Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍

Falcons ‘most likely’ partner if Texans deal No. 1 pick in 2014 NFL draft

Status
Not open for further replies.
They can have as many as they want as long as it isn't a repeat of another thread &/or in the right forum.

What are you Gary Kubiak or something ? Why not develop some flexibility and let the one and only poster from Italy who's showed up in these parts have a thread of his own, even if it's not entirely original ?
 
What are you Gary Kubiak or something ? Why not develop some flexibility and let the one and only poster from Italy who's showed up in these parts have a thread of his own, even if it's not entirely original ?

The poster being in Italy is irrelavant.
 
My reading of the Tea Leaves regarding Falcons trading up is this: Dimitroff & CO likely assume there is high probability that the Texans take a QB with their first pick since they're sans QB. Snead, Fisher & CO will pass on Clowney/Mack with Long and Quinn already on the front line. Therefore Jacksonville becomes the attractive candidate for Atlanta to trade up with so the Falcons can draft Clowney or Mack. In turn, moving from #6 to #3 vs #6 to #1, saves the Falcons 800 trade value points. The equivalent of a 1st and 3rd RD pick and still getting a player they covet.
 
I think Tenn will take a QB, but not in the 1st. They have too many other needs. Locker is adequate if and when he's healthy. If the top QB's slide to the late 1st or 2nd round, I could see them trading up for a QB.

Carolina could be drafting WR in every round cuz they really need some. :boogereater:

Carolina has the worst WR corp in the NFL right now, but their OL is also terrible. They need to come out of this draft with two starting OL and an impact WR. Not gonna be easy picking at the back of the pack.
 
I really hope this scenario plays out, then Smith trades down again for even more picks. I can see 3-4 guys I'd like at 10 or 11 that would be instant starters and impact players.

The more I watch Justin Gilbert and Ha Ha, the more I like them. This could be a need and bpa pick.
 
As most would say that two division rivals wouldnt trade. But a simple trade with the jags would also make sense. The jags are more of a natural fit for clowney as they run a 4-3 defense. Mack would be more of a fit in Houston in a 3-4. The jags can send their 3rd overall pick along their 2nd and 3rd round pick. The draft chart equals to an even trade with the point system. The texans get mack and extra two early round picks and the jags get their man in clowney.
 
As most would say that two division rivals wouldnt trade. But a simple trade with the jags would also make sense. The jags are more of a natural fit for clowney as they run a 4-3 defense. Mack would be more of a fit in Houston in a 3-4. The jags can send their 3rd overall pick along their 2nd and 3rd round pick. The draft chart equals to an even trade with the point system. The texans get mack and extra two early round picks and the jags get their man in clowney.
Not bad reasoning. I'm confident enough in Clowney being a :clown: at the NFL level that I would pull the trigger on that and risk facing him twice a year.
 
Could we trade down with Atlanta to 6th, then flip the sixth pick and a second rounder to St. Louis and move up to 2? Clowney stays in the NFC and we still get Mack before JAX picks along with another pick or two from Atlanta..
 
Could we trade down with Atlanta to 6th, then flip the sixth pick and a second rounder to St. Louis and move up to 2? Clowney stays in the NFC and we still get Mack before JAX picks along with another pick or two from Atlanta..

Probably no need to trade back up

1 Atlanta - Clowney
2 STL - Robinson
3 Jax - Bortles
4 Cleveland - Watkins
5 Oakland - Matthews
6 Houston - ????
 
I really wouldnt want to do this trade. The only other players i want besides clowney are mack or bridgewater. And i think Mack will be gone by the 6th pick and I think you can nab bridgewater later in the round.

With getting that much back, I´d definetly do it. I´d be satisfied with any of the following:

Clowney
Robinson
Mack
Matthews
Watkins
Bortles
Manziel
Bridgewater

So basically I´d be alright with trading down all the way to #8. Picking up another 2nd this year and another first next year would be enough for me - getting another third rounder would be icing on the cake.

I´d take Clowney if we stay put, but there are several questions around him, so I wouldn`t hesitate to trade the pick if we really get that much in return.
 
First-Pick has modified their chart to something like this because of the deep draft:
1-1 2500 (was 3000)
1-2 2300 (was 2600)
1-3 2100 (was 2200)
1-4 1900 (was 2000)
1-5 1700 (was 1800)

Then it continues with the traditional formulas.
That more progressive scale works with an Andrew Luck/RG3 type Draft, but without those kinda QB prospects the top picks are worth much less. I think any basis for assignment of points in a year like this is nearly random, and I would hope the Texans are so aggressively shopping their pick that they are offering trade terms just as appealing as the Rams are for their #2 overall.
 
Ted Johnson ‏@Teddyjradio
SHOP IS CLOSED.....you heard it here first. ATL doesn't want to do biz with the Texans after all... http://houston.cbslocal.com/2014/05/01/falcons-not-interested-in-clowney-or-no-1-pick/ …

Falcons Not Interested In Trading For Clowney & No. 1 Pick

The Atlanta Falcons and Houston Texans will not be working together on a trade for the No. 1 overall pick involving Jadeveon Clowney, SportsRadio 610 has learned.

The Falcons are interested in trading up to acquire a player they value above their spot at No. 6, but they do not believe that player is worth picking with the No. 1 pick. SportsRadio 610 has also learned that the player the Falcons are interested in is not Jadeveon Clowney.

Greg Robinson, OT.
 
Not buying it. They visited with Clowney 3 times. Third time was a quick turn around to go see him at USC after visiting him in Atlanta.
Wonder if the force plate test revealed something wrong with Clowney? Still, not buying that there is or isn't a deal until the Texans are actually on the clock.
 
They have a trade in place with the Rams and dont want anybody leapfrogging them for Clowney.
 
This is confusing??

They didnt want to pay the price to move up with the Texans.

Theyre not convinced we will select Clowney so in the event someone else is desperate enough to possiblly move with us they want to create less urgency by taking their name out of the hat. All while bargaining with the Rams who are in the cat bird seat.
 
They didnt want to pay the price to move up with the Texans.

Theyre not convinced we will select Clowney so in the event someone else is desperate enough to possiblly move with us they want to create less urgency by taking their name out of the hat. All while bargaining with the Rams who are in the cat bird seat.

That makes sense.
 
Teams dont divulge their plans. They just dont. How can anyone actually believe this is 100% true?
 
They all lie and never show their cards until the final minute or two on the clock. Why would you put all your chips in a week ahead of time. Media release is their version of wearing shades and shrugging their shoulders when they have a bad hand. Everybody needs to let all this stuff go in one ear and out the other. 6 more days and the fun begins, I can't wait.
 
I really think the Texans end up with Bortles or Mack and Atlanta trades into #2 for either Robinson or Clowney.
 
Not buying it. They visited with Clowney 3 times. Third time was a quick turn around to go see him at USC after visiting him in Atlanta.

Damnear every mock I've seen has the Rams taking Robinson. If the Falcons want him, the only way to get him is to trade with us.

However, if they believe we're going to take Mack & St Louis is going to take Robinson, they probably feel that Clowney will fall past Jacksonville & Cleveland.

I don't think he gets past Jacksonville, but I think it's more likely the Jags will take a QB. Probably Bridgewater, maybe Carr.
 
So Texans may have slipped and gave unintended info to Falcons?

Or maybe he Smith needs to work on his poker face.

bad-poker-face.jpg
 
Damnear every mock I've seen has the Rams taking Robinson. If the Falcons want him, the only way to get him is to trade with us.
However, if they believe we're going to take Mack & St Louis is going to take Robinson, they probably feel that Clowney will fall past Jacksonville & Cleveland.

I don't think he gets past Jacksonville, but I think it's more likely the Jags will take a QB. Probably Bridgewater, maybe Carr.
So NFL GM's and HC's rely on talking head/fan mock drafts to make their draft day decisions???
 
Good point

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
LOL. You know as well as I do that everything is smoke and mirrors til draft day is here. Believe none of what you hear and little of what you see. I'm thinking JFF, Robertson or take less than we think to trade back. Jmho.
 
Dam near every mock I've seen has the Rams taking Robinson. If the Falcons want him, the only way to get him is to trade with us.

However, if they believe we're going to take Mack & St Louis is going to take Robinson, they probably feel that Clowney will fall past Jacksonville & Cleveland.

I don't think he gets past Jacksonville, but I think it's more likely the Jags will take a QB. Probably Bridgewater, maybe Carr.

I think the first five off the board in no particular order are Clowney , Robinson , Mack , Matthews & Watkins.


If Atlanta wants one of those players , they have to move up to get him.
 
My reading of the Tea Leaves regarding Falcons trading up is this: Dimitroff & CO likely assume there is high probability that the Texans take a QB with their first pick since they're sans QB. Snead, Fisher & CO will pass on Clowney/Mack with Long and Quinn already on the front line. Therefore Jacksonville becomes the attractive candidate for Atlanta to trade up with so the Falcons can draft Clowney or Mack. In turn, moving from #6 to #3 vs #6 to #1, saves the Falcons 800 trade value points. The equivalent of a 1st and 3rd RD pick and still getting a player they covet.

I do not understand the comment of Houston being sans QB. We have three QB and, while we could improve the position, we could start the season without any additions at the position.

We are a wild card with the first pick and other teams need to know it. Assuming we will pick QB with 1-1 is an invalid assumption. I personally think Clowney, Robinson and Mack are all viable options at 1-1 as well as Bortles, Manziel and Bridgewater. I'd even think Watkins might be considered as Johnsons replacement. If you want your guy, you HAVE TO go to Houston or risk us taking him first.
 
First-Pick has modified their chart to something like this because of the deep draft:
1-1 2500 (was 3000)
1-2 2300 (was 2600)
1-3 2100 (was 2200)
1-4 1900 (was 2000)
1-5 1700 (was 1800)

Then it continues with the traditional formulas.

Now they've changed it back.
 
I do not understand the comment of Houston being sans QB. We have three QB and, while we could improve the position, we could start the season without any additions at the position.

We are a wild card with the first pick and other teams need to know it. Assuming we will pick QB with 1-1 is an invalid assumption. I personally think Clowney, Robinson and Mack are all viable options at 1-1 as well as Bortles, Manziel and Bridgewater. I'd even think Watkins might be considered as Johnsons replacement. If you want your guy, you HAVE TO go to Houston or risk us taking him first.
I think most folks doubt the ability of Yates or Keenum to get team more than 8-8 and we know little about the new FA Fitzy so getting a solid option in this draft does make sense.
 
I think most folks doubt the ability of Yates or Keenum to get team more than 8-8 and we know little about the new FA Fitzy so getting a solid option in this draft does make sense.

it's probably my own bias, but i dont know that teams would be so quick to write off keenum. o'brian fits his talents much better than kubiak as someone who can coach a wider passing offense. likewise, an early pick plus a healthy brown and foster on offense would go a long way to negating the single (but huge) knock he had last season.

the few times fitz has had healthy talent around him he's performed very well. the talent was thin and didnt last long, but he's shown he can play when even some of the pieces are in place. he'd have more all-pros at starter next season than he's had in the rest of his career combined. as someone who's battled up his whole career, he's got the mental fortitude, and with that talent i'm more than a bit curious.

yates, as much as i want to, i dont see it from. his talent is in his head, and his head seems to have taken the rosencopter route - overcompensating and trying to be more than he can.
 
Something I haven't seen mentioned, the Texans have been in phase two of the off season workout program for a week, or so, now. During this phase coaches can actually evaluate the players in drills. They can also do drills as a team on a separates basis, meaning the offense can't go against the defense. Also, I believe they are limited to shorts, no pads.

Like I said, I haven't heard a word, but O'Brien has a limited opportunity to actually see what he has in Case and Yates.
 
Right after writing the above, I go out to breakfast, pick up a Chronicle and read that O'Brien has been focusing on offseason workouts.
 
I do not understand the comment of Houston being sans QB. We have three QB and, while we could improve the position, we could start the season without any additions at the position.

We are a wild card with the first pick and other teams need to know it. Assuming we will pick QB with 1-1 is an invalid assumption. I personally think Clowney, Robinson and Mack are all viable options at 1-1 as well as Bortles, Manziel and Bridgewater. I'd even think Watkins might be considered as Johnsons replacement. If you want your guy, you HAVE TO go to Houston or risk us taking him first.

Let me be a little more clear and precise. The Texans are without a > .500 QB. Without a QB who can throw twice as many TDs as INTs. Without a QB that has a QB rating of > 80.Without a WINNING QB.
 
I think most folks doubt the ability of Yates or Keenum to get team more than 8-8 and we know little about the new FA Fitzy so getting a solid option in this draft does make sense.


I'd take 8-8 in OB's first season as HC. I'd take that in a heartbeat following 2-14.
 
One thing the Texans are good at is surprising people in round 1 draft day. Most journalists expect them to take Clowney. I bet they won't.
 
But where ? They'd do that deal with StLouis, but certainly not Seattle.

Falcons -- subject of thread. I just can't see doing it from their end. I'd protect Matty Ice and get more bodies on defense. They need a TE now, too.
 
it's probably my own bias, but i dont know that teams would be so quick to write off keenum. o'brian fits his talents much better than kubiak as someone who can coach a wider passing offense. likewise, an early pick plus a healthy brown and foster on offense would go a long way to negating the single (but huge) knock he had last season.

the few times fitz has had healthy talent around him he's performed very well. the talent was thin and didnt last long, but he's shown he can play when even some of the pieces are in place. he'd have more all-pros at starter next season than he's had in the rest of his career combined. as someone who's battled up his whole career, he's got the mental fortitude, and with that talent i'm more than a bit curious.

yates, as much as i want to, i dont see it from. his talent is in his head, and his head seems to have taken the rosencopter route - overcompensating and trying to be more than he can.
Vet FA and a high draft pick QBs probably will eliminate Keenum getting much time. I see him starting over with O'Brien as he did with Kubiak as #3. I think Yates is cut.
 
Falcons -- subject of thread. I just can't see doing it from their end. I'd protect Matty Ice and get more bodies on defense. They need a TE now, too.

Duh - yes it is ATL specific isn't it. OK, so I lost track of that for a moment.
But if the Texans are smart and they could get just those '14 picks they should jump all over it IMO. You can have Bortles, Mack, Watkins, Robinson, or Matthews and the 37th pick plus a 4th rounder. I doubt that they get a better deal than that. No way they can also get ATLs '15 first rounder.
 
Falcons -- subject of thread. I just can't see doing it from their end. I'd protect Matty Ice and get more bodies on defense. They need a TE now, too.
what if Houston would take 1-6, 2nd, 4th and 2015 2nd? Smith should not get caught up in points for points but players he could draft with a trade.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top