Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
I love it, but I doubt 1.25 is enough. Wilson is under contract through with club option through 2026. But his talent would make Nico and him 1A and 1BFWIW, I made a comment on FB that they should trade 1.25 for Garrett Wilson, and it was liked by none other than Derek Stingley Jr.
Bring Wilson in. Him and CJ would have immediate chemistry, and you know what your getting. He would be a dynamic second option to pair with Nico, and he’s been durable so far. And he’s still an ascending player.
This would qualify as a massive move. But just pick 1.25 wont get it done. I’d look at the A.J. Brown trade as a starting point. Both ascending WRs with similar production 3 years into their career.FWIW, I made a comment on FB that they should trade 1.25 for Garrett Wilson, and it was liked by none other than Derek Stingley Jr.
Bring Wilson in. Him and CJ would have immediate chemistry, and you know what your getting. He would be a dynamic second option to pair with Nico, and he’s been durable so far. And he’s still an ascending player.
It would be interesting.Obviously if Wilson makes a big stink about wanting to leave it opens up the possibility. But I think the Jets will keep him. New coach/gm do not want to start off their tenure letting go of one of their best players.
I’d at least have to wait for next season’s player Madden ratings to get released before authorizing my GM to trade off Wilson.If I don't have my QB, I'm not going to be hanging on to All star WRs.
I don't think Wison would be keen on signing an extension without the Jets QB position being settled. But the Jets will guarantee the 5th year option this offseason. Combine that with 2 years of the franchise tag, and Wilson would be under control for 4 years. Bottom line, the Jets would get full value for Wilson, likely 2 1sts.If I don't have my QB, I'm not going to be hanging on to All star WRs.
Signed,I’d at least have to wait for next season’s player Madden ratings to get released before authorizing my GM to trade off Wilson.
Tee will cost far more in cap space than Wilson will next yr and the Texans dont have much cap space. I would probably give up a 2025 1st and 4th, plus a 2026 3rd for Wilson. I could be talked into giving up a 2026 2nd instead of a 3rd.I’m out if it’s 2 firsts. Money is a huge obstacle, but if Nick can make it work…Tee Higgins won’t cost any draft capital. I believe he is an impending FA. Talent wise, I have him a shade behind Wilson but it’s close and he would also be a great compliment to Nico. Different body types amd skill sets. Tee is much closer to Nico in type and style but either would be a major upgrade and insurance against the inevitable 4-6 games Nico will miss.
Tee will cost far more in cap space than Wilson will next yr and the Texans dont have much cap space. I would probably give up a 2025 1st and 4th, plus a 2026 3rd for Wilson. I could be talked into giving up a 2026 2nd instead of a 3rd.
I agree, when they extend C.J. they're going to need guys on rookie deals. I'm all for bringing in a mid level vet though.I wouldn't give up any current and future draft capital for any WR on the market. I'd go through the draft, we already have key pieces in place
I would try to sign a young cheap guy with speed like Bo Melton or Tylan Wallace in FA. If I wasn't going to draft a WR I probably would sign both of them. They would be upgrades and fit in the budget.I wouldn't give up any current and future draft capital for any WR on the market. I'd go through the draft, we already have key pieces in place
Or hang on to Wilson and go for a quarterback in 2026 draft perhaps Manning? Jets should cut Davonte Adams and add 29 million dollars to the cap space but that leaves them with only Garrett Wilson. Adam savings could go to Wilson. Start building your team around him and your new quarterback of the future in 2026 by drafting WRs this deep draft.It would be interesting.
If you took that job, what kind of expectation would you be promoting to that franchise? I'd be telling them, yes we can turn this thing around, I don't think it will take long, but it's not going to be over the next two years. Let Wilson go, get some draft capital & let's get to work.
If I don't have my QB, I'm not going to be hanging on to All star WRs.
I do not see the 5th year option being an issue as an extension in mid to late 2025 would make that part of the new deal. For example, you would have 2025 plus the 5-year extension using 25 thru next four to prorate signing bonus and the final year not GTD.O
That was the exact deal I mentioned I'd put on the table. First and fourth this year, and a 3rd next year. Like you...if it was the difference between a yes or a no...I'd go as high as a second next year. I would not go with two #1 picks, though. I want that guy and his 5th year.
Here's the thing. I wouldn't give up that much draft capital without an extension in place as part of the package. I'd want him here at least 4-5 years during his prime.
So, ya this year he might be less than Tee, but longer term, both will cost big money. Tee is more immediate so I get it, but long term...both will want $$$$
While I understand that thought, with a trade you would know what you're getting and in the draft you do not know who's going to be available when you get to your selection each round.I wouldn't give up any current and future draft capital for any WR on the market. I'd go through the draft, we already have key pieces in place
I would even take agreeable guards.While I understand that thought, with a trade you would know what you're getting and in the draft you do not know who's going to be available when you get to your selection each round.
A trade of this significance also saves you a draft pick that might be used elsewhere. The cap hit also would not impact you going after other significant free agents such as offensive guards.
There are plenty of teams that would give up two 1sts for Wilson. Hill and Adams were traded for a 1st and 2nd in the same draft (plus 2nd day picks in the case of Hill). Both were older than Wilson (25), with Hill at 28, and Adams 30. Wilson has averaged nearly 1100 yards over all 3 seasons in the league. With less than stellar QB play and he's never missed a game. I think teams drafting near the end of the round (Chiefs, Ravens) would love to get a WR1 locked up thru his prime for that price.Tee will cost far more in cap space than Wilson will next yr and the Texans dont have much cap space. I would probably give up a 2025 1st and 4th, plus a 2026 3rd for Wilson. I could be talked into giving up a 2026 2nd instead of a 3rd.
I might do the two 1sts deal, but you're tying up a lot of money and draft capital in the WR corps. I'm not sure that's a smart thing to do.There are plenty of teams that would give up two 1sts for Wilson. Hill and Adams were traded for a 1st and 2nd in the same draft (plus 2nd day picks in the case of Hill). Both were older than Wilson (25), with Hill at 28, and Adams 30. Wilson has averaged nearly 1100 yards over all 3 seasons in the league. With less than stellar QB play and he's never missed a game. I think teams drafting near the end of the round (Chiefs, Ravens) would love to get a WR1 locked up thru his prime for that price.
I don't know what the plan might be. I do know that the Texans went from a bevy of WRs to Nico in less than a season. Trade, free agency, draft, some combination thereof. Have to do something.I might do the two 1sts deal, but you're tying up a lot of money and draft capital in the WR corps. I'm not sure that's a smart thing to do.
Collin’s 3rd round, Diggs 5th round, Tyreek 5th round, Devante 2nd round, AJ Brown 2nd. I realize that we can all put up a list that would support a particular angle. The WR Position is so volatile with later round hits and 1st round flops. Additionally, the higher injury rate at WR (which we are well aware of) compared to other positions is a real concern. A great QB can make a WR better just like a great offensive line can make a QB better. I’d rather invest a #1 pick in the more predictable offensive line than at WR this year. I don’t want to trade away a 1st for a WR.
I'm going young and cheap in FA. Bo Melton and, or Tylan Wallace. Good young WR's that can separate.If I am the Texans, here's my thought process. The only "for sure" is Nico. Everything else is up for change -
For the current guys:
1) Dell is a non-factor in 2025. Pretend he retired. If by miracle, he returns at any point in 25..it's gravy.
2) Current FA's - Diggs and Woods: I like Woods in so far as the reliable old man, but I think we can go younger and maybe get a return specialist/gunner type to replace him. I am not 100% opposed to a 1 year deal on the cheap. As far as Diggs. It comes down to role/money. I see him as moving into a more souped-up version of Woods. Basically a reliable chain mover who can still get open, so he needs to be paid like it. But he is no longer a game changer, and he is coming off of ACL so there is some uncertainty there. Unless he's ready to sign for something reasonable, let him test the market. As of now, my money is on neither returning, but I'm open minded.
3) The rest - Metchie, X, and anyone else...let them compete for spots but if there's a better guy...move on.
For new guys:
1) We need to draft at least one WR with big upside in the top three rounds. I wouldn't mind adding a guy who competes as an ST ace/return specialist on day 3. Sometimes, that can be a corner or RB as well.
2) FA OR trade: We need at least one WR with experience. How much of a splash largely depends on Diggs. For the moment, let's assume he's not back. I'm going after the big fish first...Tee Higgins, Garrett Wilson, and I will include Chris Godwin and Hollywood Brown in that group as well. Both are a step down...but still a nice option alongside Nico. The last idea would be Mike Williams...or yes even Hopkins. They may still have a bit in the tank. There may be other trade candidates that come along as well.
3) Lastly, bring in some competition for those last depth spots, whether it's UDFA guys, journeymen, etc.
Damn didn't know about the cap hit.. That changes things.
That's a misrepresentation as I understand. Spotrac is best breakdown imo.Damn didn't know about the cap hit.. That changes things.
Depends on the player.Collin’s 3rd round, Diggs 5th round, Tyreek 5th round, Devante 2nd round, AJ Brown 2nd. I realize that we can all put up a list that would support a particular angle. The WR Position is so volatile with later round hits and 1st round flops. Additionally, the higher injury rate at WR (which we are well aware of) compared to other positions is a real concern. A great QB can make a WR better just like a great offensive line can make a QB better. I’d rather invest a #1 pick in the more predictable offensive line than at WR this year. I don’t want to trade away a 1st for a WR.
Under no circumstance should Diggs return. IMO.
His age, ACL injury, along with signs that his burst was already starting to fade are my reasons. I’d accept the full cap hit for now, but look for savings through extensions or restructures with other players who are part of the long-term plan. The cap is always manageable, but it has to be done wisely. I think I remember Caserio mentioning that he evaluates things in 3-year windows, which is fine as long as the return on those decisions is strong. I haven’t looked at the extensions he’s done yet, so I can’t fully assess them.Is it because of the $$$ involved, the injury, or something else? Because I've heard it may be cheaper to retain Diggs than let him walk?
Ok where's the break down?
Click on the “ Show more”.Ok where's the break down?
I did that the next screen at the very top had the title of breaking down the contract. Cannot go any further than that.Click on the “ Show more”.
From the link there is another link:I did that the next screen at the very top had the title of breaking down the contract. Cannot go any further than that.
Thanks. A good read. I don't want WR FA but Diggs I can accept. I want Golden and Restrepo; Bech and Harris would be four plus Nico. Harold Fannin as TE. And unlike the author, I am okay with these wide receivers starting. They have to be better than what we ended up with last year.From the link there is another link:
https://www.houstonstressans.com/po...ress-their-wide-receiver-needs-this-offseason
Savion Williams could easily fit in the Tank/Diggs role. He's a big guy that's a threat to score anytime he's got the ball in his hands. You can make things work with a guy with that kind of talent. He's a good blocker too. I dont get why this guy is going top end when there are plenty of cheap upgrade WR's out there. Hodge is a guy that is very underrated.Thanks. A good read. I don't want WR FA but Diggs I can accept. I want Golden and Restrepo; Bech and Harris would be four plus Nico. Harold Fannin as TE. And unlike the author, I am okay with these wide receivers starting. They have to be better than what we ended up with last year.
Diggs is going to be a free agent whether we extend him by the 17th or not so that pressure is off. I think he wants to be here and I think Caserio if he can work out the right deal, will bring him back.
Does Williams have blazing speed? We need speed and more speed.Savion Williams could easily fit in the Tank/Diggs role. He's a big guy that's a threat to score anytime he's got the ball in his hands. You can make things work with a guy with that kind of talent. He's a good blocker too. I dont get why this guy is going top end when there are plenty of cheap upgrade WR's out there. Hodge is a guy that is very underrated.
He's more in the Nico line of a WR. Big physical dude that runs in the 4.4's and is hard to tackle. Learning an NFL offense is the only thing that will hold him back.Does Williams have blazing speed? We need speed and more speed.
Gotta, personally I want someone like Golden who is a speedster ( track speed). Youngster got great hands and his route running is pretty good as well.He's more in the Nico line of a WR. Big physical dude that runs in the 4.4's and is hard to tackle. Learning an NFL offense is the only thing that will hold him back.
From the link there is another link:
https://www.houstonstressans.com/po...ress-their-wide-receiver-needs-this-offseason
Of course. There could be an exception.Depends on the player.
Couldn't get to it from my phone. Made it happen on the trusty laptop. Here's the Diggs contract part.Goes to a GoDaddy broken link
The Stefon Diggs Dilemma: A Key Decision Before February 17th
One of the most critical decisions Houston must make is whether to re-sign Stefon Diggs before February 17th.
What Happens on February 17th?
If the Texans re-sign Diggs before February 17th, they can restructure his $16.6 million dead cap charge, spreading it across future years.
If Diggs is not re-signed by this date, the entire $16.6 million in dead cap will hit the 2025 salary cap, limiting their ability to make additional moves.
At that point, Diggs would officially test the free agent market, but Houston could still re-sign him afterward. However, doing so would create a challenging cap situation:
The Texans would still carry the $16.6 million dead cap hit in 2025 with no ability to spread it out.
A new Diggs contract would add additional cap costs this season rather than being structured in a more team-friendly way.
The combined cap impact (dead cap + new contract) would likely exceed $20M in 2025.
While Houston is incentivized to get a deal done before the deadline, Diggs is financially incentivized to test the market. The Texans may still try to re-sign him afterward, but at that point, they may have more sensible options available in free agency or through trade.
One possible scenario to watch is whether the Texans and Diggs agree to extend the February 17th deadline. The two sides could choose to push the decision back until the last day before free agency opens, allowing more time for negotiations while still preserving the option to spread out his $17 million dead cap hit if a new deal is reached. This would give both parties flexibility—allowing Diggs to explore his options without immediately triggering the full cap hit while giving Houston time to assess the market before making a final decision. However, if no extension is agreed upon, the Texans will have to decide by February 17th, or else the full dead cap hit will be locked in for 2025.
I think the true deadline will be March 12th at 4PM ESTDiggs has already been paid this money. I do not understand why he would hold the Texans over the barrel. If he wants to leave, tell them and leave. If he hopes to be extended, he needs to work with Houston.
I don't get why the contract shows the ~$17m prorated over 4 years when it is not. Today, it advances to 2025. Even if re-worked into future years and not necessarily 4.
I would have thought there would be news out if the February 17th date was pushed back. That is a significant thing in the Texans plans.
That's my thought but not what everybody else is saying. The article says the only way it goes to that date is if Diggs agrees to extend the deadline and we have seen nothing reported. Again I don't understand why the Texans have not spoken on this.I think the true deadline will be March 12th at 4PM EST