Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍

TT NFL All time

Go for the O-line. It's easier than the RBs. Well, it was for me.

C - Mike Webster, Dermontti Dawson
G - Larry Allen, Bruce Matthews, Randall McDaniel, Will Shields
T - Anthony Munoz, Johnathan Ogden, Willie Roaf, Walter Jones

QB - Staubach, Montana, Brady
RB - Brown, Payton, Smith
 
C - Mike Webster, Dermontti Dawson
G - Larry Allen, Bruce Matthews, Randall McDaniel, Will Shields
T - Anthony Munoz, Johnathan Ogden, Willie Roaf, Walter Jones

QB - Staubach, Montana, Brady
RB - Brown, Payton, Smith


I would hate to leave Otto and Munchak off any list like this
 
I would hate to leave Otto and Munchak off any list like this

Understood, but there's going to be fantastic people left off. I was tempted but left off a guy much like Otto that I think is incredibly underrated - Mark Stepnoski.
 
I would hate to leave Otto and Munchak off any list like this

Understood, but there's going to be fantastic people left off. I was tempted but left off a guy much like Otto that I think is incredibly underrated - Mark Stepnoski.

Jim Parker was another guy I had a hard time leaving off this list. Protected Johnny U's blind side for a decade.
 
Yeah, for me too. But I couldn't drop Barry and you made me move Jim Brown to RB...
maybe I could move O.J. for Earl...

To me, there is only one RB that was as great as Earl (in my lifetime), but in a completely different way, and that's Barry Sanders. Other RBs had longer careers, and therefore more stats, but in terms of greatness while they were in their prime, Earl is second to none. His star burned out faster, but it also burned a lot brighter.
 
To me, there is only one RB that was as great as Earl (in my lifetime), but in a completely different way, and that's Barry Sanders. Other RBs had longer careers, and therefore more stats, but in terms of greatness while they were in their prime, Earl is second to none. His star burned out faster, but it also burned a lot brighter.

Yeah, I agree. Earl, Barry Sanders, and Walter Payton would be my choices at RB. No disrespect at all toward the great Jim Brown, but if were honest about the analysis, the talent he played against is nowhere near what it would become in the '70's and beyond.

At WR, I'd go Jerry Rice, Randy Moss, and then a toss up at 3, I'll just pick the playmaker, Michael Irvin. I'm not a Cowboys fan, but dude was a beast and just dominated his opponents.
 
Yeah, I agree. Earl, Barry Sanders, and Walter Payton would be my choices at RB. No disrespect at all toward the great Jim Brown, but if were honest about the analysis, the talent he played against is nowhere near what it would become in the '70's and beyond.

I can't go with Barry because he was a dancer and as likely to have a negative play as a positive.

The reason I like both Emmitt and Walter is not accumulation of stats, it's that they were the consummate complete RBs from blocking to catching on top of take the team on their shoulders and grind out a game.

Emmitt v. Giants for #1 seed, with a separated shoulder

32 att. 168 yds, 10 rec. 61 yds v. #1 D.
 
Yeah, I agree. Earl, Barry Sanders, and Walter Payton would be my choices at RB. No disrespect at all toward the great Jim Brown, but if were honest about the analysis, the talent he played against is nowhere near what it would become in the '70's and beyond.

At WR, I'd go Jerry Rice, Randy Moss, and then a toss up at 3, I'll just pick the playmaker, Michael Irvin. I'm not a Cowboys fan, but dude was a beast and just dominated his opponents.

Is there really better talent or just better hyped talent? I think Jim Brown had the speed and strength and durability to play in ANY era and in ANY system. Did I mention that Jim Brown never missed a single game? He led the league in rushing 8 of his 9 years in the league back when running the ball was the lion's share of everyone's offense and defenses were geared to stop the run.

So since you wouldn't let me cheat and put Jim Brown at FB, I'm going with four RBs.
- Jim Brown (see above)
- Walter Payton (dude was the Bears' offense)
- Eric Dickerson (size, power, track speed, avg'd 1200 yds/season over 11 yrs)
- Barry Sanders (like Payton, he had NO help on offense; and dancer or not, he avg'd 1500+ yds/season with the freakin' Lions!)

But if I can have a FB it's Czonka.
 
Barry Sanders (like Payton, he had NO help on offense; and dancer or not, he avg'd 1500+ yds/season with the freakin' Lions!)

Herman Moore WR - 4 pro bowls, 3 all pro
Lomas Brown LT - 7 pro bowls, 1 all pro
Kevin Glover C - 3 pro bowls

Not exactly NO help. Heck in 1995 they had the #2 passing attack.

Emmitt and Barry each led the league in rushing 4 times. Walter 1 time.

I look at it this way - if you had to march the length of the field on one drive, who would you pick, Emmitt or Barry? To me that's a no brainer for Emmitt.

Is there really better talent or just better hyped talent? I think Jim Brown had the speed and strength and durability to play in ANY era and in ANY system. Did I mention that Jim Brown never missed a single game? He led the league in rushing 8 of his 9 years in the league back when running the ball was the lion's share of everyone's offense and defenses were geared to stop the run.

I think there is definitely better talent later BUT watching Brown and given his size/speed combo there is no doubt in my mind he would have been successful in modern football.
 
Last edited:
I think there is definitely better talent later BUT watching Brown and given his size/speed combo there is no doubt in my mind he would have been successful in modern football.

And he could run like that AND drop grenades down vents....:jogger:
 
I can't go with Barry because he was a dancer and as likely to have a negative play as a positive.

The reason I like both Emmitt and Walter is not accumulation of stats, it's that they were the consummate complete RBs from blocking to catching on top of take the team on their shoulders and grind out a game.

Emmitt v. Giants for #1 seed, with a separated shoulder

32 att. 168 yds, 10 rec. 61 yds v. #1 D.

I'd have no problem trading Emmitt for Barry. I have tremendous respect for both of them.

Barry was a dancer, but I've always thought a lot of his career was based on being the only good player on crappy teams. Put Barry on those Cowboys teams and he'd have three rings.

Is there really better talent or just better hyped talent? I think Jim Brown had the speed and strength and durability to play in ANY era and in ANY system. Did I mention that Jim Brown never missed a single game? He led the league in rushing 8 of his 9 years in the league back when running the ball was the lion's share of everyone's offense and defenses were geared to stop the run.

So since you wouldn't let me cheat and put Jim Brown at FB, I'm going with four RBs.
- Jim Brown (see above)
- Walter Payton (dude was the Bears' offense)
- Eric Dickerson (size, power, track speed, avg'd 1200 yds/season over 11 yrs)
- Barry Sanders (like Payton, he had NO help on offense; and dancer or not, he avg'd 1500+ yds/season with the freakin' Lions!)

But if I can have a FB it's Czonka.

I respect Jim Brown, but he's like Unitas, before my time. Everything I know about both of them are based on opinions and old footage, and I do not have the day-to-day and season-to-season experience of really knowing either of them during their heydays.

That said, I'm sure both Brown and Unitas have the type of talents that they would still be great in any era.

However, Brown played in a watered-down era of football. Let's be honest here: when Brown played, much of the league was still discriminating against black players. That alone means that many of the potentially great athletes of the day were not even allowed to be in the league. The league was just starting integration when Brown started playing, but it's not like the floodgates were opened when he started.

I don't want to hold era against Jim Brown, as many folks still consider him the great RB of all time. I cannot go that far considering who has played since him, so I just go off of my own experiences and those that I actually saw as a football fan.
 
I respect Jim Brown, but he's like Unitas, before my time. Everything I know about both of them are based on opinions and old footage, and I do not have the day-to-day and season-to-season experience of really knowing either of them during their heydays.

.

That's why I suggested the cutoff date. Few if any saw any of the old greats play in person, and there was practically no television coverage. What's known about them is hearsay and a few old highlight clips. It's silly to compare a known with a relative unknown in most anything.

It's hard enough comparing Sanders to Smith to Cambell and Dickerson, much less to someone like Brown. Like comparing Brady and Slingin' Sammy Baugh... doesn't make much sense to me
 
That's why I suggested the cutoff date. Few if any saw any of the old greats play in person, and there was practically no television coverage. What's known about them is hearsay and a few old highlight clips. It's silly to compare a known with a relative unknown in most anything.

It's hard enough comparing Sanders to Smith to Cambell and Dickerson, much less to someone like Brown. Like comparing Brady and Slingin' Sammy Baugh... doesn't make much sense to me

I agree and would have no problem limiting the list to the "modern Super Bowl era" of the past 50 years.
 
My thing with Barry is he was always a threat for the big run. Might of had some negative runs, but just that threat alone kept defenses At bay
 
Herman Moore WR - 4 pro bowls, 3 all pro
Lomas Brown LT - 7 pro bowls, 1 all pro
Kevin Glover C - 3 pro bowls

Not exactly NO help. Heck in 1995 they had the #2 passing attack.

Emmitt and Barry each led the league in rushing 4 times. Walter 1 time.

I look at it this way - if you had to march the length of the field on one drive, who would you pick, Emmitt or Barry? To me that's a no brainer for Emmitt.



I think there is definitely better talent later BUT watching Brown and given his size/speed combo there is no doubt in my mind he would have been successful in modern football.

I'd want Barry. He could run the whole field in one play
 
1000 to 1 for the flashy chance instead of 2 to 1 for dependable.

It's a no brainer.

I loved watching Barry... flashy was cool

I was a Walt Garrison/Earl Cambell guy tho

Give me a sure 3.5-4 yards every time
 
1000 to 1 for the flashy chance instead of 2 to 1 for dependable.

It's a no brainer.

Not to me.
And I have to wonder if Emmett would have been as successful as Barry Sanders if Emmett had to run behind those mediocre Lions O-line instead of behind Larry Allen, Nate Newton, Mark Stepnoski, Mark Tuinei, etc. I'm pretty sure Barry would have done as well behind those hawgs the Cowboys had; very little of that "dancing" would have been necessary.
 
To me, there is only one RB that was as great as Earl (in my lifetime), but in a completely different way, and that's Barry Sanders. Other RBs had longer careers, and therefore more stats, but in terms of greatness while they were in their prime, Earl is second to none. His star burned out faster, but it also burned a lot brighter.

I can't think of anybody I have less objectivity about than Earl Campbell. He graduated from my parents Alma Mater, Tyler John Tyler. I watched him in his High School Championship Game where he was a man playing against boys.

I watched him beat the Cougars as a hated Longhorn. He was drafted by My Oilers. He was coached by a neighbor named Bum Phillips, and I'm still friends with his ex son-in-law, Floyd.

Nope. There's no way I could ever be objective about Earl and no way I could ever think any running back was ever better at his best.
 
Back
Top