Mr teX
Hall of Fame
Lamar Jackson is literally THE definition of a running QB.
By the definition he's using any qb with over 100 attempts is a running qb...
Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
Lamar Jackson is literally THE definition of a running QB.
So explain your comment about 'letting him get out there on the exclusive tag'.That's what they want you to believe why they did it...
What is your definition of a running QB?By the definition he's using any qb with over 100 attempts is a running qb...
Who said anything about Colin not showing up in shape after 2 years off? Newsflash, I'm talking about how he reported to camp in 2016, long before the kneeling ever happened.. It's becoming pretty clear you don't know what the hell you're talking about regarding this situation and just echoing what the rest of woke media was at the time (and still do). They are revisionist historians who didn't/aren't reporting what actually happened in San Francisco
I remember vividly how that off-season went down.. went back and found a article about it..
Colin Kaepernick lost 'a ton' of weight, and it's becoming an issue
Colin Kaepernick's mediocre on-field performance may be impacted by his slimmer physique, a side effect of three offseason surgeries.www.businessinsider.com
I remember Jay Glazer and NFL Live talking about how poorly he was playing, how much underweight he was, and how it was a real possibility he wouldn't make the team and Blaine freaking Gabbert could beat him out. He was NOT a good starting QB at that point and on his way out of the league before he was "blackballed". Which is complete crap.
There's a difference between outright blackballing someone and deciding that their skills/ability to help your team no longer outweigh the enormous B.S. baggage/drama they carry with them to your franchise. If he still had those skills, guess what.. a team would've signed him and took on ALL of that baggage.
Need to look no further than the pervert who used to play here. League felt like he was a elite top 5 QB, so teams didn't "blackball" a guy accused of over 2 dozen sexual assault allegations. Instead he got the richest contract in NFL history. Why?.. because the league felt like he was still worth the squeeze. Kaepernick was already out of juice.
Lesson: If you're going to be a huge pain in the ass.. you better be worth it and good at your job. This isn't NFL specific, goes for any industry..
People try to act like Colin Kaepernick was some NFL martyr, he wasn't. He was already washing out as a starter in the league.
Tin hat fits you quite wellLol The whole damn thing got politicized & blown out of proportion b/c certain fools on the right echoing eerily similar statements like the one you're spouting now misinterpreted his whole damn message from the get go...even though he explained it.....all the way up to that orange idiot in the WH.
So clearly, YOU don't know what you're talking about.
& you can interject your politics into this all you like, but the fact remains, he was still better than any qb the Texans have trotted out there since 2017.
Shouldn't be surprised considering your takes on COVID and the vax.... He was CLEARLY blackballed no matter how hard you try to ignore it..
So explain your comment about 'letting him get out there on the exclusive tag'.
Tin hat fits you quite well
There you go talking around the subject again instead of answering the question put to you. The question was not what the tags were. I asked you to clarify your statement which you are avoiding doingThe only real difference between the 2 franchise tags is the amount they would have to pay him, (NE franchise tag pays less than the exclusive franchise tag) & the ability for them to match in the event he gets a better offer from another team. We know he asked for a trade in early March So imo, if they were so confident that the deal they supposedly put out there for him was what his market value was, why even retain the rights to match? What are you afraid of? Either exclusive franchise tag his ass and don't even allow him to get out there.... or let him go period if you don't want to pay him what he thinks he's worth.
Clearly they're thinking there's the possiblity he actaully could get a better offer from elsewhere or they wouldn't have hit him with the NE tag instead of the exclusive franchise tag. & by using the NE tag instead of the Exclusive, they're also gonna catch a little break in what they pay him too. So the whole "good will" they're supposedly appearing to do for him isn't all geniune like they're trying to spin it. They're trying to strong arm him without giving the appearance that they are.
There you go talking around the subject again instead of answering the question put to you. The question was not what the tags were. I asked you to clarify your statement which you are avoiding doing
Moving the goal posts again I see..Lol The whole damn thing got politicized & blown out of proportion b/c certain fools on the right echoing eerily similar statements like the one you're spouting now misinterpreted his whole damn message from the get go...even though he explained it.....all the way up to that orange idiot in the WH.
So clearly, YOU don't know what you're talking about.
& you can interject your politics into this all you like, but the fact remains, he was still better than any qb the Texans have trotted out there since 2017.
Shouldn't be surprised considering your takes on COVID and the vax.... He was CLEARLY blackballed no matter how hard you try to ignore it..
Do you not remember what you wrote? You said to put him out there on the exclusive tagi did clarify it. Wasn't what you wanted to hear, but i clarified it. Let him go...If you don't want to pay him what he thinks he's worth...& you're sure that the contract you offered him was what his market value is & he won't find anything out there that's better, and he wants to leave, let him go.
A team willing to sign LJ8 would have to give up the same draft capital no matter which tag they used & 99% of the time, teams use the exclusive vs non exclusive. & They are playing by the rules everyone agreed to & the tags have always favored the team which is just part of the reason players don't like them despite what they get paid for 1 year. The problem for me is the Ravens' credibility in using the NE franchise tag vs the exclusive tag imo. If you're offering him what the market says he should get & you're confident about that, let him get out there on the exclusive franchise tag. Why are you concerned with being able to match any offer he could get if you're so confident that the offer you gave him is the best he could get? To me that speaks to them knowing that he could probably get a better offer out on the market than what they're offering him. But the way it is spinned by them is them giving him the opportunity to go get a better deal..
I don't have a dog in this fight at all but I am curious if in this day & age do you consider making a settlement to make something go away an admission of guilt. In your opinion did Watson admit guilt to every woman he payed off? As far as I know a large percentage of settlements include a NDA (Non-Disclosure Agreement).You & he might have a point, if the NFL hadn't settled Kaep and Reid's collusion lawsuit against the NFL and paid them millions just to keep the lawsuit from going forward....This after the NFL tried to have it thrown out and the judge said that he wouldn't b/c there was enough evidence for it to go forward.....& then negotiated to have the terms of the deal kept secret...with likely some type of order to keep both parties from revealing the evidence they did have.
The thing for me about this whole "collusion" argument is are all the teams that didn't sign him potentially racist?I don't have a dog in this fight at all but I am curious if in this day & age do you consider making a settlement to make something go away an admission of guilt. In your opinion did Watson admit guilt to every woman he payed off? As far as I know a large percentage of settlements include a NDA (Non-Disclosure Agreement).
You gentlemen are very deep on this subject.
If this is really the end in Baltimore … could it be a new beginning in Houston?
But Lamar Jackson is ... Lamar Jackson. Just like Deshaun was
I've read that LJ is pleased that his lobbying for WR was granted. I don't want him but if here I will root for him.
More BS espn click bait from Dan Orlovsky that Coty Davis getting more clicks from... I hate the bs like this from the media
More BS espn click bait from Dan Orlovsky that Coty Davis getting more clicks from... I hate the bs like this from the media
Wrong! They went the non-exclusive route to prove that there’s not another team out there willing to give him the type of contract he’s demanding. And, guess what? They have been right so far. There has been zero attempt by any of the other 31 teams to pay Lamar the outrageous contract he’s seeking. It’s funny that he’s now all about the Ravens now that OBJ was signed, it in reality it’s him backpedaling and will try to spin it to look like all he wanted was a good receiver. He’ll probably proceed to signing a smaller contract than he was seeking now that he sees no other team tho is he’s worth what he thinks he is.Clearly they're thinking there's the possiblity he actaully could get a better offer from elsewhere or they wouldn't have hit him with the NE tag instead of the exclusive franchise tag. & by using the NE tag instead of the Exclusive, they're also gonna catch a little break in what they pay him too. So the whole "good will" they're supposedly appearing to do for him isn't all geniune like they're trying to spin it. They're trying to strong arm him without giving the appearance that they are.
With all the concerns about QB's getting hurt in the NFL, well hell, LJ is already there and he's 6'2" and 230!I've read that LJ is pleased that his lobbying for WR was granted. I don't want him but if here I will root for him.
I think I read a month ago or so on draft sharks IIRC that his chances of reinjury is only about 17%. We are going to improve oline, WR and already have good RBs. That will help him. He has to come off of the fully guaranteed contract for 5 years.
Ravens have to come off the two round ones.
A deal possibly but I hope not.
I kind of feel the same way but don't know why. Looking at it from his point of view : he thinks he is better than Deshaun Watson and therefore should make very similar money. DW forced his way out; perhaps LJ should hire Mulughetta.I'm not sure what it is, but I just don't think much of Jackson. Something about him just seems off.
The only reason this thread is in the TexansTalk section is because of the article that was originally posted 8 pages ago.It's also from March 27th. It'd already been posted about and shat on at that time.
You have proven my point. Jackson has missed 5 and 6 games, respectively the last 2 seasons. You think any team wants to sign him without some type of escape after a few years?Couple of things you've clearly failed to understand:
1 Mahomes' contract is trash. No other qb would've signed the contract he signed having achieved what he had already achieved. That's truly a 1 of 1 contract...& not in a good way.
2 Once you get up to over 100 mil plus in guaranteed money to any 1 player, you've already "screwed" yourself as a franchise...period. That type of money isn't whisked away no matter when you're able to "get out of the contract". Jones was guaranteed 92 million...81 million of that guaranteed at signing....they can get out of it after 2025 at the earliest...meaning they're stuck with him for the next 2 years....a....Now lets put that in perspective. His numbers are VERY similar to Davis Mills. Are you good with the Texans giving Davis Mills nearly 100 million for his 16 passing TD's? You think that type of money might prevent them from signing a key FA...or resigning 1 of their own key FA?
3 This is bigger than the LJ8 contract.
Should move the thread to the NFL forum if not the NSZThe only reason this thread is in the TexansTalk section is because of the article that was originally posted 8 pages ago.
But it's a popular thread, people won't let it die. So I'm just bringing the Texans angle back in from time to time. It's been shut down in the real world, so I'm only going to find old articles now.
fml
Probably.Should move the thread to the NFL forum if not the NSZ
You & he might have a point, if the NFL hadn't settled Kaep and Reid's collusion lawsuit against the NFL and paid them millions just to keep the lawsuit from going forward....This after the NFL tried to have it thrown out and the judge said that he wouldn't b/c there was enough evidence for it to go forward.....& then negotiated to have the terms of the deal kept secret...with likely some type of order to keep both parties from revealing the evidence they did have.
Yep. This SHOULD end the talk ofJackson getting 230 million+ gauranteed.As a side note, Jalen Hurts just signed a 5-yr $255M extension with $179.3M guaranteed.
As a side note, Jalen Hurts just signed a 5-yr $255M extension with $179.3M guaranteed.
If he gets to start ..At least Mills now knows what the market will be after his third season...
If he gets to start ..
Should move the thread to the NFL forum if not the NSZ
The suggested trade package would feature Houston receiving the 2019 NFL MVP Jackson along with the Ravens' No. 22 overall pick in exchange for the No. 2 pick, plus No. 73, plus a 2024 fourth-round conditional selection.
It could be said that the Ravens went with the non-exclusive franchise tag because they knew another team wouldn't make an offer due to collision. That's the argument the NFLPA would make.Wrong! They went the non-exclusive route to prove that there’s not another team out there willing to give him the type of contract he’s demanding. And, guess what? They have been right so far.
The whole collusion argument is moot for me - after all it is a black dominated league.Considering Hurts just got signed to an extension that makes him the highest paid QB in the league, the collusion angle seems to be about the entire league colluding against Jackson. So is that really collusion, or is it about an unreasonable self-assessment of market value?
Contract demands too much. I really want to keep 33 but like the round one from Ravens. Trade package rounding into more acceptable and could be made porridge right. LJ has given no sign he wants to get smart about dollars.
I lean towards agreeing with you that contract is hold up but a deal could give LJ much of what he wants and still get us under cap. We have approx $10- 12 m space depending on where were end up drafting therefor reducing rookie dollars a few million. Tunsil's 2024 + base could be used. Howard renegotiation could lower from $13m to ~5-7. I think a cap hit for LJ of $25-30 million could be absorbed for 2023.Contract issues aside? The contract is what would absolutely keep the deal from happening. How would Caserio open up cap space to squeeze LJ in? Can't happen, even if the two sides wanted it to happen.
It could be said that the Ravens went with the non-exclusive franchise tag because they knew another team wouldn't make an offer due to collision. That's the argument the NFLPA would make.
WOW. Lamar Jackson extended by the Ravens.
Does that open it up for him to be traded tonight?
Does that open it up for him to be traded tonight?
Certainly is interesting they got it done hours before the draft after beating about the bushes all this time...Certainly could, but I think the more realistic case is the Eagles/Hurts deal was the catalyst to finally get the Ravens and Lamar to come to genuine terms.