Mr teX
Hall of Fame
Dejavu thought I had the answer; I didn't.
I only had looked at it briefly some time in the past.
I have a few drinks today, so please verify these interesting numbers.
All the numbers can be found by looking up this page.
https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/htx/
Last year, the Texans scored 402 points, but 28 were by other means (I automatically count the extra point here - this could make a difference, as we shall see).
13 points were in OT, so the net is 361
We all probably think that 2012 was by far, the best offensive output.
It wasn't
416 total points, but 35 were by other means
12 points were in OT, so the net is 369 points, ranked second.
It was 2010 that the offense produced the most points.
390 total, 3 in OT for a net of 387.
Based on this, last year's offense ranked third in franchise history in point scored.
The interesting thing is both 2009 and 2011 saw a net of 360, just a point short of last year offensive scoring output.
(That's why I said that one point may make a difference.)
Given that the Defense under Kubiak were only good in 2011, and 2012 and the fact that the Texans don't invest heavily in offense under Kubiak (arguably less than under O'Brien), it's more than clear that Kubiak's offense was much more consistent.
And Kubiak started from scratch; not so O'Brien.
Now, I may be a little bit off, but it was clear that the best offensive output under O'Brien only ranks third in franchise history.
And only by 1 over two other years, or thereabout. (This needs verification).
Lol, so 1 stat doesn't confirm what you wanted it to so u went with another. Kubiak's offenses were "far superior" by a grand total of............8 pts........ in terms of total pts scored that is. Lol, for all intents and purposes that's damn near neglible.