Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
Dime said:We need to address the O-line. How many times do we need to say it. Carr has been screaming for one, and he had another huge year of sacks.
NO BUSH!
NO YOUNG!
NO Lienhart!
We need more picks and less cap holding players. We are already cap heavy for average players.
Dime said:We need to address the O-line. How many times do we need to say it. Carr has been screaming for one, and he had another huge year of sacks.
NO BUSH!
NO YOUNG!
NO Lienhart!
We need more picks and less cap holding players. We are already cap heavy for average players.
Dime said:We need to address the O-line. How many times do we need to say it. Carr has been screaming for one, and he had another huge year of sacks.
NO BUSH!
NO YOUNG!
NO Lienhart!
We need more picks and less cap holding players. We are already cap heavy for average players.
disturbedtexansfan513 said:Who is this Lienhart you speak of? Anyways, you can address the o-line and get bush or young or this Lienhart guy. You can get a top 5 offensive lineman in the 2nd round.
FILO_girl said:I have been in agreement with this philosophy. But we are drowned out by the Prospect of the Week buzz. We are the minority.![]()
TexanSam said:It seems that many of you all think that the draft is our only option to improve this team. There are 2 months of free agency between the Super Bowl and the draft. We can sign a good offensive lineman. We can find a good defensive end. The draft isn't the only way to rebuild a team.
TexanSam said:It seems that many of you all think that the draft is our only option to improve this team. There are 2 months of free agency between the Super Bowl and the draft. We can sign a good offensive lineman. We can find a good defensive end. The draft isn't the only way to rebuild a team.
Dime said:Less you forget that many teams need additional good O-line personel. The only reason a good o-lineman ends up in FA is because he cost to much or to free cap. We already are not having cap issues, but have over-paid several positions where we can run into cap trouble real quick if we arent not paying attention, and cant afford to many of those FA O-line.
TexansTrueFan said:and u think 1 OL guy is gonna fix all our problems we need atleast 2 MAYBE IF POSSIBLE 3. Pitts is good and well thats about it..........
Hervoyel said:Trade down is definitely an option. I would not come unglued if the Texans traded down. I personally wouldn't do it if I was making the call but that's just me. I'd take Bush in the first.
Just a question Dime. How many members of the offensive line would you replace this offseason? I don't need a big scenario or anything, I just want a number. 2? 3? Just asking.
Dime said:We need to address the O-line. How many times do we need to say it. Carr has been screaming for one, and he had another huge year of sacks.
NO BUSH!
NO YOUNG!
NO Lienhart!
We need more picks and less cap holding players. We are already cap heavy for average players.
Goldeagle said:Amen... Kubiak does not need a "STAR" running back who did not show up in the game of his life.
michaelm said:Denver's system is also succesful without any star OL...
Only one guy drafted above the 4th round starts for them. One of them was undrafted and signed with Denver as a free agent, and he's the starting LT.
You do not address a NEED with a #1 overall pick. It's BPA on your war room board.Dime said:I am just getting tired of people who talk Bush and Young like they are already on the team when EVERYONE in the league knows what are NEEDS are. Our NEEDS are NOT QB or RB! We need many positions, and the first on the list is Online needs. Others deal will Defense from DT/DE for replacements to ILB. Many others, but not RB or QB.
Big B Texan Fan said:You do not address a NEED with a #1 overall pick. It's BPA on your war room board.
Napa Auto Parts said:the Thing about wanting to draft and O-line all of you say Kubiak is a magician and he is gonna fix all our offensive problems i dont remember the last time denver drafted and O-line in the 1st round. it just dumb how some people contradict their own post. hell lets not take the best player with the most upside V.Young we have carr so what if he has failed so far personally i wouldnt mind the trade down but Vince is special and im going to hate it when i see him lead a team other than the texans to a super bowl.![]()
Napa Auto Parts said:the Thing about wanting to draft and O-line all of you say Kubiak is a magician and he is gonna fix all our offensive problems i dont remember the last time denver drafted and O-line in the 1st round. it just dumb how some people contradict their own post. hell lets not take the best player with the most upside V.Young we have carr so what if he has failed so far personally i wouldnt mind the trade down but Vince is special and im going to hate it when i see him lead a team other than the texans to a super bowl.![]()
TexansTrueFan said:ok i'm sorry you think he can come in and make all our OL suddenly pro bowlers ???have u seen these guys play ?
Big B Texan Fan said:You do not address a NEED with a #1 overall pick. It's BPA on your war room board.
TexansTrueFan said:hmm 1843, hell i dunno so u saying they could of made victor riley a good OL player ? ok well lets just see if they do what ur suggesting ? i gurantee u casserly/mcnair wont allow that.
Napa Auto Parts said:No im suggesting they could made Victor Riley a Pro Bowler![]()
Napa Auto Parts said:Yes and i ask when was the last time they wasted a 1st rounder on and O-line Player?
Dime said:If I can get a 1st round next year, a additional 2nd and 3rd this year for a top 10 trade down pick. Then we can fulfill those NEEDS with those extra picks..
THAT'S WHAT I SAID, DID YOU EVEN READ MY POST.Dime said:Dude... you need to think about that.. you dont need to address a 'need' until later rounds.. I dont agree at all with you.
Big B Texan Fan said:THAT'S WHAT I SAID, DID YOU EVEN READ MY POST.
IT SAID BPA WITH #1 PICK, NEEDS LATER BASICALLY.
Big B Texan Fan said:THAT'S WHAT I SAID, DID YOU EVEN READ MY POST.
IT SAID BPA WITH #1 PICK, NEEDS LATER BASICALLY.
OK, that makes a little more sense but you did not mention trading down in your response to so i did not catch it.Dime said:I think it is you who need to read. We wont have those extra picks without trading down. Trading down means we use our mid - first on a need like DE/ILB/or even Oline! Then we have extra pics for needs too.
Big B Texan Fan said:OK, that makes a little more sense but you did not mention trading down in your response to so i did not catch it.
I don't like trading pix cuz you turn 1 potential bust into many.
And casserly trading expertise for us with day one pix have all nearly blown up in our face or burned holes in his pockets and get used pre-maturely
The raiders rd 2 that we had the season after the crumbled the season after they went to the SB, we burned that one on Hollings.
Moved up to get Babin and gave up way too much to get him. A 2nd, 3rd, 4th, an swapped pix in the 5th with a division rival.
One of the pix we used to get P-Buch was the 3rd rd'r we bamboozled out of the cowboys for henson. Al returnred the favor to Jerry. Probably got a fruit basket out of it.
Let me see what else, oh, the trade down to get TJ and the Saints 3rd rd'r. We'll see on that but don't be surprised if we trade back in the early 2nd rd by giving a team both of those 3rd's. Coud be for a marquee TE that slips.
Sorry to ramble, just don't like CC's trax record with day 1 trades. He's gotten an F so far.
Dime said:We need to address the O-line. How many times do we need to say it. Carr has been screaming for one, and he had another huge year of sacks.
NO BUSH!
NO YOUNG!
NO Lienhart!
We need more picks and less cap holding players. We are already cap heavy for average players.
Dime said:We need to address the O-line. How many times do we need to say it. Carr has been screaming for one, and he had another huge year of sacks.
NO BUSH!
NO YOUNG!
NO Lienhart!
We need more picks and less cap holding players. We are already cap heavy for average players.
michaelm said:Denver's system is also succesful without any star OL...
Only one guy drafted above the 4th round starts for them. One of them was undrafted and signed with Denver as a free agent, and he's the starting LT.
aj. said:There's also a lot of talk in this thread about trading down and picking up several more draft picks. The Texans already have eight picks and there's this thing called the rookie pool that you can't exceed for purposes of the salary cap, plus the fact that you can only prorate new contracts 4 years now since there's no CBA extension. This means that rookie contracts have to be loaded up more and more in their second year because their first year base salaries are set and you can't prorate bonus out five or six years any more. Meaning, if you load up on low first rounders and second or even third rounders you can get yourself in a pickle pretty quickly salary cap wise by taking on too many of these higher round rookie contracts.
Big B Texan Fan said:OK, that makes a little more sense but you did not mention trading down in your response to so i did not catch it.
I don't like trading pix cuz you turn 1 potential bust into many.
And casserly trading expertise for us with day one pix have all nearly blown up in our face or burned holes in his pockets and get used pre-maturely
The raiders rd 2 that we had the season after the crumbled the season after they went to the SB, we burned that one on Hollings.
Moved up to get Babin and gave up way too much to get him. A 2nd, 3rd, 4th, an swapped pix in the 5th with a division rival.
One of the pix we used to get P-Buch was the 3rd rd'r we bamboozled out of the cowboys for henson. Al returnred the favor to Jerry. Probably got a fruit basket out of it.
Let me see what else, oh, the trade down to get TJ and the Saints 3rd rd'r. We'll see on that but don't be surprised if we trade back in the early 2nd rd by giving a team both of those 3rd's. Coud be for a marquee TE that slips.
Sorry to ramble, just don't like CC's trax record with day 1 trades. He's gotten an F so far.