infantrycak
Hall of Fame
Well for now:
QB - Staubach, Montana, Brady
RB - Brown, Payton, Smith
QB - Staubach, Montana, Brady
RB - Brown, Payton, Smith
Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
Well for now:
QB - Staubach, Montana, Brady
RB - Brown, Payton, Smith
Go for the O-line. It's easier than the RBs. Well, it was for me.
C - Mike Webster, Dermontti Dawson
G - Larry Allen, Bruce Matthews, Randall McDaniel, Will Shields
T - Anthony Munoz, Johnathan Ogden, Willie Roaf, Walter Jones
QB - Staubach, Montana, Brady
RB - Brown, Payton, Smith
I would hate to leave Otto and Munchak off any list like this
I would hate to leave Otto and Munchak off any list like this
Understood, but there's going to be fantastic people left off. I was tempted but left off a guy much like Otto that I think is incredibly underrated - Mark Stepnoski.
Yeah, for me too. But I couldn't drop Barry and you made me move Jim Brown to RB...
maybe I could move O.J. for Earl...
To me, there is only one RB that was as great as Earl (in my lifetime), but in a completely different way, and that's Barry Sanders. Other RBs had longer careers, and therefore more stats, but in terms of greatness while they were in their prime, Earl is second to none. His star burned out faster, but it also burned a lot brighter.
Yeah, I agree. Earl, Barry Sanders, and Walter Payton would be my choices at RB. No disrespect at all toward the great Jim Brown, but if were honest about the analysis, the talent he played against is nowhere near what it would become in the '70's and beyond.
Yeah, I agree. Earl, Barry Sanders, and Walter Payton would be my choices at RB. No disrespect at all toward the great Jim Brown, but if were honest about the analysis, the talent he played against is nowhere near what it would become in the '70's and beyond.
At WR, I'd go Jerry Rice, Randy Moss, and then a toss up at 3, I'll just pick the playmaker, Michael Irvin. I'm not a Cowboys fan, but dude was a beast and just dominated his opponents.
Barry Sanders (like Payton, he had NO help on offense; and dancer or not, he avg'd 1500+ yds/season with the freakin' Lions!)
Is there really better talent or just better hyped talent? I think Jim Brown had the speed and strength and durability to play in ANY era and in ANY system. Did I mention that Jim Brown never missed a single game? He led the league in rushing 8 of his 9 years in the league back when running the ball was the lion's share of everyone's offense and defenses were geared to stop the run.
I think there is definitely better talent later BUT watching Brown and given his size/speed combo there is no doubt in my mind he would have been successful in modern football.
I can't go with Barry because he was a dancer and as likely to have a negative play as a positive.
The reason I like both Emmitt and Walter is not accumulation of stats, it's that they were the consummate complete RBs from blocking to catching on top of take the team on their shoulders and grind out a game.
Emmitt v. Giants for #1 seed, with a separated shoulder
32 att. 168 yds, 10 rec. 61 yds v. #1 D.
Is there really better talent or just better hyped talent? I think Jim Brown had the speed and strength and durability to play in ANY era and in ANY system. Did I mention that Jim Brown never missed a single game? He led the league in rushing 8 of his 9 years in the league back when running the ball was the lion's share of everyone's offense and defenses were geared to stop the run.
So since you wouldn't let me cheat and put Jim Brown at FB, I'm going with four RBs.
- Jim Brown (see above)
- Walter Payton (dude was the Bears' offense)
- Eric Dickerson (size, power, track speed, avg'd 1200 yds/season over 11 yrs)
- Barry Sanders (like Payton, he had NO help on offense; and dancer or not, he avg'd 1500+ yds/season with the freakin' Lions!)
But if I can have a FB it's Czonka.
I respect Jim Brown, but he's like Unitas, before my time. Everything I know about both of them are based on opinions and old footage, and I do not have the day-to-day and season-to-season experience of really knowing either of them during their heydays.
.
That's why I suggested the cutoff date. Few if any saw any of the old greats play in person, and there was practically no television coverage. What's known about them is hearsay and a few old highlight clips. It's silly to compare a known with a relative unknown in most anything.
It's hard enough comparing Sanders to Smith to Cambell and Dickerson, much less to someone like Brown. Like comparing Brady and Slingin' Sammy Baugh... doesn't make much sense to me
Herman Moore WR - 4 pro bowls, 3 all pro
Lomas Brown LT - 7 pro bowls, 1 all pro
Kevin Glover C - 3 pro bowls
Not exactly NO help. Heck in 1995 they had the #2 passing attack.
Emmitt and Barry each led the league in rushing 4 times. Walter 1 time.
I look at it this way - if you had to march the length of the field on one drive, who would you pick, Emmitt or Barry? To me that's a no brainer for Emmitt.
I think there is definitely better talent later BUT watching Brown and given his size/speed combo there is no doubt in my mind he would have been successful in modern football.
I'd want Barry. He could run the whole field in one play
1000 to 1 for the flashy chance instead of 2 to 1 for dependable.
It's a no brainer.
1000 to 1 for the flashy chance instead of 2 to 1 for dependable.
It's a no brainer.
To me, there is only one RB that was as great as Earl (in my lifetime), but in a completely different way, and that's Barry Sanders. Other RBs had longer careers, and therefore more stats, but in terms of greatness while they were in their prime, Earl is second to none. His star burned out faster, but it also burned a lot brighter.