Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍

JaDeveon Clowney

Status
Not open for further replies.
Iirc it was about the same time frame, maybe a tad longer.

Yep,

I cant figure out why the Texans team Dr.'s don't seem concerned about the bone spurs. I just want Clowney fully healthy before he returns. I'm thinking about the next 10 yrs, not the next 4 weeks.
 
Yep,

I cant figure out why the Texans team Dr.'s don't seem concerned about the bone spurs. I just want Clowney fully healthy before he returns. I'm thinking about the next 10 yrs, not the next 4 weeks.
That was my wish too. Just frackin' fix everything.
Come back fully healthy and learn the defense the last month/month & a half of this year.
Return next year completely whole and be a holy terror.
 
I knew there was concerns about Clowney's "motor" coming out of college, but it never worried me in the least after I did some research about JD and found more out about the person Jadaveon Clowney, not just the athlete. But on the questions re injuries, fitness, the whole durability thing, specifically I know there was talk about the bone spurs he had to deal with last fall, but other than that I can't recall talk of any specific injury, maybe somebody else can help me out on that ? Were there other significant injures Clowney suffered while in college, or even earlier than that while in high school ? But this rash of injuries he's had since we drafted him is very, very troubling, and these are obviously serious injuries.
 
He has had bone spurs back to high school. Bone spurs are secondary to an underlying issue in his feet. He's a speed rusher. His push off is his game.
 
He has had bone spurs back to high school. Bone spurs are secondary to an underlying issue in his feet. He's a speed rusher. His push off is his game.

The issue with the bone spurs is the sole reason you didn't see JD being worthy of anything higher than a late first round grade in his Draft ? No other specific injury history besides the spurs ?
 
The issue with the bone spurs is the sole reason you didn't see JD being worthy of anything higher than a late first round grade in his Draft ? No other specific injury history besides the spurs ?

It is the underlying cause which is the greater concern. This is in the arena of turf toe and plantar fascitis which is deadly for a pass rusher. Gary Walker went from probowler to out of the league in two years of turf toe.

I doubt he's fighting medical attention. If the Texan's doctors want him to have surgery I'm pretty sure that's what'll happen... already happened twice.

Maybe. He said before the draft surgery had been recommended. They don't go away so he is just playing through them and Doc hasn't suggested any reason for that route.
 
It is the underlying cause which is the greater concern. This is in the arena of turf toe and plantar fascitis which is deadly for a pass rusher. Gary Walker went from probowler to out of the league in two years of turf toe.

Gary Walker had an eleven year career in the NFL, so he was way, way over the average life expectancy of a guys NFL career duration. And plantar fascitis, isn't that what former Texan and multi-year pro-bowler and highest payed defensive player ever before Watt's new contract nine year NFL vet Mario Williams had his rookie year ?
Dang Infantrycak, instead of worrying me I think you are trying to reassure me that my boy JD is in for a long and successful NFL career ?
 
Wow, nice rationalization. How long Walker played before getting the problem is irrelevant. The point is he got it and was done.
 
It is the underlying cause which is the greater concern. This is in the arena of turf toe and plantar fascitis which is deadly for a pass rusher. Gary Walker went from probowler to out of the league in two years of turf toe.



Maybe. He said before the draft surgery had been recommended. They don't go away so he is just playing through them and Doc hasn't suggested any reason for that route.

I posted this on 04/03/14:

Originally Posted by Playoffs View Post
I think I read he had surgery for the bone spur very early on... like high school? Did you know about that and does that impact anything you've posted on his outlook? ( Could be wrong on this, I go through so much stuff.)

You're not wrong....I didn't include this reference specifically when I mentioned his high school bone spur issues........but it did include surgery. This information is buried in a single old ESPN article..........and, no, it would not change my impressions.


How Jadeveon Clowney got here



Originally Published: February 11, 2011

Clowney helped Gilmore and South Pointe to a state championship in 2008. He played nearly the entire season with a bone spur in his foot. Clowney finished with 17 sacks as a sophomore and elected to have surgery on the bone spur in January 2009.
********************************************

Here's a Sept 2013 article I just came across, about his problem and that surgery should have been entertained before now.


Is Jadeveon Clowney Making the Right Decision to Postpone Foot Surgery?



By Barrett Sallee , SEC Football Lead Writer
Sep 15, 2013

As it turns out, maybe South Carolina defensive end Jadeveon Clowney isn't 100 percent after all.

The junior standout had four tackles and a sack in the Gamecocks' 35-25 win over Vanderbilt in Columbia, S.C. on Saturday night, but that wasn't the big story.

Clowney told reporters following the game that he will undergo surgery after the season to remove bone spurs from his right foot.

"It's painful," Clowney said according to Chase Goodbread of NFL.com. "I'm out here playing on it, though, so I'm just trying to give everything I've got on it. Who knows what's going to happen out there? It doesn't really bother me when I am out there much. It's just builds up pain. The more I keep going on it, the more it bothers me."

Clowney's foot has caused him problems in the past, including last season when it forced him out of the Gamecocks' win over Wofford in November. But head coach Steve Spurrier had no idea it was this serious, according to Ryan Wood of the Charleston (S.C) Post and Courier.




Ryan Wood @rwood_SC

Spurrier on Clowney's foot: "If we had known he needed surgery in the offseason, he would've gotten it."


1:05 PM - 15 Sep 2013


So what should Clowney do?

Obviously he wants to help his team win and get back to the SEC Championship Game, which has eluded him during his first two seasons with the program. But the sure-fire No. 1 draft pick has to keep his future in mind.

*********

As far as why the Texans may not have recommended surgery on his foot bone spurs AT THIS TIME, I can possibly understand the logic as follows.

We don't know how many or the exact locations of the bone spurs or the other structures (e.g., plantar fascia) that may be involved after having allowed this condition with severe symptoms to continue for so long.....although they have been referred to bone spurS (i.e., multiple) on numerous occasions. Dependent on the factors above, recovery from such surgery could be anywhere from 6 weeks to several months. With this in mind, I could make a case for not having combined the recent surgery with a bone spur surgery.........they didn't want to take the chance of having to definitely shut him down altogether this season (which could still happen secondary to compensatory injuries caused by any underlying problems that still remain).

But I still can't follow the logic of not having addressed the bone spurs in the offseason or certainly immediately after the Draft for a condition that at best is recurrent with some periods of relief brought about by conservative means.........and at worst, chronic and progressive, affecting an NFL career.
 
Okay, so the recovery from the foot thing could have shut Clowney down for the entire season.

so he should get it evaluated/addressed this off-season, right?
 
Too much speculation and worrying about Jadeveon Clowney. He said two days ago he's healthy and feeling better than ever. He's already been sprinting and cutting at game-speed level. He's not worried about the knee anymore and as far as the bone spurs he hasn't made mentuon of it so I'm assuming that's not a problem. I expect him to play at a high level next Monday Night at Pittsburgh. It's his body so I'm sure he is the best indicator for how he feels.
 
Too much speculation and worrying about Jadeveon Clowney. He said two days ago he's healthy and feeling better than ever. He's already been sprinting and cutting at game-speed level. He's not worried about the knee anymore and as far as the bone spurs he hasn't made mentuon of it so I'm assuming that's not a problem. I expect him to play at a high level next Monday Night at Pittsburgh. It's his body so I'm sure he is the best indicator for how he feels.

From LINK:
Jadeveon Clowney spoke to the media today about his knee, his possible return to action, and his desire to hurt people once again. The most important nugget - and perhaps one that he should not have said - was that Clowney apparently started running full speed just one day after he began jogging during his recovery process. The training staff of course put a quick stop to that before he re-injured himself, but it is telling that Clowney was able to sprint so soon after surgery to repair his torn meniscus.

On if he has been able to cut at all yet…

"I’m doing a little bit of cutting, yeah. It’s coming along well. I can cut, I can run straight. It’s just time now…all up to time."

On trusting his knee during the recovery process…

"I trust my knee. The second day I started running, I was like, ‘I’m running full speed’. I took off and (the trainers) were like ‘You’re not supposed to be doing that yet’."
"A little bit of cutting" is not cutting at "full speed." And "running (cutting) at full speed" is not running (or cutting) at "game speed."

Clowney may be an elite athlete, but he does not strike me as a Mensa candidate. Not listening to his trainers is not a smart way to complete rehab........though it is a good way to end up rehabbing again.
 
From LINK:
"A little bit of cutting" is not cutting at "full speed." And "running (cutting) at full speed" is not running (or cutting) at "game speed."

Clowney may be an elite athlete, but he does not strike me as a Mensa candidate. Not listening to his trainers is not a smart way to complete rehab........though it is a good way to end up rehabbing again.
even Mensa candidates can be stubborn; they would probably think they're smarter than the trainers.
:)
 
even Mensa candidates can be stubborn; they would probably think they're smarter than the trainers.
:)
Obstinate would be a good word for Mensa candidates. I'm obstinant and I turned them down after taking their little test. Not much more than pattern recognition. Bunch of smart effers proving they are smart effers, if the control the questions..
 
Bill O'Brien was asked after Wednesday's practice if he had a better feel about the rookie's readiness, and responded with "no".
http://www.houstontexans.com/news/a...ill-iffy/859d1512-bbff-4cbc-b673-283c40a9f76f
*****
So that was posted 2 hours ago after todays practice, so officially nothing has apparently changed. I still think it's unlikely we see the big guy out there vs Pittsburg, but we will see. Maybe initially just send him out there on some 3rd and longs to break him again gradually ?
 
http://www.houstontexans.com/news/a...ill-iffy/859d1512-bbff-4cbc-b673-283c40a9f76f
*****
So that was posted 2 hours ago after todays practice, so officially nothing has apparently changed. I still think it's unlikely we see the big guy out there vs Pittsburg, but we will see. Maybe initially just send him out there on some 3rd and longs to break him again gradually ?

BO'B is playing everyone like a fiddle.

I don't think the Texans need Clowney to beat Pittsburgh.

This team is talented, but it just has to get off to better starts to win games.

The Texans held Luck to three points a quarter after the initial explosion.

Defense is capable without Clowney. Just get off to better starts.
 
Posted 1 hour ago.

Jadeveon Clowney’s status for Monday night remains unchanged

Posted on October 15, 2014 | By Dale Robertson

Coach Bill O’Brien offered no new information on linebacker Jadeveon Clowney’s chances of returning to the lineup against the Steelers Monday night.

When asked if he had an update on the rookie’s status, O’Brien replied, “No.” And, when asked what Clowney had to show him to prove he’s ready to return to the field, O’Brien said, “That’s between him and me.”

Clowney, the top pick in the 2014 draft, needed surgery to repair a torn meniscus cartilage in his knee, suffered in the season opener against Washington. He resumed jogging and doing drills a couple of weeks ago, but the extent of his daily participation isn’t known because the main part of practices are closed to the media.

O’Brien, as is his habit, didn’t address any injury issues, but the NFL’s official report will be released later this afternoon.

That type of response to a legitimate benign in-general type of question is beginning to border on the pompous and the ridiculous.
 
he will be out for the pitts game just for that one more week of rest and be ready for a go hopefully for @Tenn


even tho I think Tenn has a better Oline then Pittsburg or more better oline on paper that is ..????
 
I try to.

Some people on here thought seem to think that professional football coaches should be obligated to give the enemy information.

And, when asked what Clowney had to show him to prove he’s ready to return to the field, O’Brien said, “That’s between him and me.”

Answering this hypothetical would not give the enemy information..........saying whether he can perform the required elements would have to be divulged to give the enemy information for the upcoming game.
 
Answering this hypothetical would not give the enemy information..........saying whether he can perform the required elements would have to be divulged to give the enemy information for the upcoming game.

Honestly, to what purpose? - to show he knows the appropriate tests? That falls square into we may want to know but so what. Other than being lied to this all seems like Vegas betting line noise. Sure it's nice to have if you can get it but I can't fault them for minimally complying either.
 
Answering this hypothetical would not give the enemy information..........saying whether he can perform the required elements would have to be divulged to give the enemy information for the upcoming game.

Since the standard is likely to include areas of concern specific to his injury and what he can't do, it would provide information on what things to address in any game plan against him, and the Texans. There is no need to do the other teams job for them.

Loose lips sink ships, and sometimes costs teams wins.
 
Yeah, it would have been a nice stage for his coming out party

...still, I'd rather he not come back too soon.

The only place I can find a NO answer was to a question about whether OB had a better idea on whether Clowney would be good to go on Monday. THAT NO indicates uncertainty, not that he is out.
 
Answering this hypothetical would not give the enemy information..........saying whether he can perform the required elements would have to be divulged to give the enemy information for the upcoming game.

If I give out a laundry list of things that I'm wanting Clowney to be able to do to be able to play DOES give information to the enemy.

It tells them what he was having problems doing and could give them hints about which parts of his game they can try to attack.

Even if OB answered that, I'd suspect him of lying to give disinformation to the enemy.

Reporter: "What does Clowney have to be able to do to see the field?"
OB: "Well, multiplication tables are high on the list. If he can't quickly multiply 5x12 and then come back and multiply 6x13, then he's out. And sitting down is very important. He's got to prove to me he can walk to the bench when the defense gets a three and out and sit down on the bench without tweaking something."
 
Lance Zierlein ‏@LanceZierlein 21 hours ago
100% certain he does RT @DoughertyDrew: O'Brien at podium said he doesn't have better feel about whether Jadeveon Clowney will play on MNF.

Interesting certainty yesterday from LZ.
 
Lance Zierlein ‏@LanceZierlein 21 hours ago


Interesting certainty yesterday from LZ.

I'm pretty sure OB has a really good idea if Clowney will play or not. What he says in his PCs means nothing.

I quit watching/reading his PCs because they're so full of fluff. He says a lot without actually saying anything

*Side note: Has any of the local parrots (media) asked him about his "game planning" type team? I'm curious to hear his definition of game planning, because I haven't seen much evidence the way we start games.
 
I'm pretty sure OB has a really good idea if Clowney will play or not. What he says in his PCs means nothing.

I quit watching/reading his PCs because they're so full of fluff. He says a lot without actually saying anything

*Side note: Has any of the local parrots (media) asked him about his "game planning" type team? I'm curious to hear his definition of game planning, because I haven't seen much evidence the way we start games.

3 and out not doing it for you? So far O.B. = Capers 2.0.
 
If I give out a laundry list of things that I'm wanting Clowney to be able to do to be able to play DOES give information to the enemy.

It tells them what he was having problems doing and could give them hints about which parts of his game they can try to attack.

Even if OB answered that, I'd suspect him of lying to give disinformation to the enemy.

Reporter: "What does Clowney have to be able to do to see the field?"
OB: "Well, multiplication tables are high on the list. If he can't quickly multiply 5x12 and then come back and multiply 6x13, then he's out. And sitting down is very important. He's got to prove to me he can walk to the bench when the defense gets a three and out and sit down on the bench without tweaking something."

If he gave out a "laundry list" of all the things that any LB/DE would need to do to see the field, this would not give any information as to if he has attained all or none, or if he would be playing or not playing. He did not have to choose a response that would come across more like a person displaying control issues. We'll just have to agree to disagree on this.
 
3 and out not doing it for you? So far O.B. = Capers 2.0.

3 and outs, MA's, just plain ugly.

One of Kubiak's strengths was coming up with a decent first 15. Now? I don't know what the heck I'm seeing. It's like they practice all week on one plan then OB yanks it right before game time to install a new one
 
OB need to go ahead and announce Clowney will play so Big Ben and his OC could lose sleep and develop ulcers from comptemplating on how to block Watt & JC.
 
With our injuries at Lb..I'm fairly certain Clowney's going to play..he just won't play a whole lot..obvious pass rushing situations most likely. BoB isn't fooling anyone.
 
With our injuries at Lb..I'm fairly certain Clowney's going to play..he just won't play a whole lot..obvious pass rushing situations most likely. BoB isn't fooling anyone.

It is interesting that the Texans haven't really made any moves on the OLB front with Reed and Clowney up in the air. They must know something that we don't.
 
It is interesting that the Texans haven't really made any moves on the OLB front with Reed and Clowney up in the air. They must know something that we don't.

We still have Sapp & newly signed Simon. Not that that'll make you giddy or anything

On a sad note: Simon has more sacks in one game than Mercilus and the same as Reed. Former 1st and 2nd round picks vs a 4th
 
It is interesting that the Texans haven't really made any moves on the OLB front with Reed and Clowney up in the air. They must know something that we don't.

I would seriously hope that they do know something that fans do not know.
 
I would seriously hope that they do know something that fans do not know.

We have been ran by Rick Smith, Charlie Casserly,Gary Kubiak and Don Capers for over a decade.

Consider me a little gun shy about the intelligence in that front office.

BO'B seems to have it together.
 
We still have Sapp & newly signed Simon. Not that that'll make you giddy or anything

On a sad note: Simon has more sacks in one game than Mercilus and the same as Reed. Former 1st and 2nd round picks vs a 4th

Sapp went on IR.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top