badboy
Hall of Fame
CoachingHow do you pull this stinker after a bye week!
Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
CoachingHow do you pull this stinker after a bye week!
I understand but in my opinion that cliche is for a good team that gets beaten by a inferior team. That did not happen today.Any given sunday
I am not sure they will learn from this.They are who we thought they were..No excuse Team loss Learn from this
I am sure another player has been given an unsportsmanlike conduct penalty after consecutive unabated off sides to the quarterback. I just don't remember it happeningDagnabbit, Tavierre Thomas.
Does this mean we no longer have to worry about another team taking away Slowik for their head coach?Offense play calling was absolutely dog **** today.
just stop it right now! Do I have to stop this football game and climb into the backfield with you? Huh do I?Thomas needs to quit that
Slow down SlowikTexans only play defense
Even when on offense they are playing defense
Demeco telling the O coach what to do? or is it Slow problem
I walked into my friend's house to watch the game and said I expect this one to be a easy win. His reply was uh-oh that means they're going to lose.The only other game this season with the potential to be more disgusting and embarrassing than this one is if we get walked by the Titans while they're wearing the Oilers throw backs.
So expect that to happen
They didn’t play much defense against Desmond Ridder. He was benched today, going against the Texans just delayed the inevitable.Texans only play defense
Even when on offense they are playing defense
Demeco telling the O coach what to do? or is it Slow problem
Slowik didn't forget how to call a game during the bye week. I find it hilarious that when things go wrong it's always on the coaching. Truth is the offense isn't anywhere near complete, weapons need to be added. When Singletary is your best RB in a WCO you know there are issues. They have some nice skill position players but nobody that keep opposing coaches up at night.Does this mean we no longer have to worry about another team taking away Slowik for their head coach?
I say it’s on Demeco b/c this was a game our defense was gonna have to win with how it was going. And Demeco chose to sit back in prevent defense AGAIN on what amounted to the last drive of the game. We got 6 sacks on Young, they couldn’t protect him and to just sit back and let him drive down the field and eat clock…just too conservative imo. Should’ve continued to get after him. Worst thing that happens, they score a TD fast..but we have clock and TO’s in our favor..& we then can hand the ball to our young stud qb. I like that option better than letting them move into FG territory easily while chewing clock.
exact same **** happened against the Falcons. The offense, while it struggled, actually ran the ball well today…well better than we normally have.
They did have a new play-caller for this game. Reich gave it up to his OCots of stuff went wrong and the defense fell short a bunch of times. 6 other teams faced these guys and their rookie QB yet with weeks of tape on him we fell short?
With the lack of explosive players and an offense that needs weapons. Why would anyone consider this a 10-win team?Slowik didn't forget how to call a game during the bye week. I find it hilarious that when things go wrong it's always on the coaching. Truth is the offense isn't anywhere near complete, weapons need to be added. When Singletary is your best RB in a WCO you know there are issues. They have some nice skill position players but nobody that keep opposing coaches up at night.
BTW, what's up with Stroud getting all of those passes batted down? I dont remember this being an issue in college.
I said this in the other thread, Slowick came in as an unknown quantity, and so did Stroud. Your opponent each week doesn’t know what to prepare for.Does this mean we no longer have to worry about another team taking away Slowik for their head coach?
The Panthers had a bye week to go over what the Texans have put on film. It helped them. In this game, the Texans brain trust wasn't able to exploit the Panthers weaknesses. The Texans continue to run outside, but cannot seal the edge. I don't blame the Texans for trying to establish the run. Just find a way to seal the edge if you do.What we watched today was a defense who studied our rookie QB's tendencies
But... I thought Cj had a quick release, compact throwing motion. That should help against balls batted down at the LOS.the next week you come back and a different team can develop the concept and get hands up in those passing lanes and slow you down like that.
Yep.The Texans are still a much improved team from last year. They'll win some more this season.
The Panthers had a bye week to go over what the Texans have put on film. It helped them. In this game, the Texans brain trust wasn't able to exploit the Panthers weaknesses. The Texans continue to run outside, but cannot seal the edge. I don't blame the Texans for trying to establish the run. Just find a way to seal the edge if you do.
Still, the Texans were in position to seal this game in the 4th quarter. The Texans defense sacked Young twice on a 3 and out. Dell had a 20 yard punt return to midfield. The Texans had a makable 3rd and 5 at the Panthers 35, but were flagged for delay of game. The TV analyst, Robert Smith, made an excellent point regarding all of the pre play shifting and motion. Sometimes you just need to snap the ball and make a play. A field goal there would have forced the Panthers to get a TD. Changed the complexion of the rest of the game.
The two back to back penalties by the defense on the last drive dug the Panthers out of bad field position. And getting a stop on 4th down would have given the Texans another opportunity to put the game away. 4 plays in the 4th quarter were the difference. Cleaning this up and making those 4th quarter plays will come with experience.
This weekend. We'll see more of Levis on Thursday night.Will Levis won this "battle".
Has anyone said why there was a delay in that play calling snap? There were more than one play where the clock came close to running out on Stroud.The Panthers had a bye week to go over what the Texans have put on film. It helped them. In this game, the Texans brain trust wasn't able to exploit the Panthers weaknesses. The Texans continue to run outside, but cannot seal the edge. I don't blame the Texans for trying to establish the run. Just find a way to seal the edge if you do.
Still, the Texans were in position to seal this game in the 4th quarter. The Texans defense sacked Young twice on a 3 and out. Dell had a 20 yard punt return to midfield. The Texans had a makable 3rd and 5 at the Panthers 35, but were flagged for delay of game. The TV analyst, Robert Smith, made an excellent point regarding all of the pre play shifting and motion. Sometimes you just need to snap the ball and make a play. A field goal there would have forced the Panthers to get a TD. Changed the complexion of the rest of the game.
The two back to back penalties by the defense on the last drive dug the Panthers out of bad field position. And getting a stop on 4th down would have given the Texans another opportunity to put the game away. 4 plays in the 4th quarter were the difference. Cleaning this up and making those 4th quarter plays will come with experience.
Well we did think after the last two games that they had broken through to the other side...Oh god que The Doors - The End, lol.
Because the defense should be really good and a weak schedule.With the lack of explosive players and an offense that needs weapons. Why would anyone consider this a 10-win team?
Is there any such thing as a weak schedule when you're liable to lose to an 0-6 team at any moment?Because the defense should be really good and a weak schedule.
Just because you lose to an 0-6 team doesn't mean your schedule isn't weak.Is there any such thing as a weak schedule when you're liable to lose to an 0-6 team at any moment?
BTW, what's up with Stroud getting all of those passes batted down? I dont remember this being an issue in college.
I agree and why I think it was a challenge to his coordinator. At least it was done in a respectful way.I listened carefully to Sroud’s answer to someone’s question regarding the batted balls in the post game NC. He mentioned the “short stuff”. I got the inkling he doesn’t care much about throwing short passes because that’s what leads to batted balls. I also came away with the feeling that Stroud wants to throw more deep shots.
Na, Mahomes is a proven stud. I would chalk that up to just a bad/off day. He rarely has bad games.Even Patrick Mahomes had a bad game this past Sunday. Does that mean it’s a tad bit troubling for him and the Chiefs?
According to Kyle Shanahan, he doesn't run the WCO.Isn't the WCO based on using the short passing game as an extension of the run game?
Someone tell Slowick Dell isn’t Samuels either.According to Kyle Shanahan, he doesn't run the WCO.
"'I don't run the freaking West Coast Offense,' Shanahan explained, except he didn't use the word, 'freaking.' He used a different word we can't print.
Shanahan could have been more diplomatic, but he didn't lie. He corrected the biggest misconception about him and the current 49ers offense.
Shanahan has zero connection to Walsh. Shanahan runs his father's offense. And his father, Mike Shanahan, also has zero connection to Walsh. Never coached for him. Mike Shanahan sees himself as an innovator like Walsh, who created his own offense. And Kyle Shanahan sees himself as the leader of the second generation of his father's disciples."
"At its heart, the West Coast Offense is a conservative, ball-control offense. Walsh called a series of short and intermediate passes which he considered 'extended handoffs.' He used these to maintain possession, take time off the clock and set up running plays for the second half. Of course, Walsh called the occasional deep pass, but, for the most part, it was a conservative offense.
The Shanahan Offense is completely opposite. It's an aggressive, big-play offense which features running plays that set up deep play-action passes."
Grant Cohn: Defining Kyle Shanahan's offense
He runs an updated version of what his dad and Kubiak did. He can call it whatever he wants to call it.According to Kyle Shanahan, he doesn't run the WCO.
"'I don't run the freaking West Coast Offense,' Shanahan explained, except he didn't use the word, 'freaking.' He used a different word we can't print.
Shanahan could have been more diplomatic, but he didn't lie. He corrected the biggest misconception about him and the current 49ers offense.
Shanahan has zero connection to Walsh. Shanahan runs his father's offense. And his father, Mike Shanahan, also has zero connection to Walsh. Never coached for him. Mike Shanahan sees himself as an innovator like Walsh, who created his own offense. And Kyle Shanahan sees himself as the leader of the second generation of his father's disciples."
"At its heart, the West Coast Offense is a conservative, ball-control offense. Walsh called a series of short and intermediate passes which he considered 'extended handoffs.' He used these to maintain possession, take time off the clock and set up running plays for the second half. Of course, Walsh called the occasional deep pass, but, for the most part, it was a conservative offense.
The Shanahan Offense is completely opposite. It's an aggressive, big-play offense which features running plays that set up deep play-action passes."
Grant Cohn: Defining Kyle Shanahan's offense
Every player has those type of days proven or not. It shouldn’t be a concern right now. That’s what you call overreaction.Na, Mahomes is a proven stud. I would chalk that up to just a bad/off day. He rarely has bad games.
(Which is hard to as KC always seems to have stacked rosters since before Mahomes came into the league)
I agree.Every player has those type of days proven or not. It shouldn’t be a concern right now. That’s what you call overreaction.
The Texans last 3 games they've scored 19, 20, 13 points. Some of that's on play calling, some of that's on Stroud and some of that's on needing better skill position talent.Every player has those type of days proven or not. It shouldn’t be a concern right now. That’s what you call overreaction.
The writer needs to do better homeworks.According to Kyle Shanahan, he doesn't run the WCO.
"'I don't run the freaking West Coast Offense,' Shanahan explained, except he didn't use the word, 'freaking.' He used a different word we can't print.
Shanahan could have been more diplomatic, but he didn't lie. He corrected the biggest misconception about him and the current 49ers offense.
Shanahan has zero connection to Walsh. Shanahan runs his father's offense. And his father, Mike Shanahan, also has zero connection to Walsh. Never coached for him. Mike Shanahan sees himself as an innovator like Walsh, who created his own offense. And Kyle Shanahan sees himself as the leader of the second generation of his father's disciples."
"At its heart, the West Coast Offense is a conservative, ball-control offense. Walsh called a series of short and intermediate passes which he considered 'extended handoffs.' He used these to maintain possession, take time off the clock and set up running plays for the second half. Of course, Walsh called the occasional deep pass, but, for the most part, it was a conservative offense.
The Shanahan Offense is completely opposite. It's an aggressive, big-play offense which features running plays that set up deep play-action passes."
Grant Cohn: Defining Kyle Shanahan's offense
Wait a minute. What are you arguing? In the article, the writer mentioned Shanahan worked with the 49ers and had the following paragraph.The writer needs to do better homeworks.
Mike Shanahan was with George Seifert and the Niners for 3 years, running the WCO.
1992 San Francisco 49ers Rosters, Stats, Schedule, Team Draftees | Pro-Football-Reference.com
Check out the 1992 San Francisco 49ers Roster, Stats, Schedule, Team Draftees, Injury Reports and more on Pro-Football-Reference.com.www.pro-football-reference.com
No mention of Shanny's time in Oakland.Wait a minute. What are you arguing? In the article, the writer mentioned Shanahan worked with the 49ers and had the following paragraph.
"Mike Shanahan began developing his offense during the mid-1980s when he was the Denver Broncos' offensive coordinator. In 1992, he took his offense to the 49ers and became their offensive coordinator. He stayed three seasons and won a Super Bowl in 1995. He was very good. And his son, Kyle, following his footsteps, may turn out equally as good.
After the Super Bowl, Mike Shanahan left the 49ers and became the head coach of the Broncos. When he left the 49ers, the late Dwight Clark told my dad, 'Nothing against Mike, but he didn't do what we do. We need to get back to our roots.'"
Grant Cohn: Defining Kyle Shanahan's offense
I wouldn't want to mention that either if I was lil ShannyNo mention of Shanny's time in Oakland.
I didn't say that the offense that Mike Shanahan and Gary Kubiak ran was the classic WCO.Wait a minute. What are you arguing? In the article, the writer mentioned Shanahan worked with the 49ers and had the following paragraph.
"Mike Shanahan began developing his offense during the mid-1980s when he was the Denver Broncos' offensive coordinator. In 1992, he took his offense to the 49ers and became their offensive coordinator. He stayed three seasons and won a Super Bowl in 1995. He was very good. And his son, Kyle, following his footsteps, may turn out equally as good.
After the Super Bowl, Mike Shanahan left the 49ers and became the head coach of the Broncos. When he left the 49ers, the late Dwight Clark told my dad, 'Nothing against Mike, but he didn't do what we do. We need to get back to our roots.'"
Grant Cohn: Defining Kyle Shanahan's offense