Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍

Weakest Position?

oso said:
All this talk of drafting a running back with the first round pick next year is interesting. My understanding of the Denver offensive system is that it is designed to make average backs look really good. For that reason, I don't think that RB will ever be high on the Texans' needs list.

The way I look at it is if the Broncos have had that kind of success with a sub par RB, what if they had a first rounder in the same position? One that has had proven size, speed and agility in college. :twocents:
 
We have SO many unknowns right now; how the vets will respond to the new coaching staff, how fast the rookies will come along, how effective will playing to win vs. playing to stay close work, etc., etc., etc.

At the moment, I would like to see some depth in the secondary in case of injury if for no other reason.

And if we happen on a Kicker with 99% accuracy from 70+ yards that might be nice too! Hopefully though, the kicker will be kicking mostly points after rather than long FG's. :ok:
 
TexansSeminole said:
Don't forget safety, unless we plan to pick up one in free agency, I wouldn't understand if we didn't pick up one in the first three rounds next year. Kubiak has worked well with RBs in the past that were drafted after the third.

Nod - agree. We certainly need a good safety and think we will look to pick up one in the second or third round next year. I think RB will be addressed in either the third or fourth round depending on who is available at our spot. My top pick for next year would be another shut down corner in the 1st roudn to pair up with D-rob and help solidify our secondary & nickel packages.

My draft predictions for next year
cb-lb = indicated Looking 1st at a CB then a LB
[BPA picks of that position in order of priority]

1st - CB-LB
2nd - LB-CB-Safety
3rd - Safety-RB
4th - RB-WR
5th - LB-ST
6th - OL-ST
7th - DL-ST
 
TexansSeminole said:
What is our weakest position? And what do you think we will address in next years first round?

1. Linebacker
2. Defensive end
3. DT
4. QB
5. Safety
6. Kicker

If there is a loooooad of safties and IF the line come around... I could see us wading in on a another young LB. If the Wade/Spencer experiment fails...LT.
If the Wade Spencer experiment fails and Carr gets Killed...QB.
 
I am a long time Houston sports fan and a first time Texans season ticket holder. I am definitely ready for football to begin. What are we realistically going to have this year?
 
realistically we should be hoping for 6-10, 7-9. That would be a good enough improvement over last year to show us that we are on the right track. Potentially we could do as well as 10-6, 11-5.. and those arent "off the wall" possibilities.. but not what we should be "expecting"
 
Right now I don't know about what is the weakest position because there are so many unknowns. Like how the rookies will play and whatnot. However from where I stand I could go on what the biggest uncertaintaties are.

1) RB- DD's knees are not well right now. There is no indication that he will be well by the time the season starts or if it will be a chronic problem or if he can last. Behind him we have Morrency. Alot of people are convinced this guy is going to step it up a notch, I disagree. His lack of vision and balance is not something that can so easily be corrected neither is his running style which is something that Kubiak has commented on before. I don't think Morrency will fit the system and I don't think he will have much success here. Behind them are a few rookies who alot of people are getting their hopes up about and thinking T. Davis and P. Holmes. While it would be great if that happened at this point there is no way of knowing. So that leaves us with A. Smith as the starter and workhorse. While I think highly of Smith, I don't think he is the answer. So this is the biggest questionmark I.M.O.

Gee, now that I think about it, RB is the only real uncertainty on our team. I mean we know CC is a good safety with the potential to get better and Earl while not as good also has proven he can play in the league and has alot of room to grow. I agree we could upgrade this position in next years draft, but sitting here I don't see them being overwhelmed by the grind of the season.

@ CB I think D-Rob is solid and is basically the anchor in the secondary. While P-Buch hasn't played up to his potential and can be upgraded. He has put forth alot of effort this offseason and at the very worst would only be serviceable.

@ LB- I think that Greenwood and Orr have proven they can play well. We have alot of new LB's but as someone said with the front four providing much of the pressure our LB's don't have to be spectacular and with Ryans potential this could turn out to be a very solid group.

That's all I can think of right now.
 
Weakest positions going in to this year has to be:

#1-MLB (Cowart and Rainer don't excite me.)

#2-FS ( C.C. Brown is a SS. Kevin Curtis might be OK, time will tell.)

#3-Depth at CB where Faggins tries, and pBurnt has so far dissappointed. Dunta really needs help. Can help be at hand in the form of Sanders, McKenzie
,or Walker?

There could be more depth on the OL, DT, &/or WR/TE. But these positions seem to be OK for another year at least.
 
NoBullTexan said:
Weakest positions going in to this year has to be:

#1-MLB (Cowart and Rainer don't excite me.)

#2-FS ( C.C. Brown is a SS. Kevin Curtis might be OK, time will tell.)

#3-Depth at CB where Faggins tries, and pBurnt has so far dissappointed. Dunta really needs help. Can help be at hand in the form of Sanders, McKenzie
,or Walker?

There could be more depth on the OL, DT, &/or WR/TE. But these positions seem to be OK for another year at least.

This is pretty much my exact thinking, but maybe switch MLB and FS.
 
Luv_ya_blue said:
I really wanted to say QB, but seems like everyone around these parts are pretty defensive of their QB.

Even got zapped with a negative earlier for saying that I would've rather had Bush than MW.

I feel your pain brother. It's like saying something bad about Elvis in Tennessee.

The people that aren't concerned about the most important position on the field, after seeing the last 25+ games, are experiencing some sort of disconnect from reality. This place feels like an Outer Limits episode at times.
 
Wolf said:
you beat me to the punch
Yeah Ive just wondering for a few weeks...and I know I'll be blasted....If you don't go the other way and have Hodgdon starting the season with Flanagan off the pine. Flanagan goes down...6-10 is gonna look aweful good. Wonder if Winston can snap the ball in a crisis ? And no I haven't forgot about Mac. :hides:
 
I'll say it.

Weakest positions in order

1) qb
2) qb
3) qb

Getting rid of David Carr should be the teams #1 priority...this whole experiment has been a terrible mistake. Trade him for a decent FS and kill 2 birds with one stone
 
"7. Gary Kubiak, Houston: The former Denver Broncos offensive coordinator faces some lofty expectations after replacing Dom Capers, because Texans owner Bob McNair and the fans are no longer satisfied with merely being in the NFL. Although top overall draft pick Mario Williams has the tall task of making people forget that the team passed on Bush, the focal point of scrutiny for Kubiak's rookie season will be the performance of David Carr."

This is from NFL.com where they rank how well the 10 new HC's will do this season. As you can see, they believe Carr's performance will affect Kubiak's rookie season. I know most fans believe we are set at QB this fall, but that still remains to be seen. IMO, it's ironic that most posters believe that Carr's on field results were the only ones affected by Capers and company, yet-as Kubiak stresses himself--'how Carr goes, the team goes.' Let's hope that accountability or lack there of does not translate into 'Chapter 5' of Carr still looking for his 'promise land.'

http://nfl.com/news/story/9560415
 
tsip said:
IMO, it's ironic that most posters believe that Carr's on field results were the only ones affected by Capers and company, yet-as Kubiak stresses himself--'how Carr goes, the team goes.'

Really, is it ironic or myopic (by you)? Can you name all the folks (heck even a few representing the majority) who believe Carr was adversely affected but the OL wasn't a victim of Pendry, the O wasn't a victim of Capers and Pendry, Fangio's D didn't suck, etc. I am sure there a couple of folks in any group this size who think Carr was the only one affected by bad coaching but it sure as hell isn't a majority of the MB.
 
the wonger need food said:
How does Quarterback not make anyone's list? Has no one seen the play of Dave Carr the past season and a half???

QB is on my list. If something happens to David Carr (or if he continues to play at a sub-par level), the Texans have no real backup plan.
 
1st round
Linebacker Patrick Willis 6'2 230 lbs Ole Miss

2nd round
Safety Brandon Merriweather Miami

There should be a lot of UT fans here...
what do yall think of Tarrell Brown CB or Michael Griffin S
 
threetoedpete said:
1. Linebacker
2. Defensive end
3. DT
4. QB
5. Safety
6. Kicker

If there is a loooooad of safties and IF the line come around... I could see us wading in on a another young LB. If the Wade/Spencer experiment fails...LT.
If the Wade Spencer experiment fails and Carr gets Killed...QB.

What the heck are you talking about? DE at #2? We are stacked with Mario, Kalu, Weaver who is a DE and was moved because of an abuncance, Peek, Babin. DT at #3? Robaire, TJ, Payne, Weaver, and some young guys we have for depth that im not going to look up right now. QB is your opinion, but a #3 QB shouldnt be an issue.
 
infantrycak said:
Really, is it ironic or myopic (by you)? Can you name all the folks (heck even a few representing the majority) who believe Carr was adversely affected but the OL wasn't a victim of Pendry, the O wasn't a victim of Capers and Pendry, Fangio's D didn't suck, etc. I am sure there a couple of folks in any group this size who think Carr was the only one affected by bad coaching but it sure as hell isn't a majority of the MB.

I'm basing my opinion on the topic of this thread, and the fact that so many posters choose a position-other than QB-as positions that need major improvements. These posters see all kinds of short comings in these other players but not Carr. Why? If people can justify Carr's lack of results by 'things' that were not his fault, and believe his performance will be so much better this year, why don't they hold the same opinions for the other positions? Why do these players need to be upgraded and replaced and not 'cut the same slack' as Carr?
 
Since day 1 Carr has had very limited time in the pocket, under abundance of reliable targets, and serious lack of coaching. In other words, we really don't know about him. The optimistic side of me would like to think that Kubiak's concentration on the QB spot, 2 good WR's and TE's that can catch the ball will bring him around.

If he gets decent protection in the pocket this year, and still doesn't perform, I agree he is out of excuses and a QB should be high on the list for next year.

At least with the new management this year, if he does shine they won't trade him off.
 
"I am sure there a couple of folks in any group this size who think Carr was the only one affected by bad coaching but it sure as hell isn't a majority of the MB."

...only 4 posters on this thread mentioned Carr as a problem--you would probally have an easier time listing all the posters on this board who think Carr is a problem? No, this is not a 'certified' sampling, but it is a good start as to the 'majority thought' on this board. Hell, you probally don't think there are any Carr 'intimidators/crucifiers' on this board either!!
 
I just want to tell everyone that CC Brown is performing quite well at FS. He is faster than Earl and is staying after practice to learn to play the ball better. He will suprise you. Also, castaway Michael Stone is quite fast and Lewis Sanders once he is healthy can play FS also and is pretty good at it since he is more of a corner anyway.
 
South Texan said:
In other words, we really don't know about him.

If we really don't know about him 5 years into his career, how can it not be a concern? We're talking about a still unproven player at the most important position on the field. QB should be in everyone's top 3.
 
tsip said:
I'm basing my opinion on the topic of this thread, and the fact that so many posters choose a position-other than QB-as positions that need major improvements. These posters see all kinds of short comings in these other players but not Carr. Why? If people can justify Carr's lack of results by 'things' that were not his fault, and believe his performance will be so much better this year, why don't they hold the same opinions for the other positions? Why do these players need to be upgraded and replaced and not 'cut the same slack' as Carr?

Well I understand better where you are coming from now. I would say all the crud runs to the QB on O. Riley being stuck in and pulling Wand not only hurt Wand, it hurt Carr. Bradford continually being trotted into the game hurt not only Gaffney/Armstrong, it hurt Carr. Not having the TE's run legitimate routes down the seam hurt them, the WR's and Carr. I have said a couple times that there are going to be 1-3 players on each side of the ball that turn out to have a whole lot more talent than people are giving them credit for which will emerge with the new coaching--so basically that seems to be an agreement with your point.

tsip said:
...only 4 posters on this thread mentioned Carr as a problem--you would probally have an easier time listing all the posters on this board who think Carr is a problem? No, this is not a 'certified' sampling, but it is a good start as to the 'majority thought' on this board. Hell, you probally don't think there are any Carr 'intimidators/crucifiers' on this board either!!

IMO a lot of folks haven't chimed in on this thread because that horse has been beaten into glue in numerous other threads. There is a healthy split of folks on each extreme of the Carr issue around here--in other words no majority either way.
 
Wait a minute - is there an issue because this hasn't turned into a Carr thread? Do we have a smiley that denotes "running from the room screaming"?
 
Runner said:
Wait a minute - is there an issue because this hasn't turned into a Carr thread? Do we have a smiley that denotes "running from the room screaming"?

Ahh yes, good idea... it's about time to start a new Carr thread. Let's see if I can figure something out.
 
TwinSisters said:
Ahh yes, good idea... it's about time to start a new Carr thread. Let's see if I can figure something out.

Don't do it. Just say no.
 
Runner said:
Wait a minute - is there an issue because this hasn't turned into a Carr thread? Do we have a smiley that denotes "running from the room screaming"?

...so are you saying that Carr's name should not have been included on a thread that denotes 'weakest position?' I love this kind of thinking!!...about 80 posts and Carr's name gets mentioned about 5 times and you're losing it!!! In the future, posters should note in their threads that Carr is not to be brought up in their post...of course, this applies to the Carr:homer: as well.
 
BAH! Come on. All the other cool kids are doing it. If we don't do it, we are not going to score with the ladies. Do you want to be a square coming home everyday to a lonely bare empty house, growing old and bitter with ESPN flashing images of Manning and Brady across your eyeballs every night before you nod off to sleep by yourself?

OR...

or do you want to do some Carr thread and have to tell all the hotties to wait until you are done working out the fundamental nuances of a partial side arm delivery in a West Coast offense before you move on to the next one?

eh?

That's what I thought... now let's do some Carr thread.

besides that I think I have an idea! Just need to do some looking first...
 
NATHANHALE said:
...so are you saying that Carr's name should not have been included on a thread that denotes 'weakest position?' I love this kind of thinking!!...about 80 posts and Carr's name gets mentioned about 5 times and you're losing it!!! In the future, posters should note in their threads that Carr is not to be brought up in their post...of course, this applies to the Carr:homer: as well.

My comment was a joke about how many threads turn into Carr only threads. If you care to look you'd find that I rarely participate in them, not only because I'm not a Carr homer or Carr basher, but also because they usually turn into arguments just like this one.

Mea culpa if I wasn't clear that I was being humorous.
 
TwinSisters said:
BAH! Come on. All the other cool kids are doing it. If we don't do it, we are not going to score with the ladies. Do you want to be a square coming home everyday to a lonely bare empty house, growing old and bitter with ESPN flashing images of Manning and Brady across your eyeballs every night before you nod off to sleep by yourself?

OR...

or do you want to do some Carr thread and have to tell all the hotties to wait until you are done working out the fundamental nuances of a partial side arm delivery in a West Coast offense before you move on to the next one?

eh?

That's what I thought... now let's do some Carr thread.

besides that I think I have an idea! Just need to do some looking first...

I'm sorry. I can no longer participate in this persiflage. :backsout:
 
the wonger need food said:
How does Quarterback not make anyone's list? Has no one seen the play of Dave Carr the past season and a half???


Seen him play ?? - sure - all of us have that watched the games over the last few years. I also saw alot of mediocrity amongst teh players and staff, no dedication to staying with the scheme, line changes, blocking scheme changes, player changes, coaching changes etc all in the midst of Carr trying to improve and leading the team to a 7-9 finish in 04 which had more than a few games lost due to our defense being unable to hold any kind of lead.

Ive seen several coaches come in and evaluate Carr including our current head coach checking him out throughly and naming him the starter when he had the opportunity to bring in anyone he wanted and saying that a majority of the problem was not Carr.

Following that we also have a vet QB in Sage who by Eric Moulds account said - Hes a big QB with a gun for an arm who lead the Dolphins back from a 21-0 game to a win of 24-21 against the Bills. He also stated that Sage is a good QB and will push David in camp.

I see that as us having 2 average starting QB's who need a good QB/OC coach to develop with [which Carr never truly had in 4 years] to become better players and help develop the leadership needed to ru nthe offense and take the team to some wins. IMO see this as a concern, because they are both unproven in the system, but dont see that area as the Weakest position esp when it comes to depth coming into the season. With our concerns at RB, Secondary and the LB spots where we are dangerously thin when it comes to the depth chart - I see those as Pressing needs that will have to be addressed in the near future.

From Fox - http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/teamReport?categoryId=67071&type=StrategyAndPersonnel

QUARTERBACK: Starter -- David Carr. Backups -- Sage Rosenfels, Quinton Porter.

The Texans spent part of the offseason determining what they would do with the quarterback position. Coach Gary Kubiak decided he wanted to stick with David Carr, and there will be no quarterback controversy heading into camp. Now, it's simply about Carr adjusting to the major changes being brought in during his fifth NFL season. It will be a critical year for Carr, who will be playing in a system that will complement his skills and under a true quarterbacks coach in Kubiak. Carr will throw on the run as much or more than any other quarterback in the league. Denver traditionally rolls out left and right. He has been one of the most durable quarterbacks the past four years, but the Texans have brought in a new backup in Sage Rosenfels. If Carr is allowed to stay on his feet more than in the past, he should have the best year of his career.
 
"or do you want to do some Carr thread and have to tell all the hotties to wait until you are done working out the fundamental nuances of a partial side arm delivery in a West Coast offense before you move on to the next one?"

Your writing and Dom Caper's coaching have a lot in common--you both are talking but not saying anything that makes sense. However, when it comes to getting from point A to point B, you are in a class by your self!! Anyway, who says what we say has to be understood by those who don't realize that what we said in the first place is not what we meant. Wow.I think I've got it now...bring on the hotties-keep the West Coast nuances for your self.
 
tsip said:
"7. Gary Kubiak, Houston: The former Denver Broncos offensive coordinator faces some lofty expectations after replacing Dom Capers, because Texans owner Bob McNair and the fans are no longer satisfied with merely being in the NFL. Although top overall draft pick Mario Williams has the tall task of making people forget that the team passed on Bush, the focal point of scrutiny for Kubiak's rookie season will be the performance of David Carr."

This is from NFL.com where they rank how well the 10 new HC's will do this season. As you can see, they believe Carr's performance will affect Kubiak's rookie season. I know most fans believe we are set at QB this fall, but that still remains to be seen. IMO, it's ironic that most posters believe that Carr's on field results were the only ones affected by Capers and company, yet-as Kubiak stresses himself--'how Carr goes, the team goes.' Let's hope that accountability or lack there of does not translate into 'Chapter 5' of Carr still looking for his 'promise land.'

http://nfl.com/news/story/9560415


Hey back off of me, I answered the question, the most pressing need we'll have going into next year will be the :fieldgoal You don't like it you can eat my:penguin: !! :shades: :stirpot:
 
Brandon420tx said:
Hey back off of me, I answered the question, the most pressing need we'll have going into next year will be the :fieldgoal You don't like it you can eat my:penguin: !! :shades: :stirpot:

You have a penguin?!
 
"My comment was a joke about how many threads turn into Carr only threads"

Unlike the countless threads that start off on one topic and then become a 'Carr only thread' unrelated to the original thread, this thread begins with "weakest position.' Certainly, Carr plays a position on this team, and I believe this is our 'weakest position.' The problem only arises when Carr:homer: come 'out of the wood work' to defend their 'boy done wrong' and simply do not respect another persons opinion on Carr if it does not agree with theirs. No other player on this team (probally any other board) has more excuses made for their performance on a daily basis than Carr. Let's hope and pray this sad situation ends this year...think of the bandwith we could save on this board if we could package all these excuses we all know by heart into an abbreviation or symbol, instead of listing each one every time...
 
Ha, QB is not one of our weakest positions. That is for sure. Carr has more talent than all of our safeties combined. We don't have one linebacker with the talent that Carr has.
 
Runner said:
Wait a minute - is there an issue because this hasn't turned into a Carr thread? Do we have a smiley that denotes "running from the room screaming"?


snrmaajt.gif
 
Back
Top