mexican_texan
Furry Tractors
Tonight on Total Access, our Texans will be featured. They often have a player from that team on the show. I'll keep you informed.
Death to Google Ads! Texans Talk Tip Jar! 🍺😎👍
Thanks for your support!
Tonight on Total Access, our Texans will be featured. They often have a player from that team on the show. I'll keep you informed.
Kubiak thought there were better QBs in free agency than Rosenfels, thus the reason for trading him and signing Orlovsky.
Marshall Faulk doesn't think we'll get to .500 next season, questions Matt Schaub and Slaton.
Jamie Dukes thinks highly of Kollar, thinks we might reach 10-6.
Faulk doesn't think our line is good enough for Schaub to be a drop back QB, thinks it was a mistake to trade Rosenfels, as does Dukes.
Overall, the shortest State of the Franchise I've seen on the show.
They panned us pretty bad. Rich Eisen started things off by saying we went 8-8 the last 2 seasons and got most of our wins late in the season when all the meaningful games were over with. He's correct, but at the same time he made it sound like we beat teams that didn't have anything to play for...but I seem to remember we booted the Bears out of the playoffs at the end of this past season.
Marshall Faulk said Steve Slaton isn't a full time back (despite being the rookie rushing leader and AFC leader in total yards) and either him or Dukes said our OL is not very good (despite blocking for the # 3 yardage offense in the NFL).
Faulk said we're not gonna pass .500, Dukes said we will but we're still gonna miss the playoffs. Overall, I think they overgeneralized on past stereotypes of this team (bad OL) and past stereotypes of players (Steve Slaton being solely a 3rd down back).
They also were very harsh on Schaub. They seem to think the reason he missed all of the games is because he cant take a hit (Dukes said, "He must've forgot while he was in Atlanta that defenses hit pretty hard!") and glossed over the fact 4 of his 5 games missed this season were due to 2 illegal cheap shots by Jared Allen that got Allen fined 50k. Perhaps Dukes should've said, "He must've forgot while he was in Atlanta that Jared Allen is a dirty player!"
They also were very harsh on Schaub. They seem to think the reason he missed all of the games is because he cant take a hit (Dukes said, "He must've forgot while he was in Atlanta that defenses hit pretty hard!") and glossed over the fact 4 of his 5 games missed this season were due to 2 illegal cheap shots by Jared Allen that got Allen fined 50k. Perhaps Dukes should've said, "He must've forgot while he was in Atlanta that Jared Allen is a dirty player!"
That's what happens to the Texans on every show really. We get no respect and until we get into the playoffs and win, we will continue to get none. I think it's unfair that we get such a bad rap, but that's the media for you.
Exactly. After we put togeather a few winning seasons in a row, the press we'll be getting will be more fun to watch. But you know folks, it's like that for all the teams, not just us.
ESPN still thinks we have David Carr at QB. The NFL Network is a lot better than the Worldwide LeaderThe NFL network is for the ESPN rejects, so there's a reason they don't know what they are talkin about.
Marshall Faulk doesn't think we'll get to .500 next season, questions Matt Schaub and Slaton.
He laughed at the prospect at having him as our star running back. He said we need another running back. He hinted at the pre-draft stereotype that Slaton isn't a 3 down back.Questions Steve Slaton?!?!?!?!?
After he made up all those bullshit excuses last night why Reggie Bush is a good back in this league and not a bust, during the Saints' "state of the franchise". He was all over Reggie's jock strap, seriously I almost gagged....he even used the "decoy" excuse, how the hell could he question Steve Slaton
What the hell did he have to say about Steve?
He laughed at the prospect at having him as our star running back. He said we need another running back. He hinted at the pre-draft stereotype that Slaton isn't a 3 down back.
I wouldn't be surprised at all if Slaton regressed next season. I actually don't expect him to match his numbers.
It's also true that Schaub's yet to prove he can start 16 games.
Hmmm...I don't think he will regress.
He made some pretty spectacular runs, sometimes just vanishing inside a pile and then re-appearing out of nowhere to break off a 15-yarder or even take it farther down the field.
He was scary deadly around the edges of the oline, and he pretty much single-handedly made the Jaguars defense give up when we played at Reliant. They had had enough of Steve Slaton.
Our line will be better after having a solid year of Gibbs' system and mentoring under their belt. Schaub seems to have hit the next gear, and our offensive weapons are all coming back.
The only way I see Slaton not living up to his rookie numbers is due to a lot of key injuries on offense. We had a great non-injury season. If a few guys get busted up, all bets are off. But that's true of any team. So that's not going to be Steve's fault.
I guess I'm trying to say that Steve Slaton probably loves the idea of Steve Slaton flying low under the radar.
He made some plays that I hadn't seen since DDW...but DDW didn't have that overdrive gear that Steve has. It's like DDW was taken away early, but we got him back (in a way) in the form of Slaton. Weren't they both drafted in the 3rd, and were deemed 3rd down backs (at best)? Groovy.
I just watched them both and I think you guys are all overreacting. First of all the length of each segment was almost identical, the one on the Texans lasting about 5 minutes and 40 seconds and the Saints about 20 seconds longer. They are both up on NFL.com right now. Marshall doesn't like our chances in the AFC South because all the other teams have showed they can win and we haven't. I see us going over .500 this year but he has a valid argument. The main criticism of Schaub was health and Dukes did state that he likes him a lot as a QB. Getting rid of Rosenfels is the equivalent of the Rockets shipping off Alston. I doubt we miss him but its something for people to talk about. They weren't overly rough on the OL because there is definitely still room for improvement there, especially in pass protection.
I just watched them both and I think you guys are all overreacting. First of all the length of each segment was almost identical, the one on the Texans lasting about 5 minutes and 40 seconds and the Saints about 20 seconds longer. They are both up on NFL.com right now. Marshall doesn't like our chances in the AFC South because all the other teams have showed they can win and we haven't. I see us going over .500 this year but he has a valid argument. The main criticism of Schaub was health and Dukes did state that he likes him a lot as a QB. Getting rid of Rosenfels is the equivalent of the Rockets shipping off Alston. I doubt we miss him but its something for people to talk about. They weren't overly rough on the OL because there is definitely still room for improvement there, especially in pass protection.
I follow many sports, and football analysis is consistantly and confidently off.
what kind of self respecting analyst questions the AFC leader in yards from scrimage, as a rookie too, he'll get better. I know this is pointless, but i am just constantly baffeled by the things that come out of football analysts.
Hmmm...I don't think he will regress.
He made some pretty spectacular runs, sometimes just vanishing inside a pile and then re-appearing out of nowhere to break off a 15-yarder or even take it farther down the field.
He was scary deadly around the edges of the oline, and he pretty much single-handedly made the Jaguars defense give up when we played at Reliant. They had had enough of Steve Slaton.
Our line will be better after having a solid year of Gibbs' system and mentoring under their belt. Schaub seems to have hit the next gear, and our offensive weapons are all coming back.
The only way I see Slaton not living up to his rookie numbers is due to a lot of key injuries on offense. We had a great non-injury season. If a few guys get busted up, all bets are off. But that's true of any team. So that's not going to be Steve's fault.
I guess I'm trying to say that Steve Slaton probably loves the idea of Steve Slaton flying low under the radar.
He made some plays that I hadn't seen since DDW...but DDW didn't have that overdrive gear that Steve has. It's like DDW was taken away early, but we got him back (in a way) in the form of Slaton. Weren't they both drafted in the 3rd, and were deemed 3rd down backs (at best)? Groovy.
I'm sure we'll get another back in the draft who will take a bit of the load off Slaton. Slaton will get his 1000 yds plus running and some passing yards added in for a second year in a row, then they'll change their minds.
But again, these stupid analysts on TV don't often look at individuals, but base their thoughts on teams as a whole and spout off garbage about individual players on those teams.
I refuse to get sucked into another b*tch session about our national coverage!I refuse to get sucked into another b*tch session about our national coverage!I refuse to get sucked into another b*tch session about our national coverage!I refuse to get sucked into another b*tch session about our national coverage!I refuse to get sucked into another b*tch session about our national coverage!I refuse to get sucked into another b*tch session about our national coverage!I refuse to get sucked into another b*tch session about our national coverage!I refuse to get sucked into another b*tch session about our national coverage!I refuse to get sucked into another b*tch session about our national coverage!I refuse to get sucked into another b*tch session about our national coverage!I refuse to get sucked into another b*tch session about our national coverage!I refuse to get sucked into another b*tch session about our national coverage!I refuse to get sucked into another b*tch session about our national coverage!I refuse to get sucked into another b*tch session about our national coverage!
I have a friend who caught the Saints show, and he said it was basically sloppy oral sex for Reggie. All the while ignoring the fact that he can't function as a running back. Then goes on and on about how Slaton can't carry the bulk of the load. I understand that Slaton needs a guy to get 7-10 carries a game, but Steve is a 1200 yard rusher. He had 230 ish yards vs the Tiatans, 100+ a game. The only guy who did that all year. Show just a little respect. Its this kind of 2nd rate reporting that needs to go. Expect Slaton to pass Reggies career rushing yards totla by week 3.
I think his numbers will slip a bit, but thats because he will have a platoon. Moats and a 2-4th round running back to spell him will cut into his numbers a little.
Outside of not discussing how Schuab got injured and not revelaing our other warts, they were spot on in my opinion.
Outside of not discussing how Schuab got injured and not revelaing our other warts, they were spot on in my opinion.
Outside of not discussing how Schuab got injured and not revelaing our other warts, they were spot on in my opinion.
I didn't have much of an issue with it either. Practically everything they said was true.
I'm sure McChinless will be the one reporting for the Texans on Path to the Draft. I'm interested to see what Mayock has to say. IMO, he works his butt off at what he does and he's very good at recognizing talented players.
They've had Casserly on Path to the Draft lately and I might hurl if I hear Texans come out of his pie hole.
I thought it was a good piece. Other than calling Smith, Wilson they were dead on.
I didnt get the impression that they called Slaton a 3rd down back. Just not a full time back. Which is true. We need a back to split carries with or he is going to end up like DD.
He's not a 30 carry a game back, but who is now a days. Slaton IS a full time running back, he just needs a spell back. That doesnt make him a part time back, that makes him human. Thats what bugs me.
I didn't watch it, but didn't care what they said about Schaub, because I agree he has to show he can stay healthy....my only gripe was what the said about Slaton. Since you said it's on NFL.com..I'll go check it out.
But.......
BTW, wasn't the NFC South WAY more competitive than the AFC south last year? Shouldn't the "Marshall doesn't like our chances in the AFC South because all the other teams have showed they can win and we haven't." argument also be used against them? Just saying....Marshall is trying to save face, this is a guy who openly said he's "tutoring Reggie and Reggie is his protoche"......he's tied to Reggie.
Nothing new, nothing suprising, they said a lot of the same stuff people here on this BBS say. And really, who cares what they say? Until we prove ourselves by making the playoffs a few times, nobodys gonna have a whole love of love for us anyway. What ever happens to the Texans this year depends on so many things it's just unreal. And we haven't gotten to the draft yet.
Charles Hill was a worse pick than Babin, who led the team in sacks the year before Mario...or Mario's rookie year, I can't remember.yeah, true that. just mentioned Connor Barwin, Casserly stated he lacks polished game, would like to use 2nd on someone more ready, that it will be important not to feed him too much right away. So not worth a 2nd rd. pick to developemental, but some team will take him that run a 3-4 @ OLB. Gee, sounds kinda familar maybe he should have heeded his own advice? see Jason Babin, possibly the worst draft projection ever aside from Tony Hollings both yours Mr. Path to the Draft Casserly
Charles Hill was a worse pick than Babin, who led the team in sacks the year before Mario...or Mario's rookie year, I can't remember.