Or, conversely, as a fan, I want the show to go on. So the team needs to go ahead and get these guys their money - they've earned it. It's hard for me to empathize with teams who don't fairly reward their players when in private industry, I can just go to another company. There are more than 32 companies available for me to ply my trade in.
If you can't empathize with payers who make tens of millions of dollars, I just don't get how you can empathize with teams that make hundreds of millions of dollars. If the money is the issue, then apply that standard fairly.
Well, I want to see my TEAM win. I want to see my TEAM play on Sundays.
A TEAM is made up of individuals, each with their own monetary worth as designated by the TEAM'S front office and/or the other variables surrounding the situation.
I wouldn't ***** about the QB or the RB or a star WR doing this. Those are positions that warrant the looseness of the purse strings. Those guys touch the ball more, they make the bulk of plays, and they open things up for the supporting cast (such as a freaking Tight End, for crying out loud).
If this TEAM needs a superstar TE so badly that it will give in and overpay for Owen Daniels, then I don't think I'm going to like what happens to a few other players on down the road. I want my big money tied up in Mario Williams, Steve Slaton, Andre Johnson, and maybe an extra lineman or two on either side of the ball. Not on a TE.
I just think that's upside down thinking, and it's very short-sighted. We draft too well, with the staff we have now, to go and panic and act like we'll never be able to unearth another TE.
Additionally, you conveniently leave out the part about how Owen Superstar Daniels had been offered what appears to be a pretty fair deal, yet turned it down and is still negotiating--Let's just be honest for a second and not act like he's having to beg for dinner scraps
And you neglect to admit that I have said over and over that "IF" it's only because the Texans FO has crafted the deal to be pretty incentive-heavy in order for him to get his coin...then my panties will be instantly unbunched because I can see where a player would hesitate to sign a deal that puts too much burden on achieving lofty goals that might be too hard to achieve.
But I don't think that's the case. It seems Owen and his agents are laying the framework for how he's a can't-do-without player. We seem to have a lot of those popping up lately. Which seems to come with the territory once your TEAM stops sucking and the can't-do-without players think they can cash in on the growing success of the TEAM.
One thing that has impressed me about Rick Smith is that he's not doing the outrageous contracts for players that are marginal. We might have acquired some marginal players, but they're here because they accepted some risk on their own side to start off their tenure with us. We avoided the Cedric Benson deal, which I think hindsight will prove was a good decision.
DeMeco miiiight be another player that I would want to spend some extra money on. But then we have a 1st rounder in Cushing....what happens if that dude blows up and goes all kinds of crazy in his rookie year, then follows it up with a solid sophomore year? Makes the Pro Bowl? Wins DROY? You don't think we'll need some extra coin to sign Cushing at some point?
I'm not in favor of overspending on Owen Daniels. And I don't like the position he and his agents are taking. Unless it's due to a loopy contract. Which I think is a long shot, btw.