Wolf
100% Texan
For me the answer is "No, I would not trade Mario if it meant..... whatever". I try to sign Mario because I think he was starting to really click in this system and I want to see him in it next year.
this^^^
Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
For me the answer is "No, I would not trade Mario if it meant..... whatever". I try to sign Mario because I think he was starting to really click in this system and I want to see him in it next year.
For me the answer is "No, I would not trade Mario if it meant..... whatever". I try to sign Mario because I think he was starting to really click in this system and I want to see him in it next year.
If you could choose one, which would you take?:
sign FA CB Brent Grimes, sign Arian Foster to a 5 year deal, extend Chris Myers.
or,
sign Mario Williams
I believe the coming off-season will force decisions like that one. Obviously, I don't know exactly what those decisions will be. However, Mario's signing will definitely limit our ability to re-sign our guys and certainly our freedom in FA.
So you actually think you can pay a top-flight CB AND a league-leading rusher AND the starting center on the best O-line we've ever put together for the franchise money they might pay Mario???
Seriously?
I think you are confused. Mario Williams base salary for 2011 season is $13.8m (cap $15m) Round up to $14m. Even if tagged as OLB he must be paid 120% of his last year's salary. If tagged for next season $14m (100%) + $2.8m (20%) = $16.8m.The cost to franchise a defensive end is $12.4 million per Wiki
According to the football outsiders it will cost a team $10.09 million to apply the franchise tag to an OLB. LINK
Seems to me you were right the first time with the $10 mil number.
That's less than he's due this year.
Whoever quoted that $20 million number was talking out of his (or her) butt.
Grimes was tagged by Atlanta & will cost a first round + huge contract. Not saying I would not considered it as he looks very good stat wise.If you could choose one, which would you take?:
sign FA CB Brent Grimes, sign Arian Foster to a 5 year deal, extend Chris Myers.
or,
sign Mario Williams
I believe the coming off-season will force decisions like that one. Obviously, I don't know exactly what those decisions will be. However, Mario's signing will definitely limit our ability to re-sign our guys and certainly our freedom in FA.
Lance Zierlein said:Trench warfare is all about winning the battle with the guy in front of you. Whether Mario Williams is there or not, Antonio Smith has to battle the player who is in front of him.
Grimes was tagged by Atlanta & will cost a first round + huge contract. Not saying I would not considered it as he looks very good stat wise.
I think you are confused. Mario Williams base salary for 2011 season is $13.8m (cap $15m) Round up to $14m. Even if tagged as OLB he must be paid 120% of his last year's salary. If tagged for next season $14m (100%) + $2.8m (20%) = $16.8m.
http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/houston-texans/mario-williams/
Mario as a free agent will be tagged as a franchise player. He can be then identified as exclusive or non-exclusive. Here is definition and terms:
Exclusive= Only his team can negotiate with player.
Any Club that designates a Franchise Player as "Exclusive" shall be the only Club with which that Franchise Player may negotiate or sign a contract. In order to designate an UFA or RFA as an Exclusive Franchise Player, the team must tender the player a one year contract that is the minimum of the average of the five largest salaries (as calculated at the end of the free agency signing period) for players at the position at which he played the most games during the prior year, or 120% of his prior year salary, whichever is greater.
Non-exclusive= player can negotiate with any team but:
If the team elects to name the player "non-exclusive" then the player shall be permitted to negotiate a contract with any Club as if he were an UFA; however, Draft Choice Compensation of TWO first round draft selections shall be awarded to the prior club in the event that he signs with the new club. For Non-Exlusive Franchise Players, the team must tender the player a one year contract that is the minimum of the average of the five largest PRIOR-YEAR salaries for players at the position at which he played the most games in the prior year, or 120% of his prior year salary, whichever is greater.
OR-he can be tagged as a "transitional" player.
Each Club can also designate one UFA or RFA as a Transition Player.....
Any Club that designates a Transition Player shall receive the Rights of First Refusal. In order to designate an UFA or RFA as a Transition Player, the team must tender the player a one year contract for the average of the ten largest prior year salaries for players at the position at which he played the most games during the prior year, or 120% of his prior year salary, whichever is greater.
**Note I have edited this and full article can be read at: http://www.askthecommish.com/freeagency/
After years of research, this is the guy that explains tags the best imo. I have used him for 3 years. Hope this is helpful?
Steve
From dale's linked article.
Seriously Lance? Respect really just went down for you. The idea NFL line play is just a mano on mano matter is well just ludicrous. It matters who is assigned to block you. Who is assigned to block you is dependent on who is on the field with you. It isn't just block "the player" who is in front of you.
Thanks. He is an interesting prospect with I think 11 INTS last 2 years and one (?) this season.Grimes was tendered as a restricted free agent for 2011 and signed a one year contract as a result. He will have four accrued seasons entering the 2012 season, and therefore can not be restricted again. Last years designation means nothing. He can be franchised, or he could agree to an extension prior to the start of the 2012 free agency period. Short of one of those two things happening, Atlanta cannot keep him from becoming a UFA, and any NFL team will be able sign him with no compensation going to the Falcons.
Just info to think about: 2011 team salary cap $120m & Texans paying Mario $14m so we have that $14m next season to use on Mario or else where. There is also a $3m amount that was not used this season and will be allowed next year. That adds up to $17m. We are @ about $900,000 under the 120 and that adds another million = $18m. The TV deal is expect to add apprx $13m to each team. That totals $31million. I would guess that increased radio & other revenue sources would add at least $1 million so we now have $32m for 2012. I expect Mario to sign long term deal with first year base at apprx $9m.Thanks for the research - and the lesson in franchise tagging.
-repped
But the math still doesn't work for me when the proposed choice is a pro-bowl CB, a top flight RB, AND a starting center OR Mario at 16.8 million. I don't see where you can get those three guys for 16.8 mill.
The smart play, IMHO, is not to franchise Mario but to negotiate a 4 or 5 year deal at 8.5 or 9 million per year. Or maybe 7 or 8 million per year with incentives that could total up to 10 - 10.5 mil a year. Back loading that contract, as was done with his rookie year contract, would be even better.
My feeling from March when I started this thread was to trade Mario. I think we will make the playoffs as is but with the addition of a real 1b receiver and a quality CB this team could have been a serious SB contender. One of my main reasons for the trade was Mario's propensity to injury. His injuries are strange injuries and don't seem to occur from major contact. Is he just so muscle bound that he gets injured easily. I don't see him getting more durable as he ages. If you put his history of injuries into the equation I just don't know about signing him to a long term contract. If you franchise you tie up a lot of money that could be used elsewhere and you basically set your self up to have a repeat of this year with respect to Mario only I don't think you can franchise again. I am not sure what you do with Mario at this point. I just hope he has some type of trade value left so we get something besides a compensation pick.
One of my main reasons for the trade was Mario's propensity to injury. His injuries are strange injuries and don't seem to occur from major contact. Is he just so muscle bound that he gets injured easily. I don't see him getting more durable as he ages. If you put his history of injuries into the equation I just don't know about signing him to a long term contract.
My feeling from March when I started this thread was to trade Mario. I think we will make the playoffs as is but with the addition of a real 1b receiver and a quality CB this team could have been a serious SB contender. One of my main reasons for the trade was Mario's propensity to injury. His injuries are strange injuries and don't seem to occur from major contact. Is he just so muscle bound that he gets injured easily. I don't see him getting more durable as he ages. If you put his history of injuries into the equation I just don't know about signing him to a long term contract. If you franchise you tie up a lot of money that could be used elsewhere and you basically set your self up to have a repeat of this year with respect to Mario only I don't think you can franchise again. I am not sure what you do with Mario at this point. I just hope he has some type of trade value left so we get something besides a compensation pick.
Ah but did the4 many injuries greatly effect his abilities. ALso, not everyone agrees with your assessment Mario is an "elite" pas rusher.This team beat the Steelers at full strentgh. With Mario and AJ on the field. I feel like WITH Mario the pass rush is top 5 and WITH Mario this team IS a contender. Now it may be a darkhorse contender but one nonetheless.
Also this injury thing...pretty sure we've gone through this before but the man has not missed many games at all. Up until this season Mario has missed a total of 3 games.
So I don't see this injury history.
EDIT: Also pass rushers are premier players on defense. Not many teams are going to give up a elite pass rusher for a #2 WR or CB...it just ain't happening. Much easier to come by a solid #2 at WR or CB than a premier pass rusher.
My feeling from March when I started this thread was to trade Mario. I think we will make the playoffs as is but with the addition of a real 1b receiver and a quality CB this team could have been a serious SB contender. One of my main reasons for the trade was Mario's propensity to injury. His injuries are strange injuries and don't seem to occur from major contact. Is he just so muscle bound that he gets injured easily. I don't see him getting more durable as he ages. If you put his history of injuries into the equation I just don't know about signing him to a long term contract. If you franchise you tie up a lot of money that could be used elsewhere and you basically set your self up to have a repeat of this year with respect to Mario only I don't think you can franchise again. I am not sure what you do with Mario at this point. I just hope he has some type of trade value left so we get something besides a compensation pick.
The beauty of the long term contract as I suggested it be played is:
(a) It can be structured such that a fair portion of the money is incentive laden. Mario has to get X number of sacks to get bonus A and he has to make the pro bowl to get bonus B and he has to help the team make the playoffs to get bonus C. Stuff of that nature.
(b) If we want to clear cap space at some future point, there's the option of releasing him as Jacksonville did with Garrard. Happens all the time.
And I don't really see where franchising Mario is applicable. I thought franchising done to benefit players who think they're underpaid and want to test the open market. When have we ever heard that kind of "I'm sooo unjustly underpaid" talk - like Lance Briggs keeps doing and CJ0K did this preseason - from Mario or his agent?? Anyone who has will have to show me some quotes that back that up.
I just think an incentive-laden contract extension is the smart play for both the Texans and Mario.
Ah but did the4 many injuries greatly effect his abilities. ALso, not everyone agrees with your assessment Mario is an "elite" pas rusher.
I think Grimes will get something like: 6 for $45 million. Myers will get something like 5 and $20 million. Foster will get something like 5 for $40 million. A lot of that is back end stuff, though.
Mario, I believe, will get something like: $6 for 75 million (look at the Charles Johnson deal)... His bonus money will be very large as well. Therefore, though the cumulative total money is more for the other scenario (Grimes, Myers, Foster), the cap reality the first 3 years would be the same, basically.
There's a reason why pass rushers have the 2nd highest franchise tag, they're more valuable. Grimes is just solid, meyers is god, and foster has been great. You pay in order of rarity and importance. Mario is a all pro type, not just pro bowl caliber. How many of those guy get free at a premium position become free. At the age of 27? If bill had to do it again, they would've payed seymore.
Heh unreal.
Honestly I am surprised that guys are ready to just give up a premiere pass rusher. Also i'm sorry but those that think the pass rush has not been effected with Mario out are kidding themselves.
I don't understand why some of you think Mario is an elite pass rusher. He isn't. He's good. He had one great season: 2007 and one very good one: 2008. Better pass rushers than Mario:
Dwight Freeney
Charles Johnson
J. Peppers
James Harrison
Woodley
Clay Matthews
Terrell Suggs
Robert Mathis
Tamba Hali
Demarcus Ware
Trent Cole
Justin Tuck
Osi Umenyiora
Jared Allen
those are just some names off the top of my head. Yes, I realize he plays the run better than some of those guys. But, he's no All-Pro. He's a pass rusher with no pass rush moves. He has one: the bull rush. That's it.
Conner Barwin, Brooks Reed and Upshaw whooeee!Give me Meachem, Myers,Foster and Courtney Upshaw with a 1st rd pick over 8 healthy games of MW any day and twice on Sundays. Dont give me stats about MW's games played. He may play but he's always hurt for about half the season. This yrs even more than half a season.
Was it last yr that BoBBy called out MW's effort level? I honestly cant remember.
Bollocks mate, He is All-Pro, he's been elected All-Pro twice, that is the definition of being All-Pro, whether you've been elected or not, he has.
I cannot understand your hatred of Mario? The only thing I can think is maybe you backed Bush or Young back in 2006 on your blog and are trying to save face by making him seem worse than he is??
Sure, he gets injured too much, and sure, he's expensive, but he showed through 4 games this season that he has it in him, with the right coaching, to become one of if not THE best pass rusher in the league, the guy was unstoppable through the first quarter of the season and thats with a position change and shortened off season programme, just imagine what will happen when he improves!!
Or you just keep on kidding yourself.
Hopefully, Chris Olsen VP and contract guru is already in discussions with Mario's agent. I would love to see a healthy Mario on this team with a reasonable contract. I would rather see Mario traded to a team giving us high selections in 2012 draft. Reed and Barwin continue to look good. Texans are in the driver's seat imo.It's good business to be prepared. Have they had any contract talks w/MW? What does he/agent want? This will determine if he comes back or not a Texan. He, the franchise & fan base already have a lot invested both money wise & emotionally. I hope it doesn't come down to trading him, he is such a signature Texan but if they cannot agree the Texans will move forward.![]()
One of my main concerns and i think one of the main problems in getting something in a trade for Mario is injury concerns. Every year he has "something" that causes him to play below optimum levels. This along with the change in defensive systems, his salary, and his inconsistent effort makes me want to make a trade. I do want it to be a good or at least a fair trade. I also think another year of injuries will lower his trade value. I think it is easier to get a d lineman than a true shutdown corner. IF Mario could play up to his potential then I would not be proposing this trade, but due to injuries he never has. I think you help yourself multiple ways with this trade. Along with the shutdown corner and a proven d lineman you either move up in the draft or get additional quality draft choices. I am afraid next year we will have a repeat of the Carr/Kubiak incident where Kubiak realizes Carr isn't the one and then gets nothing for Carr. I could easily see this happening with Mario/Wade.
Hopefully, Chris Olsen VP and contract guru is already in discussions with Mario's agent. I would love to see a healthy Mario on this team with a reasonable contract. I would rather see Mario traded to a team giving us high selections in 2012 draft. Reed and Barwin continue to look good. Texans are in the driver's seat imo.
Dale,
You act is tired and played out. Everyone clearly knows where you stand on Mario Williams and your opinion of him is wrong. Yes, I said your opinion, is wrong.
What he will command on the market as a free agent will dictate that. This organization would be foolish not resign Mario.
Pay Mario.
Foster will get a deal somewhere in the JC range, which is where it should be.
Pay Meyers.
Release and restructure whomever you need to make this work.
Hopefully, Chris Olsen VP and contract guru is already in discussions with Mario's agent. I would love to see a healthy Mario on this team with a reasonable contract. I would rather see Mario traded to a team giving us high selections in 2012 draft. Reed and Barwin continue to look good. Texans are in the driver's seat imo.
I get that people may disagree with my assessment of Mario. That's understandable. However, I don't get this attitude that we must re-sign him at any cost. Why? The Texans defense is playing consistent and with dominance without Mario in the lineup. How can anyone conclude that we should re-sign no matter how high the bidding gets and no matter if his contract damages our ability to re-sign other important members of this team. That doesn't make any sense. Why even watch the Texans this season? After all, Mario is on I.R., which means the Texans can't win. right?
Who said at any cost?
We are all saying Mario & his agent should take several things into consideration..... the way the defense is playing without him, his injury history.... & if we do get to the Super Bowl & Mario wants to be part of a Super Bowl winning team, he's better off resigning with us.
We've got all the leverage.
I get that people may disagree with my assessment of Mario. That's understandable. However, I don't get this attitude that we must re-sign him at any cost. Why? The Texans defense is playing consistent and with dominance without Mario in the lineup. How can anyone conclude that we should re-sign no matter how high the bidding gets and no matter if his contract damages our ability to re-sign other important members of this team. That doesn't make any sense. Why even watch the Texans this season? After all, Mario is on I.R., which means the Texans can't win. right?
Agreed but you can get the parameters down. For example Mario could state he wants to see what other teams will offer.That may be a good preliminary step, but we really have to wait out his injury recovery before we go nuts and sign him to a 70 million dollar deal. No point in giving him a big deal if we don't know that he will be recovered by the beginning of next season. It's not a given that Mario will recover 100%.
Has Doc Jean given his opinion on Mario's injury and recovery time somewhere? I'm sure he would have some good insight on that front.
I think you are confused. Mario Williams base salary for 2011 season is $13.8m (cap $15m) Round up to $14m. Even if tagged as OLB he must be paid 120% of his last year's salary. If tagged for next season $14m (100%) + $2.8m (20%) = $16.8m.
http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/houston-texans/mario-williams/
Mario as a free agent will be tagged as a franchise player. He can be then identified as exclusive or non-exclusive. Here is definition and terms:
Exclusive= Only his team can negotiate with player.
Any Club that designates a Franchise Player as "Exclusive" shall be the only Club with which that Franchise Player may negotiate or sign a contract. In order to designate an UFA or RFA as an Exclusive Franchise Player, the team must tender the player a one year contract that is the minimum of the average of the five largest salaries (as calculated at the end of the free agency signing period) for players at the position at which he played the most games during the prior year, or 120% of his prior year salary, whichever is greater.
Non-exclusive= player can negotiate with any team but:
If the team elects to name the player "non-exclusive" then the player shall be permitted to negotiate a contract with any Club as if he were an UFA; however, Draft Choice Compensation of TWO first round draft selections shall be awarded to the prior club in the event that he signs with the new club. For Non-Exlusive Franchise Players, the team must tender the player a one year contract that is the minimum of the average of the five largest PRIOR-YEAR salaries for players at the position at which he played the most games in the prior year, or 120% of his prior year salary, whichever is greater.
OR-he can be tagged as a "transitional" player.
Each Club can also designate one UFA or RFA as a Transition Player.....
Any Club that designates a Transition Player shall receive the Rights of First Refusal. In order to designate an UFA or RFA as a Transition Player, the team must tender the player a one year contract for the average of the ten largest prior year salaries for players at the position at which he played the most games during the prior year, or 120% of his prior year salary, whichever is greater.
**Note I have edited this and full article can be read at: http://www.askthecommish.com/freeagency/
After years of research, this is the guy that explains tags the best imo. I have used him for 3 years. Hope this is helpful?
Steve
Doubtful, but the Texans and said team could negotiate the compensation.Do you think any team would give 2 first rounds for Mario????
Doubtful, but the Texans and said team could negotiate the compensation.
I'm fine if Mario leaves and I'm fine if Mario stays. I hope he stays.
If he leaves, add a dynamic pass rusher to the top of your next mock. Heck, add two just in case.
Maybe we can trade him for Demarcus Ware, Jay Ratliff and 1st. Sounds about even...
![]()
I don't understand why some of you think Mario is an elite pass rusher. He isn't. He's good. He had one great season: 2007 and one very good one: 2008. Better pass rushers than Mario:
Dwight Freeney
Charles Johnson
J. Peppers
James Harrison
Woodley
Clay Matthews
Terrell Suggs
Robert Mathis
Tamba Hali
Demarcus Ware
Trent Cole
Justin Tuck
Osi Umenyiora
Jared Allen
those are just some names off the top of my head. Yes, I realize he plays the run better than some of those guys. But, he's no All-Pro. He's a pass rusher with no pass rush moves. He has one: the bull rush. That's it.