Htown34s
Waterboy
tulexan said:I think it is hilarious how you blindly follow his every move.
I think its hilarious how you blindly trash anyone who says something good about him.
Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
tulexan said:I think it is hilarious how you blindly follow his every move.
Coach C. said:They feel VY is the second coming of whoever they consider the best QB before young. he can lead any team at any level to the promise land and we should respect their view. No matter how assinine and foolish it is.
Coach C. said:VY will be good, but padding your stats on Kansas so you look like a good passer is pathetic.
Yeah, it took him all of, what...13 starts?MorKnolle said:Carson Palmer is finally living up to his hype.
I understand that. What I don't understand is how it's an illustration of how good you are by including the record of a that beat you. Had VT beaten Miami, then it would obviously be understandable because they would not only be undefeated (like Texas), but they'd also have a superior SOS. As it is, they got their butts kicked by the one really good team they played.MorKnolle said:I was comparing all of UT and VT's schedules, not just the teams they beat.
Total defense is based on yards allowed...not points. Although scoring defense is another statistical category. In the NFL (as well as college), they use yardarge to determine your defensive ranking.MorKnolle said:How is Kansas' defense ranked 5th nationally? Even before playing UT they were allowing 18.2 points per game which is no where near 5th nationally. The top few defenses are Miami, Virginia Tech, and Auburn
As opposed to all the tough defenses USC has played in the PAC-10.Coach C. said:Mork Mork Mork you continously bring the meat to these poor hungry UT HOMERS. They feel VY is the second coming of whoever they consider the best QB before young. he can lead any team at any level to the promise land and we should respect their view. No matter how assinine and foolish it is. Hell I think Winston will play better than Ferguson in the NFL. I doubt that Ferguson can keep his weight up and will suffer injuries due to that fact. But I like kids from the U with chips on their shoulder and mean streaks. i could be wrong also.
VY will be good, but padding your stats on Kansas so you look like a good passer is pathetic.
This should explain alot Huge...Huge said:Which school do you follow?
Coach C. said:I am an Aggie, but I think VY will be a good QB in this league comparable to Randall Cunningham. He will need 2 to 3 years in the league before he is a legitimate passing threat, but after he becomes one watch out if they put talent around him. If he goes to a place like Detroit or Baltimore he will be lights out in year 3.
xtruroyaltyx said:Texas will beat USC in the national championship......you heard it here first
MorKnolle said:Carson Palmer is finally living up to his hype.
Reggie was clutch this year...against BaylorHuge said:That would explain part of it. If only Vince had panned out as well as Reggie...
xtruroyaltyx said:Texas will beat USC in the national championship......you heard it here first
ok???? and???texplayer2 said:Last year Kansas lost 41-10, Baylor got beat 35-0, Colorado was beaten in Big 12 title game 42-3 by Oklahoma. These games seem real similar to Texas opponents this year? I think Jan. 4th could have a similar ring as well.![]()
Texas won at Ohio State, at night. No team had ever done that before. That's no easy task.texplayer2 said:Last year Kansas lost 41-10, Baylor got beat 35-0, Colorado was beaten in Big 12 title game 42-3 by Oklahoma. These games seem real similar to Texas opponents this year? I think Jan. 4th could have a similar ring as well.![]()
Agreextruroyaltyx said:It's only a two players on the whole team that cant be replaced DR & AJ....period
I hadn't found any stats for total yards given up, only points so that was what I was having to base the defensive rankings on. As for strength of schedule, that should include all the teams that you have played in there, not just who you've beaten. If it only included who you had beaten then losing to Miami or losing to Duke would have the same negligent effect on it, so including that shows the quality of opponent that they lost to.Huge said:Yeah, it took him all of, what...13 starts?
I understand that. What I don't understand is how it's an illustration of how good you are by including the record of a that beat you. Had VT beaten Miami, then it would obviously be understandable because they would not only be undefeated (like Texas), but they'd also have a superior SOS. As it is, they got their butts kicked by the one really good team they played.
Total defense is based on yards allowed...not points. Although scoring defense is another statistical category. In the NFL (as well as college), they use yardarge to determine your defensive ranking.
Kansas is now 20th in total defense. Before playing Texas, they were ranked 5th. That's what happens when you get dookie stomped by an offense like Texas'.
This is not to say Kansas has/had that great of defense (UCONN is ranked 7th right now but who believes they have the 7th best defense in the country?). But they're as good as the defenses that were mentioned previously.
As opposed to all the tough defenses USC has played in the PAC-10.![]()
Which school do you follow?
texplayer2 said:Last year Kansas lost 41-10, Baylor got beat 35-0, Colorado was beaten in Big 12 title game 42-3 by Oklahoma. These games seem real similar to Texas opponents this year? I think Jan. 4th could have a similar ring as well.![]()
I think scoring defense could also be used as a measure but it factors in all of the points. So if somebody returns a punt against VT, is that a reflection of their defense? I don't think it is but that's how it'd be reflected in the scoring statistics.MorKnolle said:I hadn't found any stats for total yards given up, only points so that was what I was having to base the defensive rankings on. As for strength of schedule, that should include all the teams that you have played in there, not just who you've beaten. If it only included who you had beaten then losing to Miami or losing to Duke would have the same negligent effect on it, so including that shows the quality of opponent that they lost to.
Huge said:I think scoring defense could also be used as a measure but it factors in all of the points. So if somebody returns a punt against VT, is that a reflection of their defense? I don't think it is but that's how it'd be reflected in the scoring statistics.
As for the SOS, fair enough. We don't see eye to eye on the issue but we're close. VT does have a little tougher SOS than Texas...but they also have a loss to go with it.
Again, we pretty much see eye to eye on this. I only brought up Kansas' ranking because it was previously mentioned by another poster that despite their records, NC State and Boston College were better than their records indicated because they have tough defenses. So when you look at their respective defensive rankings (scoring/total)...MorKnolle said:You're right on that, generally total yards given up is the top measure of a team's defense, but like I said I hadn't found any stats on that when I first made that post about Kansas' defense. Points allowed obviously can include points off of special teams or turnovers and not necessarily reflect on a defense's abilities, but both statistics should be considered together. I'm glad that other website was pointed out to see the rest of team defense stats because ESPN.com didn't have them.
1. The conversation about UT's SOS correlates to the level of talent Vince Young (topic subject) has played against.Coach C. said:What the Hell is this a conversation about UT SOS. Look UT is a good team damn can we get past this, I am so f-in tired of hearing about UT. They play in a weak Big 12 this year, but they are still winning and they will soon have one loss in 2007 to USC
tulexan said:Will Ferrell is a big USC guy so that should be interesting with Vince