Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
76 It looks to me that Allen expected more help as the reciever crossed the middle from the SS or possibly a LB.
When that didnt happen the FS moved up and you are right that Allen didnt get deep early enough. Should have done that as soon as the FS moved up instead he continued laterally.
A mistake by one player is again compounded by the mistakes of another ..... Its a snowball effect. **** rolls downhill.
Yessir, that is pretty much how I saw it as well.
The only thing I would disagree with slightly is that with 3 guys on the back end, you should be able to defend this 2-man route.
Refer to the earlier post about cover 3 by Matt Bowen (this guy has some good reads):
" The corners must maintain outside leverage and use the free safety to their advantage. If they get beat to their outside, they have no help to rely on. That is why they use zone technique (back to the sideline) and widen with any vertical release to protect the sideline.
The free safety is the top of the defense. He must honor his responsibilities and not chase any intermediate routes. Offenses will run a deep dig (15-yard square in) to entice the free safety to jump the route while running a post from the opposite side of the field, leaving the corner naked and playing from outside in with zero help. A classic Cover 3-beater."
http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Inside-the-playbook-Cover-3.html
In a 2 man route and the suppposed cover 3, the safety and mike were suppose to "rob" route. That display had basically zero to do with allen. The deep third safety should never let anyone get deeper than him. If that was a cover 3, divide the backend into 1/3. Davis and allen are suppose to carry their guys . Looking at that again, it was more of a combo coverage off a press.
In a 2 man route and the suppposed cover 3, the safety and mike were suppose to "rob" route. That display had basically zero to do with allen. The deep third safety should never let anyone get deeper than him. If that was a cover 3, divide the backend into 1/3. Davis and allen are suppose to carry their guys . Looking at that again, it was more of a combo coverage off a press.
76, I admire your tenacity.
But when the crowd is quite about KJax for 2 weeks, then they come out, mob like & attack the man because Drew Brees punked him on the same play, 3 times then burn him for a touchdown..
& we don't hear that same outrage when the same thing happens to a 7 year veteran, (with Jason Campbell at QB)... it's not worth arguing anymore. There's nothing you can do. Factor in that all 3, repetitive plays he allowed the WR to get out of bounds to stop the clock with less than 2 minutes in the half....... sheesh.......
When we're arguing who is doing better, who has "earned" playing time, it doesn't matter.Kjax was our first round pick. Allen was a street FA.
True.....Both suck and that has been said plenty of times.
Allen has had what 2 INTs in that time? KJac has had a forced fumble and 2 INTs since he's been here.Kjax hasn't made the amount of big plays since hes been here that Allen has made in the past 5 quarters.
That 4 yard tackle for a loss by Allen.... that was rare imo, you'd get a lot more of those with KJax on the field. That missed tackle that burned Allen for the touchdown, KJ would have played it the exact same way & it wouldn't have been a TD. We win the game... (actually it would have been the same, since KJ wouldn't have got the INT that led to the Dressen TD)......Allen atleast gets his hands on balls and causes turnovers in between getting abused. Kjax doesn't.
I think it is just your perception that Allen doesn't receive criticism because it is everywhere.
Kjax was our first round pick. Allen was a street FA.
Both suck and that has been said plenty of times.
Kjax hasn't made the amount of big plays since hes been here that Allen has made in the past 5 quarters.
Allen atleast gets his hands on balls and causes turnovers in between getting abused. Kjax doesn't.
I think it is just your perception that Allen doesn't receive criticism because it is everywhere.
When we're arguing who is doing better, who has "earned" playing time, it doesn't matter.
Allen has had what 2 INTs in that time? KJac has had a forced fumble and 2 INTs since he's been here.
That 4 yard tackle for a loss by Allen.... that was rare imo, you'd get a lot more of those with KJax on the field. That missed tackle that burned Allen for the touchdown, KJ would have played it the exact same way & it wouldn't have been a TD. We win the game... (actually it would have been the same, since KJ wouldn't have got the INT that led to the Dressen TD)......
Ummmm,
KJ is in the same class as Peterson? OK
Peterson is learning, he's 5 games into his career.
I think that's his point. Corners make mistakes & getting one to translate to instant success in the NFL is rare. Even McCourty is struggling this year. DRC... it took him a season or two before he was anybody worth talking about.
The first two games of the year, there were no complaints about KJ... through three Quarters of the Saints game... no complaints, or at least very few. He gets worked over by Brees in the 4th... & he's all of a sudden the worst CB to ever play the game again.
We're 6th this year in passing defense through 5 games. KJ played the majority of 3 of them.
So he's getting better... he's "on the right track"
This thread is analyzing Peterson & McCourty, so it belongs in the NFL forum.
Thank you, TK!I think that's his point. Corners make mistakes & getting one to translate to instant success in the NFL is rare. Even McCourty is struggling this year. DRC... it took him a season or two before he was anybody worth talking about.
All the analysis in the world will not make Kareem Jackson into a good CB, or even a serviceable one at this point.
Any team that we play will focus heavily on the #2 CB on our team and that's just how it's going to go until the Texans defense and the #2 CB can prove that it's not a sound decision to do so.
The analysis showed that Jackson played better than Patrick Peterson through their respective first five games as a pro.
Both gave up 3 passing TDs.
Peterson was punked on 2 rushing TDs, Jackson none.
Both had one INT, but Jackson's INT against the Giants was "more legitimate" than Peterson's against the Seahawks.
Jackson had 5 PDs while Peterson only had 3.
Jackson made more plays on 3rd down conversions than Peterson due to his tackling prowess (this one I will have to dig, but I'm 100% positive.)
And Peterson was regarded as the best CB prospect in a long long time.
Jackson wasn't even the first CB drafted in his class.
Assuming all that is true, what does any of that have to do with whther or not Kareem is a good player for us right now?
Assuming all that is true, what does any of that have to do with whther or not Kareem is a good player for us right now?
I think it speaks more to the unreasonable expectations Texans' fans put on Kareem. We think he doesn't deserve a spot on an NFL team, nickel at best. Wade Phillips has him starting from day one & out comes the talks that Kubiak/McNair hamstrung him to Wade Phillips.
76 has done a very good job imo, demonstrating that if you evaluate Kj on his own merit, look at what he does well, what he doesn't do well, Kj right now is the player we drafted with the 20th overall pick & he was everything we were told he would be.
He hasn't had the success of what you'd expect from that player, but that had as much to do with the team he was put on than with KJ himself.
What do you think of when you think of a 1st round Corner? That's what Kj can be. He'll get there quicker by being on the field & playing. It makes more sense to me to put him on the field now. Just like JJ Watt & Brooks Reed, Kj is going to be a much better player at week 11 than he is now.
With Allen on the field, we've got a ceiling..... a ceiling we can reach whether we put Allen on the field now or we put him on the field in week 11.
The analysis showed that Jackson played better than Patrick Peterson through their respective first five games as a pro.
Both gave up 3 passing TDs.
Peterson was punked on 2 rushing TDs, Jackson none.
Both had one INT, but Jackson's INT against the Giants was "more legitimate" than Peterson's against the Seahawks.
Jackson had 5 PDs while Peterson only had 3.
Jackson made more plays on 3rd down conversions than Peterson due to his tackling prowess (this one I will have to dig, but I'm 100% positive.)
And Peterson was regarded as the best CB prospect in a long long time.
Jackson wasn't even the first CB drafted in his class.
Im not so sure KJax will improve ALL that much. Its not like he is keeping it close and just missing the ball. He is being straight abused. Learning to turn your head and locate the ball is fixable, playing closer to the wide out is fixable, learning to cover a guy is NOT. He has lots of problems and nothing seems to be improving. the problem is, we have no one to go out there and fill in while we "fix" Kareem. If we keep trotting him out there and letting him get abused he could get shell shocked and never improved. We're close to the point of no return on him.
Trust in Wade, is all I'm saying. If he puts KJ on the field, then he's seeing something we ain't.
Trust in Wade, is all I'm saying. If he puts KJ on the field, then he's seeing something we ain't.
O I agree with this 100% and I do trust in him, but all I'm saying is, maybe corner should be a top priority yet again next off-season. He did inherit the worst secondary EVER.
kareem jackson sucks! I was defending him all pre season and so far all season, but enough is enough already! why the hell does he play 10-15 yards off his WR every play and joseph is right up there bumping.... is that just wades defense or kareem just suck?
Wow.... I was scared Kj was going to get burned quite a bit. He was playing bump & run a lot this game.
You are writing your own narrative instead of seeing what actually happened. Boldin is their best receiver and it makes no sense to double him?
Seriously, why do you try to explain away anything bad Kareem does? Its hard to take your analysis serious. All you do is post stuff to highlight other corners mistakes and stuff to make kareem's screw ups someone elses fault.
And I said the lb was in zone. I didn't say anyone blitzed, I said the lb was in a zone.
Sorry, I meant to direct that blitzing part to TK.
So if your premise is to have Joseph and Quin double-teaming on a receiver and leave Jackson covering half of the field playing man, it's fine with me.
I simply give my take; we each write our own narrative!
It makes more sense to me if it was Kareem and Quin doubling on Boldin and Joseph in man coverage on the other WR if we were to play man.