry.

I mentioned after the 49ers game, the only thing about throwing it short on 3rd down is when you throw it to a guy who is covered. If you're going to throw it to a guy who is covered anyway, throw it to the guy past the sticks.

Other than that, it's a calculated risk. If the game is even, or you have a lead, it's not worth the risk (if the guy is open under) to throw the ball deep to a guy who is covered. If you're trailing & need something, take the risk... throw it downfield & hope someone can make a play (if the underneath guy is covered).
 
  • Like
Reactions: ROO
I read this morning OB was quoted as saying he didn't install any run schemes or blocking packages this game. It was as basic as it gets. Still, I would like to see our guys be able to outmuscle theirs for some yards. I think they proved last year they could manufacture rush yards if needed. The fact OS is looking good and our wrs look great, I feel ok with our run game.
to be fair only Su'a-Fila is starting out of two guards, center, two tackles, a running back and the QB from start of 2015.
 
Act like you're not a fan. Then watch the game. There are still things he can work on. A lot of his drops were clean & the decision of where the ball should go was made by the time he made his last step backwards. On those, he came forward & delivered the ball. On others, whether it was due to coverage he wasn't expecting or guessed wrong, he kept his feet moving, while he continued to scan after he finished his drop.

Doesn't mean he's a bust. Just means he's got room to improve.

& On the free runner... Brock may or may not have identified him as a rusher. He came on a delayed blitz, after the center was already engaged. I would like to think if Brock identified him as a rusher, the RB would have been moved to Brocks right side before the snap.

Edit: I'm just listing an observation. I may very well be wrong. "I would like to think..." means just that. I'm no expert, I'm a freak'n electrician.


Thunderkyss you know I know how you get down brother. And you are spot on. Everybody still have plenty room to improve. I've watched the game twice and from my observations Brock was on point. On that 1st sack he did move Lamar to the left. He also called out the Mike. We can really chalk that play up as a great call by the defense. Basically we can't win the all.

Now as far as techniques and if he got the ball out in time. I really don't look at all that because live action has so many things going on. Example:his first read is blanketed, now he has to go through his progression. Well brother the pocket is starting to close on him. Therefore, he doesn't have time to make sure his feet is perfect on that particular throw. I don't ever see these quarterbacks utilizing the perfect technique on every throw.

Just as long as he hit his target or gave his receivers a chance to make a play.
 
I mean we won 9 games, with Hoyer, Mallett, Weeden, and Yates last season. Me predicting the SB does not require Brock to be an MVP candidate.

Well.. our winning the Bowl's future odds went from 60-1 to 45-1 after yesterday's game. Just sayin'
 
Every time he throws that deep sideline pass to Fuller he helps the running game. There will always be one safety honoring the deep ball.
I'm convinced that O'Brien is intentionally showing that deep pass now during preseason to loosen up defenses in the regular season.
Trust me, opposing defensive coordinators are already adding that info to thier scouting of the Texans

William Fuller doesn't have to have a huge season. His presence is already having an impact on regular season games. He will be a key reason the offense excels whether he gets the ball out not

Fuller gives this offense a deep threat that it has been lacking for many years. Like you said, just his presence has to be respected. But, I predict that he will get wide open at least once every game. If Brock finds him or not depends on a variety of factors, but there is no doubt in my mind that defenses studying Texans film will see that potential and plan accordingly.

Brock makes throwing the ball 30-40 yards down field look easy. I watched the one play to Fuller over and over, and Brock has no big wind up and lean back. He just flicked it over to him like it was nothing. I hope we see a lot of that this season, because it just opens up even more opportunities for Nuk.

Keep dreaming if you think teams are going to offer a 2nd round pick for Savage because he made a few nice throws. I liked what I saw, but you don't seem to to have that much awareness on the history of the NFL and how they value QB's. Show me a backup QB that teams traded a 2nd round pick for all because he made a few throws in the pre season. We gave two 2nd round picks for Schaub, because he played pretty well every time that Vick would get hurt. Teams don't offer high picks like that for a 4th round guy who plays well in pre season. It just doesn't happen.

Seth Payne was talking about backup QBs last week and the misconception that folks have about them in preseason games. He said there are about 20 truly elite pass rushers in the world - guys like J.J., Von Miller, etc., - and backup QBs NEVER see those guys in preseason games. Payne went on to explain the soft coverages and lack of blitz packages in preseason, as well as the little fact that most of the competition will be selling insurance or personal trainers next month, and this help to understand why backup QBs can appear deceivingly better than they really are in preseason games.
 
I'm assuming the blitzing guy was Miller's responsibility, but not sure he could have gotten there in time the way the play was designed and how quickly the blitz was in the backfield.
This is what I thought when it happened. The play took Miller out of position to pick up the blitz.

That said, we don't know what Brock's pre-snap read/audible was either.
 
I think the problem with the running game largely comes from a lack of game planning, the OL not having enough time together, and the fact that the OL is a patchwork quilt at this point.
One thing I try to look at for a bit of sunshine is the fact that of the three injured starting OL's, Newton is far and away the best bet to return soon. He's also a good run blocker in spite of the fact that on an overall basis, he may be average at best. But regardless of where he's rated on an overall basis, he's clearly a starter on this team when healthy, so hopefully that happens soon, and things get better - even if only a little bit.
 
One thing I try to look at for a bit of sunshine is the fact that of the three injured starting OL's, Newton is far and away the best bet to return soon. He's also a good run blocker in spite of the fact that on an overall basis, he may be average at best. But regardless of where he's rated on an overall basis, he's clearly a starter on this team when healthy, so hopefully that happens soon, and things get better - even if only a little bit.

Agreed. Newton, with all his faults is a big upgrade over Lamm. Lamm is who they bring in at TE for an extra blocker, imo
 
Brock's future looks very promising but lets hold off on the MVP type chatter.

Now Big Ben, (possibly Luck), Rodgers and Cam will be the favorites to win that award.
 
I read this morning OB was quoted as saying he didn't install any run schemes or blocking packages this game. It was as basic as it gets. Still, I would like to see our guys be able to outmuscle theirs for some yards. I think they proved last year they could manufacture rush yards if needed. The fact OS is looking good and our wrs look great, I feel ok with our run game.


He said that during the interviewed him after the game.

Thunder some of those completion were in close quarters. The receivers didn't get seperation on every throw.
 
Sounds like a coach who's covering his butt.

4369918522_c442539502.jpg


Heaven forbid if Kubiak said such nonsense. :tinfoil:
Why imagine? Just like now, there would be Kubiak lovers defending him to the end, Kubiak haters who would criticize even if he won a Super Bowl (Oh - wait), and those in the middle who would recognize it as a valid and very likely accurate comment.
 
Back
Top