Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
What position should we be looking for?
I understand that some wants to look for that special QB.
What else?
ILB maybe?
CB maybe?
OG? OT?
Rank the positions of need, if you will.
Cb, olb
I was thinking about this at work last night, here's my line of thinking:
1. Move Reed to ILB like we wanted to do this year. Reed's an instant upgrade at ILB next to Cushing and solidifies the middle. Then we only need some mid-late round depth in the draft.
2. Re-sign Antonio Smith to a 2 yr. extension but lower his base salary. Based on this past offseason the market for older vet. FA isn't all that great. Teams aren't lining up to throw big money at older vets. so we can probably get him back at a discount. This also lessens the need for a DT/DE high in the draft.
3. Tuggle gives us depth at ILB and Jefferson gives us depth at OLB, and with their continued development we won't need Montgomery and T. Williams who are both a disappointment.
4. We lose Wade Smith to FA and add Quessenberry at LG. Cheaper and better.
5. We cut OD and save some money, Graham is the starter, and I was impressed with Ryan Griffen in preseason.
Draft:
1. OLB, a stud here instantly gives us a starter and vastly improves our depth at the position with Jeffersons development.
2. CB, 2014 seems like a good year for CB. Some quality talent here allows for development for the future while also giving us quality depth at a position that's very hard to get depth at. Along with Bouye's development we could be the envy of the NFL.
3. Safety, we need someone to push Keo off the team and Ed Reed is probably a 1 and done player.
4. OT, someone to give serious competition at RT but can also play OG and add overall depth to the O-line. With B. Williams, a rookie, and Newton hopefully we find our future RT.
5. TE, depth and competition behind Graham and Griffen.
6. ILB, depth only since we'll have starters and Tuggle.
7. Safety, someone to add depth and play special teams.
^^^^
This, unless Jackson is re-signed
OLB is the biggest need, then the RT problem still hasn't been solved in my mind. I wish Marlon Brown had stayed in camp with the Texans. Martin needs to improve or go. Maybe Cruse will turn into the player Martin was supposed to be.
Texans nailed the Ryan Griffin pick and OD will be gone.
How old is Peyton Manning's son?![]()
3. Tre Boston-S
^^^^
This, unless Jackson is re-signed
OLB is the biggest need, then the RT problem still hasn't been solved in my mind. I wish Marlon Brown had stayed in camp with the Texans. Martin needs to improve or go. Maybe Cruse will turn into the player Martin was supposed to be.
I see next years O-line lineup being:
Brown - Quessenberry - Myers - Brooks - BPA
Yup. Wade Smith will be a cap casualty unless he takes a pay cut. Quess and Ben Jones will battle it out fiercely for the open LG spot. Jones is still eye'd as the successor to Meyers as well. At right tackle, we'll have zero doubt about what kind of talent Newton is by season's end. Williams will still be an unknown commodity. If Newton doesn't solidify the spot, look for a mid round pick and a journey man swing tackle type to also compete.
I see a rick smith trend on addressing "non priority positions." What's considered "non priority" is surely up for debate and offseason talent also plays into the equation (draft bpa, eager free agents...) To me the trend is attacking that non-priority position 3 ways: incumbent vs. rookie vs. Veteran journey man free agent.
I also see a rick smith trend of attacking positions 2 years in advance of contract expiration through the draft... As long as we have depth we have that luxury with mid and late round picks.
At rb we have a solid example of that. No they weren't drafted, but karim, cierre wood, d Johnson and the guy on the practice squad (forget his name) show a focus on a 2 year timetable. Tate will be gone and Foster will have boatloads of mileage. Foster will hit a wall sooner then later by percentages so find the next guy now and start grooming. It's not a bad formula.
What position should we be looking for?
I understand that some wants to look for that special QB.
What else?
ILB maybe?
CB maybe?
OG? OT?
Rank the positions of need, if you will.
The only way to get continuously better is BPA
Agreed
How I would draft would depend on what the 2015 draft class at QB looks like. If it isn't as good as 2014, then QB would be my pick.
I haven't started studying next yrs draft, but OLB seems to be strong and unless Mercilus improves I really like Van Noy. He looks like a natural pass rusher. He will probabl only run 4.7 at the combine which might make him available when the Texans pick.
What does the draft offer in the way of CB depth?
Totally disagree, for example if BPA was a RB, we would not use a first. It depend on several things including the quality of the pick, is he a franchise type player or just BPA? It depends on our weaknesses. If BPA is a QB (looking at 2013 draft) we are decent with MS, Keenum and Yates so you don't ignore Hopkins. You also have to consider salary cap down the road for player you select. Also like 76 said, you might not choose a safety high if Ed Reed is sitting there in FA.The only way to get continuously better is BPA
Totally disagree, for example if BPA was a RB, we would not use a first. It depend on several things including the quality of the pick, is he a franchise type player or just BPA? It depends on our weaknesses. If BPA is a QB (looking at 2013 draft) we are decent with MS, Keenum and Yates so you don't ignore Hopkins. You also have to consider salary cap down the road for player you select. Also like 76 said, you might not choose a safety high if Ed Reed is sitting there in FA.
A corner, LT and Qb may take longer to develop so you might draft another position if it is also a high priority. There may be other excellent players at a lower round you could select freeing up higher pick. For example I like QB McCarron in late first but if David Fales appears to be available in second
(currently rated #76) I might go another way in first & hope to get Fales later.
I hope Texans soon get to level of BPA each round but not there yet.
Agree, prior to game against A&M AJ was rated in low 50s and has moved to 44. I would spend a first on him.The Texans hisorically say they use rds1-3 for BPA. Reality is they draft for need. Hopkins/KJ/Watt/Mercilus/Tate etc... need picks.
If you like McCarron alot you're going to have to spend a 1st on him. I just hope they dont draft JM. Great college QB, who I dont see panning out in the pro's.
There will be pressure to pick JM. Since the majority of the Texans fanbase are Aggies JM will appease them. BoB is all about that.
Gary I like OD and he is fan favorite however under the new CBA his 2014 cap hit $6.25 m is way too much. He is an 8 year vet & 31 YOA Nov 9th. 27 YOA (August '13) Garrett Graham 7 for 57 yds 2 TDs 6'3" 243 looks way good. Sunday he was 3 of 5 for 30 and a TD. If Hopkins, Posey and Martin are good, I hesitate to keep OD as I think passes to WR will increase. To work the cap, we have to move young cheaper guys into certain starting roles.Don't cut Reed or OD let them stay. Cut OD? Very nice.
Both OLB if not busts have not fulfilled the job they were drafted to perform imo. Montgomery seem to be in coaches doghouse from first OTA and T was to be a speed specialist disrupting QB.I think it is far too early to be calling Sam Montgomery and Trevardo Williams busts, personally. They weren't expected to be starters out the gate, in any case.
I think DE will be a possible target depending on how they handle Antonio Smith, but also I am confident that either Jared Crick or Tim Jamison could take over as a starter opposite Watt as well. Still, depth is always valuable on the defensive front, so I could see either a DE or NT getting picked at some point in the first three rounds if the value is right.
ILB is a position I would like to see them target, and we will eventually need another safety and CB talent.
OL is something that, in my opinion, teams should be adding almost every year in the draft, just not necessarily early all the time. Depth is vitally important at all the OL positions.
TE is going to be a need sooner than later, but I am generally not a fan of first round TEs...but again it's a question of value and draft position.
QB of the future is always tough, but I would trust the FO should they choose to select one.
I have a feeling Tate will be gone, so RB will get addressed somethere between rounds 3-5 I would guess.
Really, it's anyones guess at this point. It should be clearer by the end of the season, I'm sure.
I do not see Smith returning. Replace OD sooner than later due to OD's cap hit next 2 years with Garrett Graham We are good at rotating TEs onto the roster.
Ninja turns 32 Oct 21st so 33 just after 2014 season begins. Can he still play? Yep but this is type of player I want to see moved especially at his current $9m cap. Could he sign at $3 m for two years sure but he can get much more. His bonus would have to be prorated and I just don't want to be in dead money hell like we use to be.I think you get too aggressive with projections of cuts/not re-signing players. It is not as easy as saying well we have someone at the position so they'll be good enough and we save money. Smith makes money because his play is better by far than most With the free agent market the way it was last off-season and his age his cap hit can be severely reduced with a new contract.
OD is a situation beyond cap hit alone. You have to consider the impact on free agents, contract extensions and restructuring. Players aren't going to favor a team who doesn't deliver on contracts unless there has been a reduction in play quality. His contract only minimally goes up next year. It is not some giant balloon amount everyone knew wouldn't be paid. Instead of a cut, barring a letdown in production, he is also a target for an extension with lower salaries commensurate with new contracts.
The Texans hisorically say they use rds1-3 for BPA. Reality is they draft for need. Hopkins/KJ/Watt/Mercilus/Tate etc... need picks.
I think you get too aggressive with projections of cuts/not re-signing players. It is not as easy as saying well we have someone at the position so they'll be good enough and we save money. Smith makes money because his play is better by far than most With the free agent market the way it was last off-season and his age his cap hit can be severely reduced with a new contract.
OD is a situation beyond cap hit alone. You have to consider the impact on free agents, contract extensions and restructuring. Players aren't going to favor a team who doesn't deliver on contracts unless there has been a reduction in play quality. His contract only minimally goes up next year. It is not some giant balloon amount everyone knew wouldn't be paid. Instead of a cut, barring a letdown in production, he is also a target for an extension with lower salaries commensurate with new contracts.
I think it is a little more complicated than this. Almost all player decisions are based on making the most money (why Ed Reed is not a Raven). The biggest problem facing the Texans starting the 2014 league year is they have 38 players under contract and with Cushing's new contract and AJ restructure the Texans will start the 2014 new year approx $12 million under the cap. $12 million to sign 15 players, that doesn't do much, in fact it does very little for a 53 man roster. This pretty much mirrors the the start of the 2012 & 2013 seasons. No big FA contracts or signings, only allows for vet and rookie minimums and the Texans STILL have to restructure every year. Don't be surprised to see Smith and Daniels go the way of Barwin, Quin and Casey because they simply can't afford them. This will be the deciding factor.
The Texans always seem to be up against the cap. I dont know if this is due to Bob/ Olson/Rick/Gary's philosophy or they just aren't very good at cap management.
I've got a feeling they will try to keep the core together for 1 more yr.
I think it is a little more complicated than this.
Nailed it! One thing you can count on is Rick Smith the day before the draft lecturing the masses on how important it is to take the BPA. Then he proceeds to the draft room and first thing Texans do is reach for a positions of needs. They talk the talk but they certainly don't walk the walk.
I never even implied the state of the cap overall was not a consideration.
Or they didn't reach at all and the draftniks were just wrong aka Duane Brown. JJ Watt and Cushing certainly were not reaches and neither was KJ. Even bust Okoye wasn't a reach - the draftniks had him rated that high. Mario wasn't even a reach and arguably QB and RB were higher needs. Seems like you are example shy on your position.
The ONLY BPA in your list of names is JJ Watt. The others were high positions of need and some were reaches regardless of what you have been led to believe. If you take off the Rose colored glasses it is clear to see that the Texans are clearly Reactive and not Proactive. It's called Coach Think vs GM Think!
Total BS. Being a position of need does not preclude someone from also being BPA such as Cushing. And there is no led to believe. Picking the worst result, Okoye was all over the place listed as value at our pick with a significant number of people ranking him to go before us.
Spare the silly false comparison. EVERY single GM in the league considers both BPA and need.
Things are sweet when BPA=Need.
I wanted Clay Matthews over Cushing as BPA when he was drafted. Pass rusher over MLB. Plus Matthews gene lines showed he was more likely to stay healthy. Even after Cushing was drafted I wanted Rick to trade back into the 1st rd and pick Matthews. Of course Rick waited and took Barwin in the 2nd. (I was high on Barwin too) and we see how that turned out. The Texans are still looking for a high end pass rusher today.
Who did you want Cushing or Matthews?
Just like I thought during that draft, it was and is a toss up. I certainly would have cheered a move to get both.
Cushing was not drafted to be MLB. He played OLB his 1st two seasons including going to the pro-bowl and being named defensive rookie of the year at OLB over Matthews.
Total BS.
He played OLB his 1st two seasons including going to the pro-bowl and being named defensive rookie of the year at OLB over Matthews.
You couldn't go wrong with either one of them.
The bold move to make would've been to move up and get both of them. Like the Packers did with Raji and Matthews.
Not crossing threads, but I'm worried that Grigson will make these bold moves and the Rick wont. If this happens it wont be long before the Texans pass the Texans in the standings again.
I could have sworn Rey Maualuga was the MLB for the Trojans while he, Cushing and Matthews were there...and don't forget we were still running a 4-3 at the time.When he was juiced. (which was also a very strong rumor prior to the draft) Performance dropped after his suspension.
Quite a few wanted Matthews because Texans were in desperate need of pass rusher opposite of Mario. This is an illustration in some of logic of Texans drafting. They draft Cushing who played primarily MILB at USC to play OLB. What's the first thing Wade does when he comes in, moves Cush to MILB where he was so successful at USC.
I really don't see the point in arguing about past drafts.
I could have sworn Rey Maualuga was the MLB for the Trojans while he, Cushing and Matthews were there...and don't forget we were still running a 4-3 at the time.