mexican_texan
Furry Tractors
I figure, the RBs have one.
Case Keenum is not NFL material.
Case Keenum is not NFL material.
Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
Sam Bradford, Oklahoma
Mark Sanchez, USC
Matthew Stafford, Georgia
Tim Tebow, Florida
Cullen Harper, Clemson
Curtis Painter, Purdue
Tom Brandstater, Fresno State
Not in that order but those are the QB's that look real sharp so far but in the end I see it being Stafford, Harper and Painter in the first two rounds. The jury is still out of Tebow since he is a Meyer product and well all know how his last QB turned out.
Good thing you made this thread, we might actually need it by the end of the season.
Who ever we draft had better have alot of attitude.
Give me Tim Tebow .... I know he doesnt have the best measurables but the guy just seems to find a way .
Stafford will be the top QB in the draft IMO.
Big, athletic kid playing well against the SEC. He's on a winning team and he has a rocket arm.
Stafford is a beast but he does have a ton of talent around him. I kind of like Max Hall right now good arm and he is older then most players
2009 is not a good year for Senior QB's. However, if some underclassmen declare, then it gets good.
My top 10 (draft eligible):
Sam Bradford, Oklahoma - weak arm & skinny as hell & he's only a sophmore i believe.
Mark Sanchez, USC
Matthew Stafford, Georgia
Tim Tebow, Florida - system qb
Cullen Harper, Clemson - garbage
Rudy Carpenter, Arizona State - garbage
Colt McCoy, Texas - too short & fragile
Hunter Cantwell, Louisville - who?
Curtis Painter, Purdue - don't know enough about him, but never heard of him until this post.
Tom Brandstater, Fresno State - do we really want another fresno state qb? some of us are still scrubing off the david carr stinch.
stafford & Sanchez are the only 2 worth looking into. Sanchez can move has a rocket for an arm & comes from a good system. The same for stafford.
I like my QB's from winning programs with a pro-style offense and a strong arm. I think their ability to lead a successful team in college is undervalued at time and overvalued at time. It should just be a factor along with ability and things like release time, sacks (pocket awareness) compared to just hurries, and why kind of offense they run. Guys like Reesing and Daniel shouldn't be drafted high because they run a dink-and-dump system. I love Reesing but he isn't NFL material.
not only that but daniels is short & reesing's arm strength is questionable. I too think that college success should be made more of a factor, but it has to be taken into account with all the other things; intangibles, arm strength etc. One things for sure...Jay Cutler probably doesn't agree with us. I had the opportunity to sit & watch him yesterday & he looks like night & day from last year, clearly a different guy & the top qb from that draft.
Give me Tim Tebow .... I know he doesnt have the best measurables but the guy just seems to find a way .
Sounds like VY. No thanks.
I'm still not sold on Cutler, but that is a different issue. In defense of Reesing, he has remarkable arm strength for his size. More than adequate for the NFL, however, it's the other things that hold him back. If he or Daniel were to get a shot, it would need to be in a WCO. However, we aren't here to talk about them because I don't like any of them at the next level.
I'm still not sold on Cutler, but that is a different issue. In defense of Reesing, he has remarkable arm strength for his size. More than adequate for the NFL, however, it's the other things that hold him back. If he or Daniel were to get a shot, it would need to be in a WCO. However, we aren't here to talk about them because I don't like any of them at the next level.
Well I called Cutler the best in his class when he came out. Best arm, best mechanics, and oh btw, he's winning. I can see why you still have your doubts.
I don't want to see any QB's or talk about any QB's or even think about any QB'slets focus on the trenches, until we own them its not gonna matter who the hades we march out there behind center
![]()
Except the first 3 years of his career and his sudden rise up the boards in the final month before the draft? These first 3 games clearly override the first 3 years.
He's always had a good arm about him, but his numbers have never been that good. I'm not condemning him just yet, but he in no way has done anything on his own to this point to establish himself as the top QB. The simple fact is that VY is a nut job and a suicide risk when people don't like him and Matty simply hasn't panned out. It's kind of like succeeding by default. I'm still giving Cutler a chance, but by no means am I proclaiming him a success story just yet. Also, it would be nice if you finally hit on a prospect I guess, eh?
Blah, Blah, blah. Well YTF I knew about stubborn people to silly to admit when they were dead wrong. Didn't know for sure about you until this post.
i'm using Cutler's whole career to judge him, and he's looked awesome
Someday, people will understand UT's O-line and offense created Benson and Young. I said this before Benson was drafted, I stand by it.Speaking of QB's .... Where do you guy's think Colt McCoy falls in the draft ?
He's putting up some solid numbers including an 80% completion percentage (leads NCAA) and a 14-1 TD/Int ratio (Tops in NCAA) 10.2 yards per att. (6th NCAA) 209.7 QB rating (2nd NCAA) and only sacked 2 times in 100 att. Toss in 278 rushing yards in 34 att , an 8.2 ypg avg. and 4 rushing TD's
I just cant get past my "blind homerism" and figure where he would / should fall in the draft. If you look strictly at the numbers ..... he compares favorably to any of the other QB's that will be available.
Speaking of QB's .... Where do you guy's think Colt McCoy falls in the draft ?
He's putting up some solid numbers including an 80% completion percentage (leads NCAA) and a 14-1 TD/Int ratio (Tops in NCAA) 10.2 yards per att. (6th NCAA) 209.7 QB rating (2nd NCAA) and only sacked 2 times in 100 att. Toss in 278 rushing yards in 34 att , an 8.2 ypg avg. and 4 rushing TD's
I just cant get past my "blind homerism" and figure where he would / should fall in the draft. If you look strictly at the numbers ..... he compares favorably to any of the other QB's that will be available.
Speaking of QB's .... Where do you guy's think Colt McCoy falls in the draft ?
He's putting up some solid numbers including an 80% completion percentage (leads NCAA) and a 14-1 TD/Int ratio (Tops in NCAA) 10.2 yards per att. (6th NCAA) 209.7 QB rating (2nd NCAA) and only sacked 2 times in 100 att. Toss in 278 rushing yards in 34 att , an 8.2 ypg avg. and 4 rushing TD's
I just cant get past my "blind homerism" and figure where he would / should fall in the draft. If you look strictly at the numbers ..... he compares favorably to any of the other QB's that will be available.
I saw Ball State play and I must say I was very impressed with junior Nate Davis.
Career stats:
Passing Stats
YEAR TEAM CMP ATT PCT YDS AVG TD LNG INT RAT
2006 BALL 150 245 61.2 1975 8.1 18 81 8 146.65
2007 BALL 270 478 56.5 3667 7.7 30 77 6 139.13
2008 BALL 66 88 75.0 916 10.4 9 61 3 189.37
Stats provided by ESPN
He also had 5 TDs on the ground in 2007.
I don't want to see any QB's or talk about any QB's or even think about any QB'slets focus on the trenches, until we own them its not gonna matter who the hades we march out there behind center
![]()
numbers are meaningless for projecting players to the NFL, especially quarterbacks