Death to Google Ads! Texans Talk Tip Jar! 🍺😎👍
Thanks for your support!
I agree, VY is not and will never be an NFL QB...Coach C. said:Right now we are tops of strength of schedule. And bigcarlos I sincerely hope that I never have to see that particular jersey in Houston Texans Battle Red.
HomeBred_Texan said:I agree, VY is not and will never be an NFL QB...
Okay AggyHomeBred_Texan said:I agree, VY is not and will never be an NFL QB...
Coach C. said:I am in favor of an all U draft.
1. Eric Winston
2. Orien Harris
3.a Sinorice Moss
3.b Greg Threat
4. Rocky McIntosh
5. Kelly Jennings
6. Javon Nanton
7 Leon Williams
Coach C. said:It is just an unique take on the draft. Rocky McIntosh, Threat, Moss, Winston, Jennings will be good players in this league. With rocky, moss, and winston likely being future pro-bowlers.
If Vince wins the NC and the heisman and will be a top pick with millions waiting for him???????????? What reason would he have to come back???????Reddevil63 said:Ricky Williams didnt, Roy Williams didnt, Derrick Johnson didnt, what makes everybody so sure that he will? I think he is smart enough to know that another year to work on his passing would be a really good idea.
bigcarlos said:If Vince wins the NC and the heisman and will be a top pick with millions waiting for him???????????? What reason would he have to come back???????
bigcarlos said:If Vince wins the NC and the heisman and will be a top pick with millions waiting for him???????????? What reason would he have to come back???????
LCROD said:That's a lot of if's, but one thing he can do is learn to more effectively pass the ball. Throwing motion, accuracy, better read defense, etc... QB is a always learning and getting better position.
The way I see it playing out is Young stays for his senior year, Carr is given a two/three year extension/buyback ('06-'07, '07-'08, '08-'09 seasons). Young is drafted in next years draft ('06-'07), sits the year behind Carr ('07-'08), starts or competes the year after for starting QB. This draft ('05-'06) we get better olinemen, give them some time to gel before brining in Young.
One can only dream right?
Texas said:But eventually we will have to take our chances and draft a new QB. I still say we go after Bush and put him or davis at WR and then a LT and stick with carr 1 more year to see what he can do with protection. Thats just me though!
Texas said:But eventually we will have to take our chances and draft a new QB. I still say we go after Bush and put him or davis at WR and then a LT and stick with carr 1 more year to see what he can do with protection. Thats just me though!
MorKnolle said:It would be interesting to see Bush at WR, but Davis certainly could not play WR.
Yoiu cant be serious? We not only want, but need either Leinart or Bush. We cannot afford to trade out of this position for draft picks...humbleone said:IMO the most interesting thing about Reggie Bush will be what we can get draft day trading partners to give up in order to get him. There are several teams that are bad that would kill to get him (49ers, Green Bay, Jets, and Arizona to name a few). In addition, there are teams that will want Leinart (Miami, Cleavland, Arizona, Baltimore, Jets perhaps).
It is possible we could be in a terrific position to get some nice value for only dropping down a few places and still get one of the top 3 LT's. Let the other bad teams get the QB or RB playmaker..I would rather have their first round pick and an extra pick in the 2-4 range from any of the guys above.
i dont know about L********t but definitely Mr. BushHomeBred_Texan said:Yoiu cant be serious? We not only want, but need either Leinart or Bush. We cannot afford to trade out of this position for draft picks...
HomeBred_Texan said:Yoiu cant be serious? We not only want, but need either Leinart or Bush. We cannot afford to trade out of this position for draft picks...
HomeBred_Texan said:Yoiu cant be serious? We not only want, but need either Leinart or Bush. We cannot afford to trade out of this position for draft picks...
humbleone said:Actually, I am. If we don't take one of the top 3 LT prospects with our first pick, that is a huge mistake. Quality OL's are built primarily through the draft with high picks. A quality OL is the foundation we can build a good offense on once we get new coaches here.
texplayer2 said:The Colts are 9-0 and they only have one guy that was acquired above the 4th rnd of the draft on their O-line. They also have two guys they acquired though free agency. They did acquire WR,QB,and RB in the first rnd. We have two of these WR and QB. Why not model our team on a winning formula?
texplayer2 said:The Colts are 9-0 and they only have one guy that was acquired above the 4th rnd of the draft on their O-line. They also have two guys they acquired though free agency. They did acquire WR,QB,and RB in the first rnd. We have two of these WR and QB. Why not model our team on a winning formula?
You aren't going to save any money paying out a top 5 draft salary. Those guys get paid more than you think.tulexan said:We tried to acquire Orlando Pace last year and couldn't. Therefore we are going to draft the best LT in the draft. Elite linemen are very expensive too, so drafting one rather than pursuing one through free agency would make sense because then we can spend the saved money on other positions.
Vinny said:You aren't going to save any money paying out a top 5 draft salary. Those guys get paid more than you think.
tulexan said:No I realize that they are getting paid a lot. But it is also depends on the player and the position. Walter Jones and Orlando Pace both received contracts around 7 years and $50 Million. Alex Smith, Eli Manning, and Phillip Rivers all received huge contracts because players at the top of their position are receiving well over $10 Million/year. Even if D'Brick got a similar contact to Jones and Pace, which I don't think he will, we are still getting a younger player, not one who is in their late 20's or early 30's.